In preparation for deprecating the `is_final` method; move the
`enables_absolute_lock_time` method to be directly above the `is_final`
method.
Refactor only, no logic changes.
The `HexWriter` is not used any more since we added the new hex code in
internals for fast hex encoding.
While we are removing the benches for `HexWriter` also remove the last
remaining bench for writing using `Display` because this is not the
correct place for that code - its trivial to re add later in the correct
module.
`Sighash` does not need to implement `Encodable` because it is
claimed (I don't know exactly myself) that `Sighash` is never consensus
encode in Bitcoin.
We are currently relying on `Sighash` to implement `Encodable` when
encoding creating the segwit v0 sighash for a single input.
For reference, from BIP143:
If sighash type is SINGLE and the input index is smaller than the
number of outputs, hashOutputs is the double SHA256 of the output
amount with scriptPubKey of the same index as the input;
We can use `write_all` directly to write the hashed bytes and remove the
implementation of `Encodable` from the `Sighash` type.
While we are at it, use `write_all` to write the zero hash also to make
the code more uniform and understandable.
Fix: #1549
Recently while trying to fix CI I (Tobin) added a call to `cargo clean`
and a code comment justifying it. This was merged because while not
incorrect it is redundant since calling `cargo` with different
`RUSTFLAGS` triggers a rebuild.
53ee42d7c1 Fix ASAN in CI (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
When we merged `hashes` into `rust-bitcoin` we ran the test script a couple of times using `./hashes/contrib/test.sh` this causes the `cargo` commands in the CI script to be run from the crate root which is not what we want.
This showed up recently because `cargo test` was getting run in `bitcoin` after building with address/memory sanitazation configured into the build.
While we are at it run `cargo clean` after the last sanitizer build just to future proof the CI script in case we later accidentally re-use the same build with plain old `cargo` (without `-Zbuild-std etc.`).
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 53ee42d7c1
sanket1729:
ACK 53ee42d7c1
Tree-SHA512: 3d0b9aa35be6290808e2d23144e4dce467ab433862b375e1f164dc41261919e8e27e4cab117bbe9bfe18814ec7bf468e1c03674d20e9f36b5319e986fc329e89
When we merged `hashes` into `rust-bitcoin` we ran the test script a
couple of times using `./hashes/contrib/test.sh` this causes the `cargo`
commands in the CI script to be run from the crate root which is not
what we want.
This showed up recently because `cargo test` was getting run in
`bitcoin` after building with address/memory sanitazation configured
into the build.
While we are at it run `cargo clean` after the last sanitizer build just
to future proof the CI script in case we later accidentally re-use the same
build with plain old `cargo` (without `-Zbuild-std etc.`).
70fe07f1ce Export the DisplayHex trait from within prelude (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
We use `internals::hex::display::DisplayHex` in many places, we can improve ergonomics of the `internals` crate by re-exporting it from the `prelude` module.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 70fe07f1ce
apoelstra:
ACK 70fe07f1ce
Tree-SHA512: 96a89135cb0b829b7b5926a3b344f78e178b5b48e772a69da5133fab6d2e14e7b7bbaa56b7a417a5c1a64337546a1c7bac32307d3a1f27aa199ed61f590902bf
Currently the docs build commands in `hashes` and `bitcoin` differ, they
should be the same.
Add a command `cargo doc` to improve coverage e.g., recently we botched
the feature guarding but since CI only runs `cargo rustdoc` with custom
compiler conditional set we didn't catch it.
Run docs in CI using nightly and stable toolchains as required.
a7dd4b5ab0 Add a rustdoc test to Denomination (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Add a rustdoc test to the `Denomination` type to show basic usage.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK a7dd4b5ab0
apoelstra:
ACK a7dd4b5ab0
Tree-SHA512: 08f15c4641e70f043276b873e60fcf0e195fe50b6c5c18a245d2d609f4a4a4badc291aae1be532fc4890a91b2057cd308c86d0d3b85770b600a07499303a7bc4
308c727c82 pow: Add more mutation testing (Tobin C. Harding)
948b04927d Remove unnecessary parenthesis (Tobin C. Harding)
c3021d852a Fix typo in code comment (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Add more mutation testing to the `pow` module.
The first two patches are preparatory clean up.
All functions/methods that are non-trivial are tested excluding:
- `to_compact_lossy`
- `from_compact`
- `fmt_decimal`
I think its ok to not test `fmt_decimal`. The compact format ones require a bit of work to do but should be done at some stage.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 308c727c82
apoelstra:
ACK 308c727c82
Tree-SHA512: 1bd8df00521676c2193f482d6e3b557c727e7807211acc11c311aa715ebe94ae957352897c084474b22dc33c589382ef557c33f95c467929b7c1659128fdced0
f4e7def72f internals: Add CI test script (Tobin C. Harding)
db6b3f1df5 Fix method names in rustdoc (Tobin C. Harding)
7593f1f334 Use set -ex (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Quick merge this while noone's looking ... we forgot to test the new `internals` crate in CI.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK f4e7def72f
apoelstra:
ACK f4e7def72f
Tree-SHA512: c603d2308911210eeed17f128ef684ea161e33f5749d3d5567bb15ac4a01695eb07718873e53824bb21159427b453b04265db6728b9839a13092a6817ac9c4d8
Recently we introduced some mutation testing to the `pow` module but
testing is never done - add more `mutate` attributes and add unit tests
to ensure all mutants are killed.
Of note, the `from_compact` and `to_compact_lossy` functions are not
done, doing so results in a bunch of surviving mutants.
bef7c6e687 Use marker type to enforce validation of `Address`'s network (Jiri Jakes)
Pull request description:
Adds marker type `NetworkValidation` to `Address` to help compiler enforce network validation. Inspired by Martin's suggestion. Closes#1460.
Open questions:
1. Compilation fails with serde, which uses `Address:from_str` via macro `serde_string_impl!(Address, "a Bitcoin address");`. I don't think there is much we can do, so unless somebody has a better idea how to combine serde and network validation, I would just demacroed the macro for `Address` and add `unsafe_mark_network_valid` into it.
2. Would someone prefer wrapping the validation types by `mod validation`? As they are now, they live in `address` namespace so I don't think mod is necessary.
3. Almost all methods that used to be on `Address` are now on `Address<NetworkValid>` except one (`address_type`) that needs to be called on both and a few that are only on `Address<NetworkUnchecked>` (mainly `is_valid_for_network`). Some methods (e. g. `to_qr_uri`, `is_standard` and perhaps others) could be, theoretically, called on both valid and unchecked. I think we should encourage validating the network ASAP, so I would leave them on NetworkValid only, but I can move them if others have different opinion.
4. Should `NetworkValid` and `NetworkUnchecked` enums have some trait impls derived? The `PartialEq` was necessary for tests (I think `assert_eq` required it) but I am not sure whether some other would be good to have. The enums are only used as types so I guess it's not necessary, but also I do not fully understand why the `PartialEq` was needed.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK bef7c6e687
apoelstra:
ACK bef7c6e687
Tree-SHA512: 8d18b25e62c594468625b39ab174b27ae04b98082cd6011283fe657e868a525f0e4cb40d0f68aff44ad145582e9f3c6387bd2077c5c1f2857d4032674121c31f
Parsing addresses from strings required a subsequent validation of
network of the parsed address. However, this validation was not
enforced by compiler, one had to remember to perform it.
This change adds a marker type to `Address` that will assist the
compiler in enforcing this validation.
f39cd88f5f Use TapNodeHash in NodeInfo (sanket1729)
5ff2635585 Rename TapBranchHash -> TapNodeHash (sanket1729)
Pull request description:
This does not completely fix#1393 but is a simple starter. Unfortunately, we still need hash_new_type for `TapNodeHash` because is exported as the Merkle root in taproot psbt. This requires serialization and display/from_str methods.
This also adds a method 1) `TapNodeHash::from_script` to deal with single leaf case cleanly. As a nice side effect, this removes the ugly uses of `sha256::Hash` that I had used to represent both `TapLeafHash` and `TapBranchHash`
Does not fix
1) Exporting `TapTweakHash`. This requires some changes to macros we use.
2) Safer usage of `TapNodeHash` by not making it `hash_new_type` and having guarded constructors. As mentioned above, this is required for psbts and sharing Merkle roots. Perhaps, we might need a new type while constructing trees that is not `hash_new_type`, and convert it to another type that represents the final Merkle root.
My overall feeling is that this is best addressed with more examples than changing and complicating existing code.
I don't feel strongly about the rename, so can go back if `TapBranchHash` instead of `TapNodeHash`.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK f39cd88f5f
tcharding:
ACK f39cd88f5f
Tree-SHA512: 55310b89442ac1f73cce8a7202bbed6ac5a0bbefec0a938fe6065e65c65fe1d34c9e2b5e30ce56ae2bbd0cc9e4caa1363dbd03e9feb7929acb47bbac9f2a4191
We use `internals::hex::display::DisplayHex` in many places, we can
improve ergonomics of the `internals` crate by re-exporting it from the
`prelude` module.
1b0988833a Remove `ToHex` (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
The `ToHex` trait was replaced by either simple `Display`/`LowerHex` where appropriate or `DisplayHex` from `bitcoin_internals` which is faster.
This change replaces the usages and removes the trait.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 1b0988833a
apoelstra:
ACK 1b0988833a
Tree-SHA512: a1b508e24ac247a0692c01b7cb1e7fa8f23fbfa3d6c3d5dfe669eec01f940a96c3f88508cb0b2e3529eebd9cb51e7d41435dbd5f4cbaf3bc14b9c7e7d790308b
a400757676 Add failing tests from serde-json (sanket1729)
b3246bf73f Fix LeafVersion serde (sanket1729)
Pull request description:
The default implementation maps to visit_u64. The current implementation
does not roundtrip with many deserializers, including serde_json. See
the failing test in the second commit
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
tACK a400757676
tcharding:
ACK a400757676
Tree-SHA512: a6307b799b0bb4af398addc9ddbff0d811b632d1cc6ab4bdd77aaf3f151e48dd1cd10e3f90a71ef8fc3feb1cd988f7a719f92ec745b5fdf2ae0f0ad97ab2fa10
The `ToHex` trait was replaced by either simple `Display`/`LowerHex`
where appropriate or `DisplayHex` from `bitcoin_internals` which is
faster.
This change replaces the usages and removes the trait.
94b678e73f Rename `push_scriptint` and make it private (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
`push_scriptint` is a significant footgun with an unclear name. This renames it and unpublishes to avoid mistakes by downstream crates.
Closes#1517
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 94b678e73f
Tree-SHA512: 9e1772c6fb326d8b0c78d702ad9926a79a91589feb8650aed7c5e75bfbdbf0164357b4d5b190877c40b8469e0e3be3d3453fe407741b5dae0c5758176f756417
16c49df688 Accept amounts with denominations with and without spaces (Casey Rodarmor)
Pull request description:
I didn't add tests for parsing with no space, but wanted to get a PR up to show the approach.
Fixes#1519.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 16c49df688
Kixunil:
ACK 16c49df688
Tree-SHA512: 651f12974a23b711a421005cc5905cb613bfdb092b03f7b0a0e2c02b3f9351f81eb985f848d313a17506e4960df7c01b40f673a100e4230a7045364acc4865de
c4363e5ba1 Deserialize Psbt fields, don't consensus_encode (DanGould)
c1dd6ad8a2 Serialize Psbt fields, don't consensus_encode them (DanGould)
1b7b08aa5d De/serialize Psbt without consensus traits (DanGould)
Pull request description:
fix https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/934
Instead of using consensus {de,en}code, serialize high-level structures (PartiallySignedTransaciton, Output, Input) borrow the signature from `Serialize`, `Deserialize` traits and implement them on Psbt:
```rs
impl Psbt {
/// Serialize a value as raw data.
fn serialize(&self) -> Vec<u8>;
/// Deserialize a value from raw data.
fn deserialize(bytes: &[u8]) -> Result<Self, encode::Error>;
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK c4363e5ba1
tcharding:
ACK c4363e5ba1
sanket1729:
ACK c4363e5ba1. One small comment, but can be addressed in follow up if there is nothing else from other reviewers.
Kixunil:
ACK c4363e5ba1
Tree-SHA512: d8dd5ef1189b36fde08969b1ec36006a6fc55ae990f62ea744e6669e03a7f9e90e1d5907be7eac48ee1af23bc20a62aa7e60ff1ff78080d0e923bb9ccedcd432
The default implementation maps to visit_u64. The current implementation
does not roundtrip with many deserializers, including serde_json. See
failing test in the subsequent commit
089a1e452d Replace `Vec::from_hex` with `hex!` (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
This makes the code less noisy and is a preparation for changing it to `const`-based literal. Because of the preparation, places that used variables to store the hex string were changed to constants.
