Clippy emits:
error: written amount is not handled
This code is explicitly writing garbage to the writer, no need to handle
the number of bytes written.
Clippy emits:
warning: this expression creates a reference which is immediately
dereferenced by the compiler
As suggested, remove the additional reference.
07c75304d2 Refactor address byte swapping (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Refactor address byte swapping
When encoding a `network::Address` two of the fields are encoded
big-endian instead of little-endian as is done by `consensus_encode`. In
order to achieve this we have a helper function `addr_to_be` that swaps
the bytes. This function is miss-named because it is not converting to a
specific endian-ness (which implies different behaviour on machines with
different endian-ness) but is reversing the byte order irrespective of
the underlying architecture.
- Remove function `addr_to_be`
- Inline the endian-ness code when encoding an address
- Remove TODO and use `to_be_bytes` when encoding port
- Add a function for reading big-endian bytes `read_be_address`
- Use `read_be_address` when decoding `Address` and `Addrv2`
Refactor only, no logic changes. Code path is already covered by
unit tests.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 07c75304d2
Kixunil:
ACK 07c75304d2
Tree-SHA512: 186bc86512e264a7b306f3bc2e18d1619f3cd84fc54412148cfc2663e8d6e9616ea9e2fe19eafec72d76cc11367a9b39cac2b73210d9e43eb8f453bd253b33de
97a5bb1439 Implement std::error::source codebase wide (Tobin C. Harding)
0a9191b429 Add parenthesis around left hand side of companion (Tobin C. Harding)
7cf8af2f86 Put Error impl block below Display (Tobin C. Harding)
2384712364 Re-order Display match arms (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Now that we have MSRV of 1.41.1 we should use `source` instead of `cause`. Audit the whole codebase and implement `source` for _every_ error type we have.
The first three patches are preparatory cleanup, patch 3 is particularly shameful (adds parenthesis to make my editor work).
CC @Kixunil because he is championing the error stuff.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 97a5bb1439
Tree-SHA512: 46313a28929445f32e01e30ca3b0246b30bc9d5e43db5754d4b441e9c30d3e427efaf247100eb6b452f98beec5a4fcde1daba7943a772114aa34f78ab52cbc60
9896f27eae psbt: Improve documentation (Tobin C. Harding)
33a50831ce sighash: Improve documentation (Tobin Harding)
Pull request description:
Done while working on sighash and PSBT signing. Just the usual docs fixes. Note, does not do the whole `psbt` module just the file mentioned.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 9896f27eae
Tree-SHA512: 5fbfa258cdb216189922a49a42b7ab9fb78faeee72d82f8cb99a1b3d930d170074013e317b0e7af259a404ac4db93841b4d2b525e933c5e145da71e7522800fd
58f94bee9b Remove sha256t_hash_newtype macro (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Since commit `commit 275adc6c335a4326699cfbd444949e1725864ea1` on `bitcoin_hashes` we have the identical implementation of the macro `sha256t1_hash_newtype` in this crate and in `bitcoin_hashes`.
Remove the `sha256t_hash_newtype` macro from this crate in favour of the one in `bitcoin_hashes`.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 58f94bee9b
sanket1729:
ACK 58f94bee9b
Tree-SHA512: ec08fd25c1cca71a07ea61cb5838ce8962daae7cbb84d8beccc3d0d285439909721edd643292a8f3f6989e1c2c41fda9addfd5cdb063ef53ebc6ef646da79cf3
90b4f1cde8 Clear TapTreeIter clippy warning (Tobin C. Harding)
e6084a1af8 Improve documentation around EcdsaSig (Tobin Harding)
Pull request description:
Do a couple of trivial docs fixes, done during other work.
- Patch 1 improves docs on the `EcdsaSig` struct
- Patch 2 clears a clippy warning during docs build - no sure if the solution is the best available though
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
re-ACK 90b4f1cde8
sanket1729:
ACK 90b4f1cde8
Tree-SHA512: 0647dc2e6550938ccca658a9dddffba7175d5c4eb8cec0e165d3a7fa8f2b1dfb902e795aca77d96a6c31092baf64244fa1d7151a304134d3b1895619a2823338
7ca30b6aa8 Move Address::payload_as_bytes to Payload::as_bytes (Fredrik Meringdal)
525ea00e0f Make Address::get_payload_bytes public (Fredrik Meringdal)
Pull request description:
Hi, thanks for the amazing work on this crate.
I am trying to upgrade from v0.27 to v0.28, but unable to do so because the `Address::get_payload_bytes` was made private. My use-case is that I have a script hash address and an `Address` and need to compare the two, and in order to do so I need access to the payload bytes of `Address`.
I hope you will consider making this function public again 🙏
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 7ca30b6
tcharding:
ACK 7ca30b6aa8
sanket1729:
ACK 7ca30b6aa8. Sorry for the delay and congratz on your first time contribution
Tree-SHA512: 02af4565853d93506751ed7cb004f52cb5d8c7936067e06b3e237b448ccdf5716470448eeccbe211958e095b66bb37c7027800c0470c6988dc18d8bd5b48f459
Parenthesis are not needed around this expression but my editor is going
mad and cannot format the code without them. Since it does not hurt
readability add parenthesis around the expression.
When encoding a `network::Address` two of the fields are encoded
big-endian instead of little-endian as is done by `consensus_encode`. In
order to achieve this we have a helper function `addr_to_be` that swaps
the bytes. This function is miss-named because it is not converting to a
specific endian-ness (which implies different behaviour on machines with
different endian-ness) but is reversing the byte order irrespective of
the underlying architecture.
- Remove function `addr_to_be`
- Inline the endian-ness code when encoding an address
- Remove TODO and use `to_be_bytes` when encoding port
- Add a function for reading big-endian bytes `read_be_address`
- Use `read_be_address` when decoding `Address` and `Addrv2`
Refactor only, no logic changes. Code path is already covered by
unit tests.
The Lightning network defines a type called 'chain hash' that is used to
uniquely represent the various Bitcoin networks as a 32 byte hash value.
Chain hash is now being used by the DLC folks, as such it is useful to
have it implemented in rust-bitcoin.
One method of calculating a chain hash is by hashing the genesis block
for the respective network.
Add a `ChainHash` type that can be used to get the unique identifier of
each of the 4 Bitcoin networks we support. Add a method that returns
the chain hash for a network using the double sha256 of the genesis
block. Do so using hard coded consts and add unit
tests (regression/sanity) that show these hard code byte arrays match
the hash of the data we return for the genesis block for the respective
network.
The chain hash for the main Bitcoin network can be verified from LN
docs (BOLT 0), add a link to this document.
Since commit `commit 275adc6c335a4326699cfbd444949e1725864ea1` on
`bitcoin_hashes` we have the identical implementation of the macro
`sha256t1_hash_newtype` in this crate and in `bitcoin_hashes`.
Remove the `sha256t_hash_newtype` macro from this crate in favour of the
one in `bitcoin_hashes`.
Clippy emits warning:
public documentation for `script_leaves` links to private item `TapTreeIter`
I'm not exactly sure why this is but adding the generic type place
holder clears the warning.
Improve documentation in `psbt/mod.rs` by doing:
- Use full sentences (full stops and capitalisation)
- Use 100 line column width
- Use back ticks and links as appropriate
- Use `Errors` section
- Use third person tense to describe functions
Improve the rustdoc documentation in the `sighash` module by doing:
- Improve grammar
- Use full sentences (full stops and capitalisation)
- Use 100 line column width
- Use back ticks and links as appropriate
- Improve correctness of `SigHashCache::new` function
Use cargo to upgrade from edition 2015 to edition 2018.
cargo fix --edition
No manual changes made. The result of the command above is just to fix
all the use statements (add `crate::`) and fix the fully qualified path
formats i.e., `::Foo` -> `crate::Foo`.
We do this all over the place in rust-lightning, and its probably
the most common thing to do with a `Witness` so I figured I'd
upstream the util method to do this. It also avoids an allocation
compared to the naive approach of `SerializedSignature.to_vec()`
with two pushes, which is nice.
4f1200d629 Added `amount::Display` - configurable formatting (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
This significatnly refactors the formatting code to make formatting more
configurable. The main addition is the `Display` type which is a
builder that can configure denomination or other things (possibly more
in the future).
Further, this makes all representations of numbers minimal by default,
so should be documented as a possibly-breaking change.
Because of the effort to support all other `fmt::Formatter` options this
required practically complete rewrite of `fmt_satoshi_in`. As a
byproduct I took the opportunity of removing one allocation from there.
Closes#709
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 4f1200d629
dr-orlovsky:
ACK 4f1200d629
sanket1729:
ACK 4f1200d629
Tree-SHA512: 3fafdf63fd720fd4514e026e9d323ac45dfcd3d3a53a4943178b1e84e4cf7603cb6235ecd3989d46c4ae29453c4b0bb2f2a5996fbddf341cd3f68dc286062144
2c28d3b448 Fix handling of empty slice in Instructions (Martin Habovštiak)
e6ff754b73 Fix doc of take_slice_or_kill (Martin Habovštiak)
0ec6d96a7b Cleanup after `Instructions` refactoring (Martin Habovstiak)
bc763259fe Move repeated code to functions in script (Martin Habovstiak)
1f55edf718 Use iterator in `blockdata::script::Instructions` (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
This refactors `blockdata::script::Instructions` to use
`::core::slice::Iter<'a, u8>` instead of `&'a [u8]` to better express
the intention and to avoid some slicing mistakes. Similarly to a
previous change this uses a macro to deduplicate the common logic and
the new `read_uint_iter` internal function to automatically advance the
iterator.
