Merge rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin#2045: Use correct terminology: carve out

b229fd5555 Use correct form for noun: carve-out (Tobin C. Harding)

Pull request description:

  One "carves out" something, not "carve output" - woops.

ACKs for top commit:
  apoelstra:
    ACK b229fd5555

Tree-SHA512: 196c5c239da35a67b83eb96f2f9346af6518af51ff6bb4a9e40cddab8c8511f2e913278a9727bfe4e97d50c58cb87a4100e40c13c8313643b04a2d0fabaaa9e5
This commit is contained in:
Andrew Poelstra 2023-09-21 16:50:22 +00:00
commit fc52fd9ced
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: C588D63CE41B97C1
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ grammar fixes.
Pull request merge requirements: Pull request merge requirements:
- all CI test should pass, - all CI test should pass,
- at least two "accepts"/ACKs from the repository maintainers (see "refactor carve out"). - at least two "accepts"/ACKs from the repository maintainers (see "refactor carve-out").
- no reasonable "rejects"/NACKs from anybody who reviewed the code. - no reasonable "rejects"/NACKs from anybody who reviewed the code.
Current list of the project maintainers: Current list of the project maintainers:
@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ Current list of the project maintainers:
- [Riccardo Casatta](https://github.com/RCasatta) - [Riccardo Casatta](https://github.com/RCasatta)
- [Tobin Harding](https://github.com/tcharding) - [Tobin Harding](https://github.com/tcharding)
#### Refactor carve output #### Refactor carve-out
The repository is going through heavy refactoring and "trivial" API redesign The repository is going through heavy refactoring and "trivial" API redesign
(eg, rename `Foo::empty` to `Foo::new`) as we push towards API stabilization. As (eg, rename `Foo::empty` to `Foo::new`) as we push towards API stabilization. As