Merge rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin#2035: Improve witness display
de95bf52cb
Use checked_sub (Tobin C. Harding) Pull request description: Recently we "if" guarded subtraction manually using `> 0`, we can better convey the meaning by using `checked_sub` and pattern match on the option. Refactor only, no logic changes. ACKs for top commit: RCasatta: utACKde95bf52cb
apoelstra: ACKde95bf52cb
Tree-SHA512: 2514cc2d8af89158e5e5e5a866f3fadb4927ba07dfb4e077fd16a98acf638588bee5ce03e2dc73fbda0b5064c30d8773d3be583c03c2a5336b8738c212a9776f
This commit is contained in:
commit
70223027b9
|
@ -68,27 +68,31 @@ fn fmt_debug(w: &Witness, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> Result<(), fmt::Error>
|
|||
f.write_str("witnesses: [")?;
|
||||
|
||||
let instructions = w.iter();
|
||||
if instructions.len() > 0 {
|
||||
let last_instruction = instructions.len() - 1;
|
||||
match instructions.len().checked_sub(1) {
|
||||
Some(last_instruction) => {
|
||||
for (i, instruction) in instructions.enumerate() {
|
||||
let bytes = instruction.iter();
|
||||
if bytes.len() > 0 {
|
||||
let last_byte = bytes.len() - 1;
|
||||
match bytes.len().checked_sub(1) {
|
||||
Some(last_byte) => {
|
||||
f.write_str("[")?;
|
||||
for (j, byte) in bytes.enumerate() {
|
||||
write!(f, "{:#04x}", byte)?;
|
||||
f.write_str(comma_or_close(j, last_byte))?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
}
|
||||
None => {
|
||||
// This is possible because the varint is not part of the instruction (see Iter).
|
||||
write!(f, "[]")?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
f.write_str(comma_or_close(i, last_instruction))?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
}
|
||||
None => {
|
||||
// Witnesses can be empty because the 0x00 var int is not stored in content.
|
||||
write!(f, "]")?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
f.write_str(" }")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue