milksad
/
rust-bitcoin-unsafe-fast
14
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Activity

Fix GT/LT/GTEQ/LTEQ handling to not compare bools 

I was trying to do something clever by making sure that the numeric
bounds were consistent with whatever ordering relation we were checking,
AND that the boolean values were also consistent...this is Wrong is the
case of negative numbers, and pointless anyway since I recently fixed
`set_bool_value`, `set_num_lo` and `set_num_hi` to update both numeric
and boolean information if possible, so they will always contain the
same info.
This commit is contained in:
Andrew Poelstra 2014-08-31 16:43:26 -07:00
parent 1515f68748
commit 9d283150c9
1 changed files with 8 additions and 14 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

22
src/blockdata/script.rs
View File

@ -937,37 +937,29 @@ impl AbstractStackElem {
/// Whether an element could possibly be less than another
pub fn may_be_lt(&self, other: &AbstractStackElem) -> bool {
self.num_lo() < other.num_hi() &&
(self.num_value().is_none() || other.num_value().is_none() ||
self.num_value().unwrap() < other.num_value().unwrap()) &&
(self.bool_value().is_none() || other.bool_value().is_none() ||
self.bool_value().unwrap() < other.bool_value().unwrap())
self.num_value().is_none() || other.num_value().is_none() ||
self.num_value().unwrap() < other.num_value().unwrap()
}
/// Whether an element could possibly be greater than another
pub fn may_be_gt(&self, other: &AbstractStackElem) -> bool {
self.num_hi() > other.num_lo() &&
(self.num_value().is_none() || other.num_value().is_none() ||
self.num_value().unwrap() > other.num_value().unwrap()) &&
(self.bool_value().is_none() || other.bool_value().is_none() ||
self.bool_value().unwrap() >= other.bool_value().unwrap())
self.num_value().unwrap() > other.num_value().unwrap())
}
/// Whether an element could possibly be less than or equal to another
pub fn may_be_lteq(&self, other: &AbstractStackElem) -> bool {
self.num_lo() <= other.num_hi() &&
(self.num_value().is_none() || other.num_value().is_none() ||
self.num_value().unwrap() <= other.num_value().unwrap()) &&
(self.bool_value().is_none() || other.bool_value().is_none() ||
self.bool_value().unwrap() <= other.bool_value().unwrap())
self.num_value().is_none() || other.num_value().is_none() ||
self.num_value().unwrap() <= other.num_value().unwrap()
}
/// Whether an element could possibly be greater than or equal to another
pub fn may_be_gteq(&self, other: &AbstractStackElem) -> bool {
self.num_hi() >= other.num_lo() &&
(self.num_value().is_none() || other.num_value().is_none() ||
self.num_value().unwrap() >= other.num_value().unwrap()) &&
(self.bool_value().is_none() || other.bool_value().is_none() ||
self.bool_value().unwrap() >= other.bool_value().unwrap())
self.num_value().unwrap() >= other.num_value().unwrap())
}
/// Whether an element could possibly be a 20-byte hash
@ -2720,6 +2712,8 @@ mod test {
assert_eq!(Script(ThinVec::from_vec("522103bb52138972c48a132fc1f637858c5189607dd0f7fe40c4f20f6ad65f2d389ba42103bb52138972c48a132fc1f637858c5189607dd0f7fe40c4f20f6ad65f2d389ba45f6054ae".from_hex().unwrap())).is_provably_unspendable(), false);
// This one is on mainnet oeO
assert_eq!(Script(ThinVec::from_vec("827651a0698faaa9a8a7a687".from_hex().unwrap())).is_provably_unspendable(), false);
// gmaxwell found this one
assert_eq!(Script(ThinVec::from_vec("76009f69905160a56b210378d430274f8c5ec1321338151e9f27f4c676a008bdf8638d07c0b6be9ab35c71ad6c".from_hex().unwrap())).is_provably_unspendable(), false);
}
}