Merge pull request #565 from sgeisler/2021-02-rbf
Add function to check RBF-ness of transactions
This commit is contained in:
commit
80b47f1f5b
|
@ -482,6 +482,13 @@ impl Transaction {
|
||||||
pub fn is_coin_base(&self) -> bool {
|
pub fn is_coin_base(&self) -> bool {
|
||||||
self.input.len() == 1 && self.input[0].previous_output.is_null()
|
self.input.len() == 1 && self.input[0].previous_output.is_null()
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/// Returns `true` if the transaction itself opted in to be BIP-125-replaceable (RBF). This
|
||||||
|
/// **does not** cover the case where a transaction becomes replaceable due to ancestors being
|
||||||
|
/// RBF.
|
||||||
|
pub fn is_explicitly_rbf(&self) -> bool {
|
||||||
|
self.input.iter().any(|input| input.sequence < (0xffffffff - 1))
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
impl_consensus_encoding!(TxOut, value, script_pubkey);
|
impl_consensus_encoding!(TxOut, value, script_pubkey);
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue