Recently we introduced a bug in the weight/size code, while
investigating I found that our `Transaction`/`Block` weight/size APIs
were in a total mess because:
- The docs were stale
- The concept of weight (weight units) and size (bytes) were mixed up
I audited all the API functions, read some bips (141, 144) and re-wrote
the API with the following goals:
- Use terminology from the bips
- Use abstractions that mirror the bips where possible
6c6a89b1d1 Add sub-sat fractions parsing regression test (Martin Habovstiak)
f1a3dc6719 Allow parsing sub-sat denoms with decimal points (Martin Habovstiak)
b3d9a267ea Add a few more amount parsing tests (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
Numbers with only zeros after decimal points are valid if they are also
multiples of `10^precision` (e.g. 1000 for msats). These were
artificially disallowed as "too precise" which was at least misleading.
This change allows parsing such numbers.
And yes, I know this is not perfectly efficient (unless the compiler figures out some magic opts) but so isn't the rest of the code. TBH this parsing code drives me crazy and I'd love to rewrite it to be more efficient and readable.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 6c6a89b1d1
Tree-SHA512: 03cf4b416f2eac25e0aac57ef964ed06fa36c7fe8244bdcf97852cc58e1613b1ec6132379b834da58ad3240fdd61508a384202f63aa9ffa335c18cd7b2b724d3
Numbers with only zeros after decimal points are valid if they are also
multiples of `10^precision` (e.g. 1000 for msats). These were
artificially disallowed as "too precise" which was at least misleading.
This change allows parsing such numbers.
Our previous MSRV did not support MIN/MAX associated consts so we had
methods min/max_value. Now that our MSRV is Rust 1.48.0 we can use the
consts.
Deprecate min/max_value methods in favor of MIN/MAX associated conts.
We currently use the functions `min_value` and `max_value` because the
consts were not available in Rust 1.41.1, however we recently bumped the
MSRV so we can use the consts now.
If we use `#![cfg_attr(docsrs, feature(doc_auto_cfg))]` instead of
`#![cfg_attr(docsrs, feature(doc_cfg))]` we no longer need to manually
mark types with `#[cfg_attr(docsrs, doc(cfg(feature = "std")))]`.
Sweeeeeet.
Various formatting issues have crept into the codebase because we do not
run the formatter in CI.
In preparation for enabling formatting checks in CI run `cargo +nightly
fmt` to fix current formatting issues. No changes other than those
create by the formatter.
The `max_value` and `min_value` functions only exist to be
compatible/uniform with Rust 1.41.1 they will never change and they just
return a constant value. They can therefore be made const functions.
Adds new module `string` to be later converted to its own
crate. The module currently contains the FromHexStr trait and an error
type to be used for implementing hex parsing on types. This change
also adds implementations of FromHexStr for types with a single u32
member such as `Sequence(pub u32)`. All structs that match the
following regex have been given this implementation
`\(u32\)` and `\(pub u32\)`. All implementations have associated
unit tests matching all possible cases. NonStandardSighashType has
been ommitted from this change as it is an error and should not be
constructed using the methods added in this change.
Adds parse::hex_u32 for future use to be made generic to allow
different sizes of integers to be parsed from hex strings.
The error type FromHexError implements required traits such as
Display and std::error::Error
Kani can't really handle string processing, and appears to be unable
to check integer multiplication (for now), but we do several checks
for addition and subtraction, and conversion between signedness,
that Kani can easily prove.
108a1f73ca Fail CI if docs build throws warnings (Tobin C. Harding)
b014f0fdcb Fix rustdocs build warnings (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Currently we do not fail the CI script if the docs build throws warnings, since we are a group of super anal, easily triggered, code cleanliness obsessed devs this causes a mild rash to develop on the lower back [0]. We can easily fix this by checking for build warnings in CI.
[0] - Amusingly my rash has been playing up since Friday but I thought I'd fixed the warnings in an open PR someplace so I was ignoring it, seeing Kixunil's [issue](https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/1403) this morning prompted me to fix it :)
Fix#1403
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 108a1f73ca
apoelstra:
ACK 108a1f73ca
Tree-SHA512: 0f86c318b2ec8bf7aa6a0d0f355f8fe8e3eb8ad5eb74d95f8dab882d6729c386c3e0ef4cc2378645e15460ff2b9b47d66e3603958f8b188f5e2b07272739d755
Done as part of flattening the `util` module. Simply move the `amount`
module out of the `util` module and to the crate root. Justified by the
fact that the `Amount` type is more-or-less a "primitive" bitcoin type.
2022-10-21 10:16:49 +11:00
Renamed from bitcoin/src/util/amount.rs (Browse further)
Tobin C. Harding
yancy
Andrew Poelstra
Martin Habovstiak
bnabi
Casey Rodarmor
Daniela Brozzoni
connormullett