Addresses:
https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/662#pullrequestreview-768320603
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 2c28d3b448
sanket1729:
ACK 2c28d3b448. I don't want to hold ACKs on minor things as they can be in a fixup later.
Tree-SHA512: 9dc770b9f7958efbd0df2cc2d3546e23deca5df2f94ea2c42b089df628f4b99f08032ca4aa8822caf6643a8892903e1bda41228b78c8519b90bcaa1255d9acc6
76fcf81474 Override default visit_byte_buf on Script (ass3rt)
add100c20d Removed reimplementations of default methods (ass3rt)
7db03f27e4 Disable Serde's default-features (ass3rt)
Pull request description:
With this patch, existing users of the `use-serde` feature will no longer be
compiling with `serde/std` enabled, but this allows dependent projects
to import serde and enable `serde/alloc` as required by some no-std targets.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 76fcf81474
tcharding:
ACK 76fcf81474
apoelstra:
ACK 76fcf81474
Tree-SHA512: 5748e64e1f91f19dbfbf32bead6e6d759e448e92ed0dab731b3059f6b37bd811fad6654edc8fbd113e3be17fefaf9fc4912145d6b61484ced0517712361ecfdc
7854bd7918 Fix `no_std` MSRV Fixes#690, #947 (mcroad)
Pull request description:
`rust-bitcoin` does not work with rust 1.29 under a `no_std` environment. This could be considered a bug. However, `no_std` support is a recent addition and this is likely not breaking anyone's builds.
A decision needs to be made, either `no_std` MSRV is the current stable version while keeping the `std` MSRV as 1.29, or it needs to be fixed.
This pr adds `no_std` to the 1.29 test suite.
This came as I try to get rust-bitcoin/rust-miniscript#277 working and got stuck on the issue of testing `no_std` under 1.29.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 7854bd7918
tcharding:
ACK 7854bd7918
sanket1729:
ACK 7854bd7918
apoelstra:
ACK 7854bd7918
Tree-SHA512: 1614fb2193f760ed340592bdb94d076066f6f783bc1dc2b145d97f7151a28316e56b1975f1ad948460eb26db04e7e9382e60076686a681e46dcf33521fda5fca
831b0267de Use contains() instead of manual range (Tobin C. Harding)
6410095687 Use chunks_exact (Tobin C. Harding)
3a0097ba49 Use trim_start_matches (Tobin C. Harding)
0a19710906 Use vec! macro instead of new followed by push (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Now that 0.28 is out we do not need to support Rust 1.29 on `master`.
Remove trivial MSRV `TODO`s from the code. (All these changes only rely on MSRV bumping to 1.31 so are easily within bounds.)
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 831b0267de
sanket1729:
ACK 831b0267de
Tree-SHA512: f1ea594216ba7dfa24696b964ce296a8aea72dd2e16e11d3a43fe8b90c851abf59b1612b2b1311146e8070112f3834762584e4f0515b8f546f72af169eb4bda9
5afb0eaf40 API to get an iterator for funding utxos in psbt (violet360)
Pull request description:
### Current status
The API returns a vector of UTXOs and has return type `Result<Vec<&TxOut>, Error>`
### Expected
The return statement should be of type `sighash::Prevouts` as pointed in #849
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 5afb0eaf40
tcharding:
ACK 5afb0eaf40
sanket1729:
ACK 5afb0eaf40. Thanks for being patient with this.
Tree-SHA512: 724fc3dffdbb1331584f89bbe84527e1af0d193a344fe43b36f2f2a628652d259001a3abf6b3909df53524cd3fbdbe3af760b7004d40d3bee1848fbb83efff5b
31571cafbd util::amount: Make from_sat constructor constant (Steven Roose)
Pull request description:
Currently unmergable because of MSRV but I heard talk about bumping it, so once it's bumped, this is a very much needed change :)
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 31571cafbd
apoelstra:
ACK 31571cafbd
Tree-SHA512: f254eb10a4349d890e29ea5fae77536429c7e731362cf2edcf2fe98ec9cbf2d8bbf65f98dfc8f0b80bac89960de688005d066a116d6cb62cca1efa9c1151f2ae
7307363c2e Use qualified path instead of alias (Tobin C. Harding)
80e0fb7673 Remove unnecessary 'as' statement (Tobin C. Harding)
21e1b9dbbd Use secp256k1 qualified path instead of underscore (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Three trivial clean ups of import aliases.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 7307363c2e
sanket1729:
ACK 7307363c2e. These are clean improvements
Kixunil:
ACK 7307363c2e
Tree-SHA512: f6ed3ede11d2803dbcb4584f11632fc47d28e525b5bf4de7794d400117f2d7c9ffce5bdff274877a63a519d5799bba2224fc39105d623da4bccad863005e171f
It is more typical in this repo to use `module::Error` instead of a type
alias when importing.
Use `hex::Error` directly instead of `use hex::Error as HexError`.
d882b68a2c Add Script conversion method p2wpkh_script_code (Tobin Harding)
Pull request description:
In order to sign a utxo that does a p2wpkh spend we need to create the
script that can be used to create a sighash. In the libbitcoin docs this
is referred to as the 'script code' [0] (also described in BIP143)
The script is the same as a p2pkh script but the pubkey_hash is found in
the scriptPubkey.
Add a `Script` conversion method that checks if `self` is a v0 p2wpkh
script and if so extracts the pubkey_hash and returns the required
script.
Includes a link to BIP143
[0] https://github.com/libbitcoin/libbitcoin-system/wiki/P2WPKH-Transactions#spending-a-p2wpkh-output
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK d882b68a2c
sanket1729:
code review ACK d882b68a2c.
Tree-SHA512: 9a3244b5aac4e2911edf4d3bb634d3d2b98006b864280a2a04b45c55c263c2541bf25f01196f2a65bf9acbdd0cf28c69c3a020a7e6c8da6fddf7c7cfbb62836d
f92854a805 Add PSBT alias (Tobin Harding)
Pull request description:
Programmers are inherently lazy and for good reason. I'm yet to see
anyone write `PartiallySignedTransaction` in code that uses
`rust-bitcoin`, its too obvious to add a type alias for PSBTs, let's
just do it ourselves to save everyone else having to do so.
Add public type alias `Psbt` for `PartiallySignedTransaction`.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK f92854a805
sanket1729:
ACK f92854a805
Tree-SHA512: 1f56ac236d34a89bbb557ada147f05d8a8ce961dad3ad921f10f26c597b91ecc8e15070f8825774745e5333ba5282962830a3cc0c53b93f147be93ab566b1b9e
548725c5fb test: reject message (de)serialization (0xb10c)
fc572aba86 fix: use var_str in 'reject' msgs (0xb10c)
Pull request description:
[BIP-61 defines `response-to-msg`][bip61] (`Reject::message` in rust-bitcoin; the message that triggered the reject) to be a `var_str`. However, by using the `CommandString` it was (de)serialized as 12 byte string. A test is added that de- and serializes two reject messages received from an older Bitcoin Core peer.
Reject message sending has been removed from Bitcoin Core, I'm still receiving them from older peers from time to time.
[bip61]: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0061.mediawiki#common-payload
gh-ref: https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/323
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 548725c5fb
Tree-SHA512: e5cbf215a471f113b4dd7f7fada162686fc6e8c7b1e2e9e641667208a36d3db610e57e8b549756ffe597656fee5444fe95466f1b88f45366595766f7c4640eea
c97589f8de Fix TapTree derserialization (sanket1729)
Pull request description:
Trees should only be serialized if both of the following conditions
hold:
1) Tree is complete binary tree(is_finalized)
2) Tree does not have any hidden nodes
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK c97589f8de
apoelstra:
ACK c97589f8de
Tree-SHA512: 33d16f2d532cb24acba4ab847d493e550f7b279567678f3f2cd7e4161dea8b720a0e35be32b6c506e467c3526a29042aad8f4b5f45133b9a32028d4ee6a48f8e
This creates a few primitive functions for handling iterators and uses
them to avoid repeated code. As a result not only is the code simpler
but also fixes a forgotten bound check. Thanks to a helper function
which always does bounds check correctly this can no longer be
forgotten.
This refactors `blockdata::script::Instructions` to use
`::core::slice::Iter<'a, u8>` instead of `&'a [u8]` to better express
the intention and to avoid some slicing mistakes. Similarly to a
previous change this uses a macro to deduplicate the common logic and
the new `read_uint_iter` internal function to automatically advance the
iterator.
Addresses:
https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/662#pullrequestreview-768320603
7969b7a43e Make TaprooBuilder::finalize able to return keyspend only (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
JeremyRubin:
> ACK 7969b7a
sanket1729:
ACK 7969b7a43e
apoelstra:
ACK 7969b7a43e
Tree-SHA512: 26d0b730590f610a858061394faafaa74b13dd353f34ccf1c6166d0cbb62937010eed5661a887f7bea4f983ac9eab8cdca10a5fe7bd74f2dd5701a7782cbac64
In the future, TapTree may iterate over different node types, and that's why it does not have `iter()` function; using instead `script_leafs`. Thus, we should not have IntoIterator implementation as well
Previously used depth and script tuple missed information about the leaf version.
