Use the `must_use_candidate` clippy lint to find all functions that are
candidates for having `must_use`.
Add `must_use` attribute but exclude obvious functions like `from_`,
`to_`, and `new`.
This patch is subjective.
ac74ed2144 Range check against SignedAmount::MAX instead of i64::MAX (yancy)
Pull request description:
Future proof this check by using SignedAmount::MAX in the case where the MAX SignedAmount changes to something other then i64::MAX.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK ac74ed2144
apoelstra:
ACK ac74ed2144e785fef7c395388a4fb7fb394e833e; successfully ran local tests; nice. Simple and obviously an improvement
Tree-SHA512: 4003a2f3b34e03330c57125622cab5e55a235b1a610dda622035c071bc5530811e275c2e25f40e1309cecf1c3bef35070ae690fa57fdf3e2c1b5c3f75ca5d29e
ffdd63fa8e units: test for C-SEND-SYNC (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Done as part of the Rust API guidelines checklist.
Add a unit test for `Send` and one for `Sync`.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK ffdd63fa8ec3575bc3087241ebdcbccc71818ab7; successfully ran local tests; ooh, I like how extensible this API test framework is!
Tree-SHA512: 9227ad487f77596964c728deee97c62a04490510a8ab69fd3fc29a3e400b37114e27c777cf868fe58de870a9ff0aca3d234ccf2bb93d69a709e8c9b85d44fc61
6950c0a7b5 Change `Amount::MAX` to equal `MAX_MONEY` (Jamil Lambert, PhD)
Pull request description:
As discussed in #3688 and #3691 using `u64::MAX` causes errors when converting to `f64` so `MAX_MONEY` is should be used as the maximum `Amount`.
- `Amount::MAX` changed to equal `MAX_MONEY`
- Add a check to add, multiply and from_str functions
- Change tests to account for new lower maximum
Different approach to the existing PR #3692. I have only done Amount and not SignedAmount until there is feedback on which approach to use.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 6950c0a7b5
apoelstra:
ACK 6950c0a7b507f9d70c1ebdab540634482f73b247; successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: 03ebf39c47b19ba88d95235538039f28bfa29f4499618fab25c9b627684c348ed41caef682e8f0e01ca62cf9ced8a1183fe3ed861bffeb9609b09440ddfb1c92
To prevent rounding errors converting to and from f64 change
`Amount::MAX` to `MAX_MONEY` which is below the limit in f64 that has
issues.
Add checks to `from_str_in`, `checked_add` and `checked_mul` that the
result is below MAX, where previously a u64 overflow was relied on.
Change tests to account for new lower MAX that is within the range of
SignedAmount and does not overflow so easily
Remove overflow tests
`Amount::MAX` is now below `u64::MAX` and within the range of values for
`SignedAmount`. These tests therefore do not overflow.
In effective_value there is no error with `Amount::MAX` and the correct
value is returned.
In psbt the removed test is effectively the same as the previous test.
Modify `Amount` tests to work with new `MAX`
Tests need to be changed that checked values above the new `MAX` or
`Amount::MAX` was out of range for `SignedAmount` which it isn't anymore
Needs release notes but there are 20 pages of them, that feels like too
many to go through manually.
Includes a missing changelog entry in `units` for an already released
change that is included in this `bitcoin` release.
Sometimes JSON parsers may munge floats. Instead of using `f64` we can
serialize BTC amounts as strings.
Includes addition of `alloc` feature gate to `DisplayFullError` to
remove lint warnings when building with `--no-default-features`.
Close: #894
fd2a5c1ec7 Close amounts error types (Tobin C. Harding)
23c77275b1 Reduce code comment lines (Tobin C. Harding)
d595f421c6 Remove whitespace between enum variants (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Close the two pubic enum error types in `units::amounts`. All the other structs are closed already because they either have private fields or marked `non_exhaustive`.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK fd2a5c1ec79f337fb3695c030c9fb6b4671468f2; successfully ran local tests; thanks!
Tree-SHA512: f8d68ef821449e0829c926cf527df4b226b29c8d1d41b320a016fbf70b4b39cc54c8c218955caa0c3776158eeeae0ebacc1cc89dab67bafc399b94063324ab0e
Close the two pubic enum error types in `units::amounts`. All the other
structs are closed already because they either have private fields or
marked `non_exhaustive`.
433f70939c Implement iter::Sum for BlockInterval (Tobin C. Harding)
0369e64b56 Implement Sum for an iterator of references to amounts (Tobin C. Harding)
31f883ac00 Implement iter::Sum for FeeRate (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Enables summing an iterator of values. Note that this does not include either `LockTime`s. `absolute::LockTime` should not be added and for `relative::LockTime` we have https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/3676Close: #1638
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 433f70939c3ecc10702ab6502e3f9bcd94dab739; successfully ran local tests; nice!
sanket1729:
utACK 433f70939c
Tree-SHA512: 1eda00f3bbbc61f795198ce8525a5a9b690478a8abc268da6d2e40de7d91decc28dd8211df0c6abeaf30148c7ec3907b85e3c5351972c354590569840e84d562
22769268f3 units: Close the hex parse errors (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
As part of the 1.0 effort close the errors in the `units::parse` module.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 22769268f34b45c0bd86c548eb13cfe1e290f0d7; successfully ran local tests; thanks!
sanket1729:
ACK 22769268f3
Tree-SHA512: 598ba236f8c08c3f750112e0d8b8e0aa0568be2700a328e4a2d8999ca59eada8a16a6a1d9e9121e7f42ce9bbe3da3f87221ba67c36056996a687e489f4c6007c
c49f40fd9a units: Test C-COMMON-TRAITS (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Add structs to the `api` integration test file that verify the set of common traits.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK c49f40fd9af1b9446a7c9a35aefdc02b30801275; successfully ran local tests; good idea!
Tree-SHA512: bc60ed8912e705d4c07714e9d19c0eee4fb2eb6be17a6ee67c2bb922ea27ef3a737eda3f7de690fa3a9fa364c34029989f20361d03f706fd3152ec4f20f33aab
7e17eaf21c units: Add stringy regression tests (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Add regression tests for `Display` and `FromStr` impls. Exclude error types and helper types (`amount::Display`).
Done as part of #2498 and also as part of the 1.0'ing effort.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 7e17eaf21c479338d5161b493f02578ef4186e62; successfully ran local tests; nice
Tree-SHA512: 6484806777501fe38557987c9c39b377f972fd4406cf3cfd8ac36f8426041484caab45d4ccff87221dbc5c34507d1be6a7b23839367bd3010855c92fd898c835
The `Amount` and `SignedAmount` were not supposed to implement `serde`
traits by design because doing so implicitly uses sats. We provide two
modules `as_sat` and `as_btc` to allow users to explicitly serialize in
their preferred format.
In commit: `d57ec019d5 Use Amount type for TxOut value field` derives
were added for `serde` and we did not notice it during review.
7b8369f381 units: Add integration test of API surface (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
In an effort to check off items in the Rust API guidelines checklist (#3632) add an integration test file that tests:
- The location of re-exports for various typical usage styles.
- Regressions in the API surface (things being accidentally moved).
- All public types implement Debug (C-DEBUG).
- For all non-error types:
- `Debug` representation is never empty (C-DEBUG-NONEMPTY)
- For all error types:
- Derive standard traits as defined by `rust-bitcoin` policy.
- All data structures implement `serde` traits (C-SERDE).
I used the `cargo check-api` script we have laying around from ages ago (#2986) to parse `units` and get a list of the public types.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 7b8369f381c3f3fc15ed536d5316e86e02914b4e; successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: 6fa2a61f6b67a6b5a56950b87e6df68b761b69bd2a49e7aac48aa238cb84441ce04acd85097d28ae4055058052a7491eccda3da218812149a896e548b4018aaa
17ca5018eb units: Comment alloc feature (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Add a comment to the `serde` module about why we have all the `alloc` feature gating.
Done as part of #3556 - auditing the whole crate for use of `alloc` feature.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 17ca5018ebb28d5d392d61aee62170fb3e4f2a5b; successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: 6d13129903a9c530db811e9f64ae4fa653dbcc952a42502c53c6c622a80c1e58b3037edd0638de78867823ca370b3a4595a08a9ec07b84c71afb6200454f5d6d
In an effort to check off items in the Rust API guidelines
checklist (#3632) add an integration test file that tests:
- The location of re-exports for various typical usage styles.
- Regressions in the API surface (things being accidentally moved).
- All public types implement Debug (C-DEBUG).
- For all non-error types:
- `Debug` representation is never empty (C-DEBUG-NONEMPTY)
- For all error types:
- Derive standard traits as defined by `rust-bitcoin` policy.
I used the `cargo check-api` script we have laying around from ages
ago (#2986) to parse `units` and get a list of the public types.
a8379bf005 Mark `checked_` functions const in bitcoin. (Jamil Lambert, PhD)
fe10ff2eb7 Mark functions `const` in `units` (Jamil Lambert, PhD)
Pull request description:
Following on #3608, #3627 and #1174 the rest of the `checked_` functions in all `rust-bitcoin` have been marked as const. Except for tests and traits.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK a8379bf0053e66cf5984ce449d19e54e529b6b70; successfully ran local tests; thanks! I find this much easier to read
tcharding:
ACK a8379bf005
Tree-SHA512: b8d97b7a3d9fc33b57349f418ccc5aac2f3e8c4145a73bf0e24e85547217d41214696e9a80b1fb5a1bae7e766aad1c2b5df6044564772fe76cec9b3628bcd8e5
Add a comment to the `serde` module about why we have all the `alloc`
feature gating.
Done as part of #3556 - auditing the whole crate for use of `alloc`
feature.
Mark `checked_` functions const. Replace `map()` and `?` operators,
which are not allowed in const context, with match statements.
Use descriptive variable names in ceiling division to make
it easier to follow.
4223655829 Add test case (yancy)
Pull request description:
Since there are test cases for other functions here, add test case as follow up for https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/3604. I forgot to request this during review.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 422365582964cf405529de3a1cf63d766b0d0e2e; successfully ran local tests
tcharding:
ACK 4223655829
Tree-SHA512: 8629cfff3e3eb800aa4d4625627e0a777c389566f4125bc63e67fe4c5a597ca63b9fb92da42f6c9dab12e6c63839eef35a13957f98606a37ed687eb96d896c2e
0348801ef3 Remove Amount::fmt_value_in (Shing Him Ng)
Pull request description:
Saw this mentioned in #3556Fixes#2952
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 0348801ef30d1cdfdc40cd2316671532d4c06141; successfully ran local tests
tcharding:
ACK 0348801ef3
Tree-SHA512: 29a1d230672a22d059d2ef0870e68dec0fe6d6ae9d3fed51275d9b6779d097578a38a514544df11bdf23908c2d8e3c5fd5c6de2e460aab9792770d6b9e396fc6
4c94695942 Mark funtions const (yancy)
Pull request description:
May as well mark these const as well. Follow up to https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/3605
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 4c94695942de41e5eca4ac120db2e069c0bb037d; successfully ran local tests; yeah, I think this are all worth consting
tcharding:
ACK 4c94695942
sanket1729:
ACK 4c94695942
Tree-SHA512: bf41e416cb8a2eb90e26d7bd640df5c2a5a868e3b721bde7cc8a3b97c687bab4d1cb4ab1c4b04ed625e8657e25c59e386720cb0f9d735ffc492e98f5b8b2ca3c
1db4b723dc Mark function as const (yancy)
Pull request description:
We discussed marking from_vb as const here: https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/3602
However, from what I can tell, map() isn't const and I don't see a tracking issue for changing it. Also, the question mark operator isn't available in const context either, although there is a tracking issue for that: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74935. It will be a long while before that makes it into this projects MSRV if/when it lands.
There are some other functions in this module that could use the same re-write to make them const as well it looks like.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 1db4b723dc
apoelstra:
ACK 1db4b723dc59568c14c76598e7c63c58651ed1cd; successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: 62b612791dd3ce2f6ebf27f586a1262633a46566b9fd3583984171f62209714ad979439345fe86d8ef87d2f78a2cee21d619e2eb3621689faf59d81640e9f77c
There is a range of different wordings used in the docs of constructor
type functions.
Change all to start with `Constructs a new` or `Constructs an empty`.
In functions that act like constructors there is a mixture of the usage
of `creates` and `constructs`.
Replace all occurrences of `creates` with `constructs` in the first line
of docs of constructor like functions.
81d8699b55 units: Put no_std up top (Tobin C. Harding)
3e332c3839 amount: Fix docs on FromStr (Tobin C. Harding)
5bec76aa51 amount: Fix rustdocs (Tobin C. Harding)
41c80cc476 amount: Improve docs on div by weight (Tobin C. Harding)
2b4a61739a Add type to debug output for Amount (Tobin C. Harding)
42e5043b33 Add from_int_btc group of functions (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Improve the `amount` module by doing:
- Patch 1: Add/update `from_int_btc` and `from_int_btc_const` functions
- Patch 2: Add type to debug output for `Amount`
- Patch 3: Fix incorrect docs
- Patch 4: Make docs use correct style and be uniform across the two amount types
- Patch 5: Fix docs on `FromStr`
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 81d8699b55dad570247cb14d2b3eea64270a83cf; successfully ran local tests
jamillambert:
ACK 81d8699b55
Tree-SHA512: ddd6e02b4cd9a9aa8cbdd2d2f7ae289a6bcca9eb002ef0c6d83a6eca950b2cd08f5918286bb33e814f321e3bfe83fdf75ae051cf8f91ee45d3e4abe76c1c2a4c
The `no_std` attribute has significant ramifications, as opposed to the
clippy attributes etc.
Put the `no_std` attribute up top so it catches the eye. This is also
uniform with other crates in this repo.
The docs on `FromStr` say "string slice is zero" but actually mean to
document the behaviour when the value represented is zero.
Also the fact that `FromStr` returns an error if parsing fails is self
evident.
Fix the rustdocs on `Amount` and `SignedAmount` by doing:
- Make them uniform
- Use correct style (looks like `SignedAmount` got left behind when we
improved `Amount`)
Add/update the from_int group of functions to provide one that errors
and one that is const and panics (errors in const context are not useful
because one cannot call `unwrap` in const context).
In an effort to reduce requirement for `alloc`; remove the `String` and
use `InputString` in the hex prefix related error types.
Tested with:
(Note in test code we have to use `"cafe".to_owned()` before this patch
is applied.)
rust```
#[test]
fn hex_prefix_errors() {
let err = hex_remove_prefix("cafe").unwrap_err();
std::println!("{}", err);
std::println!("{:?}", err);
let err = hex_check_unprefixed("0xcafe").unwrap_err();
std::println!("{}", err);
std::println!("{:?}", err);
}
```
Before:
hex string is missing a prefix (e.g. 0x): cafe
MissingPrefixError { hex: "cafe" }
hex string contains a prefix: 0xcafe
ContainsPrefixError { hex: "0xcafe" }
After:
failed to parse 'cafe' as hex because it is missing the '0x' prefix
MissingPrefixError { hex: InputString("cafe") }
failed to parse '0xcafe' as hex because it contains the '0x' prefix
ContainsPrefixError { hex: InputString("0xcafe") }
3f2e760d1f Replace String with InputString in ParseIntError (Tobin C. Harding)
aa5c78430c Replace invalidInteger with ParseIntError (Tobin C. Harding)
9b7a706bfd Remove From<ParseIntError> (Tobin C. Harding)
c90f4b6033 Fix bug in error output (Tobin C. Harding)
c986b2f620 internals: Move error.rs to error/mod.rs (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
This PR hopefully clears the way for removing many of the `alloc` feature gates in `units` and `primitives`
The three final patches were tested by adding the following test to `units::locktime::absolute`:
```rust
#[test]
pub fn debug_absolute_error_conversion_height() {
let invalid_height = LOCK_TIME_THRESHOLD + 1;
let err = Height::from_consensus(invalid_height).unwrap_err();
std::println!("{:?}", err);
std::println!("{}", err);
let invalid_time = LOCK_TIME_THRESHOLD - 1;
let err = Time::from_consensus(invalid_time).unwrap_err();
std::println!("{:?}", err);
std::println!("{}", err);
let invalid_height = std::format!("{:x}", LOCK_TIME_THRESHOLD + 1);
let err = Height::from_hex(&invalid_height).unwrap_err();
std::println!("{:?}", err);
std::println!("{}", err);
let invalid_time = std::format!("{:x}", LOCK_TIME_THRESHOLD - 1);
let err = Time::from_hex(&invalid_time).unwrap_err();
std::println!("{:?}", err);
std::println!("{}", err);
let err = Height::from_hex("somerandomshit").unwrap_err();
std::println!("{:?}", err);
std::println!("{}", err);
let err = Time::from_hex("somerandomshit").unwrap_err();
std::println!("{:?}", err);
std::println!("{}", err);
}
```
Gives the following output (the last four lines is the bit that changes, the rest just proves we don't break other variants)
On commit: `d47ff1c25 Remove From<ParseIntError>`
ConversionError { unit: Blocks, input: 500000001 }
invalid lock time value 500000001, expected lock-by-blockheight (must be < 500000000)
ConversionError { unit: Seconds, input: 499999999 }
invalid lock time value 499999999, expected lock-by-blocktime (must be >= 500000000)
ParseHeightError(Conversion(500000001))
block height 500000001 is above limit 499999999
ParseTimeError(Conversion(499999999))
block height 499999999 is below limit 500000000
ParseHeightError(InvalidInteger { source: ParseIntError { kind: InvalidDigit }, input: "somerandomshit" })
failed to parse somerandomshit as block height
ParseTimeError(InvalidInteger { source: ParseIntError { kind: InvalidDigit }, input: "somerandomshit" })
failed to parse somerandomshit as block time
On commit: `0155a0d9a Replace invalidInteger with ParseIntError`
ConversionError { unit: Blocks, input: 500000001 }
invalid lock time value 500000001, expected lock-by-blockheight (must be < 500000000)
ConversionError { unit: Seconds, input: 499999999 }
invalid lock time value 499999999, expected lock-by-blocktime (must be >= 500000000)
ParseHeightError(Conversion(500000001))
block height 500000001 is above limit 499999999
ParseTimeError(Conversion(499999999))
block height 499999999 is below limit 500000000
ParseHeightError(ParseInt(ParseIntError { input: "somerandomshit", bits: 32, is_signed: true, source: ParseIntError { kind: InvalidDigit } }))
failed to parse somerandomshit as block height
ParseTimeError(ParseInt(ParseIntError { input: "somerandomshit", bits: 32, is_signed: true, source: ParseIntError { kind: InvalidDigit } }))
failed to parse somerandomshit as block time
On Commit: `3f2e760d1 Replace String with InputString in ParseIntError`
ConversionError { unit: Blocks, input: 500000001 }
invalid lock time value 500000001, expected lock-by-blockheight (must be < 500000000)
ConversionError { unit: Seconds, input: 499999999 }
invalid lock time value 499999999, expected lock-by-blocktime (must be >= 500000000)
ParseHeightError(Conversion(500000001))
block height 500000001 is above limit 499999999
ParseTimeError(Conversion(499999999))
block time 499999999 is below limit 500000000
ParseHeightError(ParseInt(ParseIntError { input: InputString("somerandomshit"), bits: 32, is_signed: true, source: ParseIntError { kind: InvalidDigit } }))
failed to parse 'somerandomshit' as absolute Height/Time (block height)
ParseTimeError(ParseInt(ParseIntError { input: InputString("somerandomshit"), bits: 32, is_signed: true, source: ParseIntError { kind: InvalidDigit } }))
failed to parse 'somerandomshit' as absolute Height/Time (block time)
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 3f2e760d1fef2951f93a2554cd53340b0d7a6e0b; successfully ran local tests; nice!
Tree-SHA512: f7fd55acfb83082419db22c24a6b375c20e2631263401e500410c5b5659463f06dc4bdb145621e475dc15d75e764668cdcbf8f88006a487248a05fdb237ad136
Currently the `ParseIntError` contains an owned copy of the input
string, this is causing us to have to use `alloc` everywhere.
We already have a alloc-friendly string replacement type, the
`InputString` - use it.
We have a special type for wrapping integer parsing errors, use it.
To test this I added the following tests:
#[test]
pub fn debug_absolute_error_conversion_height() {
let invalid_height = LOCK_TIME_THRESHOLD + 1;
let _ = Height::from_consensus(invalid_height).unwrap();
}
#[test]
pub fn debug_absolute_error_conversion_time() {
let invalid_time = LOCK_TIME_THRESHOLD - 1;
let _ = Time::from_consensus(invalid_time).unwrap();
}
#[test]
#[cfg(feature = "std")]
pub fn debug_absolute_error_conversion_height_string() {
let invalid_height = std::format!("{:x}", LOCK_TIME_THRESHOLD + 1);
let _ = Height::from_hex(&invalid_height).unwrap();
}
#[test]
#[cfg(feature = "std")]
pub fn debug_absolute_error_conversion_time_string() {
let invalid_time = std::format!("{:x}", LOCK_TIME_THRESHOLD - 1);
let _ = Time::from_hex(&invalid_time).unwrap();
}
#[test]
#[cfg(feature = "std")]
pub fn debug_absolute_error_height_invalid_hex_string() {
let _ = Height::from_hex("somerandomshit").unwrap();
}
#[test]
#[cfg(feature = "std")]
pub fn debug_absolute_error_time_invalid_hex_string() {
let _ = Time::from_hex("somerandomshit").unwrap();
}
Which resulted in the following output
Before:
---- locktime::absolute::tests::debug_absolute_error_conversion_height stdout ----
thread 'locktime::absolute::tests::debug_absolute_error_conversion_height' panicked at units/src/locktime/absolute.rs:431:56:
called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: ConversionError { unit: Blocks, input: 500000001 }
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
---- locktime::absolute::tests::debug_absolute_error_conversion_height_string stdout ----
thread 'locktime::absolute::tests::debug_absolute_error_conversion_height_string' panicked at units/src/locktime/absolute.rs:444:51:
called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: ParseHeightError(Conversion(500000001))
---- locktime::absolute::tests::debug_absolute_error_conversion_time stdout ----
thread 'locktime::absolute::tests::debug_absolute_error_conversion_time' panicked at units/src/locktime/absolute.rs:437:52:
called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: ConversionError { unit: Seconds, input: 499999999 }
---- locktime::absolute::tests::debug_absolute_error_height_invalid_hex_string stdout ----
thread 'locktime::absolute::tests::debug_absolute_error_height_invalid_hex_string' panicked at units/src/locktime/absolute.rs:457:52:
called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: ParseHeightError(InvalidInteger { source: ParseIntError { kind: InvalidDigit }, input: "somerandomshit" })
---- locktime::absolute::tests::debug_absolute_error_conversion_time_string stdout ----
thread 'locktime::absolute::tests::debug_absolute_error_conversion_time_string' panicked at units/src/locktime/absolute.rs:451:47:
called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: ParseTimeError(Conversion(499999999))
---- locktime::absolute::tests::debug_absolute_error_time_invalid_hex_string stdout ----
thread 'locktime::absolute::tests::debug_absolute_error_time_invalid_hex_string' panicked at units/src/locktime/absolute.rs:464:50:
called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: ParseTimeError(InvalidInteger { source: ParseIntError { kind: InvalidDigit }, input: "somerandomshit" })
After:
---- locktime::absolute::tests::debug_absolute_error_conversion_height stdout ----
thread 'locktime::absolute::tests::debug_absolute_error_conversion_height' panicked at units/src/locktime/absolute.rs:432:56:
called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: ConversionError { unit: Blocks, input: 500000001 }
---- locktime::absolute::tests::debug_absolute_error_conversion_height_string stdout ----
thread 'locktime::absolute::tests::debug_absolute_error_conversion_height_string' panicked at units/src/locktime/absolute.rs:445:51:
called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: ParseHeightError(Conversion(500000001))
---- locktime::absolute::tests::debug_absolute_error_conversion_time stdout ----
thread 'locktime::absolute::tests::debug_absolute_error_conversion_time' panicked at units/src/locktime/absolute.rs:438:52:
called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: ConversionError { unit: Seconds, input: 499999999 }
---- locktime::absolute::tests::debug_absolute_error_conversion_time_string stdout ----
thread 'locktime::absolute::tests::debug_absolute_error_conversion_time_string' panicked at units/src/locktime/absolute.rs:452:47:
called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: ParseTimeError(Conversion(499999999))
---- locktime::absolute::tests::debug_absolute_error_height_invalid_hex_string stdout ----
thread 'locktime::absolute::tests::debug_absolute_error_height_invalid_hex_string' panicked at units/src/locktime/absolute.rs:458:52:
called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: ParseHeightError(ParseInt(ParseIntError { input: "somerandomshit", bits: 32, is_signed: false, source: ParseIntError { kind: InvalidDigit } }))
---- locktime::absolute::tests::debug_absolute_error_time_invalid_hex_string stdout ----
thread 'locktime::absolute::tests::debug_absolute_error_time_invalid_hex_string' panicked at units/src/locktime/absolute.rs:465:50:
called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: ParseTimeError(ParseInt(ParseIntError { input: "somerandomshit", bits: 32, is_signed: false, source: ParseIntError { kind: InvalidDigit } }))
The errors in `units::locktime::absolute` are complex, I'd like to make
them more simple so they are more understandable.
I have no clue why this is implemented - remove it.
This has been fixed and we use nightly to lint so we have access to the
merged fix.
Removing the attribute uncovers a bunch of real lint warnings, fix
them while we are at it.
In an effort to make the `amount` module more readable move the
`SignedAmount` type to a private submodule.
Re-export everything so this is not a breaking change.
Code move and re-exports only.
When we move `SignedAmount` to a submodule linking to `self` introduces
a clippy warning, I'm not exactly sure why but lets remove the link in
preparation for the move.
In an effort to make the `amount` module more readable move the `Amount`
type to a private submodule.
Re-export everything so this is not a breaking change.
Code move and re-exports only.
There is _a lot_ of error types in the `amount` module. Move them to a
separate `error` module.
Add a bunch of `pub(super)` to keep things private to the `amount`
module.
Eventually we will want to close all these errors.
In preparation for splitting the error types out of `amount.rs` into
their own file move the `amount.rs` file to `amount/mod.rs`.
File move only, no other changes.
88b53a471e Unify deprecated note field format (Jamil Lambert, PhD)
Pull request description:
Following the suggestion in Issue #3306 all the deprecated note fields have been changed to be lower case and in the format "use `abc` instead".
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 88b53a471e
apoelstra:
ACK 88b53a471e successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: 5c20eda7140f37ce78eb58dfdf03ecc11a67fcb10f294d860e81eaaee696e3a4209516017a9885cef9bfff1aa69b845534d139578b674933770fa24d59e4275f
We use `TBD` in our `deprecated` string and it was discovered that there
is an exception on this string so as not to warn because it is used
internally by the Rust language. However there is a special lint to
enable warnings, lets use it.
Add `#![warn(deprecated_in_future)]` to the coding conventions section
of all crates except `fuzz`.
a0c58a4a8b Add checked weight division to Amount (yancy)
8def40a991 Add assertions to checked_weight_mul test (yancy)
16ce70d3a6 Add div_by_weight test to fee_rate (yancy)
Pull request description:
Adds the checked variant of `amount / weight`. I also added a test to the non-checked version for comparison so the reviewer knows they compute the same way (integer division rounded down).
Also added assertion to `checked_weight_mul test` showing the results are rounded up.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK a0c58a4a8b
apoelstra:
ACK a0c58a4a8b successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: cf14123ed261d100e3261a720c26f8c10368f05225e32eaa246f25ab766d20515db5feb98335d4e3e08a8146a70db65ff64670da3f75e7764e8f86ef534d2663
07a529a132 Bump version of bitcoin-units to 0.2.0 (Tobin C. Harding)
148711a4c6 units: Use double ## in changelog entries (Tobin C. Harding)
80e600ba0c units: Copy 0.1.2 release notes (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
In preparation for releasing `units v0.2.0` bump the version number, add a changelog entry, update the lock files, and depend on the new version in all crates that depend on `units`.
Close: #3095
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 07a529a132 successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: 98a75d485ded6225551a5fc4b4a14d8efecc76911a720f959044cdd62781024a8787f258f171ed297705f5ab470f9a88a81ad5d255c9e03c1e22857615ad2e6d
de319670ae feat: Create relative lock times at compile time (Christian Lewe)
53e1fb6b0c feat: Create absolute lock time at compile time (Christian Lewe)
Pull request description:
I noticed that I cannot create lock times as compile-time constants. This PR tries to remedy this issue by marking lock time constructors as `const`.
Because the `internals` crate depends on the `units` crate in a way that I don't fully understand yet, this PR updates the `units` crate only.
If `from_consensus` is being kept non-`const` by design, to keep the API flexible to future changes, then please close this PR. In this case, I overlooked existing discussions.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK de319670ae successfully ran local tests; good start; should backport
tcharding:
ACK de319670ae
Tree-SHA512: 69f9147707bcf8f91f755dd6d1be5ed08945e775ee46918e33d77a9d07ce474047a80ed1226134a3914ead51d1ddbbc657552ca934dc3c079b92ad3d50b13152
Also mark these methods as const. Because <u32 as From<u16>>::from
is not available in const contexts, I had to cast u16 as u32. I try to
avoid casts as much as I can, but in this case a cast seems unavoidable.
Casting u16 as u32 should be safe on all architectures.
Mark the from_consensus and to_consensus methods of the absolute
lock time structs as const. In theory. these methods do some sanity
checking and wrap a u32 value in a newtype. This should be possible
to do in const. Marking the methods as const should not break existing
call sites.
In preparation for releasing `units v0.2.0` bump the version number,
add a changelog entry, update the lock files, and depend on the new
version in all crates that depend on `units`.
When we do patch version releases (on a separate branch) the release
patches typically include a changelog entry that does not appear on
`master` - this seems like a process fail. Anyways, grab the release
notes for `v0.1.2` and add them to the changelog file. Intentionally do
not cherrypick the release patch because that may make the git index
hard to understand.
18110a51f2 Bump version of internals to 0.4.0 (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
In preparation for releasing `internals v0.4.0` bump the version number, add a changelog entry, update the lock files, and depend on the new version in all crates that depend on `internals`.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 18110a51f2 successfully ran local tests; lots of nice stuff here
Tree-SHA512: a4d3d5279b7d7fa993cbc3b7b34fc6dc4024dd54c0bfa1ecd0f0d5f09b984871f156c3695092a1f6c44b7571f8b2051699040f5f77636d44d4cae6c972ab597f
f6abdcc001 Allow unused in `macros.rs` docs (Jamil Lambert, PhD)
fd89ddf401 Remove or fix unused variables and methods in docs (Jamil Lambert, PhD)
ff6b1d4f19 Remove unused variables and methods from docs (Jamil Lambert, PhD)
e58cda6f92 Remove `unused_imports` in docs (Jamil Lambert, PhD)
Pull request description:
As mentioned in #3362 examples in documentation are not linted in the same way as other code, but should still contain correctly written code.
#![doc(test(attr(warn(unused))))] has been added to all lib.rs files
In the docs throughout all crates:
- Unused imports have been removed.
- Unused variables, structs and enums have been used e.g. with an `assert_eq!` or prefixed with `_`
- Unused methods have been called in the example code.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK f6abdcc001
apoelstra:
ACK f6abdcc001 successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: c3de1775ecde6971056e9fed2c9fa1621785787a6a6ccbf3a6dbd11e18d42d4956949f3f8adfc75d94fd25db998b04adb1c346cc2c2ba47f4dc37402e1388277
f5cae1cddd Comment from_str methods (yancy)
Pull request description:
Follow up from https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/3346
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK f5cae1cddd
apoelstra:
ACK f5cae1cddd successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: 2b95381e5281754e2b3a49aa8dfaac5742c244970fb54f68024dc23b61a74955ae95b9a0e7ae848095ac0686df5faf93faf7de3371b2f341b108cc10e5d4a9cd
8c29fe08f8 Revise doc comment (yancy)
Pull request description:
Update doc comment to make clear that the ceiling is computed instead of the default behavior for integer division.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 8c29fe08f8
apoelstra:
ACK 8c29fe08f8 successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: 3793dccab5b5a3e59b3949ecb54475c76263e1debcc18df42f3b0251189435ba87e537c4b5d80c91f4b916449618a75e6efac32b4ba2fc29c42563e1b0fb4a89
Examples in documentation are not linted in the same way as other code,
but should still contain correctly written code.
Throughout all of the crates except internals (another commit) unused
variables have been prefixed with `_`, unused imports have been removed,
and a warn attribute added to all of the `lib.rs` files.
In preparation for releasing `internals v0.4.0` bump the version number,
add a changelog entry, update the lock files, and depend on the new
version in all crates that depend on `internals`.
894f82e7cc Add a condition for parsing zero from string when not denominated. (yancy)
Pull request description:
closes https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/3307
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 894f82e7cc
tcharding:
ACK 894f82e7cc
apoelstra:
ACK 894f82e7cc9eb459a297d43e82734621e0824610; successfully ran local tests.
Tree-SHA512: 6d32847c74ccedc3355d615838e2dd1e08add29cc47ff69d9ef22683eda93049d41131dd0c992c8d7be3a018f5438856c415a3d2f3cb9de9c986534b268ee386
b6371b5801 Fix clippy rustdocs warnings (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
A new nightly version (`nightly-2024-08-28`) introduces a few warnings because of our rustdocs. These are valid warnings and should be fixed, thanks `clippy` team.
(The `bip152` change is a bit sloppy, open to suggestions.)
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK b6371b5801 successfully ran local tests
Kixunil:
ACK b6371b5801
Tree-SHA512: 503fb9d48772b74a5acdb26c0f77a85c52323c03360f983204fccee0f28bedeff142237b067caa1ce6ea04ea9842cc493e0d06dc141ca00a98151fa002b62392
3f244db19d Add Arbitrary to SignedAmount type (yancy)
Pull request description:
While proptesting, I've found Arbitrary for SingedAmount to be useful. Would appreciate adding this as well.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 3f244db19d
Kixunil:
ACK 3f244db19d
Tree-SHA512: f293215505db85998135c75e147f4cb0031a08c7db619b706e6c7d632c6f23783af56992531396aecc6e3da55b107a7f2c7ec4d68a3e5737ebcf4225f306ed29
A new nightly version (`nightly-2024-08-28`) introduces a few warnings
because of our rustdocs. These are valid warnings and should be fixed,
thanks `clippy` team.
(The `bip152` change is a bit sloppy, open to suggestions.)
f8edbd1f45 Add Arbitrary to Weight (yancy)
Pull request description:
Adds Arbitrary to the Weight type. I had meant to add this with the initial Arbitrary PR but I overlooked it.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK f8edbd1f45
Kixunil:
ACK f8edbd1f45
Tree-SHA512: b886f78285b5cd06b2531a1e53272cad623a8e43e76e8108abe90668b45d00674b6a867c5ff980ee7f0a34919e1d6bb534624bd0bc67a53c8c9a41ea2ed504e8
`s.parse` is more idiomatic and produces more helpful error messages.
This has been changed repo wide in the main codebase, not including
examples, rustdocs, and in the test module.
`use std::str::FromStr;` has been removed where this change makes
it unnecessary.
3e034d5ede Add Arbitrary dependency (yancy)
Pull request description:
Adds an example draft showing what is needed to use Arbitrary for coin selection.
Shot out to how nice Arbitrary is for fuzzing a target by taking unstructured randomness and creating structured rust-bitcoin types for fuzzing. Is there a way we could add this to rust-bitcoin for structuring the fuzz data needed?
This is then the example to fuzz test a SRD algo (after applying this PR to rust-bitcoin) using rust-bitcoin types :)
```
#![no_main]
use arbitrary::Arbitrary;
use bitcoin::{Amount, FeeRate};
use bitcoin_coin_selection::{select_coins_srd, WeightedUtxo};
use libfuzzer_sys::fuzz_target;
use rand::thread_rng;
#[derive(Arbitrary, Debug)]
pub struct Params {
target: Amount,
fee_rate: FeeRate,
weighted_utxos: Vec<WeightedUtxo>,
}
fuzz_target!(|params: Params| {
let Params { target: t, fee_rate: f, weighted_utxos: wu } = params;
select_coins_srd(t, f, &wu, &mut thread_rng());
});
```
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 3e034d5ede
Kixunil:
ACK 3e034d5ede
apoelstra:
ACK 3e034d5ede successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: accd565815de3b37730d2ff12a24fcfc84e52ad357e5c940b1500a1e0bb17f4ff5fd6e52d31e8e96bb5290ee4fa050cfd2a9bbd6bbae13fc378f43093b64177f
c427d8b213 bitcoin: Compile time assert on index size (Tobin C. Harding)
49a6acc1a0 internals: Remove double parenthesis in const_assert (Tobin C. Harding)
2300b285ef units: Remove compile time pointer width check (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
3 patches in preparation for other size related work, this PR does not touch the `ToU64` issue which will be handled separately.
- Patch 1: Don't check pointer width in `units` because its not consensus code
- Patch 2: Modify internal macro `const_assert`
- Patch 3: Use index size to enforce not building on a 16 bit machine
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK c427d8b213 though I think the last commit was kinda a waste of time and it should have been adding the trait instead or leave it for later.
apoelstra:
ACK c427d8b213 successfully ran local tests; unsure if we want to merg this or wait for #3215
Tree-SHA512: 823df5b6a5af3265bce2422c00d287f45816faeb5f965685650ac974a1bd441cf548e25ac2962591732ff221bee91a55703da936382eb166c014ca5d4129edf8
The `units` crate does not contain consensus logic and since our
requirement to only support 32-bit and 64-bit machines is due to
consensus logic we do not need to enforce the `target_pointer_width` in
the `units` crate.
Remove the compile time check on pointer width from the `units` crate.
The version 1.63 satisfies our requirements for MSRV and provides
significant benefits so this commit bumps it. This commit also starts
using some advantages of the new MSRV, namely namespaced features, weak
dependencies and the ability to use trait bounds in `const` context.
This however does not yet migrade the `rand-std` feature because that
requires a release of `secp256k1` with the same kind of change - bumping
MSRV to 1.63 and removing `rand-std` in favor of weak dependency.
We re-export to help users keep their dependencies in sync but `serde`
is at `v1.0` so this is not really a problem.
Remove the public re-export of `serde` (and with current MSRV we don't
need the `extern crate` at all).
ab581a90f8 Remove re-export of ParseIntError (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
In d242125 I claimed that `ParseIntError` was somehow special, I no longer thing this is the case. As we pin down the re-export policy (for errors and other types) it is hard if we have one non-typical re-export.
We have https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/3068 to discuss the policy, for now just remove the unusual re-export.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK ab581a90f8
shinghim:
ACK ab581a90f8
apoelstra:
ACK ab581a90f8
Tree-SHA512: 5ac4123aeb27c8cee78e5760f21e70be8035d526ba7e14e72759cba27f98b51cc2cba9b2bf0eeb99e0f6b7210ec4a750986bb6c5dc0725ed892730fdec8a7e06
a76c13f675 Add more unit test coverage for relative LockTime (Shing Him Ng)
Pull request description:
Adding some test cases for `from_seconds_floor` and one more for `from_seconds_ceil`
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK a76c13f675
Kixunil:
ACK a76c13f675
Tree-SHA512: 5d773a30fa56842af21109d232ec3eae7fde7ce38aca93dadccc7bfbf14d5207ea329ef737f847e45ba755fd22e1862c3e78e7e64a8a0babebcb0e27a2bb7a90
In d242125 I claimed that `ParseIntError` was somehow special, I no
longer thing this is the case. As we pin down the re-export policy (for
errors and other types) it is hard if we have one non-typical re-export.
We have https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/3068 to
discuss the policy, for now just remove the unusual re-export.
2169b75bba Use lower case error messages (Jamil Lambert, PhD)
Pull request description:
Error messages should be lower case, except for proper nouns and variable names. These have all been changed.
~~They should also state what went wrong. Some expect error messages were positive, giving the correct behaviour or correct input. These have been changed so that they are now negative, i.e. saying what went wrong.~~
EDIT: After further discussion it was decided not to change the expect messages.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 2169b75bba
tcharding:
ACK 2169b75bba
Tree-SHA512: 92442c869e0141532425f6fca5195fd319b65026f68c4230a65ad70253565d98931b2b44ee202975c307280525c505147e272297dc81207312e40c43d007021c
7874db8fc3 Throw error instead of panic when from_second_ceil input is too large (Shing Him Ng)
Pull request description:
Update `from_second_ceil` per [comment](https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/3029#issuecomment-2227459248) and add unit tests
Resolves#3029
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 7874db8fc3
tcharding:
ACK 7874db8fc3
Tree-SHA512: 0d60397f867d4536ff00b81441c27ea3dc4bf9e5ecc2fb5afbe50cb3153101df54c2bb5056da1916d83c3e84367f987f5bac07a381b7433a5701a0ea8a587f95
84dd04cf60 Rename variable assignment (yancy)
Pull request description:
The type created after assignment is a Weight type. Using a var name vb which is short for virtual byte is incorrect.
Pulled this out of stale PR 2215
ACKs for top commit:
shinghim:
ACK 84dd04cf60
apoelstra:
ACK 84dd04cf60
Kixunil:
ACK 84dd04cf60
Tree-SHA512: 1bfc875f53037b2c1e8da25fe44e9ca3303981bdce4e48661a8fb2061833e3cd90318d854f7119c805e861cd8a591697378f829f32eb74ac99a71dc4c947abde
1cce1b5aa6 Remove private prelude module from units crate (Jamil Lambert, PhD)
Pull request description:
The private prelude module has been removed from the units crate and instead imports are stated in full when needed. As discussed in #2926.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 1cce1b5aa6
apoelstra:
ACK 1cce1b5aa6
Tree-SHA512: 58b93ff66f74399938bc1a7f59fe8d2a21d0437c7e90e0c190d3d6a8de30f9c9268c8e4288d1db287b4d190624968937b1ad6c6e54d29025370e47e71be925c1
Tobin C. Harding
merge-script
yancy
Jamil Lambert, PhD
Fmt Bot
Shing Him Ng
Rob N
Casey Rodarmor
Christian Lewe
Martin Habovstiak