Merge rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin#2045: Use correct terminology: carve out
b229fd5555
Use correct form for noun: carve-out (Tobin C. Harding) Pull request description: One "carves out" something, not "carve output" - woops. ACKs for top commit: apoelstra: ACKb229fd5555
Tree-SHA512: 196c5c239da35a67b83eb96f2f9346af6518af51ff6bb4a9e40cddab8c8511f2e913278a9727bfe4e97d50c58cb87a4100e40c13c8313643b04a2d0fabaaa9e5
This commit is contained in:
commit
fc52fd9ced
|
@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ grammar fixes.
|
|||
|
||||
Pull request merge requirements:
|
||||
- all CI test should pass,
|
||||
- at least two "accepts"/ACKs from the repository maintainers (see "refactor carve out").
|
||||
- at least two "accepts"/ACKs from the repository maintainers (see "refactor carve-out").
|
||||
- no reasonable "rejects"/NACKs from anybody who reviewed the code.
|
||||
|
||||
Current list of the project maintainers:
|
||||
|
@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ Current list of the project maintainers:
|
|||
- [Riccardo Casatta](https://github.com/RCasatta)
|
||||
- [Tobin Harding](https://github.com/tcharding)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Refactor carve output
|
||||
#### Refactor carve-out
|
||||
|
||||
The repository is going through heavy refactoring and "trivial" API redesign
|
||||
(eg, rename `Foo::empty` to `Foo::new`) as we push towards API stabilization. As
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue