fabcde036f Use package in manifest and shorten import (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
We can use `package` to rename `bitcoin_hashes` to `hashes` and `bitcoin_internals` to `internals`. This makes imports more terse with no loss of meaning.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK fabcde036f
Kixunil:
ACK fabcde036f
Tree-SHA512: bc5bff6f7f6bf3b68ba1e0644a83da014081d8c6c9d578c21cb54fdd56a018f68733dd1135d05b590ba193ed9efd12fa9019182c1fed347e604d8548f6ef9103
29cb34eed7 Refactor Address struct and its methods (Harshil Jani)
Pull request description:
Closes#1755
In this PR the `as_unchecked` is added to the Address struct, which returns a reference to the same address but with the type Address<NetworkUnchecked>. Similarly, the `assume_checked_ref` is added to Address<NetworkUnchecked>, which returns a reference to the same address but with the type Address.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 29cb34eed7
apoelstra:
ACK 29cb34eed7
Tree-SHA512: 75ba40883d9fb31026b0e94e8d3fdcf808ff38a4d10f61f99a1e14ddc48358da86bad44cd78563dc67aa5d39382a5493e73c03891317f361f590e39b6257cb84
91f45a214f Replace hardcoded values with compile-time hashing (Martin Habovstiak)
095b7958dd Make `sha256t_hash_newtype!` evocative of the output. (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
The Rust API guidelines state that macros should be evocative of the
output, which is a sensible recommendation. We already had this for
`hash_newtype!` macro but didn't for sha256t version.
This changes the macro to have this syntax:
```rust
sha256t_hash_newtype! {
// Order of these structs is fixed.
/// Optional documentation details here. Summary is auto-generated.
/*pub*/ struct Tag = raw(MIDSTATE_BYTES, LEN);
/// Documentation here
#[hash_newtype(forward)] // optional, default is backward
/*pub*/ struct HashType(/* attributes allowed here */ _);
}
```
Closes https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/1427
Depends on #1769
How do you like the syntax? Is weird `struct Foo = bar(..);` acceptable?
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 91f45a214f
apoelstra:
ACK 91f45a214f
Tree-SHA512: f6b555b20311a4c1cb097bc296c92459f6fbe16ba102d8c977eb2383dbcae3cc8ffce32e3cb771e7e22197fda26379971aa4feaadc5e2e70d37fa690ae8b8859
873501a85f Use slice patterns (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
Some code looks better with slice patterns. This changes `bip32` to use them.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 873501a85f
tcharding:
ACK 873501a85f
Tree-SHA512: 2e91b21d0f943c04f592112f241444ba3b1b1dad47ea6bea162f62cfbcaf98e383257cad144072b3807aaa0c122dabab638ac10b1cc1f5179727a5f05aac0659
This commit refactors the Address struct and its methods to improve
its functionality and usability.The AddressInner struct now holds
the payload and network, and the PhantomData<V> type is used to track
the network validation state.
Also as_unchecked and assume_checked_red methods are added to allow
conversion between checked and unchecked network validation state.
Signed-off-by: Harshil Jani <harshiljani2002@gmail.com>
Previous changes enabled passing the string used as a tag into
`sha256t_hash_newtype!` macro rather than hard-coding midstate. This
commit takes advantage of it and replaces the hard-coded values with
compile-time executed (`const`) hashing.
The Rust API guidelines state that macros should be evocative of the
output, which is a sensible recommendation. We already had this for
`hash_newtype!` macro but didn't for sha256t version.
This changes the macro to have this syntax:
```rust
sha256t_hash_newtype! {
// Order of these structs is fixed.
/// Optional documentation details here. Summary is auto-generated.
/*pub*/ struct Tag = raw(MIDSTATE_BYTES, LEN);
/// Documentation here
#[hash_newtype(forward)] // optional, default is backward
/*pub*/ struct HashType(/* attributes allowed here */ _);
}
```
Closes#1427
We've upgraded MSRV but didn't update clippy config, so some things that
could be improved aren't caught by clippy. This updates the config and
fixes the new issues.
