2022-01-10 10:54:28 +00:00
|
|
|
# Contributing to rust-bitcoin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:+1::tada: First off, thanks for taking the time to contribute! :tada::+1:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a set of guidelines for contributing to Rust Bitcoin
|
|
|
|
implementation and other Rust Bitcoin-related projects, which are hosted in the
|
|
|
|
[Rust Bitcoin Community](https://github.com/rust-bitcoin) on GitHub. These are
|
|
|
|
mostly guidelines, not rules. Use your best judgment, and feel free to propose
|
|
|
|
changes to this document in a pull request.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Table Of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- [General](#general)
|
|
|
|
- [Communication channels](#communication-channels)
|
|
|
|
- [Asking questions](#asking-questions)
|
|
|
|
- [Contribution workflow](#contribution-workflow)
|
|
|
|
* [Preparing PRs](#preparing-prs)
|
|
|
|
* [Peer review](#peer-review)
|
|
|
|
* [Repository maintainers](#repository-maintainers)
|
|
|
|
- [Coding conventions](#coding-conventions)
|
|
|
|
* [Formatting](#formatting)
|
|
|
|
* [MSRV](#msrv)
|
|
|
|
* [Naming conventions](#naming-conventions)
|
|
|
|
* [Unsafe code](#unsafe-code)
|
|
|
|
- [Security](#security)
|
|
|
|
- [Testing](#testing)
|
|
|
|
- [Going further](#going-further)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## General
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Rust Bitcoin project operates an open contributor model where anyone is
|
|
|
|
welcome to contribute towards development in the form of peer review,
|
|
|
|
documentation, testing and patches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone is invited to contribute without regard to technical experience,
|
|
|
|
"expertise", OSS experience, age, or other concern. However, the development of
|
|
|
|
standards & reference implementations demands a high-level of rigor, adversarial
|
|
|
|
thinking, thorough testing and risk-minimization. Any bug may cost users real
|
|
|
|
money. That being said, we deeply welcome people contributing for the first time
|
|
|
|
to an open source project or pick up Rust while contributing. Don't be shy,
|
|
|
|
you'll learn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Communication channels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communication about Rust Bitcoin happens primarily in
|
|
|
|
[#bitcoin-rust](https://web.libera.chat/?channel=#bitcoin-rust) IRC chat on
|
|
|
|
[Libera](https://libera.chat/) with the logs available at
|
2022-01-13 16:59:20 +00:00
|
|
|
<https://gnusha.org/bitcoin-rust/> (starting from Jun 2021 and now on) and
|
|
|
|
<https://gnusha.org/rust-bitcoin/> (historical archive before Jun 2021).
|
2022-01-10 10:54:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion about code base improvements happens in GitHub issues and on pull
|
|
|
|
requests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major projects are tracked [here](https://github.com/orgs/rust-bitcoin/projects).
|
|
|
|
Major milestones are tracked [here](https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/milestones).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Asking questions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> **Note:** Please don't file an issue to ask a question. You'll get faster
|
|
|
|
> results by using the resources below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have a dedicated developer channel on IRC, #bitcoin-rust@libera.chat where
|
|
|
|
you may get helpful advice if you have questions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Contribution workflow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The codebase is maintained using the "contributor workflow" where everyone
|
|
|
|
without exception contributes patch proposals using "pull requests". This
|
|
|
|
facilitates social contribution, easy testing and peer review.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To contribute a patch, the workflow is a as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Fork Repository
|
|
|
|
2. Create topic branch
|
|
|
|
3. Commit patches
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-10 11:25:08 +00:00
|
|
|
Please keep commits should atomic and diffs easy to read. For this reason
|
|
|
|
do not mix any formatting fixes or code moves with actual code changes.
|
2022-01-10 10:54:28 +00:00
|
|
|
Further, each commit, individually, should compile and pass tests, in order to
|
|
|
|
ensure git bisect and other automated tools function properly.
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-10 11:25:08 +00:00
|
|
|
Please cover every new feature with unit tests.
|
2022-01-10 10:54:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When refactoring, structure your PR to make it easy to review and don't hesitate
|
|
|
|
to split it into multiple small, focused PRs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commits should cover both the issue fixed and the solution's rationale.
|
2022-01-10 11:25:08 +00:00
|
|
|
Please keep these [guidelines](https://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/) in mind.
|
2022-01-10 10:54:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To facilitate communication with other contributors, the project is making use
|
|
|
|
of GitHub's "assignee" field. First check that no one is assigned and then
|
|
|
|
comment suggesting that you're working on it. If someone is already assigned,
|
|
|
|
don't hesitate to ask if the assigned party or previous commenters are still
|
|
|
|
working on it if it has been awhile.
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-17 22:39:42 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-01-10 10:54:28 +00:00
|
|
|
## Preparing PRs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The main library development happens in the `master` branch. This branch must
|
|
|
|
always compile without errors (using GitHub CI). All external contributions are
|
|
|
|
made within PRs into this branch.
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-10 11:25:08 +00:00
|
|
|
Prerequisites that a PR must satisfy for merging into the `master` branch:
|
2022-01-10 10:54:28 +00:00
|
|
|
* each commit within a PR must compile and pass unit tests with no errors, with
|
|
|
|
every feature combination (including compiling the fuzztests) on some
|
|
|
|
reasonably recent compiler (this is partially automated with CI, so the rule
|
2022-01-10 11:25:08 +00:00
|
|
|
is that we will not accept commits which do not pass GitHub CI);
|
2022-01-10 10:54:28 +00:00
|
|
|
* the tip of any PR branch must also compile and pass tests with no errors on
|
|
|
|
MSRV (check [README.md] on current MSRV requirements) and pass fuzz tests on
|
|
|
|
nightly rust;
|
|
|
|
* contain all necessary tests for the introduced functional (either as a part of
|
|
|
|
commits, or, more preferably, as separate commits, so that it's easy to
|
|
|
|
reorder them during review and check that the new tests fail without the new
|
|
|
|
code);
|
|
|
|
* contain all inline docs for newly introduced API and pass doc tests;
|
|
|
|
* be based on the recent `master` tip from the original repository at
|
|
|
|
<https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin>.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NB: reviewers may run more complex test/CI scripts, thus, satisfying all the
|
|
|
|
requirements above is just a preliminary, but not necessary sufficient step for
|
|
|
|
getting the PR accepted as a valid candidate PR for the `master` branch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PR authors may also find it useful to run the following script locally in order
|
|
|
|
to check that each of the commits within the PR satisfies the requirements
|
|
|
|
above, before submitting the PR to review:
|
|
|
|
```shell script
|
2022-03-08 04:23:51 +00:00
|
|
|
BITCOIN_MSRV=1.29.0 ./contrib/test.sh
|
2022-01-10 10:54:28 +00:00
|
|
|
```
|
2022-01-10 11:25:08 +00:00
|
|
|
Please replace the value in `BITCOIN_MSRV=1.29.0` with the current MSRV from
|
|
|
|
[README.md].
|
2022-01-10 10:54:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NB: Please keep in mind that the script above replaces `Cargo.lock` file, which
|
|
|
|
is necessary to support current MSRV, incompatible with `stable` and newer cargo
|
|
|
|
versions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Peer review
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone may participate in peer review which is expressed by comments in the pull
|
|
|
|
request. Typically, reviewers will review the code for obvious errors, as well as
|
2022-01-10 11:25:08 +00:00
|
|
|
test out the patch set and opine on the technical merits of the patch. Please,
|
|
|
|
first review PR on the conceptual level before focusing on code style or
|
2022-01-10 10:54:28 +00:00
|
|
|
grammar fixes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Repository maintainers
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-10 11:25:08 +00:00
|
|
|
Pull request merge requirements:
|
|
|
|
- all CI test should pass,
|
|
|
|
- at least two "accepts"/ACKs from the repository maintainers
|
|
|
|
- no reasonable "rejects"/NACKs from anybody who reviewed the code.
|
2022-01-10 10:54:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current list of the project maintainers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- [Andrew Poelstra](https://github.com/apoelstra)
|
|
|
|
- [Steven Roose](https://github.com/stevenroose)
|
|
|
|
- [Matt Corallo](https://github.com/TheBlueMatt)
|
|
|
|
- [Elichai Turkel](https://github.com/elichai)
|
|
|
|
- [Sanket Kanjalkar](https://github.com/sanket1729)
|
2022-01-17 22:34:54 +00:00
|
|
|
- [Martin Habovštiak](https://github.com/Kixunil)
|
|
|
|
- [Riccardo Casatta](https://github.com/RCasatta)
|
|
|
|
- [Tobin Harding](https://github.com/tcharding)
|
2022-01-10 10:54:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Coding conventions
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-10 11:25:08 +00:00
|
|
|
Library reflects Bitcoin Core approach whenever possible.
|
2022-01-10 10:54:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Formatting
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-10 11:12:59 +00:00
|
|
|
The repository currently does not use `rustfmt`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New changes may format the code with `rustfmt`, but they should not re-format
|
|
|
|
any existing code for maintaining diff size small, keeping `git blame` intact and
|
2022-01-10 11:25:08 +00:00
|
|
|
reduce review time. Repository maintainers may not review PRs introducing large
|
|
|
|
blocks of re-formatted code.
|
2022-01-10 10:54:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You may check the [discussion on the formatting](https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/172)
|
|
|
|
and [how it is planned to coordinate it with crate refactoring](https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/525)
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-10 11:12:59 +00:00
|
|
|
For the new code it is recommended to follow style of the existing codebase and
|
|
|
|
avoid any end-line space characters.
|
2022-01-10 10:54:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### MSRV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Minimal Supported Rust Version (MSRV) is 1.29; it is enforced by our CI.
|
|
|
|
Later we plan to increase MSRV to support Rust 2018 and you are welcome to check
|
|
|
|
the [tracking issue](https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/510).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Naming conventions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Naming of data structures/enums and their fields/variants must follow names used
|
2022-01-10 11:25:08 +00:00
|
|
|
in Bitcoin Core, with the following exceptions:
|
|
|
|
- the case should follow Rust standards (i.e. PascalCase for types and
|
|
|
|
snake_case for fields and variants);
|
|
|
|
- omit `C`-prefixes.
|
2022-01-10 10:54:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Unsafe code
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-10 11:25:08 +00:00
|
|
|
Use of `unsafe` code is prohibited unless there is a unanimous decision among
|
2022-01-10 10:54:28 +00:00
|
|
|
library maintainers on the exclusion from this rule. In such cases there is a
|
|
|
|
requirement to test unsafe code with sanitizers including Miri.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Security
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security is the primary focus for this library; disclosure of security
|
|
|
|
vulnerabilities helps prevent user loss of funds. If you believe a vulnerability
|
|
|
|
may affect other implementations, please disclose this information according to
|
|
|
|
the [security guidelines](./SECURITY.md), work on which is currently in progress.
|
|
|
|
Before it is completed, feel free to send disclosure to Andrew Poelstra,
|
2022-01-10 11:25:08 +00:00
|
|
|
apoelstra@wpsoftware.net, encrypted with his public key from
|
|
|
|
<https://www.wpsoftware.net/andrew/andrew.gpg>.
|
2022-01-10 10:54:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Testing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related to the security aspect, rust bitcoin developers take testing very
|
|
|
|
seriously. Due to the modular nature of the project, writing new test cases is
|
|
|
|
easy and good test coverage of the codebase is an important goal. Refactoring
|
|
|
|
the project to enable fine-grained unit testing is also an ongoing effort.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuzzing is heavily encouraged: feel free to add related material under `fuzz/`
|
|
|
|
|
2022-01-10 11:25:08 +00:00
|
|
|
Mutation testing is planned; any contributions helping with that are highly
|
|
|
|
welcome!
|
2022-01-10 10:54:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Going further
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You may be interested in the guide by Jon Atack on
|
|
|
|
[How to review Bitcoin Core PRs](https://github.com/jonatack/bitcoin-development/blob/master/how-to-review-bitcoin-core-prs.md)
|
|
|
|
and [How to make Bitcoin Core PRs](https://github.com/jonatack/bitcoin-development/blob/master/how-to-make-bitcoin-core-prs.md).
|
|
|
|
While there are differences between the projects in terms of context and
|
|
|
|
maturity, many of the suggestions offered apply to this project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall, have fun :)
|