Numbers with only zeros after decimal points are valid if they are also
multiples of `10^precision` (e.g. 1000 for msats). These were
artificially disallowed as "too precise" which was at least misleading.
This change allows parsing such numbers.
8e6f953aa7 Expose valid (min, max) difficulty transition thresholds (Wilmer Paulino)
Pull request description:
Once `U256` was made private, we lost the ability to check whether a valid difficulty transition was made in the chain, since `Target` doesn't expose any operations. We only choose to expose `Shl<u32>` and `Shr<u32>` such that we can compute the min and max target thresholds allowed for a difficulty transition.
This is something we realized was missing after bumping to `rust-bitcoin v0.30.0` in `rust-lightning`, specifically for our `lightning-block-sync` crate. It may also be worth having a helper in `rust-bitcoin` that checks a header properly builds upon the previous, but that can be left for future work.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 8e6f953aa7
sanket1729:
ACK 8e6f953aa7 . Sorry, was confused by some details.
apoelstra:
ACK 8e6f953aa7
Tree-SHA512: 740dd64089426463dc6a19726d5a562276bd0966e0e31af8e1e67b28d18945644ac0e50be3cf0cc7fa604acc3d2c5b912a77a7caa69d8cff85f70fd57e5328c5
dff757d7db Comment predict_weight (yancy)
Pull request description:
I've been reading over the `predict_weight` function since it is one of the biggest challenges for coin-selection. IE choosing inputs and constructing an optimal selection strategy requires predicting the weight to get the best selection. It's great this work has been done but there are some things I don't understand well enough to comment.
1) why are we looking at the size of VarInt struct here
> let script_size = script_len + VarInt(script_len as u64).len()
2) [predict_weight_internal](36500b4451/bitcoin/src/blockdata/transaction.rs (L1245)) has a bunch of magic numbers. I'd like to be able to comment this as well but I don't fully understand that function.
Also, `Transaction.rs` is a big file and it seems like all of the prediction stuff could be moved to a separate module or maybe a separate crate?
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK dff757d7db
Kixunil:
ACK dff757d7db
Tree-SHA512: 8ffa16d500075d691528ce1819b9352a148af431889bebbd7cddcf470bd4e3048ec53a5e778bc3659e33d8c25b68422a93dac1d46b9489ff56f41d88d7f05433
d57ec019d5 Use Amount type for TxOut value field (yancy)
Pull request description:
Propose using `Amount` type for the `TxOut` `value` field. I only implemented `Decodable ` and `Encodable` enough to compile but this needs to completed obviously if using `Amount` seems like a good idea.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK d57ec019d5
apoelstra:
ACK d57ec019d5
Tree-SHA512: df3fd55294d5f9392ca90bb920be8fbb9d7d285d97669412e07d5a099f70f81fd73e7e259679de9c8ce5c6c855e64f62213700f0fb7db415e0c706c509485377
ed6421c939 address: Add generic serde::Serialize for Address (Steven Roose)
814b9917da address: Add Sync, Send, Sized and UnPin marker traits on NetworkValidation (Steven Roose)
Pull request description:
With the new rewrite of Address, `serde::Serialize` is only implemented on `Address<bitcoin::address::NetworkChecked>` and `Address<bitcoin::address::NetworkUnchecked>`. But the compiler has no way of knowing that that are all the possible versions of `Address`, so the generic `Address<impl bitcoin::address::NetworkValidation>` doesn't implement `serde::Serialize`.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK ed6421c939
tcharding:
ACK ed6421c939
Tree-SHA512: 65e43dff244c94fe08ccb2d985781a2687a1e2db186960a35d4ae89f3b31c5af66892630a3ebaac9cecdc83638487425afa17374869d278648b348869e0ba091
Once `U256` was made private, we lost the ability to check whether a
valid difficulty transition was made in the chain, since `Target`
no longer exposes any arithmetic operations.
Our previous MSRV did not support MIN/MAX associated consts so we had
methods min/max_value. Now that our MSRV is Rust 1.48.0 we can use the
consts.
Deprecate min/max_value methods in favor of MIN/MAX associated conts.
We currently use the functions `min_value` and `max_value` because the
consts were not available in Rust 1.41.1, however we recently bumped the
MSRV so we can use the consts now.
1c3bbd4bf2 internals: Remove attribution from all files (Tobin C. Harding)
99673ab5c4 hashes: Introduce SPDX license identifiers (Tobin C. Harding)
984fe69448 bitcoin: Remove attribution from all files (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Please note, whether or not we need a per-file license comment is out of scope for this PR. This PR leaves us with the most simple per-file solution possible and leaves the merit of per-file license comment to be discussed on another day.
Simplify the per-file license stuff by doing:
- Remove the attribution line from each file.
Currently we have a mishmash of attribution lines accompanying the SPDX identifier. These lines are basically meaningless because:
- The date is often wrong
- The original author attributed is not the only contributor to a file
- The term "rust bitcoin developers" is basically just noise
- Introduce SPDX license identifiers into `hashes` and remove attribution line (ie, make `hashes` uniform with `bitcoin`)
Required before merge please:
- [x] ack from apoelstra because as the library original author many of the changes in this PR remove his name
- [x] ack from Kixunil because he had some concerns in the issue descussion
Fix: #1816
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 1c3bbd4bf2
sanket1729:
ACK 1c3bbd4bf2
apoelstra:
ACK 1c3bbd4bf2
Tree-SHA512: c5ac05c5eb23b3b6a760f707c344b22f5871a4dedee4990b1840f57e4cee1d38560ff4507c354bbf29bc8ff05a179d95d7e100fcf19bd93c5362344a352c7b5a
Currently we have a mishmash of attribution lines accompanying the SPDX
identifier. These lines are basically meaningless because:
- The date is often wrong
- The original author attributed is not the only contributor to a file
- The term "rust bitcoin developers" is basically just noise
Just remove all the attribution lines and be done with it. While we are
at it add an SPDX line to the few files missing it, whether this license
nonsense is even needed is left as an argument for another day.
dd4ad9444e Hardcode expected weight in txin_txout_weight_tests (Peter Todd)
Pull request description:
Rational: the expected weight is fixed so this both ensures we don't accidentally change it somehow, and makes it easier to re-use these test cases in other codebases (eg python-bitcoinlib).
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK dd4ad9444e
tcharding:
ACK dd4ad9444e
Kixunil:
ACK dd4ad9444e
Tree-SHA512: 4769a4bb8695f4f4c95e258bb5f06a232090b14c3d9159d6d5de2d09d7fc934a1b920b90cc09677a88fc0cf37ac21ed27794692dff2c73df4252c9551dc10fc2
Rational: the expected weight is fixed so this both ensures we don't
accidentally change it somehow, and makes it easier to re-use these test
cases in other codebases (eg python-bitcoinlib).
a54e1ceab1 Apply rustfmt (The rustfmt Tyranny)
38d11ce3da ci: Make release CI search for NEXT.RELEASE instead (Steven Roose)
dad3abd20f transaction: Rename is_coin_base to is_coinbase (Steven Roose)
Pull request description:
Alternative to https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/1795.
Keep the old method as deprecated and add doc alias. Also change internal usage of the method.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK a54e1ceab1
apoelstra:
ACK a54e1ceab1
Tree-SHA512: 52d9729bf83da164556d960f8867cb836ff57a0f619da3dd3620efffb28a974aac23b8085863ab0e072a4bdb2f13ac576efa43ad2eec9a271ad044227f4d00a4
8f6317fbab Add predict_weight test for witness address types (yancy)
Pull request description:
Add a predict_weight test for address types with witness data
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 8f6317fbab
apoelstra:
ACK 8f6317fbab
Tree-SHA512: 954908f068d6b0e8f7cc6bc6bffd110d490d7165cf2544ff0f936264761cb1f8e4da1e37fd5a6a34fd8b05f8d72817a3b340bbf968b29c9f538f10853347fdf0
fabcde036f Use package in manifest and shorten import (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
We can use `package` to rename `bitcoin_hashes` to `hashes` and `bitcoin_internals` to `internals`. This makes imports more terse with no loss of meaning.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK fabcde036f
Kixunil:
ACK fabcde036f
Tree-SHA512: bc5bff6f7f6bf3b68ba1e0644a83da014081d8c6c9d578c21cb54fdd56a018f68733dd1135d05b590ba193ed9efd12fa9019182c1fed347e604d8548f6ef9103
29cb34eed7 Refactor Address struct and its methods (Harshil Jani)
Pull request description:
Closes#1755
In this PR the `as_unchecked` is added to the Address struct, which returns a reference to the same address but with the type Address<NetworkUnchecked>. Similarly, the `assume_checked_ref` is added to Address<NetworkUnchecked>, which returns a reference to the same address but with the type Address.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 29cb34eed7
apoelstra:
ACK 29cb34eed7
Tree-SHA512: 75ba40883d9fb31026b0e94e8d3fdcf808ff38a4d10f61f99a1e14ddc48358da86bad44cd78563dc67aa5d39382a5493e73c03891317f361f590e39b6257cb84
91f45a214f Replace hardcoded values with compile-time hashing (Martin Habovstiak)
095b7958dd Make `sha256t_hash_newtype!` evocative of the output. (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
The Rust API guidelines state that macros should be evocative of the
output, which is a sensible recommendation. We already had this for
`hash_newtype!` macro but didn't for sha256t version.
This changes the macro to have this syntax:
```rust
sha256t_hash_newtype! {
// Order of these structs is fixed.
/// Optional documentation details here. Summary is auto-generated.
/*pub*/ struct Tag = raw(MIDSTATE_BYTES, LEN);
/// Documentation here
#[hash_newtype(forward)] // optional, default is backward
/*pub*/ struct HashType(/* attributes allowed here */ _);
}
```
Closes https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/1427
Depends on #1769
How do you like the syntax? Is weird `struct Foo = bar(..);` acceptable?
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 91f45a214f
apoelstra:
ACK 91f45a214f
Tree-SHA512: f6b555b20311a4c1cb097bc296c92459f6fbe16ba102d8c977eb2383dbcae3cc8ffce32e3cb771e7e22197fda26379971aa4feaadc5e2e70d37fa690ae8b8859
873501a85f Use slice patterns (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
Some code looks better with slice patterns. This changes `bip32` to use them.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 873501a85f
tcharding:
ACK 873501a85f
Tree-SHA512: 2e91b21d0f943c04f592112f241444ba3b1b1dad47ea6bea162f62cfbcaf98e383257cad144072b3807aaa0c122dabab638ac10b1cc1f5179727a5f05aac0659
This commit refactors the Address struct and its methods to improve
its functionality and usability.The AddressInner struct now holds
the payload and network, and the PhantomData<V> type is used to track
the network validation state.
Also as_unchecked and assume_checked_red methods are added to allow
conversion between checked and unchecked network validation state.
Signed-off-by: Harshil Jani <harshiljani2002@gmail.com>
Previous changes enabled passing the string used as a tag into
`sha256t_hash_newtype!` macro rather than hard-coding midstate. This
commit takes advantage of it and replaces the hard-coded values with
compile-time executed (`const`) hashing.
The Rust API guidelines state that macros should be evocative of the
output, which is a sensible recommendation. We already had this for
`hash_newtype!` macro but didn't for sha256t version.
This changes the macro to have this syntax:
```rust
sha256t_hash_newtype! {
// Order of these structs is fixed.
/// Optional documentation details here. Summary is auto-generated.
/*pub*/ struct Tag = raw(MIDSTATE_BYTES, LEN);
/// Documentation here
#[hash_newtype(forward)] // optional, default is backward
/*pub*/ struct HashType(/* attributes allowed here */ _);
}
```
Closes#1427
We've upgraded MSRV but didn't update clippy config, so some things that
could be improved aren't caught by clippy. This updates the config and
fixes the new issues.
I also `rg '1\.41\.1'`ed for interesting changes and found one
additional improvement.
a189942c64 Use doc_auto_cfg (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
If we use `#![cfg_attr(docsrs, feature(doc_auto_cfg))]` instead of `#![cfg_attr(docsrs, feature(doc_cfg))]` we no longer need to manually mark types with `#[cfg_attr(docsrs, doc(cfg(feature = "std")))]`.
Sweeeeeet.
Props to pezcore for the lesson :)
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK a189942c64
Kixunil:
ACK a189942c64
Tree-SHA512: 1ced1e09f5d1733b362b83ca650d3f52c89eb57e78e8437f74c496d89776548f8c50feab6750352342e2abe680434681de2c126ce36a81dda21397b9695d4d4e
Signed-off-by: Harshil Jani <harshiljani2002@gmail.com>
implementation of PartialEq<Address> for Address<NetworkUnchecked>
Signed-off-by: Harshil Jani <harshiljani2002@gmail.com>
If we use `#![cfg_attr(docsrs, feature(doc_auto_cfg))]` instead of
`#![cfg_attr(docsrs, feature(doc_cfg))]` we no longer need to manually
mark types with `#[cfg_attr(docsrs, doc(cfg(feature = "std")))]`.
Sweeeeeet.
ed80df5ebc Add `ChainHash::from_genesis_block_hash` (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
This improves readability of converting `BlockHash` into `ChainHash`. It's useful in e.g. Electrum protocol which sends `BlockHash` (serialized backward).
Closes#1751
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK ed80df5ebc
tcharding:
ACK ed80df5ebc
Tree-SHA512: b03eb9ca0a1eb38196cc8e43751c2def0d00b463b774003c5319bf56599db598ddd4bb0e2ad0bd3803f21a925135992d421848e7b1ba5e7bab3a405f60fc973c
We can use `package` to rename `bitcoin_hashes` to `hashes` and
`bitcoin_internals` to `internals`. This makes imports more terse with
no loss of meaning.
82b6332b91 create a set of recognized denomination forms (yancy)
Pull request description:
I took a stab at restricting the acceptable forms here. There was some consensus that "BtC" was confusing that was discussed in a previous pr https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/1715.
Also, personally I felt that the `PossiblyConfusingDenomination` enum variant was itself confusing. I think it's probably cleaner to just maintain a list of acceptable forms and treat everything else as unknown. For now I just created a const of possibly confusing forms.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 82b6332b91
apoelstra:
ACK 82b6332b91
Tree-SHA512: f3c212046e4d8a34ce2d50f34065b1778ae190ca80dd9ad73ef41eb5925705c88c0a764ec149d731eb1735d670c5542415953633a7f3f672d0c1e46b6e004d0b
This improves readability of converting `BlockHash` into `ChainHash`.
It's useful in e.g. Electrum protocol which sends `BlockHash`
(serialized backward).
Closes#1751
122188f7dd Use shorter import statements (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Just patch 2, patch 1 is #1728
From the commit log of patch 2
Use shorter import statements
As per discussion [0] use the shorter form for importing crates that we
re-export (`hashes` and `secp256k1`).
[0] https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/discussions/1661
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 122188f7dd
sanket1729:
utACK 122188f7dd
Tree-SHA512: 3f540464d38c72ba9d68f8ceda8600540bd0c3eef0ba67531c87fa1e0e4f757af7035cf80a1a5f17aa05604a17fdd9ef59bb6bece6b4145d540dac1e5362fc01
Add the `mutate` attribute to mutate `mul_u64`. Add non-doc comments
listing the two false positives. These are identical but we list them
twice so when devs grep for `mutagen false pos` the same number of lines
for each function is displayed as is displayed by the `mutagen` run.
This coding false positives thing is also introduced in PR #1655.
1dc04fe10f Remove rust_v_1_46 (Tobin C. Harding)
71fa9e81e7 Bump MSRV to 1.48.1 (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Just patch 2, patch 1 is #1728
From the commit log of patch 2
Bump MSRV to 1.48.1
As per discussion [0] bump our MSRV for all crates in `rust-bitcoin`
repo to 1.48.1 [1].
[0] https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/discussions/1329
[1] https://blog.rust-lang.org/2020/11/19/Rust-1.48.html
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 1dc04fe10f
sanket1729:
ACK 1dc04fe10f
Tree-SHA512: 533470c55f7aeede88382db8245033dac9317d75b38ced2ad8256d38319632a524335f893044e96300a1e60048f9aaca2d1634735eb324eb8ed9ad3c9ab2f872
dbd2ea07b5 Add kilo weight unit conversion (yancy)
Pull request description:
The FeeRate module defaults to sats per `kwu` so when doing fee calculations, it would be convenient to easily convert weight to the same units.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK dbd2ea07b5
tcharding:
ACK dbd2ea07b5
apoelstra:
ACK dbd2ea07b5
Tree-SHA512: fe26b631cf474f1dca627a4d21e9052c80f8ada9a0eb635c46b7f8f42095671b9b161fb5012b723699008372faf7668507d5e92bde7d1808d389f85dba33529b
We just merged a patch to enable formatting in CI but commit: `05fdead2
Feature: Add difficulty_float method for block::Header.` must have
slipped in.
Run the formatter.
913575ac91 hashes: Run the formatter (Tobin C. Harding)
52c4579057 Enable formatting for hashes (Tobin C. Harding)
3f16b6bf9f util: Run the formatter (Tobin C. Harding)
d210d2ac83 Enable formatting for util (Tobin C. Harding)
5973dce9db blockdata: Run the formatter (Tobin C. Harding)
0dcbed3c7b Enable formatting for blockdata (Tobin C. Harding)
a52746d01c psbt: Run the formatter (Tobin C. Harding)
ef306db5e2 Enable formatting for psbt (Tobin C. Harding)
296f2ed82c Make test panic instead of using code comment (Tobin C. Harding)
3ec8a12428 crypto: Run the formatter (Tobin C. Harding)
c8a3c58786 Enable formatting for crypto (Tobin C. Harding)
314e6786b4 crypto: Add rustfmt::skip attributes (Tobin C. Harding)
450a84f6e8 consensus: Run the formatter (Tobin C. Harding)
89143205f9 Enable formatting for consensus (Tobin C. Harding)
ce773af20f tests: Remove useless use of super imports (Tobin C. Harding)
ef01f4d0f6 consensus: Introduce local variables (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
One final push crew, 16 patches, only a few are big.
All non-trivial formatting is done in separate patches so the changes can be verified mechanically.
With this applied the whole `rust-bitcoin` crate will be formatted.
Big thanks to everyone for putting up with the ongoing formatting PRs, no-one likes doing these but hopefully this an improvement to the project - especially in helping us get more contributors to the project.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
> ACK [913575a](913575ac91). Went through the workflow locally.
sanket1729:
ACK 913575ac91. Went through the workflow locally.
apoelstra:
ACK 913575ac91
Tree-SHA512: b30eaa2893563155de05f8fa97be4a24a7dd8bf43bb426314c5104598477ca2173af279da796da8b18cc53a0ed525908b3d4edd0504836a443465efa0773632d
67618d679d Mark `Denomination` as `non_exhaustive` (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
It is possible that we will add new variants to `Denomination` in the future so making it `non_exhaustive` is better for forward compatibility.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 67618d679d
apoelstra:
ACK 67618d679d
sanket1729:
ACK 67618d679d
Tree-SHA512: a28b7c6577f098b3d64c505e948e3b9fd0cc43a911a2b7c35610ada6a2f75514a1cb05ab8c99212340cf4e34426ac8b5f0ecc65d5afa22d67296e82d878b9308
2d23e11569 Remove extern crate hashbrown (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
(Merge candidate only after release of 0.30.0)
We no longer have a "hashbrown" feature, the feature gated `pub extern crate hashbrown` should have been removed when we removed the feature.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 2d23e11569
Kixunil:
ACK 2d23e11569
Tree-SHA512: 36d4c539f3f972d42bbc9fda9e96063a78d35afc6aebbf534b878dcef0440b72c2a990bcbdbb2ad3bf99cab7048cdbd4002899c2b314da21e4a7bacaf8c71f0f
Add `rustfmt::skip` attribute in a couple of places and then remove the
exclude for the `blockdata` module. Do not run the formatter, that will
be done as a separate patch to aid review.
Currently we have a code comment that is supposed to assist devs in
maintaining the `network::constants::Network` type by failing to build
if a new variant is added. This plays havoc with the formatter because
the comment is hanging at the bottom of a match block and the formatting
thinks its for the proceeding line of code.
Instead of using a code comment add a panic so the unit test fails if a
new variant is added to `network::constants::Network`.
In preparation for running the formatter introduce a couple of local
variables to reduce the line length and inhibit function call from being
split over multiple lines.
Refactor only, no logic changes.
00b46d6d9d Indent functions (Martin Habovstiak)
d56d202aeb Support weight prediction in `const` context (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
**Notes for reviewers:**
This is something that I want to use in my code and hopefully reasonably easy to review, so if this can get into 0.30 that'd be really nice. No hard feelings if it doesn't.
I tried to put extra effort into making review easier by:
* intentionally "mis-formatting" the first commit so diff is smaller and easy to understand - see individual commits.
* copying patterns from non-const fn to const fn so it's obviously correct (includes same variable names)
* not bothering with the array trick in `VarInt::len` and simply accepting the limitation of Rust 1.46+ (I use 1.48 BTW).
**Description**
Some smart contracts or simplified wallets statically know the sizes of
transactions or inputs. The possible approaches to handling them so far
were re-computing the values (and hoping the optimizer will const fold
them) or using a simple constant which may be harder to understand and
get right. It's much nicer to just use a `const` but our code didn't
support it until now.
This change adds methods that can compute the prediction in `const`
context for Rust versions >= 1.46.0 which allow use of loops (and
conditions but those could be workaround anyway).
As a side effect of this, the change also adds `const` to `VarInt::len`
in Rust 1.46+. While this one could be made unconditional using array
trick it's probably not worth it because of the planned MSRV bump.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 00b46d6d9d
tcharding:
ACK 00b46d6d9d
Tree-SHA512: 5509886a68b4de5227db0e28d92a40be8de64592e0b189c519213db21bcfe98ca03d9a1936b1024729b97db69e8ec0b55fac870a7ce9bab0d0c9a47b2087990f
Some smart contracts or simplified wallets statically know the sizes of
transactions or inputs. The possible approaches to handling them so far
were re-computing the values (and hoping the optimizer will const fold
them) or using a simple constant which may be harder to understand and
get right. It's much nicer to just use a `const` but our code didn't
support it until now.
This change adds methods that can compute the prediction in `const`
context for Rust versions >= 1.46.0 which allow use of loops (and
conditions but those could be workaround anyway).
As a side effect of this, the change also adds `const` to `VarInt::len`
in Rust 1.46+. While this one could be made unconditional using array
trick it's probably not worth it because of the planned MSRV bump.
Note: this commit is intentionally unformatted to make diff easier to
understand. Formatting will be done in future commit.
It wasn't obvious that displaying address with alternate formatting
upper cases bech32 addresses.
This change adds information about this and also a note about the
compatibility of various wallets.
2158f88f1d Add a method to `pow::Target` for returning difficulty as an f64. (junderw)
Pull request description:
Closes#1703
This adds a conversion function to U256 to get an f64. We use the method shown in the following blog post.
https://blog.m-ou.se/floats/
Target::MAX was converted to a f64 and set as a const that is verified in a unit test.
The code is rather confusing, so I took a crack at explaining it in my comments as well. Please let me know if you want it cleaned up some more.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 2158f88f1d
tcharding:
ACK 2158f88f1d
Tree-SHA512: 7c0e82bd1756950c1c6dfb9da91fd71b276e2e7dc8a33e69112f87b87e358240f0f7c4894d24ab228e149d862938833a2e65e345ce2712a78dc86dec197da34f
This adds a conversion function to U256 to get an f64. We use the method shown in the following blog post. https://blog.m-ou.se/floats/
Target::MAX was converted to a f64 and set as a const that is verified in a unit test.
e3f95ee22b Add tests for the FeeRate type (yancy)
Pull request description:
Adds some tests for the `FeeRate` type.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK e3f95ee22b
tcharding:
ACK e3f95ee22b
Kixunil:
ACK e3f95ee22b
Tree-SHA512: 74d6597c747d5aa62a6510bf9fa8de971f89ad56f571aadd496f6487e80cc88bb2b5a1c6bcfed825d09d18ca2310b2bfd6fdbe330f2760369d167a653d26bef8
3eb648df01 Add constants to `InputWeightPrediction` (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
There are several common spends in Bitcoin that have known input weight predictions. It can be useful to have these as constants, so this change adds them. However, this only adds native segwit ones as the others are slowly fading away and might clutter the API.
If anyone wants other constants, please write them for me, their value is not that great to me so I'm not motivated to figure out the correct numbers. :)
This would be nice to add to 0.30 since it's small and easy but not critical.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 3eb648df01
tcharding:
ACK 3eb648df01
sanket1729:
ACK 3eb648df01
Tree-SHA512: 51d2cd2ecef7e6b79f9d4b52319e34b908fe8b5a337551dc2088994feeafc9c3ca87884c3db8369f8bd002947d6d14b373f08ef1419db282713206ed6f1b309a
There are several common spends in Bitcoin that have known input weight
predictions. It can be useful to have these as constants, so this change
adds them. However, this only adds native segwit ones as the others are
slowly fading away and might clutter the API.
Various formatting issues have crept into the codebase because we do not
run the formatter in CI.
In preparation for enabling formatting checks in CI run `cargo +nightly
fmt` to fix current formatting issues. No changes other than those
create by the formatter.
74022baa44 Rename ScriptLeaf to LeafNode (sanket1729)
289dc1e7f5 Remove serde for taprootspendinfo (sanket1729)
a397ab0c19 Remove serde for ScriptLeaf (sanket1729)
9affda3012 Introduce Hidden leaves in ScriptLeaves (sanket1729)
22bc39a143 Fix serde for TaprootMerkleBranch (sanket1729)
38ed9bdf49 MOVE ONLY: Move TapTree to taproot module (sanket1729)
Pull request description:
This PR changes/removes the serde implementation for the following types
- TaprootSpendInfo: Removed. This data structure contains derived information for taproot spending that cannot be validated easily. To elaborate, `TaprootSpendInfo` is constructed from a tree, but loses information about the tree structure and maintains handy information like `script_control_block_map`, cached tweaked key, Merkle root etc.
- TaprootBuillder: Removed. Hard to implement and not very useful.
- TapTree: Modified to check invariants.
- NodeInfo: Now implements serde with support for Hidden nodes
- ScriptLeaf: Removed serde. Users should not directly construct this. This is just an output iterator item of `TapTree::script_leaves()`
Data structure changes:
- Introduced `LeafNode`: Supports Hidden leaves. Has serde implemented
- Cleanly separate `TapTree` and `NodeInfo`: `TapTree` is a full BIP370 compatible tree with no hidden nodes. `NodeInfo` is a tree that can potentially contain hidden leaves.
- Added `NodeInfo::leaf_nodes`: Iterator that iterates over known and hidden leaves of `NodeInfo`.
- Updated `TapTree::script_leaves`: Iterator that is guaranteed to output known leaves.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 74022baa44
apoelstra:
ACK 74022baa44
Tree-SHA512: 919ea5bf60dc0cd8431301c1b744b046d1d781b3bed302b83a600cfa644216b6c682752795d463646b2723ac8661879284f557862a67e4572fd965fcf3dc194d
b0b0cdb46c Improve the public API for Feerate and Weight (yancy)
Pull request description:
Small nit for https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/1627/ to re-export `Weight` and `FeeRate` to shorten the use path.
```
use bitcoin::Weight;
use bitcoin::FeeRate;
````
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK b0b0cdb46c
Kixunil:
ACK b0b0cdb46c
apoelstra:
ACK b0b0cdb46c
Tree-SHA512: 81e508c980c4f37e3791d26616459608dd60e5a6255ef28b3a049c1d27281b2853b92474d42f10031254c8c46878adf666eb709826aa4ffde1b4b3542451e080
73e876ffd4 Include address in Error::NetworkValidation (Subhradeep Chakraborty)
Pull request description:
Fixes: #1677
## Change
In `bitcoin/src/address.rs`, a new field `address` is added to the enum variant `Error::NetworkValidation`. Also, the implementation of `Display` trait for `Error` is updated to print the `address` field.
However, to print the `address` through `Display`, either the reference is needed or `Address` and `Payload` both need to derive the `Copy` trait. Since I am little new to both the rust-bitcoin codebase and rust itself, I am confused about choosing between the two and have moved with the first one. Would appreciate any feedback on this.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 73e876ffd4
tcharding:
ACK 73e876ffd4
apoelstra:
ACK 73e876ffd4
Tree-SHA512: dd53b8648bccc8372c829e56817402fb02a9d51d1dffc854f24e68814bbefe7ea777f67aefb0d170762dbf6cdd50bd3ec55af325a1ffc21b1241d1df5531cd24
Implementing this for spendinfo is really complicated because it
contains some cached data without retaining the components that are used
to compute them.
Users should serde the 1) NodeInfo and 2) internal key and reconstruct
TaprootSpendInfo from it.
This was incorrect and not needed. Users should not be able to create
only tree leaves directly without going through the tree construction in
rust-bitcoin
Cleanly separate `TapTree` and `NodeInfo`. Fix serde not respecting
invariants for several data structures
Repurpose some tests from removed taproot builder for taptree
42b07586ac Improve the public API (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
We created the `crypto` crate as a container for cryptography modules with the idea that it may be split out into a separate crate. There is no reason for users of the lib to know about this module. Also, we have two `taproot` modules, one in `crypto` and one at the crate root, this makes for un-ergonomic usage of the lib.
Improve the public API by doing:
- Make the `crypto` module private (`pub(crate)`).
- Re-export `crypto::taproot::Signature` (and `Error`) from `crate::taproot`
Fix: #1668
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 42b07586ac
Kixunil:
ACK 42b07586ac
Tree-SHA512: 5713b98b2a48d2776cdd6ca2c0e798d6e2df604d780e5182bd770fb2df807cf1f65bc24663ee6f7734fc1e0c80494c5a87dc60e44c83acefcffec7f059203a47
We created the `crypto` crate as a container for cryptography modules
with the idea that it may be split out into a separate crate. There is
no reason for users of the lib to know about this module. Also, we have
two `taproot` modules, one in `crypto` and one at the crate root, this
makes for un-ergonomic usage of the lib.
Improve the public API by doing:
- Make the `crypto` module private (`pub(crate)`).
- Re-export `crypto::taproot::Signature` (and `Error`) from
`crate::taproot`
7d1645aea0 Add constant for coinbase maturity (benthecarman)
Pull request description:
Not sure if this is the best place to put this but it is nice to have a constant for this instead of having other libraries make their own (ie https://github.com/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning/pull/1924#pullrequestreview-1222807626)
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 7d1645aea0
apoelstra:
ACK 7d1645aea0
Tree-SHA512: 5ac2a3359cadd303158c66ba45db8f4bf8cc80b6c19604262999ff361fd0bd98e2a4851c57da1962cb5c74f5789a85c8b3861f1742706a60ce1fbc57c3c200cc
56569b32ef Add utils to convert ChainHash to a Network (benthecarman)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 56569b32ef
tcharding:
ACK 56569b32ef
Tree-SHA512: a489fcb1c1208db4271076d88288658988a63209e56e7433bde82d7d5719450433348fcc3cb6aae59ffa6ed8aff510d6b031c6899d5cf64c503a53b2d4c692b8
161273b209 Re-name hash inner/byte methods (Tobin C. Harding)
324b6f264b Use `into` for hash argument (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Currently we have an associated type on hash types `Inner` with accompanying methods `into_inner`, `from_inner`, `as_inner`. Also, we provide a way to create new wrapped hash types. The use of 'inner' becomes ambiguous with the addition of wrapped types because the inner could be the inner hash type or the `Inner` byte array of the inner wrapped hash type.
In an effort to make the API more clear and uniform do the following:
- Rename `Inner` -> `Bytes`
- Rename `*_inner` -> `*_byte_array`
- Rename the inner hash to/from methods to `*_raw_hash`
Correct method prefix `into_` -> `to_` because theses methods convert owned `Copy` types.
Add the trait Bound `Copy` to the `Bytes` type because we rely on this trait bound for the conversion methods to be correctly named according to convention.
Because of the dependency hole created by `secp256k1` this patch changes the secp dependency to a git tag dependency that includes changes to the hashes calls required so that we can get green lights on CI in this repo.
Fix: #1554
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 161273b209
apoelstra:
ACK 161273b209
Tree-SHA512: b51b851a1855e6a26a7ef8ccb9f554723d4cc39b368812703587a50e81e7ab49714a81696af0be743b947f09e1fca227a5331b6735912c5b0d5cd0178905f006
a4b5fb4002 Fix docs for UnknownMagic to be accurate (benthecarman)
Pull request description:
I assume the old docs are a copy-paste error, strings are not involved when this error is encountered.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK a4b5fb4002
apoelstra:
ACK a4b5fb4002
Tree-SHA512: b2b71f81be8a0d979b15471e7262e01284443e05626b26a19236fd25581700d9e37409576a4b73d5bb537c49ae83a4b7d40f0888dff078b07bd7550026cd778a
76c4c647cf Reexport `Magic` (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
Writing `network::Magic` is more natural and less annoying than `network::constants::Magic`, so this change reexports it.
Closes#1667
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 76c4c647cf
tcharding:
ACK 76c4c647cf
Tree-SHA512: 1d85372ecd9723c0871faa4552ba5f93a3c95d0b213fa8aace398949f97157cdfde164bbcb2c35bae4c61ae0185e3fbdb854714cde0849c1afaf90e4e8ec223f
Currently we have an associated type on hash types `Inner` with
accompanying methods `into_inner`, `from_inner`, `as_inner`. Also, we
provide a way to create new wrapped hash types. The use of 'inner'
becomes ambiguous with the addition of wrapped types because the inner
could be the inner hash type or the `Inner` byte array of the inner
wrapped hash type.
In an effort to make the API more clear and uniform do the following:
- Rename `Inner` -> `Bytes`
- Rename `*_inner` -> `*_byte_array`
- Rename the inner hash to/from methods to `*_raw_hash`
Correct method prefix `into_` -> `to_` because theses methods convert
owned `Copy` types.
Add the trait Bound `Copy` to the `Bytes` type because we rely on this
trait bound for the conversion methods to be correctly named according
to convention.
Because of the dependency hole created by `secp256k1` this patch changes
the secp dependency to a git tag dependency that includes changes to the
hashes calls required so that we can get green lights on CI in this
repo.
090dad770f Improve string parsing (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Currently we implement string parsing for height/time from the `absolute` module but not the `relative` module.
Improve the macros used to implement string parsing and use the new versions to implement string parsing for the height and time types in `relative`.
Done while reviewing data structures in relation to `serde`.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 090dad770f
Kixunil:
ACK 090dad770f
Tree-SHA512: bfa88efbaf5dc35755eb46df373a08e223f112860e8a65f58db9fdd77e2c01dc9377da735b33ef58940004fe5fe11690ac09be19591fded2c9fd04cd7d2bdf73
d71c31c235 Create Address::matches_script_pubkey method (hashmap)
Pull request description:
to check if an address creates a particular script without allocating.
fixesrust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin#1604
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK d71c31c235
apoelstra:
ACK d71c31c235
Tree-SHA512: cb60a53ae2be7c47dcd27415c883a73c81d57cbbf0bc92eaf76243d79d9c8e2c2efe91bef65a7e67ed26fec376f11325709ff27025d054813b1907ea2bf4961c
06f1f027ab Make `hash_newtype` evocative of the output (Martin Habovstiak)
b018f3e90b Remove the `$len` argument from `hash_newtype` (Martin Habovstiak)
752817e20d Stop using `$len` in `hash_newtype` (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
The API guidelines say macro input should be evocative of the output.
`hash_newtype` didn't have this property.
This change makes it look exactly like the resulting struct, `$len`
parameter was removed since it's not needed, reversing is controlled
using an attribute. The macro is also better documented and ready to be
extended in the future.
The tagged SHA256 newtype is not yet modified because it has a more
complicated input parameters.
Closes#1648
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 06f1f027ab
Tree-SHA512: 9762db1eca9cd749980e5d68ca286f6c926620295a602f62365f199c7b333334b976db25ba25c64e56403cd1ba046b21b99e1c73cc528ad95612ef8901f216e5
438ee45691 Show cache construction in rustdoc (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
To make it more clear what the cache is show the cache construction line in rustdoc.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 438ee45691
Kixunil:
ACK 438ee45691
Tree-SHA512: d6da6bad57fddf9e2f4bcfb7c9b87df38bf4b2bb914e92e52d5ae8afa3405a9793536d7164223021ab6d183ddde732cf6889370834e36f37bae470127b0271fa
The API guidelines say macro input should be evocative of the output.
`hash_newtype` didn't have this property.
This change makes it look exactly like the resulting struct, `$len`
parameter was removed since it's not needed, reversing is controlled
using an attribute. The macro is also better documented and ready to be
extended in the future.
The tagged SHA256 newtype is not yet modified because it has a more
complicated input parameters.
Closes#1648
It may not be obvious why the condition in `push_bytes` module checks
for negation of 16 and 32 bit architectures rather than 64 bit. This
adds a comment about it being conservative.
6fb2d12373 Get rid of BadFormat error (hashmap)
Pull request description:
add additional variants instead.
as discussed in https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/1365
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 6fb2d12373
apoelstra:
ACK 6fb2d12373
Tree-SHA512: 2cf9146670c372a3a482448f84a30943cd2ff2fa4e724075d67a52dba5ac0ad38f99ca2af3dd3494e13584653f2b23e913e6421328d40be52e868a107fffe03b
"schnorr" is a dirty word; the current `schnorr` module defines a
`Signature` that includes a sighash type, this sighash type is a bitcoin
specific construct related to taproot. Therefore the `Signature` is
better named `taproot::Signature`. Note also that the usage of `schnorr`
in `secp256k1` is probably justified because the
`secp256::schnorr::Signature` is just doing the crypto.
While we are at it, update docs and error messages to use "taproot"
instead of "schnorr". Also change function names and identifiers that
use "schnorr".
Currently we have `TapSighash` that is used for taproot sighashes but
for non-taproot sighashes we use `hash_types::Sighash`. We can improve
the API by creating a `LegacySighash`, and `SegwitV0Sighash`.
Copy the original `Sighash` macro calls to create the two new types in
the `sighash` module.
While we are at it, put the `TapSighash` and `TapSighashTag` into the
`sighash` module also.
There is never any use for the `sighash` module unless one is signing,
which requires the `crypto` module. The `sighash` module should
therefore live in the `crypto` module. This is not an API breaking
change because we reexport it at the crate root.
`Signature` only supported serialization into `Vec` which required a
heap allocation as well as prevented statically proving maximum length.
Adding a specialized type that holds a byte array and size solves this.
The solution is very similar to `secp256k1::ecdsa::SerializedSignature`.
The difference is that serialized signature in this crate contains
sighash bytes flag while in `secp256k1` it doesn't.
Script parsing is composed of several functions which implicitly rely on
various properties. Adding a type that restricts the valid values makes
local review easier.
So far we deserialized hex into `Vec<u8>` at run time. This was mainly
in tests where it had negligible performance cost. However moving the
computation to compile time has a few benefits: it allows proving the
length of the decoded bytes and identifies potential typos before the
code goes through LLVM and other compilation machinery which makes
feedback faster.
This change uses the `hex_lit` crate to move computation to compile
time. It is implemented as `const` declarative macro which doesn't blow
up compilation time.
a121e19e94 hashes: Implement AsRef for fixed size arrays (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Implement `AsRef<[u8; X]>` for hash types including wrapped hash types. Doing so means at times the compiler can no longer infer the type because we have `AsRef<[u8]` implemented also but we can use `into_inner` and `as_inner` to get the inner array if needed.
Fix: #1462
## Note
This touches code that will likely be changed by #1577 and when we do #1491 but I believe its a step forward.
ACKs for top commit:
arturomf94:
ACK [`a121e19`](a121e19e94)
apoelstra:
ACK a121e19e94
Kixunil:
ACK a121e19e94
Tree-SHA512: 257c44826c7649db25bb3a6f023f68b2f17b70c546a056afad044bc8a16bf61f654c3846222505aaf5e6f9a0ad1d2113272d61317b407d0ac83702e41060a1ee
c3cc9e52ab Fix absolute lock time examples and tests (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
An absolute lock time of 100 is nonsensical because we are well past block 100. This value was used because it makes sense for _relative_ locktimes but for absolute lock times it makes the examples and tests slightly confusing.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK c3cc9e52ab
Kixunil:
ACK c3cc9e52ab
Tree-SHA512: f490ef111bce0989c4ce8300c507c21b454448af4a91b9ef7a2fc05407411ca8721c9caa3dd1f0e8c0c133c4892c5c512f2d881af2cc67ae843d87eacae76ef1
4a03e2e721 psbt: Remove unused error variant (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Remove an unused error variant for PSBT code (API breaking because the error type is public).
Woops, somehow I managed to get what was patch 1 of this series merged yesterday, I thought I left it out. Anyways, this is just the remove unused error variant now. No changes to that patch from previous versions of the PR.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 4a03e2e721
Kixunil:
ACK 4a03e2e721
Tree-SHA512: 228c661b97c6656db5a2bcc9ceb494ea485363b7f7262a97c677ee1639b5209c92ec3715ff48fdb108c95c828bfc83b6c475aa66f0ce8c5b0f286bfa7cc19554
An absolute lock time of 100 is nonsensical because we are well past
block 100. This value was used because it makes sense for _relative_
locktimes but for absolute lock times it makes the examples and tests
slightly confusing.
dd316e4d14 pow: Remove Mul/Div by arbitrary integer types (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
When we added `Target` and `Work` types we implemented multiplication and division by anything `Into<u64>`, this is not typically done in the Rust stdlib and also is semantically incorrect for the types.
Remove `Mul` and `Div` impls from `Target` and `Work`. Also remove `Mul<T>` for `T: Into<u64>` from the private `U256` type.
Fix#1632
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK dd316e4d14
Kixunil:
ACK dd316e4d14
Tree-SHA512: ede53555844adab321ff344535b7b8bab3c5c73855823dfc3ad728b077ae199451b7e22a1d203ef73a076073b7f0cbf9637cefa5fe82fc78ab454d02fa0b62b9
When we added `Target` and `Work` types we implemented multiplication
and division by anything `Into<u64>`, this is not typically done in the
Rust stdlib and also is semantically incorrect for the types.
Remove `Mul` and `Div` impls from `Target` and `Work`. Also remove
`Mul<T>` for `T: Into<u64>` from the private `U256` type.
kshitjj
Martin Habovstiak
Andrew Poelstra
Wilmer Paulino
yancy
Tobin C. Harding
Riccardo Casatta
Peter Todd
The rustfmt Tyranny
Steven Roose
Sergi Delgado Segura
Harshil Jani
junderw
Salvatore Ingala
Subhradeep Chakraborty
sanket1729
benthecarman
hashmap
Lorenzo Maturano