I also `rg '1\.41\.1'`ed for interesting changes and found one
additional improvement.
a189942c64 Use doc_auto_cfg (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
If we use `#![cfg_attr(docsrs, feature(doc_auto_cfg))]` instead of `#![cfg_attr(docsrs, feature(doc_cfg))]` we no longer need to manually mark types with `#[cfg_attr(docsrs, doc(cfg(feature = "std")))]`.
Sweeeeeet.
Props to pezcore for the lesson :)
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK a189942c64
Kixunil:
ACK a189942c64
Tree-SHA512: 1ced1e09f5d1733b362b83ca650d3f52c89eb57e78e8437f74c496d89776548f8c50feab6750352342e2abe680434681de2c126ce36a81dda21397b9695d4d4e
Signed-off-by: Harshil Jani <harshiljani2002@gmail.com>
implementation of PartialEq<Address> for Address<NetworkUnchecked>
Signed-off-by: Harshil Jani <harshiljani2002@gmail.com>
If we use `#![cfg_attr(docsrs, feature(doc_auto_cfg))]` instead of
`#![cfg_attr(docsrs, feature(doc_cfg))]` we no longer need to manually
mark types with `#[cfg_attr(docsrs, doc(cfg(feature = "std")))]`.
Sweeeeeet.
ed80df5ebc Add `ChainHash::from_genesis_block_hash` (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
This improves readability of converting `BlockHash` into `ChainHash`. It's useful in e.g. Electrum protocol which sends `BlockHash` (serialized backward).
Closes#1751
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK ed80df5ebc
tcharding:
ACK ed80df5ebc
Tree-SHA512: b03eb9ca0a1eb38196cc8e43751c2def0d00b463b774003c5319bf56599db598ddd4bb0e2ad0bd3803f21a925135992d421848e7b1ba5e7bab3a405f60fc973c
We can use `package` to rename `bitcoin_hashes` to `hashes` and
`bitcoin_internals` to `internals`. This makes imports more terse with
no loss of meaning.
82b6332b91 create a set of recognized denomination forms (yancy)
Pull request description:
I took a stab at restricting the acceptable forms here. There was some consensus that "BtC" was confusing that was discussed in a previous pr https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/1715.
Also, personally I felt that the `PossiblyConfusingDenomination` enum variant was itself confusing. I think it's probably cleaner to just maintain a list of acceptable forms and treat everything else as unknown. For now I just created a const of possibly confusing forms.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 82b6332b91
apoelstra:
ACK 82b6332b91
Tree-SHA512: f3c212046e4d8a34ce2d50f34065b1778ae190ca80dd9ad73ef41eb5925705c88c0a764ec149d731eb1735d670c5542415953633a7f3f672d0c1e46b6e004d0b
This improves readability of converting `BlockHash` into `ChainHash`.
It's useful in e.g. Electrum protocol which sends `BlockHash`
(serialized backward).
Closes#1751
122188f7dd Use shorter import statements (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Just patch 2, patch 1 is #1728
From the commit log of patch 2
Use shorter import statements
As per discussion [0] use the shorter form for importing crates that we
re-export (`hashes` and `secp256k1`).
[0] https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/discussions/1661
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 122188f7dd
sanket1729:
utACK 122188f7dd
Tree-SHA512: 3f540464d38c72ba9d68f8ceda8600540bd0c3eef0ba67531c87fa1e0e4f757af7035cf80a1a5f17aa05604a17fdd9ef59bb6bece6b4145d540dac1e5362fc01
1dc04fe10f Remove rust_v_1_46 (Tobin C. Harding)
71fa9e81e7 Bump MSRV to 1.48.1 (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Just patch 2, patch 1 is #1728
From the commit log of patch 2
Bump MSRV to 1.48.1
As per discussion [0] bump our MSRV for all crates in `rust-bitcoin`
repo to 1.48.1 [1].
[0] https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/discussions/1329
[1] https://blog.rust-lang.org/2020/11/19/Rust-1.48.html
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 1dc04fe10f
sanket1729:
ACK 1dc04fe10f
Tree-SHA512: 533470c55f7aeede88382db8245033dac9317d75b38ced2ad8256d38319632a524335f893044e96300a1e60048f9aaca2d1634735eb324eb8ed9ad3c9ab2f872
dbd2ea07b5 Add kilo weight unit conversion (yancy)
Pull request description:
The FeeRate module defaults to sats per `kwu` so when doing fee calculations, it would be convenient to easily convert weight to the same units.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK dbd2ea07b5
tcharding:
ACK dbd2ea07b5
apoelstra:
ACK dbd2ea07b5
Tree-SHA512: fe26b631cf474f1dca627a4d21e9052c80f8ada9a0eb635c46b7f8f42095671b9b161fb5012b723699008372faf7668507d5e92bde7d1808d389f85dba33529b
We just merged a patch to enable formatting in CI but commit: `05fdead2
Feature: Add difficulty_float method for block::Header.` must have
slipped in.
Run the formatter.
913575ac91 hashes: Run the formatter (Tobin C. Harding)
52c4579057 Enable formatting for hashes (Tobin C. Harding)
3f16b6bf9f util: Run the formatter (Tobin C. Harding)
d210d2ac83 Enable formatting for util (Tobin C. Harding)
5973dce9db blockdata: Run the formatter (Tobin C. Harding)
0dcbed3c7b Enable formatting for blockdata (Tobin C. Harding)
a52746d01c psbt: Run the formatter (Tobin C. Harding)
ef306db5e2 Enable formatting for psbt (Tobin C. Harding)
296f2ed82c Make test panic instead of using code comment (Tobin C. Harding)
3ec8a12428 crypto: Run the formatter (Tobin C. Harding)
c8a3c58786 Enable formatting for crypto (Tobin C. Harding)
314e6786b4 crypto: Add rustfmt::skip attributes (Tobin C. Harding)
450a84f6e8 consensus: Run the formatter (Tobin C. Harding)
89143205f9 Enable formatting for consensus (Tobin C. Harding)
ce773af20f tests: Remove useless use of super imports (Tobin C. Harding)
ef01f4d0f6 consensus: Introduce local variables (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
One final push crew, 16 patches, only a few are big.
All non-trivial formatting is done in separate patches so the changes can be verified mechanically.
With this applied the whole `rust-bitcoin` crate will be formatted.
Big thanks to everyone for putting up with the ongoing formatting PRs, no-one likes doing these but hopefully this an improvement to the project - especially in helping us get more contributors to the project.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
> ACK [913575a](913575ac91). Went through the workflow locally.
sanket1729:
ACK 913575ac91. Went through the workflow locally.
apoelstra:
ACK 913575ac91
Tree-SHA512: b30eaa2893563155de05f8fa97be4a24a7dd8bf43bb426314c5104598477ca2173af279da796da8b18cc53a0ed525908b3d4edd0504836a443465efa0773632d
67618d679d Mark `Denomination` as `non_exhaustive` (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
It is possible that we will add new variants to `Denomination` in the future so making it `non_exhaustive` is better for forward compatibility.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 67618d679d
apoelstra:
ACK 67618d679d
sanket1729:
ACK 67618d679d
Tree-SHA512: a28b7c6577f098b3d64c505e948e3b9fd0cc43a911a2b7c35610ada6a2f75514a1cb05ab8c99212340cf4e34426ac8b5f0ecc65d5afa22d67296e82d878b9308
2d23e11569 Remove extern crate hashbrown (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
(Merge candidate only after release of 0.30.0)
We no longer have a "hashbrown" feature, the feature gated `pub extern crate hashbrown` should have been removed when we removed the feature.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 2d23e11569
Kixunil:
ACK 2d23e11569
Tree-SHA512: 36d4c539f3f972d42bbc9fda9e96063a78d35afc6aebbf534b878dcef0440b72c2a990bcbdbb2ad3bf99cab7048cdbd4002899c2b314da21e4a7bacaf8c71f0f
Add `rustfmt::skip` attribute in a couple of places and then remove the
exclude for the `blockdata` module. Do not run the formatter, that will
be done as a separate patch to aid review.