All three comprises already existing type `LeafInfo` which was made public in
previous commits.
In order to sign a utxo that does a p2wpkh spend we need to create the
script that can be used to create a sighash. In the libbitcoin docs this
is referred to as the 'script code' [0].
The script is the same as a p2pkh script but the pubkey_hash is found in
the scriptPubkey.
Add a `Script` conversion method that checks if `self` is a v0 p2wpkh
script and if so extracts the pubkey_hash and returns the required
script.
[0] https://github.com/libbitcoin/libbitcoin-system/wiki/P2WPKH-Transactions#spending-a-p2wpkh-output
Programmers are inherently lazy and for good reason. I'm yet to see
anyone write `PartiallySignedTransaction` in code that uses
`rust-bitcoin`, its too obvious to add a type alias for PSBTs, let's
just do it ourselves to save everyone else having to do so.
Add public type alias `Psbt` for `PartiallySignedTransaction`.
Trees should only be serialized if both of the following conditions
hold:
1) Tree is complete binary tree(is_finalized)
2) Tree does not have any hidden nodes
c036b0db6f Unit test for failing TapTree on builder containing hidden nodes. (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
77715311cf Prevent TapTree from hidden parts (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
b0f3992db1 Rename TaprootBuilder::is_complete into is_finalized (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
efa800fb1f Make TapTree::from_inner return a proper error type (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
e24c6e23e3 TapTree serialization roundtrip unit test (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
56adfa4527 TaprootBuilder::has_hidden_nodes method (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
e69701e089 Rename taproot `*_hidden` API into `*_hidden_nodes` (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
6add0dd9dc Track information about hidden leaves in taproot NodeInfo (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
Pull request description:
Closes#928
ACKs for top commit:
sanket1729:
ACK c036b0db6f. Reviewed the range diff
apoelstra:
ACK c036b0db6f
Tree-SHA512: 3a8193e6d6dd985da30a2094d1111471b5971f422525870003b77b6ac47cd4ad6e718d46a6d86bbb5e92e5253ac53804badf67edd98bbccbdc11e6383c675663
This adds tests for the previously untested reject message
(de)serialization. The two reject messages were received from an
older Bitcoin Core peer that still sends reject messages.
46c34b3fb7 Fix code comments referring to sighash (Tobin Harding)
8f36c3979c Use sighash not sig_hash in identifiers (Tobin Harding)
c3a167b96b Rename SigHash -> Sighash (Tobin Harding)
52b711c084 Rename InvalidSigHashType -> InvalidSighashType (Tobin Harding)
b84f25584e Rename SigHashCache -> SighashCache (Tobin Harding)
e37652578b Rename PsbtSigHashType -> PsbtSighashType (Tobin Harding)
c19ec339ef Rename NonStandardSigHashType -> NonStandardSighashType (Tobin Harding)
130e27349e Rename SigHashTypeParseError -> SighashTypeParseError (Tobin Harding)
6caba2ed24 Rename SchnorrSigHashType -> SchnorrSighashType (Tobin Harding)
5522454583 Rename EcdsaSigHashType -> EcdsaSighashType (Tobin Harding)
Pull request description:
Our usage of `SigHash` implies that 'sighash' is _two_ words; 'sighash' is a well known word in the Bitcoin ecosystem it should appear in identifiers as `Sighash`.
Change various types, variants, and code comments to use sighash as a single word.
- Patches 1-8 are code changes `s/SigHash/Sighash/g`
- Patch 9 is code changes `s/sig_hash/sighash/g`
- Patch 11 is docs fixes
Fixes: #911
## Note to reviewers
I've been particularly pedantic with the patch separation because we are so close to release.
Done as separate patches to make review easier if review is to be done by reading the diffs. Perhaps at least one person could verify this PR programmatically by doing
- Reset the last 2 patches (those are easy to do manually)
- Check out master
- Do `s/SigHash/Sighash/g` on all source files (bash function below)
- Use `git diff branchA..branchB` to verify
The difference between the two branches should only include comment lines (last three patches) and these seven instances of `SigHash:
```
CHANGELOG.md:82:- [Add FromStr/Display implementation for SigHashType](a4a7035a94)
CHANGELOG.md:93:- [Introduce `SigHashCache` structure](https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/390) to replace `SighashComponents` and support all sighash modes
CHANGELOG.md:121: - `SigHash`
src/blockdata/transaction.rs:1190: "SigHash_None",
src/blockdata/transaction.rs:1191: "SigHash_NONE",
src/util/sighash.rs:1175: "SigHash_None",
src/util/sighash.rs:1176: "SigHash_NONE",
```
In case its useful, the shell function I used to do these changes is:
```bash
function search-and-replace() {
if (($# != 2))
then
echo "Usage: $0 <this> <that>"
return
fi
local this="$1"
local that="$2"
# For all files containing $this, replace $this with $that.
for file in $(git grep -l "$this")
do
perl -pi -e "s/$this/$that/g" "$file"
done
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
dr-orlovsky:
ACK 46c34b3fb7
apoelstra:
ACK 46c34b3fb7
Tree-SHA512: fe7e25e9cfb5155e4921de5ac185dbf9f4ca0770846d7892f6968b44fc5431f3f1a183380107449e90f7ea662094c60b118dc0468230384e8f9a8ef98d5ee0a0
f27c4a541d Added push_x_only_key(..) and its test. (mpls)
Pull request description:
**Issue**
I can not use [`XOnlyPublicKey`](ae985dd191/src/key.rs (L973)) in my Scripts which prevents me from working with Taproot.
**Cause**
The current version of [`script::Builder`](0a2d45de09/src/blockdata/script.rs (L121)) does not accept `XOnlyPublicKey`s.
**Solution**
So, I created a function `push_xkey(self, key: &XOnlyPublicKey)` based on the existing [`push_key`](0a2d45de09/src/blockdata/script.rs (L914)) function. I also augmented an [existing test](0a2d45de09/src/blockdata/script.rs (L1108)) in an attempt to reach testing parity with existing code.
After toying around with `push_xkey`, it seems to work on my end.
ACKs for top commit:
dr-orlovsky:
ACK f27c4a541d
sanket1729:
utACK f27c4a541d. Thanks a lot for keeping up the iterations with prompt responses
Tree-SHA512: 064958d49edc1d3636a21e428d62c2e9bcd9b13bd226c5821db9e04ce78663a11fcf601c7667b564f88e845207219a052e1c7413f50e5d27c79003e8129825ed
da731c4825 Add further description to the NodeInfo struct (Tobin Harding)
492ccebd99 Use links for error types (Tobin Harding)
3e05887579 Use 'the' to improve sentence (Tobin Harding)
Pull request description:
See to nits from review of https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/912
Three minor patches to the `taproot` module docs.
CC @dr-orlovsky
ACKs for top commit:
dr-orlovsky:
ACK da731c4825
sanket1729:
ACK da731c4825
Tree-SHA512: 17a27a19c88f9baa8127023b2ee30fc2259cb0058a92dc9d8ae595e9e02ccb047fefcba7548ff7900fffa7bc6853447183e80660b8756d90d055ab8aa96ae938
Recently we added a bunch of additional sighash types, some of the code
comments became stale. Use the non-specific term 'sighash type' instead
of a particular sighash identifier in comments to make the comments more
applicable.
Recently we update all types and docs to use `Sighash` instead of
`SigHash` because 'sighash' is a single word. We should apply the same
logic to functions and variable names.
Do not use an underscore in the identifier 'sighash'.
Our usage of `SigHash` implies that 'sighash' is _two_ words; 'sighash'
is a well known word in the Bitcoin ecosystem it should appear in
identifiers as `Sighash`.
Rename the `SigHash` type to `Sighash`.
Our usage of `SigHash` implies that 'sighash' is _two_ words; 'sighash'
is a well known word in the Bitcoin ecosystem it should appear in
identifiers as `Sighash`.
Rename the `InvalidSigHashType` variant to `InvalidSighashType`.
Our usage of `SigHash` implies that 'sighash' is _two_ words; 'sighash'
is a well known word in the Bitcoin ecosystem it should appear in
identifiers as `Sighash`.
Rename `SigHashCache` to `SighashCache`.
Our usage of `SigHash` implies that 'sighash' is _two_ words; 'sighash'
is a well known word in the Bitcoin ecosystem it should appear in
identifiers as `Sighash`.
Rename `PsbtSigHashType` to `PsbtSighashType`.
Our usage of `SigHash` implies that 'sighash' is _two_ words; 'sighash'
is a well known word in the Bitcoin ecosystem it should appear in
identifiers as `Sighash`.
Rename the `NonStandardSigHashType` type and error variant to
`NonStandardSighashType`.
Our usage of `SigHash` implies that 'sighash' is _two_ words; 'sighash'
is a well known word in the Bitcoin ecosystem it should appear in
identifiers as `Sighash`.
Rename `SigHashTypeParseError` to `SighashTypeParseError`.
Our usage of `SigHash` implies that 'sighash' is _two_ words; 'sighash'
is a well known word in the Bitcoin ecosystem it should appear in
identifiers as `Sighash`.
Rename `SchnorrSigHashType` to `SchnorrSighashType`.
Our usage of `SigHash` implies that 'sighash' is _two_ words; 'sighash'
is a well known word in the Bitcoin ecosystem it should appear in
identifiers as `Sighash`.
Rename `EcdsaSigHashType` to `EcdsaSighashType`.
c25eddd187 Remove unnecessary documentation (Tobin Harding)
8631474f08 Improve docs in taproot module (Tobin Harding)
Pull request description:
I should have done this PR a month ago, my bad. This one is kind of important IMO because we are going to have so many people looking at this part of the code soon as we release.
As has been done in other places in the codebase; improve the docs in the `taproot` module by doing:
- Use full sentences (capital letters + full stops)
- Use back ticks and links for types where appropriate
- Fix grammar
- Fix stale docs
- Use third person for describing functions
- Use 100 character line width
- Use markdown sections (`# Examples`, `# Returns`) where appropriate
- Separate brief heading from extended description when appropriate
- Use `///` for all functions/types (both private and public)
I also did:
- Build the docs and check all the links
- Read all the built docs, check for sanity and pretty-ness
Its all in one patch, I couldn't really tease it apart. I can try a bit harder if it proves too annoying to review.
ACKs for top commit:
sanket1729:
ACK c25eddd187
dr-orlovsky:
ACK c25eddd187
apoelstra:
ACK c25eddd187
Tree-SHA512: 72f35bf8779392060388db985df5abc42a89796eaad1eafd08ea50b635d469fbd07a53ff253cdf27ad4d4baed7d37cec6ea1da1aece3672b9447f87181e218f8
We deprecated the `bip143::SigHashCache` in
```
commit 53d0e176d3
Author: <elided>
Date: Fri Jul 16 10:44:18 2021 +0200
Deprecate bip143::SigHashCache in favor of sighash::SigHashCache
...
```
This means these changes are unreleased so the deprecated since version
should be the upcoming 0.28 release.
As has been done in other places in the codebase; improve the docs in
the `taproot` module by doing:
- Use full sentences (capital letters + full stops)
- Use back ticks and links for types where appropriate
- Fix grammar
- Fix stale docs
- Use third person for describing functions
- Use 100 character line width
- Use markdown sections (`# Examples`, `# Returns`) where appropriate
- Separate brief heading from extended description when appropriate
- Use `///` for all functions/types (both private and public)
I also did:
- Build the docs and check all the links
- Read all the built docs, check for sanity and pretty-ness
992857ad0a PsbtSighashType unit tests (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
5be1cdb8c7 PsbtSigHashType Display and FromStr implementation (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
7cdcdaad6c Support SIGHASH_RESERVED in SchnorrSigHashType::from_u8 (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
Pull request description:
The newly introduced `PsbtSigHashType` uses very different serde formatting from previously used `EcdsaSigHashType`; for instance it does not output human-readable sighash. This is especially obvious when printing out PSBT as JSON/YAML object and is a breaking change from the `0.27`. Serde human-readable implementation requires `Display/FromStr`, which were also absent.
ACKs for top commit:
sanket1729:
ACK 992857ad0a. This is much better
apoelstra:
ACK 992857ad0a
Tree-SHA512: 71a46471f34b5481e4c1273a66846f59d61bfd98fcb65e7823ca216ff0dd419d81ca86d99c7aaf674fcfe2b1c010e899c8e74328f60a1e809015c663c453cc89
51fef76129 feat: Add Address.is_related_to_pubkey() (Andrew Ahlers)
Pull request description:
## Motivation
This is addressing the second half of this comment: https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/684#issuecomment-1012136845
> but would accept a PR (or two PRs) that returns Result<bool, UnsupportedAddress> and a method to check if a PublicKey is associated with an address.
