blockdata: Improve content of rustdocs

Recently we (tcharding) do some mechanical improvements to the rustdocs
in the `blockdata` module without considering the content. On review a
bunch of improvements were suggested.

Improve the content of various rustdoc comments in the `blockdata`
module.

Suggested content came from reviewers, all mistakes are my own :)
This commit is contained in:
Tobin C. Harding 2022-11-06 06:45:00 +11:00
parent e1e5974065
commit c9a49d5be7
2 changed files with 18 additions and 11 deletions

View File

@ -604,11 +604,11 @@ impl Transaction {
cloned_tx.txid().into()
}
/// Computes the txid.
/// Computes the [`Txid`].
///
/// For non-segwit transactions this will be identical to the output of `wtxid()`, but for
/// segwit transactions, this will give the correct txid (not including witnesses) while `wtxid`
/// will also hash witnesses.
/// Hashes the transaction **excluding** the segwit data (i.e. the marker, flag bytes, and the
/// witness fields themselves). For non-segwit transactions which do not have any segwit data,
/// this will be equal to [`Transaction::wtxid()`].
pub fn txid(&self) -> Txid {
let mut enc = Txid::engine();
self.version.consensus_encode(&mut enc).expect("engines don't error");
@ -618,10 +618,11 @@ impl Transaction {
Txid::from_engine(enc)
}
/// Computes SegWit-version of the transaction id (wtxid).
/// Computes the segwit version of the transaction id.
///
/// For transaction with the witness data this hash includes witness, for pre-witness
/// transaction it is equal to the normal value returned by txid() function.
/// Hashes the transaction **including** all segwit data (i.e. the marker, flag bytes, and the
/// witness fields themselves). For non-segwit transactions which do not have any segwit data,
/// this will be equal to [`Transaction::txid()`].
pub fn wtxid(&self) -> Wtxid {
let mut enc = Wtxid::engine();
self.consensus_encode(&mut enc).expect("engines don't error");
@ -644,7 +645,7 @@ impl Transaction {
/// - Does NOT attempt to support OP_CODESEPARATOR. In general this would require evaluating
/// `script_pubkey` to determine which separators get evaluated and which don't, which we don't
/// have the information to determine.
/// - Does NOT handle the sighash single bug (see "Return type" section)
/// - Does NOT handle the sighash single bug (see "Returns" section)
///
/// # Returns
///
@ -852,6 +853,11 @@ impl Transaction {
}
/// Checks if this is a coinbase transaction.
///
/// The first transaction in the block distributes the mining reward and is called the coinbase
/// transaction. It is impossible to check if the transaction is first in the block, so this
/// function checks the structure of the transaction instead - the previous output must be
/// all-zeros (creates satoshis "out of thin air").
pub fn is_coin_base(&self) -> bool {
self.input.len() == 1 && self.input[0].previous_output.is_null()
}
@ -859,7 +865,8 @@ impl Transaction {
/// Returns `true` if the transaction itself opted in to be BIP-125-replaceable (RBF).
///
/// This **does not** cover the case where a transaction becomes replaceable due to ancestors
/// being RBF.
/// being RBF. Please note that transactions may be replaced even if they do not include the RBF
/// signal: <https://bitcoinops.org/en/newsletters/2022/10/19/#transaction-replacement-option>.
pub fn is_explicitly_rbf(&self) -> bool {
self.input.iter().any(|input| input.sequence.is_rbf())
}

View File

@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ pub struct Witness {
indices_start: usize,
}
/// Support structure to allow efficient and convenient iteration over the Witness elements.
/// An iterator returning individual witness elements.
pub struct Iter<'a> {
inner: &'a [u8],
indices_start: usize,