There are still some instances of `Vec::from_hex` left - where they won't be changeable to `const` and where `hex!` is unavailable (integration tests). These may be dealt with later.
See also #1189
Note that while the change appears big it's nearly entirely mechanical, so should be pretty easy to review. (But I don't feel it's `trivial`.)
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 089a1e452d
tcharding:
ACK 089a1e452d
Tree-SHA512: c55357b8cffc86f8e107c0f8390490ede75948260018f63dc926455700cbcaf422f6ae72444f93943065e6f4ffa4335bee9160a64184ea4f8e91721f30a46ace
8d58ee2ca3 Change `#[cfg(docsrs)]` to `#[cfg(doc)]` on `use` (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
The additional `use` items were added to improve the style of documentation. Because they were only used for doc they were `cfg`ed. But because this is independent from being built by `docs.rs` the `cfg` should've been `doc` not `docsrs`.
IOW `docsrs` means roughly `all(doc, nightly)` and the added items are unrelated to `nightly`.
Do we want CI for this kind of thing? It feels a bit too much to me but if someone sends a PR I probably won't reject it.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 8d58ee2ca3
Tree-SHA512: 89ee4d1a0a43595576850983a82aed9644e898d1ad9efdc982ca697ae2ad9ec894fe59f4c6d2a46aad86c7160d260da964c0bd3dba20b455d4bdbb3d0b09e695
This makes the code less noisy and is a preparation for changing it to
`const`-based literal. Because of the preparation, places that used
variables to store the hex string were changed to constants.
There are still some instances of `Vec::from_hex` left - where they
won't be changeable to `const` and where `hex!` is unavailable
(integration tests). These may be dealt with later.
See also #1189
The additional `use` items were added to improve the style of
documentation. Because they were only used for doc they were `cfg`ed.
But because this is independent from being built by `docs.rs` the `cfg`
should've been `doc` not `docsrs`.
IOW `docsrs` means roughly `all(doc, nightly)` and the added items are
unrelated to `nightly`.
411174c391 Add fuzz target for sha512_256 (Calvin Kim)
31fc1f8638 Add support for sha512/256 (Calvin Kim)
15b5af1117 Export sha512::HashEngine fields/function within the crate (Calvin Kim)
Pull request description:
Adds a new file named `sha512_256.rs` that implements the `sha512/256` hash. This was needed as a part of https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/discussions/1318 to drop the `sha2` dependency.
All the actual hashing code is exactly the same as `sha512.rs`, minus the initial constants and the use of `hash_type!` macro. Some unit tests were added from wikipedia (for the "" input) and the rest were from the Go standard library's tests for sha512_256.
Benchmarks on my Ryzen 3600 machine show that it is faster than sha256.
```
test sha256::benches::sha256_10 ... bench: 37 ns/iter (+/- 0) = 270 MB/s
test sha256::benches::sha256_1k ... bench: 3,338 ns/iter (+/- 24) = 306 MB/s
test sha256::benches::sha256_64k ... bench: 213,605 ns/iter (+/- 1,806) = 306 MB/s
test sha512_256::benches::sha512_256_10 ... bench: 27 ns/iter (+/- 1) = 370 MB/s
test sha512_256::benches::sha512_256_1k ... bench: 2,196 ns/iter (+/- 12) = 466 MB/s
test sha512_256::benches::sha512_256_64k ... bench: 140,552 ns/iter (+/- 777) = 466 MB/s
```
One caveat is that I could not get hongfuzz to build locally so I couldn't test the fuzz on my machine. I ended up only testing through the CI for the fuzz tests.
I thought adding a completely separate file was the easiest and the most straightforward way of implementing it. I'm very much open to changing the implementation if you guys don't think this is the right direction.
ACKs for top commit:
sanket1729:
ACK 411174c391. Reviwed range diff from 43feb9ea7b282d9119708a27fa7a1c7412d1386a that I had ACked
apoelstra:
ACK 411174c391
Tree-SHA512: 98298a7c177cbb616bfbc02cec5c5860f10204df8275cc9f1e4ea07333b901095e574fbc3fe0a03375e0d321a1579e2c2023a5c14addd863e10cc927f155710c
bnabi
Tobin C. Harding
sanket1729
DanGould
Andrew Poelstra
Jiri Jakes
Martin Habovstiak
Casey Rodarmor