(The first half was addressed [here](https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/819))
These changes will help build out and improve message signature verification. We don't necessarily need to add it to this crate but it allows for easy verification with something such as:
1. recovering a pubkey
2. checking if that pubkey relates to the given address
## Possible Improvements
- There is likely a better name than `is_related_to_secp256k1_key()`
- This could drop the `secp256k1` part of the name and take in a Pubkey enum that also supports Schnorr pubkeys and then this could be used for taproot addresses as well. This felt like a much larger change that will likely get turned down. Verifying taproot is simple enough and if absolutely desired, similar functions can be added for schnorr keys (tweaked and untweaked)
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 51fef76129 for merging after TR
apoelstra:
ACK 51fef76129
Tree-SHA512: c9ab8c0f101fb4c647713e7f500656617025d8741676e8eb8a3132009dde9937d50cf9ac3d8055feb14452324a292397e46639cbaca71cac77af4b06dc42d09d
208eb65f1b Make NodeInfo API public (sanket1729)
Pull request description:
Reported by @shesek. Users might find it convenient to manually construct the tree using `NodeInfo` API
```rust
let leaf1 = NodeInfo::from_leaf_with_ver();
let leaf2 = NodeInfo::from_leaf_with_ver();
let root = NodeInfo::combine(leaf1, leaf2);
let spend_info = TaprootSpendInfo::from_node_info(&secp, internal_key, root);
```
ACKs for top commit:
dr-orlovsky:
ACK 208eb65f1b
apoelstra:
ACK 208eb65f1b
Tree-SHA512: b5a6b26e0d4a637f7ad6e987976b31b00d3567feca85f1a0bf63aa03603aded0ddae6578b1cabc1056870a596b8cb1a83e4ef3f45802e03da80c3d58d9bab1f1
e27f8ff594 TapTree iterator implementation (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
Pull request description:
Implemented after @sanket1729 suggestion in https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/895#issuecomment-1074366108
Iterates all scripts present in TapTree in DFS order returning `(depth, script)` pairs.
I propose to have it as an RC fix since this functionality is really lacking and may be required for many wallets working with Taproot PSBT even outside of the scope where I originally needed it (OP_RETURN tweaks for TapTree described in #895)
ACKs for top commit:
sanket1729:
utACK e27f8ff594.
apoelstra:
ACK e27f8ff594
Tree-SHA512: b398e468a10534561297f22dba47e340391069734a41999edd85d726890752035053690a22014402879ea40b948160f00310f78771443d382c0bbaf0201dfbe5
It is possible, although not immediately obvious, that it is possible to
create a `PsbtSigHashType` with a non-standard value.
Add a unit test to show this and also catch any regressions if we
accidental change this logic.
Improve the `PsbtSigHashType` conversion methods by doing:
- Re-name `inner` -> `to_u32` as per Rust convention
- Add `from_u32` method
Note, we explicitly do _not_ use suffix 'consensus' because these
conversion methods make no guarantees about the validity of the
underlying `u32`.
The functions `from_u32_standard` and `from_u32_consensus` smell a bit
like hungarian notation. We can look at the method definition to see
that the methods accept `u32` arguments without mentioning that in the
method names.
Remove `_u32_` from the method names. This brings the `from_*` methods
in line with the `to_standard` method also.
Rust naming conventions stipulate that conversion methods from owned ->
owned for `Copy` types use the naming convention `to_`.
This change makes the function name objectively better, however it makes
no claims of being the 'best' name. We have had much discussion on using
`to_standard` vs `to_u32` but are unable to reach consensus.
We have conversion functions that include suffixes `_consensus`
and `_standard` to make it explicit what guarantees are provided by the
returned `u32` value. The `From` implementation reduces the clarity of
the API.
2b942cf506 Add Serialize/Deserialize for TaprootSpendInfo (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
I think this is missing -- unless there is a reason not to have it?
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 2b942cf506
dr-orlovsky:
ACK 2b942cf506
Tree-SHA512: d1467d8515c85a5057037b1e5bf53c1930275fbe7e4fcbc726079a47febd75d6bbce8e2d99ed4f9d8afccf6fc3782e43763a2258c4c2a934c2453920fe587e4b
83dda74ecb Check for SIGHASH_SINGLE bug in writer fn (Tobin Harding)
Pull request description:
Recently we moved the logic for checking for the SIGHASH_SINGLE bug to
the `signature_hash()` function. Although this left users of the
`encode_signing_data_to()` function without correct handling of the bug
there is not much else we can do but alert users to this behaviour.
Add documentation to highlight the behaviour of `encdoe_signing_data_to`
in regards to the sighash single bug. Requires updating docs for
`signature_hash` also.
Please note, uses non-conventional markdown header `# Warning`.
Closes: #817
ACKs for top commit:
sanket1729:
ACK 83dda74ecb. This is much cleaner
dr-orlovsky:
ACK 83dda74ecb
apoelstra:
ACK 83dda74ecb
Tree-SHA512: 1263b06ddfbb05a293c80e7dbf6f87eac5922c501e7db1c1d26d41d3ea0172c6b7a44afc0b1843b06e78985d3ecf70a3a3feb2515d535a7413685aed0a338c64
Tobin C. Harding
Andrew Poelstra
sanket1729
Riccardo Casatta
Matt Corallo
Fredrik Meringdal
mcroad
ass3rt
violet360
Martin Habovštiak
Dr Maxim Orlovsky
0xb10c
Jeremy Rubin
mpls