Use correct form for noun: carve-out
One is said to "carve out" something, not "carve output" - woops. However, when used as a noun its written "carve-out".
This commit is contained in:
parent
c06c9beb01
commit
b229fd5555
|
@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ grammar fixes.
|
|||
|
||||
Pull request merge requirements:
|
||||
- all CI test should pass,
|
||||
- at least two "accepts"/ACKs from the repository maintainers (see "refactor carve out").
|
||||
- at least two "accepts"/ACKs from the repository maintainers (see "refactor carve-out").
|
||||
- no reasonable "rejects"/NACKs from anybody who reviewed the code.
|
||||
|
||||
Current list of the project maintainers:
|
||||
|
@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ Current list of the project maintainers:
|
|||
- [Riccardo Casatta](https://github.com/RCasatta)
|
||||
- [Tobin Harding](https://github.com/tcharding)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Refactor carve output
|
||||
#### Refactor carve-out
|
||||
|
||||
The repository is going through heavy refactoring and "trivial" API redesign
|
||||
(eg, rename `Foo::empty` to `Foo::new`) as we push towards API stabilization. As
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue