31571cafbd util::amount: Make from_sat constructor constant (Steven Roose)
Pull request description:
Currently unmergable because of MSRV but I heard talk about bumping it, so once it's bumped, this is a very much needed change :)
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 31571cafbd
apoelstra:
ACK 31571cafbd
Tree-SHA512: f254eb10a4349d890e29ea5fae77536429c7e731362cf2edcf2fe98ec9cbf2d8bbf65f98dfc8f0b80bac89960de688005d066a116d6cb62cca1efa9c1151f2ae
7307363c2e Use qualified path instead of alias (Tobin C. Harding)
80e0fb7673 Remove unnecessary 'as' statement (Tobin C. Harding)
21e1b9dbbd Use secp256k1 qualified path instead of underscore (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Three trivial clean ups of import aliases.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 7307363c2e
sanket1729:
ACK 7307363c2e. These are clean improvements
Kixunil:
ACK 7307363c2e
Tree-SHA512: f6ed3ede11d2803dbcb4584f11632fc47d28e525b5bf4de7794d400117f2d7c9ffce5bdff274877a63a519d5799bba2224fc39105d623da4bccad863005e171f
f92854a805 Add PSBT alias (Tobin Harding)
Pull request description:
Programmers are inherently lazy and for good reason. I'm yet to see
anyone write `PartiallySignedTransaction` in code that uses
`rust-bitcoin`, its too obvious to add a type alias for PSBTs, let's
just do it ourselves to save everyone else having to do so.
Add public type alias `Psbt` for `PartiallySignedTransaction`.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK f92854a805
sanket1729:
ACK f92854a805
Tree-SHA512: 1f56ac236d34a89bbb557ada147f05d8a8ce961dad3ad921f10f26c597b91ecc8e15070f8825774745e5333ba5282962830a3cc0c53b93f147be93ab566b1b9e
c97589f8de Fix TapTree derserialization (sanket1729)
Pull request description:
Trees should only be serialized if both of the following conditions
hold:
1) Tree is complete binary tree(is_finalized)
2) Tree does not have any hidden nodes
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK c97589f8de
apoelstra:
ACK c97589f8de
Tree-SHA512: 33d16f2d532cb24acba4ab847d493e550f7b279567678f3f2cd7e4161dea8b720a0e35be32b6c506e467c3526a29042aad8f4b5f45133b9a32028d4ee6a48f8e
7969b7a43e Make TaprooBuilder::finalize able to return keyspend only (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
JeremyRubin:
> ACK 7969b7a
sanket1729:
ACK 7969b7a43e
apoelstra:
ACK 7969b7a43e
Tree-SHA512: 26d0b730590f610a858061394faafaa74b13dd353f34ccf1c6166d0cbb62937010eed5661a887f7bea4f983ac9eab8cdca10a5fe7bd74f2dd5701a7782cbac64
In the future, TapTree may iterate over different node types, and that's why it does not have `iter()` function; using instead `script_leafs`. Thus, we should not have IntoIterator implementation as well
Previously used depth and script tuple missed information about the leaf version.
All three comprises already existing type `LeafInfo` which was made public in
previous commits.
Programmers are inherently lazy and for good reason. I'm yet to see
anyone write `PartiallySignedTransaction` in code that uses
`rust-bitcoin`, its too obvious to add a type alias for PSBTs, let's
just do it ourselves to save everyone else having to do so.
Add public type alias `Psbt` for `PartiallySignedTransaction`.
Trees should only be serialized if both of the following conditions
hold:
1) Tree is complete binary tree(is_finalized)
2) Tree does not have any hidden nodes
c036b0db6f Unit test for failing TapTree on builder containing hidden nodes. (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
77715311cf Prevent TapTree from hidden parts (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
b0f3992db1 Rename TaprootBuilder::is_complete into is_finalized (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
efa800fb1f Make TapTree::from_inner return a proper error type (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
e24c6e23e3 TapTree serialization roundtrip unit test (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
56adfa4527 TaprootBuilder::has_hidden_nodes method (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
e69701e089 Rename taproot `*_hidden` API into `*_hidden_nodes` (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
6add0dd9dc Track information about hidden leaves in taproot NodeInfo (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
Pull request description:
Closes#928
ACKs for top commit:
sanket1729:
ACK c036b0db6f. Reviewed the range diff
apoelstra:
ACK c036b0db6f
Tree-SHA512: 3a8193e6d6dd985da30a2094d1111471b5971f422525870003b77b6ac47cd4ad6e718d46a6d86bbb5e92e5253ac53804badf67edd98bbccbdc11e6383c675663
46c34b3fb7 Fix code comments referring to sighash (Tobin Harding)
8f36c3979c Use sighash not sig_hash in identifiers (Tobin Harding)
c3a167b96b Rename SigHash -> Sighash (Tobin Harding)
52b711c084 Rename InvalidSigHashType -> InvalidSighashType (Tobin Harding)
b84f25584e Rename SigHashCache -> SighashCache (Tobin Harding)
e37652578b Rename PsbtSigHashType -> PsbtSighashType (Tobin Harding)
c19ec339ef Rename NonStandardSigHashType -> NonStandardSighashType (Tobin Harding)
130e27349e Rename SigHashTypeParseError -> SighashTypeParseError (Tobin Harding)
6caba2ed24 Rename SchnorrSigHashType -> SchnorrSighashType (Tobin Harding)
5522454583 Rename EcdsaSigHashType -> EcdsaSighashType (Tobin Harding)
Pull request description:
Our usage of `SigHash` implies that 'sighash' is _two_ words; 'sighash' is a well known word in the Bitcoin ecosystem it should appear in identifiers as `Sighash`.
Change various types, variants, and code comments to use sighash as a single word.
- Patches 1-8 are code changes `s/SigHash/Sighash/g`
- Patch 9 is code changes `s/sig_hash/sighash/g`
- Patch 11 is docs fixes
Fixes: #911
## Note to reviewers
I've been particularly pedantic with the patch separation because we are so close to release.
Done as separate patches to make review easier if review is to be done by reading the diffs. Perhaps at least one person could verify this PR programmatically by doing
- Reset the last 2 patches (those are easy to do manually)
- Check out master
- Do `s/SigHash/Sighash/g` on all source files (bash function below)
- Use `git diff branchA..branchB` to verify
The difference between the two branches should only include comment lines (last three patches) and these seven instances of `SigHash:
```
CHANGELOG.md:82:- [Add FromStr/Display implementation for SigHashType](a4a7035a94)
CHANGELOG.md:93:- [Introduce `SigHashCache` structure](https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/390) to replace `SighashComponents` and support all sighash modes
CHANGELOG.md:121: - `SigHash`
src/blockdata/transaction.rs:1190: "SigHash_None",
src/blockdata/transaction.rs:1191: "SigHash_NONE",
src/util/sighash.rs:1175: "SigHash_None",
src/util/sighash.rs:1176: "SigHash_NONE",
```
In case its useful, the shell function I used to do these changes is:
```bash
function search-and-replace() {
if (($# != 2))
then
echo "Usage: $0 <this> <that>"
return
fi
local this="$1"
local that="$2"
# For all files containing $this, replace $this with $that.
for file in $(git grep -l "$this")
do
perl -pi -e "s/$this/$that/g" "$file"
done
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
dr-orlovsky:
ACK 46c34b3fb7
apoelstra:
ACK 46c34b3fb7
Tree-SHA512: fe7e25e9cfb5155e4921de5ac185dbf9f4ca0770846d7892f6968b44fc5431f3f1a183380107449e90f7ea662094c60b118dc0468230384e8f9a8ef98d5ee0a0
da731c4825 Add further description to the NodeInfo struct (Tobin Harding)
492ccebd99 Use links for error types (Tobin Harding)
3e05887579 Use 'the' to improve sentence (Tobin Harding)
Pull request description:
See to nits from review of https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/912
Three minor patches to the `taproot` module docs.
CC @dr-orlovsky
ACKs for top commit:
dr-orlovsky:
ACK da731c4825
sanket1729:
ACK da731c4825
Tree-SHA512: 17a27a19c88f9baa8127023b2ee30fc2259cb0058a92dc9d8ae595e9e02ccb047fefcba7548ff7900fffa7bc6853447183e80660b8756d90d055ab8aa96ae938
Recently we added a bunch of additional sighash types, some of the code
comments became stale. Use the non-specific term 'sighash type' instead
of a particular sighash identifier in comments to make the comments more
applicable.
Recently we update all types and docs to use `Sighash` instead of
`SigHash` because 'sighash' is a single word. We should apply the same
logic to functions and variable names.
Do not use an underscore in the identifier 'sighash'.
Our usage of `SigHash` implies that 'sighash' is _two_ words; 'sighash'
is a well known word in the Bitcoin ecosystem it should appear in
identifiers as `Sighash`.
Rename the `SigHash` type to `Sighash`.
Our usage of `SigHash` implies that 'sighash' is _two_ words; 'sighash'
is a well known word in the Bitcoin ecosystem it should appear in
identifiers as `Sighash`.
Rename the `InvalidSigHashType` variant to `InvalidSighashType`.
Our usage of `SigHash` implies that 'sighash' is _two_ words; 'sighash'
is a well known word in the Bitcoin ecosystem it should appear in
identifiers as `Sighash`.
Rename `SigHashCache` to `SighashCache`.
Our usage of `SigHash` implies that 'sighash' is _two_ words; 'sighash'
is a well known word in the Bitcoin ecosystem it should appear in
identifiers as `Sighash`.
Rename `PsbtSigHashType` to `PsbtSighashType`.
Our usage of `SigHash` implies that 'sighash' is _two_ words; 'sighash'
is a well known word in the Bitcoin ecosystem it should appear in
identifiers as `Sighash`.
Rename the `NonStandardSigHashType` type and error variant to
`NonStandardSighashType`.
Our usage of `SigHash` implies that 'sighash' is _two_ words; 'sighash'
is a well known word in the Bitcoin ecosystem it should appear in
identifiers as `Sighash`.
Rename `SigHashTypeParseError` to `SighashTypeParseError`.
Our usage of `SigHash` implies that 'sighash' is _two_ words; 'sighash'
is a well known word in the Bitcoin ecosystem it should appear in
identifiers as `Sighash`.
Rename `SchnorrSigHashType` to `SchnorrSighashType`.
Our usage of `SigHash` implies that 'sighash' is _two_ words; 'sighash'
is a well known word in the Bitcoin ecosystem it should appear in
identifiers as `Sighash`.
Rename `EcdsaSigHashType` to `EcdsaSighashType`.
c25eddd187 Remove unnecessary documentation (Tobin Harding)
8631474f08 Improve docs in taproot module (Tobin Harding)
Pull request description:
I should have done this PR a month ago, my bad. This one is kind of important IMO because we are going to have so many people looking at this part of the code soon as we release.
As has been done in other places in the codebase; improve the docs in the `taproot` module by doing:
- Use full sentences (capital letters + full stops)
- Use back ticks and links for types where appropriate
- Fix grammar
- Fix stale docs
- Use third person for describing functions
- Use 100 character line width
- Use markdown sections (`# Examples`, `# Returns`) where appropriate
- Separate brief heading from extended description when appropriate
- Use `///` for all functions/types (both private and public)
I also did:
- Build the docs and check all the links
- Read all the built docs, check for sanity and pretty-ness
Its all in one patch, I couldn't really tease it apart. I can try a bit harder if it proves too annoying to review.
ACKs for top commit:
sanket1729:
ACK c25eddd187
dr-orlovsky:
ACK c25eddd187
apoelstra:
ACK c25eddd187
Tree-SHA512: 72f35bf8779392060388db985df5abc42a89796eaad1eafd08ea50b635d469fbd07a53ff253cdf27ad4d4baed7d37cec6ea1da1aece3672b9447f87181e218f8
We deprecated the `bip143::SigHashCache` in
```
commit 53d0e176d3
Author: <elided>
Date: Fri Jul 16 10:44:18 2021 +0200
Deprecate bip143::SigHashCache in favor of sighash::SigHashCache
...
```
This means these changes are unreleased so the deprecated since version
should be the upcoming 0.28 release.
As has been done in other places in the codebase; improve the docs in
the `taproot` module by doing:
- Use full sentences (capital letters + full stops)
- Use back ticks and links for types where appropriate
- Fix grammar
- Fix stale docs
- Use third person for describing functions
- Use 100 character line width
- Use markdown sections (`# Examples`, `# Returns`) where appropriate
- Separate brief heading from extended description when appropriate
- Use `///` for all functions/types (both private and public)
I also did:
- Build the docs and check all the links
- Read all the built docs, check for sanity and pretty-ness
992857ad0a PsbtSighashType unit tests (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
5be1cdb8c7 PsbtSigHashType Display and FromStr implementation (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
7cdcdaad6c Support SIGHASH_RESERVED in SchnorrSigHashType::from_u8 (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
Pull request description:
The newly introduced `PsbtSigHashType` uses very different serde formatting from previously used `EcdsaSigHashType`; for instance it does not output human-readable sighash. This is especially obvious when printing out PSBT as JSON/YAML object and is a breaking change from the `0.27`. Serde human-readable implementation requires `Display/FromStr`, which were also absent.
ACKs for top commit:
sanket1729:
ACK 992857ad0a. This is much better
apoelstra:
ACK 992857ad0a
Tree-SHA512: 71a46471f34b5481e4c1273a66846f59d61bfd98fcb65e7823ca216ff0dd419d81ca86d99c7aaf674fcfe2b1c010e899c8e74328f60a1e809015c663c453cc89
51fef76129 feat: Add Address.is_related_to_pubkey() (Andrew Ahlers)
Pull request description:
## Motivation
This is addressing the second half of this comment: https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/684#issuecomment-1012136845
> but would accept a PR (or two PRs) that returns Result<bool, UnsupportedAddress> and a method to check if a PublicKey is associated with an address.
(The first half was addressed [here](https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/819))
These changes will help build out and improve message signature verification. We don't necessarily need to add it to this crate but it allows for easy verification with something such as:
1. recovering a pubkey
2. checking if that pubkey relates to the given address
## Possible Improvements
- There is likely a better name than `is_related_to_secp256k1_key()`
- This could drop the `secp256k1` part of the name and take in a Pubkey enum that also supports Schnorr pubkeys and then this could be used for taproot addresses as well. This felt like a much larger change that will likely get turned down. Verifying taproot is simple enough and if absolutely desired, similar functions can be added for schnorr keys (tweaked and untweaked)
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 51fef76129 for merging after TR
apoelstra:
ACK 51fef76129
Tree-SHA512: c9ab8c0f101fb4c647713e7f500656617025d8741676e8eb8a3132009dde9937d50cf9ac3d8055feb14452324a292397e46639cbaca71cac77af4b06dc42d09d
208eb65f1b Make NodeInfo API public (sanket1729)
Pull request description:
Reported by @shesek. Users might find it convenient to manually construct the tree using `NodeInfo` API
```rust
let leaf1 = NodeInfo::from_leaf_with_ver();
let leaf2 = NodeInfo::from_leaf_with_ver();
let root = NodeInfo::combine(leaf1, leaf2);
let spend_info = TaprootSpendInfo::from_node_info(&secp, internal_key, root);
```
ACKs for top commit:
dr-orlovsky:
ACK 208eb65f1b
apoelstra:
ACK 208eb65f1b
Tree-SHA512: b5a6b26e0d4a637f7ad6e987976b31b00d3567feca85f1a0bf63aa03603aded0ddae6578b1cabc1056870a596b8cb1a83e4ef3f45802e03da80c3d58d9bab1f1
e27f8ff594 TapTree iterator implementation (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
Pull request description:
Implemented after @sanket1729 suggestion in https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/895#issuecomment-1074366108
Iterates all scripts present in TapTree in DFS order returning `(depth, script)` pairs.
I propose to have it as an RC fix since this functionality is really lacking and may be required for many wallets working with Taproot PSBT even outside of the scope where I originally needed it (OP_RETURN tweaks for TapTree described in #895)
ACKs for top commit:
sanket1729:
utACK e27f8ff594.
apoelstra:
ACK e27f8ff594
Tree-SHA512: b398e468a10534561297f22dba47e340391069734a41999edd85d726890752035053690a22014402879ea40b948160f00310f78771443d382c0bbaf0201dfbe5
It is possible, although not immediately obvious, that it is possible to
create a `PsbtSigHashType` with a non-standard value.
Add a unit test to show this and also catch any regressions if we
accidental change this logic.
Improve the `PsbtSigHashType` conversion methods by doing:
- Re-name `inner` -> `to_u32` as per Rust convention
- Add `from_u32` method
Note, we explicitly do _not_ use suffix 'consensus' because these
conversion methods make no guarantees about the validity of the
underlying `u32`.
The functions `from_u32_standard` and `from_u32_consensus` smell a bit
like hungarian notation. We can look at the method definition to see
that the methods accept `u32` arguments without mentioning that in the
method names.
Remove `_u32_` from the method names. This brings the `from_*` methods
in line with the `to_standard` method also.
Rust naming conventions stipulate that conversion methods from owned ->
owned for `Copy` types use the naming convention `to_`.
This change makes the function name objectively better, however it makes
no claims of being the 'best' name. We have had much discussion on using
`to_standard` vs `to_u32` but are unable to reach consensus.
35b682d495 Implement Display/FromStr for SchnorrSigHashType (Tobin Harding)
46c4164d67 Improve SigHashTypeParseError field (Tobin Harding)
c009210d4c Use full path for String in macro (Tobin Harding)
Pull request description:
Implement Display/FromStr for SchnorrSigHashType
We currently implement `Display` and `FromStr` on `EcdsaSigHashType` and use them in the `serde_string_impl` macro to implement ser/de.
Mirror this logic in `SchnorrSigHashType`.
Patch 1 and 2 are preparatory patches for patch 3.
## Notes to reviewers
This PR has some conflicts with https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/898 but is pushing in the same direction, I'm happy to let 898 go in first and rebase on top.
ACKs for top commit:
sanket1729:
ACK 35b682d495. Thanks, much easier to review now that the diff is small
dr-orlovsky:
ACK 35b682d495
Tree-SHA512: 481f192a3064ff39acf8904737dfb25b54ef128a37e0ca765ebb39138edac772d4f01ed10aa98ff185a8ed5668d64fa5d5957206b920ffe87950cafcf5a3b516
63e36fe6b4 Remove impl_index_newtype macro (Tobin Harding)
Pull request description:
This macro is no longer needed since we bumped MSRV to 1.29.
~We can implement `SliceIndex` to get the `Index` implementations.~
We can implement `core::ops::Index` directly since all the inner types implement `Index` already.
Original ~Idea shamelessly stolen from @elichai [in this comment](https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/352#issuecomment-560331856).~
New idea proposed by @Kixunil during review below. Thanks.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 63e36fe6b4
dr-orlovsky:
utACK 63e36fe6b4
sanket1729:
ACK 63e36fe6b4
Tree-SHA512: f7b4555c7fd9a2d458dcd53ec8caece0d12f3af77a10e850f35201bd7a580ba8fd7cb1d47a7f78ba6582e777dffa13416916ecacac6e0e874bdbb1c866132dc2
We currently implement `Display` and `FromStr` on `EcdsaSigHashType` and
use them in the `serde_string_impl` macro to implement ser/de.
Mirror this logic in `SchnorrSigHashType`.
The exact code formatting we use is not as important as uniformity.
Since we do not use tooling to control the formatting we have to be
vigilant ourselves. Recently I (Tobin) changed the way default type
parameters were formatted (arbitrarily but uniformly). Turns out I
picked the wrong way, there is already a convention as shown in the rust
documentation online (e.g. [1]).
Use 'conventional' spacing for default type parameters. Make the change
across the whole repository, found using
git grep '\<.* = .*\>'
[1] - https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch19-03-advanced-traits.html
This macro is no longer needed since we bumped MSRV to 1.29.
We can implement `core::ops::Index` directly since all the inner types
implement `Index` already.
This significatnly refactors the amount formatting code to make
formatting more configurable. The main addition is the
`amount::Display` type which is a builder that can configure
denomination or other things (possibly more in the future).
Further, this makes all representations of numbers minimal by default,
so should be documented as a possibly-breaking change.
Because of the effort to support all other `fmt::Formatter` options this
required practically complete rewrite of `fmt_satoshi_in`. As a
byproduct I took the opportunity of removing one allocation from there.
Closes#709
In this library we specifically do not use rustfmt and tend to favour
terse statements that do not use extra lines unnecessarily. In order to
help new devs understand the style modify code that seems to use an
unnecessary number of lines.
None of these changes should reduce the readability of the code.
This function uses neither "Block" nor "Visual" style (as defined by
`rustfmt`). This is unusual, code that is regular is less jarring to
read. We tent to use "Block" style for functions so elect to do that
here.
Our usage of `where` statements is not uniform, nor is it inline with
the typical layout suggested by `rustfmt`.
Make an effort to be more uniform with usage of `where` statements.
However, explicitly do _not_ do every usage since sometimes our usage
favours terseness (all on a single line).
We have a few instances of strange indentation:
- Incorrect number of characters
- Usage of neither "Block" style or "View" style (elect to use "Block")
Do various whitespace refactorings, of note:
- Use space around equals e.g., 'since = "blah"'
- Put return/break/continue on separate line
Whitespace only, no logic changes.
7f33fe6a9b Delete contract hash module (Tobin Harding)
Pull request description:
This module has been deprecated in commit 1ffdce9 in August 2020, it is safe to delete it now.
Fixes: #322
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 7f33fe6a9b
Kixunil:
ACK 7f33fe6a9b
dr-orlovsky:
ACK 7f33fe6a9b
Tree-SHA512: f218c8b0c09b14cd885cd7cf03c0a4623e5ead785decbc62a2f9610d438d5ea3efd2e2b47172a7608e33714996efa121707583d4257fa683dbfc9717988ceda6
e391ce9939 test: Add a test for incorrect message signature (Andrew Ahlers)
Pull request description:
In response to this comment: https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/819#discussion_r801477961
This should be straightforward. Let me know if there are any style issues. I tried to keep things similar to the existing test while cutting out any extra cruft to keep things small.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK e391ce9939
Kixunil:
ACK e391ce9939
dr-orlovsky:
ACK e391ce9939
Tree-SHA512: 47296a7e0b2f45d5e50f507727ae4360686730a386f37dedfd1360b8cdf4b9dd3ce3bb5d05ea630177379ce4109059b6924fa362396b984ebab0ed1754318627
Update our `rust-secp256k1` dependency to the latest version.
Requires doing:
- Add a new variant to `Error` for the case where parity of the internal
key is an invalid value (not 0 or 1).
- Use non-deprecated const
Changes the API from TweakedPublicKey to XonlyPublicKey. I believe we
introduced TweakedPublicKey to guard against creating address API. This
is confusing because when we want to verify control block we have to
call dangerous_assume_tweak.
This is in true in most cases that the key would be tweaked, but we only
want to guard in while creating a new address. If we want to verify
blocks, we should deal with native X-only-keys regardless of how they
were created
5e2449922d Separate merge logic out of Map trait (Tobin Harding)
Pull request description:
Recently we (*cough* Tobin) made the `Map` trait private and neglected
to add a public API for merging together two PSBTs. Doing so broke the
`psbt` module.
Add a public trait `Merge` and implement it for
`PartiallySignedTransaction` using the code currently in the `merge`
method of the now private `Map` trait.
Motivated by https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/841
ACKs for top commit:
JeremyRubin:
> ACK 5e24499
apoelstra:
ACK 5e2449922d
sanket1729:
ACK 5e2449922d. Also verified that the vectors are same of that of BIP174
Tree-SHA512: 79eefe93e870b61231b388aa28a95ee5c8ac06b68910f4ff324569512a79eafe5b86239fd45f54ca7a868cf59dc6301e45d1f046c039a64b2493a8ffcea659fd
c0d36efb8b Don't allow uncompressed public keys without prefix 0x04 (Noah Lanson)
Pull request description:
Was following #520 and through it was a quick fix that I could do:
#### Changes:
- If an uncompressed public key doesn't have prefix 0x04 in `PublicKey::from_slice()`, an error is returned.
<br>
I was wondering if `PublicKey::from_str()` should also enforce the same rules, however I have not incuded this in the PR.
Please let me know if any changes need to be made.
Thanks
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK c0d36efb8b
apoelstra:
ACK c0d36efb8b
sanket1729:
utACK c0d36efb8b. Not thrilled about the error message expecting len 66, when it can be both 66/130. But can live with it
Tree-SHA512: cfbcd569691c9a7f69ee775ec530605f42e988470a2ff9c28b4c881cec6b259053bb2288818e00b6f6b20316b1fb30fecc0b9a240ebbe7618f202ef6b5efeb9b
Recently we (*cough* Tobin) made the `Map` trait private and neglected
to add a public API for combining together two PSBTs. Doing so broke the
`psbt` module.
Pull the merge logic out of the `Map` trait and put it in methods on
each individual type (`Input`, `Output`, `PartiallySignedTransaction`).
Doing so allows for simplification of return types since combining
inputs/outputs never errors.
Use the term 'combine' instead of 'merge' since that is the term used in
BIP 174.
10fedfb3b4 Change Prevouts::All(&[TxOut]) to Prevouts::All(&[Borrow<T>]) (sanket1729)
Pull request description:
I believe this avoids some allocation of creating a vec of TxOut to
create a slice incase the data is already available in psbt/other
methods.
See #834
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 10fedfb3b4
Kixunil:
ACK 10fedfb3b4
Tree-SHA512: 20f69c626b38d6b3c03c8cb370cfad097bbf0bfefff9bb2379c8af3bc94e25d8cc45fc5d69488aeefad58a95470e8f30eb7b400349992a9ebd0d3a13870cba43
This avoids some allocation of creating a vec of TxOut to
create a slice incase the data is already available in psbt/other
methods. Facilitates creation of Prevouts from &[TxOut] as well as
&[&TxOut]
This changes the type of secp signature from secp256k1::Signature to
bitcoin::PublicKey. Psbt allows storing signatures for both compressed
as well as uncompressed keys. This bug was introduced in #591 while
trying to change the type of BIP32 keys from bitcoin::PublicKey to
secp256k1::PublicKey.
151173821b Use fn name to_ instead of into_ (Tobin Harding)
Pull request description:
Rust convention is to use `to_` for conversion methods that convert from
an owned type to an owned `Copy` type. `into_` is for owned to owned
non-`Copy` types.
Re-name conversion methods that use `into_` for `Copy` types to use
`to_`, no need to deprecate these ones because they are unreleased.
**Note to maintainers**
This is similar in concept to #798 but only touches new code introduced in this release. Has been labelled 'RC fix' for that reason. Please feel free to remove the label if you disagree.
From the docs: https://rust-lang.github.io/api-guidelines/naming.html
<h2><a class="header" href="https://rust-lang.github.io/api-guidelines/naming.html#ad-hoc-conversions-follow-as_-to_-into_-conventions-c-conv" id="ad-hoc-conversions-follow-as_-to_-into_-conventions-c-conv">Ad-hoc conversions follow <code>as_</code>, <code>to_</code>, <code>into_</code> conventions (C-CONV)</a></h2>
<p>Conversions should be provided as methods, with names prefixed as follows:</p>
Prefix | Cost | Ownership
-- | -- | --
as_ | Free | borrowed -> borrowed
to_ | Expensive | borrowed -> borrowed
| | | borrowed -> owned (non-Copy types)
| | | owned -> owned (Copy types)
into_ | Variable | owned -> owned (non-Copy types)
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 151173821b
apoelstra:
ACK 151173821b
sanket1729:
ACK 151173821b
Tree-SHA512: 4bb97e4fb78beda0fd1ec9482d24ef0f4ade6d3689f5c1bcf2208fa2df3195962522fa5d5ac700e6d4d5ff2096a20b2a0ad51784909a3c12405762aa08d1ced2
b138428df7 Re-export public map types from root level (Tobin Harding)
Pull request description:
We currently have the `map` module private but containing a bunch of types that are needed in the public API (specifically in a `PartiallySignedTransaction`).
To give access to them re-export the `util::psbt` module at the root level.
Found while testing `master` with `rust-miniscript`.
ACKs for top commit:
sanket1729:
utACK b138428df7
Kixunil:
ACK b138428df7
RCasatta:
ACK b138428df7
dr-orlovsky:
ACK b138428df7
Tree-SHA512: 36fc8595164c4975abdadb6c8149ef27686a2d681a1815379f91b1bd36f8a56ceaa7faed5979ba6869823684790721a16a0c41e662c6227a09cd0ba576a0a181
Rust convention is to use `to_` for conversion methods that convert from
an owned type to an owned `Copy` type. `into_` is for owned to owned
non-`Copy` types.
Re-name conversion methods that use `into_` for `Copy` types to use
`to_`, no need to deprecate these ones because they are unreleased.
We currently have the `map` module private but containing a bunch of
types that are needed in the public API (specifically in a
`PartiallySignedTransaction`).
Re-export the publicly required types to the `psbt` module and then
again at the root level of `rust-bitcoin` as we do for other types.
abe52f681b Cleanup/Dedup psbt (De)Serialization code (sanket1729)
fbd86dcf63 Update documentation of EcdsaSig::from_slice (sanket1729)
85009a7b50 Update documentation of from_u32_consensus (sanket1729)
0fed04e2d5 Change EcdsaSig hash type deser (sanket1729)
Pull request description:
Changes the parsing behavior in PSBT on non-standard sighash types to give an explicit error, rather than silently mangling the parsed value
ACKs for top commit:
dr-orlovsky:
ACK abe52f681b
apoelstra:
ACK abe52f681b
Kixunil:
ACK abe52f681b
Tree-SHA512: 1d5dbe3aa5885ca16649cf8ea05a7476e8dd977dd870b79358d97a3ce383bee93754d2b88163e7db3792cdc4b9cb867356409c8eea4e110877577ad196ba0786
dfd8924398 Remove insert_pair from Map trait (Tobin Harding)
ad75d5181f Make Map trait private to psbt module (Tobin Harding)
53225c0a6e Improve docs in map module (Tobin Harding)
92059c2841 Add full stops to rustdocs (Tobin Harding)
11c046b707 Refactor match arms (Tobin Harding)
e6af569490 Move imports to top of file (Tobin Harding)
Pull request description:
The `Map` method `insert_pair` is never called for `PartiallySignedTransaction`. Separate the method into its own trait (`Insert`) and delete dead code. The dead code contains the alleged bug in #576.
- Patch 1: Preparatory cleanup
- Patch 2: Preparatory refactor
- Patch 3 and 4: Improve docs in the module that this PR touches
- Patch 5: Make `Map` trait private to the `psbt` module
- ~Patch 6: Make `concensus_decode_global` method into a function~
- Patch ~7~ 6: Pull `insert_pair` method out of `Map` trait into newly create `Insert` trait
Resolves: https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/576
(Title of PR is `Make Map trait private` because that is the API break.)
ACKs for top commit:
dr-orlovsky:
ACK dfd8924398
apoelstra:
ACK dfd8924398
Tree-SHA512: 1a78294bc8a455552d93caf64db697f886345ba979f574abad55820415958fee1c2dd16945f4eafdbe542fa202cb7e08618aa137ec7ee22b3c9dac5df0328157
8a993e8a58 Properly deprecate util::ecdsa key re-exports (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
bcb8932ccf Re-org keys and ecdsa mods - pt.3 (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
d1c2213d3b Re-org keys and ecdsa mods - pt.2 (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
b9170162d5 Re-org keys and ecdsa mods - pt.1 (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
2d9de78725 Re-export all key types under `util::key`. Deprecate other exports. (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
Pull request description:
This PR tries to do a minimally-invazive separation of signature- and key-related types, previously mixed in a single `util::ecdsa` module.
Rationale: bitcoin key types are not specific for signature algorithm. See discussion at #588.
This PR became possible after we moved on new `secp256k1` version exposing `XonlyPublicKey` type, since now all key types may co-exist in a single module under different names
The PR goal is achieved through
- Renaming ecdsa mod into private ec module such that the code is not copied and diff size is small;
- Introducing dummy ecdsa mod back in the next commit and re-exporiting only signature types from internal `ec` mod in it;
- Re-exporting all key types under `key` module, removing previous depreciation message for bitcoin keys.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 8a993e8a58
sanket1729:
utACK 8a993e8a58
Tree-SHA512: 9f71edaa2cf4cdab4b239cb1d57576e2ba0fc3c2ec0ea19ae232005967b9400da6ded992b33d10b190ca617a66dca9b99be430bc5058a064f0be1489723c4a3a
The method implementation of `insert_pair` is currently not used for
`PartiallySignedTransaction`. Having an implementation available is
deceiving.
Delete the unused `insert_pair` code from
`PartiallySignedTransaction` (dead code). Make the `insert_pair` methods
from `Input` and `Output` be standalone functions.
The `Map` trait has been deemed confusing and not that useful to users
of the library, we still use it internally within the `psbt` module
though so make it visible only in `psbt` and `psbt::map`.
Improve the function rustdocs in the `psbt::map` module by:
- using third person tense as is idiomatic in the Rust ecosystem
- using rustdoc `///` not code comments `//` for methods
- Use `# Return` section for documenting return values
Done for this module only as part of a PR fixing code within this
module.
40f38b3edc enforce strict SI(treat capital of m, u, n, p as invalid) in parsing amount denomiation. add disallow_unknown_denomination test (KaFai Choi)
e80de8b1ee add nano and pico BTC to Donomination enum (KaFai Choi)
Pull request description:
Close [741](https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/741)
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 40f38b3edc
apoelstra:
ACK 40f38b3edc
dr-orlovsky:
Changing review to ACK 40f38b3edc since it was my misunderstanding and not a bug
Tree-SHA512: 4cc380b8e7403e37e7993e25848b25d74c610d4e9fe274526c613d4b3e2a9f6677c7df52310fc1cab6f1d629d9529ff9f5a2efa41d9e07eab62d0989780ae3a4
This commit tries to achieve separation of signature- and key-related types, previously mixed in a single ECDSA module.
Rationale: bitcoin key types are not specific for signature algorithm.
This is achieved through
- Remove key mod with its content moved to ecdsa mod
- Re-export keys under key module in util mod - to make git generate diff for the rename of ecdsa mod in the next commit correctly.
Tobin C. Harding
mcroad
violet360
Andrew Poelstra
sanket1729
Dr Maxim Orlovsky
Jeremy Rubin
Steven Roose
Martin Habovstiak
Andrew Ahlers
Rishabh Singhal
Noah Lanson
Riccardo Casatta
wim-web
KaFai Choi