In an effort to reduce review burden add so strict rules defining 3
times where we think it is acceptable for code to be merged with a
single ACK. Feels a bit like we only just added the refactor carve out
and now we are adding more carve outs, so whats next? We should take
these rules seriously, if we are to be taken seriously.
eccd3fe57b Introduce a basic justfile (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Introduce usage of `just` by adding a basic `justfile`.
If this goes in we can add various script invocations to it plus other useful things that often get red CI runs (eg, checking no-std).
ACKs for top commit:
RCasatta:
ACK eccd3fe57b
apoelstra:
ACK eccd3fe57b
Tree-SHA512: c10514e0ee623f366904c9103bc961a1316b199c09083180767fb9b5864e94df122c9db1a3ea084c8790f0b849e89c68b304f87247b70763fb93c28a33642d28
18e2854a42 Update base64 usage to 0.21.3 (junderw)
Pull request description:
Closes#2031
The imports are a bit bike-sheddy... but I think this is fine.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 18e2854a42
apoelstra:
ACK 18e2854a42
Tree-SHA512: 5707adc2066ef33a30e81eb74ddcb938350e5853438152278767c824a45909a0b4761d036e4e5f21fccd61102c4734936b5fd570dbd87140cd3b679dc9c7eec4
A P2TR output does not need to be clarified with version 1, it is
implicit. As with p2wpkh/p2wsh and version 0.
Remove redundant version identifiers from function names, deprecating
the originals.
`T` is a generic that implements`AsRef<PushBytes>`, it should not be a
reference. This is inline with other usages of `AsRef<PushBytes>` for
example in `Builder::push_slice`.
One encodes to a writer and decodes from a reader, most of the time in
the consensus `Encodable`/`Decodable` traits we use generic `R`/`W` and
variable `r`/`w` but there are other places that use other characters.
While touching these lines note also that there are a bunch of unneeded
`mut`s, I'm not sure why since usually between the compiler and the
linter `mut` is handled correctly.
Make implementations of `Encodable` and `Decodable` uniform by:
- Use R/W and r/w for trait and variable name
- Remove unneeded mut
Done as part of the push to have small specific errors instead of large
general ones.
Split the `witness_version::Error` up into small specific errors.
Recently we "if" guarded subtraction manually using `> 0`, we can better
convey the meaning by using `checked_sub` and pattern match on the
option.
Refactor only, no logic changes.
Recently we deprecated the `segwit_signature_hash` function but during
development the deprecation notice got stale.
Fix deprecation notice to use the actual function names.
adcc01c0bd CI: Fix pinning (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
More crates broke our MSRV by using edition 2021 without doing a major release, pin them in the CI script.
Other open PRs need this to get past CI.
ACKs for top commit:
sanket1729:
ACK adcc01c0bd
Tree-SHA512: 3fbaaf2677791c4761fb0543a09f855441a977aec8d277c01c12c3389ce64158833b6a5ea89a3cf4f2182b51f480849deaf8e33127a14f818024a1af95346baa
84614d9997 Unit test debug print of witness with empty instruction (Tobin C. Harding)
e96be5ee6e Fix Witness debug display bug (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
When we introduce a custom `Debug` implementation for the `Witness` we introduced a bug that causes code to panic if the witness contains an empty instruction.
The bug can be verified by putting patch 2 first or by running `cargo run --example sighash` on master.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 84614d9997
RCasatta:
ACK 84614d9997
Tree-SHA512: d51891206ab15f74dda07eb29ff3f6c69dc3f983a5a5abb55685688548481a19f7c1d33aa1183a89c553ff2bc86cf41057c2bae33d75e8a7f3b801056775bf9e
55e94b5dea Remove test from test names for Weight type (yancy)
142dde64c3 Use Weight type for stripped_size (yancy)
cb76f3ec43 Add scale_by_witness_factor to Weight type (yancy)
38c9e9947e Add witness scale factor to the Weight type (yancy)
77552987ab Add from_wu_usize to Weight type (yancy)
1a88c887f5 Rename strippedsize to stripped_size (yancy)
3369257c75 Fix grammar (yancy)
Pull request description:
Return Weight type for the strippedize function.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 55e94b5dea
tcharding:
ACK 55e94b5dea
Tree-SHA512: ad3e4bc29380f22e20a6302c1b24c201c772be759c655c62ba4717840a01fcaa36f0f8442c9a3ba71c6400d6af47a9a815e6d90877b5f14c6883fb950b9669fd
29a4f9b114 Wrap the bitcoinconsensus error (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Currently the `bitcoinconsensus` error is part of the public API. This hinders maintainability because changes to the verison of `bitcoinconsensus` force a re-release in `rust-bitcoin`. This is an unnecessary maintenance burden, we can wrap the error instead.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 29a4f9b114
sanket1729:
utACK 29a4f9b114
Tree-SHA512: 36bc1b0ad5f5675d79eea2409844a839d862997c256e301c53c5f1af547edc9a0b83e586bd70e1b8853722cd7ef279e7515e09fbe942660f8049090d1be39d3a
f18f684ad2 Add version bytes consts (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
BIP-32 defines 4 4-byte consts used as version bytes; currently we are hardcoding the version bytes in multiple places.