Currently we have a code comment that is supposed to assist devs in
maintaining the `network::constants::Network` type by failing to build
if a new variant is added. This plays havoc with the formatter because
the comment is hanging at the bottom of a match block and the formatting
thinks its for the proceeding line of code.
Instead of using a code comment add a panic so the unit test fails if a
new variant is added to `network::constants::Network`.
In preparation for running the formatter introduce a couple of local
variables to reduce the line length and inhibit function call from being
split over multiple lines.
Refactor only, no logic changes.
00b46d6d9d Indent functions (Martin Habovstiak)
d56d202aeb Support weight prediction in `const` context (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
**Notes for reviewers:**
This is something that I want to use in my code and hopefully reasonably easy to review, so if this can get into 0.30 that'd be really nice. No hard feelings if it doesn't.
I tried to put extra effort into making review easier by:
* intentionally "mis-formatting" the first commit so diff is smaller and easy to understand - see individual commits.
* copying patterns from non-const fn to const fn so it's obviously correct (includes same variable names)
* not bothering with the array trick in `VarInt::len` and simply accepting the limitation of Rust 1.46+ (I use 1.48 BTW).
**Description**
Some smart contracts or simplified wallets statically know the sizes of
transactions or inputs. The possible approaches to handling them so far
were re-computing the values (and hoping the optimizer will const fold
them) or using a simple constant which may be harder to understand and
get right. It's much nicer to just use a `const` but our code didn't
support it until now.
This change adds methods that can compute the prediction in `const`
context for Rust versions >= 1.46.0 which allow use of loops (and
conditions but those could be workaround anyway).
As a side effect of this, the change also adds `const` to `VarInt::len`
in Rust 1.46+. While this one could be made unconditional using array
trick it's probably not worth it because of the planned MSRV bump.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 00b46d6d9d
tcharding:
ACK 00b46d6d9d
Tree-SHA512: 5509886a68b4de5227db0e28d92a40be8de64592e0b189c519213db21bcfe98ca03d9a1936b1024729b97db69e8ec0b55fac870a7ce9bab0d0c9a47b2087990f
Some smart contracts or simplified wallets statically know the sizes of
transactions or inputs. The possible approaches to handling them so far
were re-computing the values (and hoping the optimizer will const fold
them) or using a simple constant which may be harder to understand and
get right. It's much nicer to just use a `const` but our code didn't
support it until now.
This change adds methods that can compute the prediction in `const`
context for Rust versions >= 1.46.0 which allow use of loops (and
conditions but those could be workaround anyway).
As a side effect of this, the change also adds `const` to `VarInt::len`
in Rust 1.46+. While this one could be made unconditional using array
trick it's probably not worth it because of the planned MSRV bump.
Note: this commit is intentionally unformatted to make diff easier to
understand. Formatting will be done in future commit.
It wasn't obvious that displaying address with alternate formatting
upper cases bech32 addresses.
This change adds information about this and also a note about the
compatibility of various wallets.
2158f88f1d Add a method to `pow::Target` for returning difficulty as an f64. (junderw)
Pull request description:
Closes#1703
This adds a conversion function to U256 to get an f64. We use the method shown in the following blog post.
https://blog.m-ou.se/floats/
Target::MAX was converted to a f64 and set as a const that is verified in a unit test.
The code is rather confusing, so I took a crack at explaining it in my comments as well. Please let me know if you want it cleaned up some more.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 2158f88f1d
tcharding:
ACK 2158f88f1d
Tree-SHA512: 7c0e82bd1756950c1c6dfb9da91fd71b276e2e7dc8a33e69112f87b87e358240f0f7c4894d24ab228e149d862938833a2e65e345ce2712a78dc86dec197da34f
This adds a conversion function to U256 to get an f64. We use the method shown in the following blog post. https://blog.m-ou.se/floats/
Target::MAX was converted to a f64 and set as a const that is verified in a unit test.
Steven Roose
Andrew Poelstra
Harshil Jani
Martin Habovstiak
Tobin C. Harding
yancy
junderw
Salvatore Ingala