Add BIP-32 version bytes consts and use them throughout the module.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK f18f684ad2
RCasatta:
utACK f18f684ad2
Tree-SHA512: 50bf2d26f0f8e3528642ffcc621c03b82f536994deb808a6c84225676b4b8849db8e0d16e46f3819e0810296a422b31cf90d0595739910afdb92fb768ef7696e
66d5800ac0 psbt: Add IndexOutOfBounds error (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
We currently have a bunch of functions that are infallible if the `index` argument is within-bounds however we return a `SignError`, this obfuscates the code.
Add an `IndexOutOfBoundsError`. While we are at it make it an enum so users can differentiate between which vector the out of bounds access was attempted against.
ACKs for top commit:
sanket1729:
utACK 66d5800ac0. This is a clean improvement over existing code.
apoelstra:
ACK 66d5800ac0
Tree-SHA512: fa8a24990d1dcdab0c9b019fb2387b5a518b02d0a65715f0ab62519894b19c0c74750d3dcdc928626fa68b146038b907d79de3ba9712c9287db8fa64693ebc11
be05f9d852 Rename xpub and xpriv types (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
The BIP-32 extended public key and extended private key exist in the Bitcoin vernacular as xpub and xpriv. We can use these terms with no loss of clarity.
Rename our current BIP-32 types
- `ExtendedPubKey` to `Xpub`
- `ExtendedPrivKey` to `Xpriv`
This patch is a mechanical search-and-replace, followed by running the formatter, no other manual changes.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK be05f9d852
sanket1729:
ACK be05f9d852
Tree-SHA512: 49925688783c3f37a9b92a9767a0df095323a3fa51f3d672a0b5dd1d8bca86f7facbcc33921274bc147b369de09042c4850b08c31e63f71110903435daa6c00c
724be17394 Remove useless usage of vec! macro (Tobin C. Harding)
e84ca292d9 Clear incorrect implementation of clone warning (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
A new version `clippy 0.1.72 (5680fa1 2023-08-23)` just came out and we get a two new warnings. Fix them up.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 724be17394
Tree-SHA512: f82f026773f8738d8d89710b36b979850e0e33c4d1afb4f78d2d4e957b37dd850ef9e83c9e25197dac981c7b49c448e49078777261749567303f1aac282b3d33
7bbdd9b2af Export all hash types (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
During the 0.30.0 release we removed the re-exports of hash types. This upset some folk and since the aim of our re-exports is not exactly clean as well as the fact that the public API surface is not yet fixed just re-export all the hash types at the crate root again.
This is #1792 but does not use a wildcard and also grabs the other hashes that we recently moved.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 7bbdd9b2af
sanket1729:
ACK 7bbdd9b2af
Tree-SHA512: addfb617fae2fce12eb9d198ffeb1b0c99792dfd757222c21c62bd4b408432de5dc93c42da7d886b43c29b2c34bd318573e813f567a29080fc264ee7beba0f70
53f68383b7 hashes: Bump version to 0.13.0 (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
In preparation for `hashes` release, bump the version. Depend on new version in `rust-bitcoin`.
Note the `bitcoin-private` addition to the lock files is because we temporarily have two `bitcoin_hashes` dependencies and the secp one (v.0.12.0) depends on `bitcoin-private`.
ACKs for top commit:
sanket1729:
utACK 53f68383b7 . I am not sure about the exact nature of release dance between various crates in rust-bitcoin. This code and changelog entries looks good.
apoelstra:
ACK 53f68383b7
Tree-SHA512: a1933bcda1fa9a06c96a4c7079ff49f531e4f366373e98700446cecdf1eed5a104d4d4aa737202ec426cb1f1edf88eff5eee80df9f0cc3a9779c051a55f847b5
8b84227aec Add a script for updating lock files (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Every time one of the dependencies is explicitly changed we have to update the minimal/recent lock files. Add a script to do so.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 8b84227aec
sanket1729:
ACK 8b84227aec
Tree-SHA512: f165308131077c55712d9ae5b85a4dc5f0f24c660dd4c196c48a53f64411b25714b2f32d3a6538f040b3d8ef5240df7d16b7b66561e0d8bb49245b44eb8f522c
0419fa278b Add VarInt from implementations by way of macro (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Throughout the codebase we cast values to `u64` when constructing a `VarInt`. We can make the code marginally cleaner by adding `From<T>` impls for all unsigned integer types less than or equal to 64 bits. Also allows us to (possibly unnecessarily) comment the cast in a single place.
ACKs for top commit:
sanket1729:
utACK 0419fa278b
apoelstra:
ACK 0419fa278b
Tree-SHA512: 0cbcc7e9ec6a1a102693cb13685c348672fb13b098cbecd0a36bed0331165adb008f149f87f7b0c64f131974cfe513adbc12f508bc4853906adb2a65c0c647ee
We currently have a bunch of functions that are infallible if the
`index` argument is within-bounds however we return a `SignError`, this
obfuscates the code.
Add an `IndexOutOfBoundsErorr`. While we are at it make it an enum so
users can differentiate between which vector the out of bounds access
was attempted against.
Throughout the codebase we cast values to `u64` when constructing a
`VarInt`. We can make the code marginally cleaner by adding `From<T>`
impls for all unsigned integer types less than or equal to 64 bits.
Also allows us to (possibly unnecessarily) comment the cast in a single
place.
d9533523ac Remove usage of ThirtyTwoByteHash (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
The `ThirtyTwoByteHash` trait is defined in `secp256k1` and used in `hashes` as well as `bitcoin`. This means that we must use the same version of `hashes` in both `bitcoin` and `secp256k1`. This makes doing release difficult.
Remove usage of `ThirtyTwoByteHash` and use `Message::from_slice`. Include TODO above each usage because as soon as we release the new version of secp we can use the new `Message::from_digest`.
This is step backwards as far as type safety goes and it makes the code more ugly as well because it uses `expect` but thems the breaks.
For context see #1985
ACKs for top commit:
sanket1729:
utACK d9533523ac
apoelstra:
ACK d9533523ac
Tree-SHA512: 0dc6f7895ba6e1d2de978d45152e6e12b9f81b3fbe9f3ba89c090005b6c8d2e1221e0a04a3ac38c7e7669f6ce62edaa21739ae58cc1d2cad63f608a36231718e
The `ThirtyTwoByteHash` trait is defined in `secp256k1` and used in
`hashes` as well as `bitcoin`. This means that we must use the same
version of `hashes` in both `bitcoin` and `secp256k1`. This makes doing
release difficult.
Remove usage of `ThirtyTwoByteHash` and use `Message::from_slice`.
Include TODO above each usage because as soon as we release the new
version of secp we can use the new `Message::from_digest`.
This is step backwards as far as type safety goes and it makes the code
more ugly as well because it uses `expect` but thems the breaks.
BIP-32 defines 4 4-byte consts used as version bytes; currently we are
hardcoding the version bytes in multiple places.
Add BIP-32 version bytes consts and use them throughout the module.
The BIP-32 extended public key and extended private key exist in the
Bitcoin vernacular as xpub and xpriv. We can use these terms with no
loss of clarity.
Rename our current BIP-32 types
- `ExtendedPubKey` to `Xpub`
- `ExtendedPrivKey` to `Xpriv`
This patch is a mechanical search-and-replace, followed by running the
formatter, no other manual changes.
4300cf2210 Add p2wpkh and p2wsh signature hash functions (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
The word "segwit" refers to segwit v0 and taproot but these functions are version specific. Add `v0` into the function names.
This is similar to #1994, both based on recent post of mine to bitcoin dev mailing list.
ACKs for top commit:
stevenroose:
ACK 4300cf2210
apoelstra:
ACK 4300cf2210
Tree-SHA512: 723fc302954514da0fa57a3890b9f62e9d8d1b25289b8db00611d8bc34c5000b9e54943f57b8e94befcaf72633ac078b2ff66a1da0c5bb483cfaa584e3cb6014
7ec33d29eb refactor: developer doc first (yancy)
5496feb5c1 Add base weight const to TxIn (yancy)
Pull request description:
Add a base weight const to TxIn. I also used this const in strippedsize() and scaledsize(). As a different PR, I think strippedsize and scaledsize could return Weight instead of usize. Also added a small commit to re-arrange commit messages.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 7ec33d29eb
tcharding:
ACK 7ec33d29eb
Tree-SHA512: b20f95605ed664b88df0a5a178d48f15f27d90eb404c9707aef010c4504d7ffd4a3565c217710b9289f87ed2a0724fd8f7cc78a79a58547fe3ee87339c0d74c1
f2c5f19557 Introduce the `small-hash` feature for `bitcoin_hashes` (Alekos Filini)
Pull request description:
When enabled this feature swaps the hash implementation of sha512, sha256 and ripemd160 for a smaller (but also slower) one.
On embedded processors (Cortex-M4) it can lead to up to a 52% size reduction, from around 37KiB for just the `process_block` methods of the three hash functions to 17.8KiB.
The following numbers were collected on `aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu` with `cargo 1.72.0-nightly`.
## Original
```
RUSTFLAGS='--cfg=bench -C opt-level=z' cargo bench
```
```
test hash160::benches::hash160_10 ... bench: 33 ns/iter (+/- 1) = 303 MB/s
test hash160::benches::hash160_1k ... bench: 2,953 ns/iter (+/- 187) = 346 MB/s
test hash160::benches::hash160_64k ... bench: 188,480 ns/iter (+/- 11,595) = 347 MB/s
test hmac::benches::hmac_sha256_10 ... bench: 33 ns/iter (+/- 2) = 303 MB/s
test hmac::benches::hmac_sha256_1k ... bench: 2,957 ns/iter (+/- 104) = 346 MB/s
test hmac::benches::hmac_sha256_64k ... bench: 192,022 ns/iter (+/- 6,407) = 341 MB/s
test ripemd160::benches::ripemd160_10 ... bench: 25 ns/iter (+/- 1) = 400 MB/s
test ripemd160::benches::ripemd160_1k ... bench: 2,288 ns/iter (+/- 93) = 447 MB/s
test ripemd160::benches::ripemd160_64k ... bench: 146,823 ns/iter (+/- 1,102) = 446 MB/s
test sha1::benches::sha1_10 ... bench: 41 ns/iter (+/- 0) = 243 MB/s
test sha1::benches::sha1_1k ... bench: 3,844 ns/iter (+/- 70) = 266 MB/s
test sha1::benches::sha1_64k ... bench: 245,854 ns/iter (+/- 10,158) = 266 MB/s
test sha256::benches::sha256_10 ... bench: 35 ns/iter (+/- 0) = 285 MB/s
test sha256::benches::sha256_1k ... bench: 3,063 ns/iter (+/- 15) = 334 MB/s
test sha256::benches::sha256_64k ... bench: 195,729 ns/iter (+/- 2,880) = 334 MB/s
test sha256d::benches::sha256d_10 ... bench: 34 ns/iter (+/- 1) = 294 MB/s
test sha256d::benches::sha256d_1k ... bench: 3,071 ns/iter (+/- 107) = 333 MB/s
test sha256d::benches::sha256d_64k ... bench: 188,614 ns/iter (+/- 8,101) = 347 MB/s
test sha512::benches::sha512_10 ... bench: 21 ns/iter (+/- 0) = 476 MB/s
test sha512::benches::sha512_1k ... bench: 1,714 ns/iter (+/- 36) = 597 MB/s
test sha512::benches::sha512_64k ... bench: 110,084 ns/iter (+/- 3,637) = 595 MB/s
test sha512_256::benches::sha512_256_10 ... bench: 22 ns/iter (+/- 1) = 454 MB/s
test sha512_256::benches::sha512_256_1k ... bench: 1,822 ns/iter (+/- 70) = 562 MB/s
test sha512_256::benches::sha512_256_64k ... bench: 116,231 ns/iter (+/- 4,745) = 563 MB/s
test siphash24::benches::siphash24_1ki ... bench: 1,072 ns/iter (+/- 41) = 955 MB/s
test siphash24::benches::siphash24_1ki_hash ... bench: 1,102 ns/iter (+/- 42) = 929 MB/s
test siphash24::benches::siphash24_1ki_hash_u64 ... bench: 1,064 ns/iter (+/- 41) = 962 MB/s
test siphash24::benches::siphash24_64ki ... bench: 69,957 ns/iter (+/- 2,712) = 936 MB/
```
```
0000000000005872 t _ZN84_$LT$bitcoin_hashes..ripemd160..HashEngine$u20$as$u20$bitcoin_hashes..HashEngine$GT$5input17hc4800746a9da7ff4E
0000000000007956 t _ZN81_$LT$bitcoin_hashes..sha256..HashEngine$u20$as$u20$bitcoin_hashes..HashEngine$GT$5input17hf49345f65130ce9bE
0000000000008024 t _ZN14bitcoin_hashes6sha2568Midstate10const_hash17h57317bc8012004b4E.llvm.441255102889972912
0000000000010528 t _ZN81_$LT$bitcoin_hashes..sha512..HashEngine$u20$as$u20$bitcoin_hashes..HashEngine$GT$5input17h9bc868d4392bd9acE
```
Total size: 32380 bytes
## With `small-hash` enabled
```
RUSTFLAGS='--cfg=bench -C opt-level=z' cargo bench --features small-hash
```
```
test hash160::benches::hash160_10 ... bench: 52 ns/iter (+/- 3) = 192 MB/s
test hash160::benches::hash160_1k ... bench: 4,817 ns/iter (+/- 286) = 212 MB/s
test hash160::benches::hash160_64k ... bench: 319,572 ns/iter (+/- 11,031) = 205 MB/s
test hmac::benches::hmac_sha256_10 ... bench: 54 ns/iter (+/- 2) = 185 MB/s
test hmac::benches::hmac_sha256_1k ... bench: 4,846 ns/iter (+/- 204) = 211 MB/s
test hmac::benches::hmac_sha256_64k ... bench: 319,114 ns/iter (+/- 4,451) = 205 MB/s
test ripemd160::benches::ripemd160_10 ... bench: 27 ns/iter (+/- 0) = 370 MB/s
test ripemd160::benches::ripemd160_1k ... bench: 2,358 ns/iter (+/- 150) = 434 MB/s
test ripemd160::benches::ripemd160_64k ... bench: 154,573 ns/iter (+/- 3,954) = 423 MB/s
test sha1::benches::sha1_10 ... bench: 41 ns/iter (+/- 1) = 243 MB/s
test sha1::benches::sha1_1k ... bench: 3,700 ns/iter (+/- 243) = 276 MB/s
test sha1::benches::sha1_64k ... bench: 231,039 ns/iter (+/- 13,989) = 283 MB/s
test sha256::benches::sha256_10 ... bench: 51 ns/iter (+/- 3) = 196 MB/s
test sha256::benches::sha256_1k ... bench: 4,823 ns/iter (+/- 182) = 212 MB/s
test sha256::benches::sha256_64k ... bench: 299,960 ns/iter (+/- 17,545) = 218 MB/s
test sha256d::benches::sha256d_10 ... bench: 52 ns/iter (+/- 2) = 192 MB/s
test sha256d::benches::sha256d_1k ... bench: 4,827 ns/iter (+/- 323) = 212 MB/s
test sha256d::benches::sha256d_64k ... bench: 302,844 ns/iter (+/- 15,796) = 216 MB/s
test sha512::benches::sha512_10 ... bench: 34 ns/iter (+/- 1) = 294 MB/s
test sha512::benches::sha512_1k ... bench: 3,002 ns/iter (+/- 123) = 341 MB/s
test sha512::benches::sha512_64k ... bench: 189,767 ns/iter (+/- 10,396) = 345 MB/s
test sha512_256::benches::sha512_256_10 ... bench: 34 ns/iter (+/- 1) = 294 MB/s
test sha512_256::benches::sha512_256_1k ... bench: 2,996 ns/iter (+/- 198) = 341 MB/s
test sha512_256::benches::sha512_256_64k ... bench: 192,024 ns/iter (+/- 8,181) = 341 MB/s
test siphash24::benches::siphash24_1ki ... bench: 1,081 ns/iter (+/- 65) = 947 MB/s
test siphash24::benches::siphash24_1ki_hash ... bench: 1,083 ns/iter (+/- 63) = 945 MB/s
test siphash24::benches::siphash24_1ki_hash_u64 ... bench: 1,084 ns/iter (+/- 63) = 944 MB/s
test siphash24::benches::siphash24_64ki ... bench: 67,237 ns/iter (+/- 4,185) = 974 MB/s
```
```
0000000000005384 t _ZN81_$LT$bitcoin_hashes..sha256..HashEngine$u20$as$u20$bitcoin_hashes..HashEngine$GT$5input17hae341658cf9b880bE
0000000000005608 t _ZN14bitcoin_hashes9ripemd16010HashEngine13process_block17h3276b13f1e9feef8E.llvm.13618235596061801146
0000000000005616 t _ZN14bitcoin_hashes6sha2568Midstate10const_hash17h3e6fbef64c15ee00E.llvm.7326223909590351031
0000000000005944 t _ZN81_$LT$bitcoin_hashes..sha512..HashEngine$u20$as$u20$bitcoin_hashes..HashEngine$GT$5input17h321a237bfbe5c0bbE
```
Total size: 22552 bytes
## Conclusion
On `aarch64` there's overall a ~30% improvement in size, although ripemd160 doesn't really shrink that much (and its performance also aren't impacted much with only a 6% slowdown). sha512 and sha256 instead are almost 40% slower with `small-hash` enabled.
I don't have performance numbers for other architectures, but in terms of size there was an even larger improvements on `thumbv7em-none-eabihf`, with a 52% size reduction overall:
```
Size Crate Name
25.3KiB bitcoin_hashes <bitcoin_hashes[fe467ef2aa3a1470]::sha512::HashEngine as bitcoin_hashes[fe467ef2aa3a1470]::HashEngine>::input
6.9KiB bitcoin_hashes <bitcoin_hashes[fe467ef2aa3a1470]::sha256::HashEngine as bitcoin_hashes[fe467ef2aa3a1470]::HashEngine>::input
4.8KiB bitcoin_hashes <bitcoin_hashes[fe467ef2aa3a1470]::ripemd160::HashEngine as bitcoin_hashes[fe467ef2aa3a1470]::HashEngine>::input
```
vs
```
Size Crate Name
9.5KiB bitcoin_hashes <bitcoin_hashes[974bb476ef905797]::sha512::HashEngine as bitcoin_hashes[974bb476ef905797]::HashEngine>::input
4.5KiB bitcoin_hashes <bitcoin_hashes[974bb476ef905797]::ripemd160::HashEngine>::process_block
3.8KiB bitcoin_hashes <bitcoin_hashes[974bb476ef905797]::sha256::HashEngine as bitcoin_hashes[974bb476ef905797]::HashEngine>::input
```
I'm assuming this is because on more limited architectures the compiler needs to use more instructions to move data in and out of registers (especially for sha512 which ideally would benefit from 64-bit registers), so reusing the code by moving it into functions saves a lot of those instructions.
Also note that the `const_hash` method on `sha256` causes the compiler to emit two independent implementations. I haven't looked into the code yet, maybe there's a way to merge them so that the non-const `process_block` calls into the const fn.
-----
Note: commits are unverified right now because I don't have the keys available, I will sign them after addressing the review comments.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK f2c5f19557
tcharding:
ACK f2c5f19557
Tree-SHA512: 1d5eb56324c458660e2571e8cf59895dc31dae9c5427c7ed36f8a0e81ca2e9a0f39026f56b6803df03635cc8b66aee3bf5182d51ab8972d169d56bcfec33771c
546c0122d7 Add simd sha256 intrinsics for x86 machines (sanket1729)
Pull request description:
This is my first time dabbling into architecture specific code and simd. The algorithm is a word to word translation of the C code from 4899efc81d/sha256-x86.c .
Some benchmarks:
With simd
```
test sha256::benches::sha256_10 ... bench: 11 ns/iter (+/- 0) = 909 MB/s
test sha256::benches::sha256_1k ... bench: 712 ns/iter (+/- 2) = 1438 MB/s
test sha256::benches::sha256_64k ... bench: 45,597 ns/iter (+/- 189) = 1437 MB/s
```
Without simd
```
test sha256::benches::sha256_10 ... bench: 47 ns/iter (+/- 0) = 212 MB/s
test sha256::benches::sha256_1k ... bench: 4,243 ns/iter (+/- 17) = 241 MB/s
test sha256::benches::sha256_64k ... bench: 271,263 ns/iter (+/- 1,610) = 241 MB/s
```
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 546c0122d7
tcharding:
ACK 546c0122d7
Tree-SHA512: 7167c900b77e63cf38135a3960cf9ac2615f73b2ef7020a12b5cc3f4c047910063ba9045217b9ecfa70f7de1eb0f02f2674f291bd023a853bad2b9162fae831e
Tobin C. Harding
Andrew Poelstra
junderw
sanket1729
Riccardo Casatta
yancy