Calls to `unwrap` outside of tests are typically unfavourable.
Sink writers do not error. We can use `expect` with a descriptive
message string to indicate this.
Docs can always do with a bit of love.
Clean up the module level (`//!`) rustdocs for all public modules.
I claim uniform is better than any specific method/style. I tried to fit
in with what ever was either most sane of most prevalent, therefore
attaining uniformity without unnecessary code churn (one exception being
the changes to headings described below).
Notes:
* Headings - use heading as a regular sentence for all modules e.g.,
```
//! Bitcoin network messages.
```
as opposed to
```
//! # Bitcoin Network Messages
```
It was not clear which style to use so I picked a 'random' mature
project and copied their style.
* Added 'This module' in _most_ places as the start of the module
description, however I was not religious about this one.
* Fixed line length if necessary since most of our code seems to follow
short (80 char) line lengths for comments anyways.
* Added periods and fixed obvious (and sometimes not so obvious)
grammatically errors.
* Added a trailing `//!` to every block since this was almost universal
already. I don't really like this one but I'm guessing it is Andrew's
preferred style since its on the copyright notices as well.
This refactors `Script::bytes_to_asm_fmt`` function to use an iterator
instead of index. Such change makes it easier to reason about overflows
or out-of-bounds accesses. As a result this also fixes three unlikely
overflows and happens to improve formatting to not output space at the
beginning in some weird cases.
To improve robustness even better it also moves `read_uint`
implementation to internal function which returns a more specific error
type which can be exhaustively matched on to guarantee correct error
handling. Probably because of lack of this the code was previously
checking the same condition twice, the second time being unreachable and
attempting to behave differently than the first one.
Finally this uses macro to deduplicate code which differs only in single
number, ensuring the code stays in sync across all branches.
This adds a test case for script formatting which caused overflow in the
past and a few others from the same "interesting" transaction. Note that
to trigger the bug one has to run the test on 32 bit architecture.
This adds an overflow check in `Script::bytes_to_asm_fmt()` motivated by
`electrs` issue. While it was not tested yet, I'm very confident that
overflow is the cause of panic there and even if not it can cause panic
becuase the public function takes unvalidated byte array and reads
`data_len` from it.
The `electrs` issue: https://github.com/romanz/electrs/issues/490
This documents cargo features in two ways: explictly in text and in code
using `#[doc(cfg(...))]` attribute where possible. Notably, this is
impossible for `serde` derives. The attribute is contitional and only
activated for docs.rs or explicit local builds.
This change also adds `package.metadata.docs.rs` field to `Cargo.toml`
which instructs docs.rs to build with relevant features and with
`docsrs` config activated enabling `#[doc(cfg(...))] attributes.
I also took the opportunity to fix a few missing spaces in nearby code.
Based on the original work by Justin Moon.
*MSRV unchanged from 1.29.0.*
When `std` is off, `no-std` must be on, and we use the [`alloc`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/alloc/) and core2 crates. The `alloc` crate requires the user define a global allocator.
* Import from `core` and `alloc` instead of `std`
* `alloc` only used if `no-std` is on
* Create `std` feature
* Create `no-std` feature which adds a core2 dependency to polyfill `std::io` features. This is an experimental feature and should be
used with caution.
* CI runs tests `no-std`
* MSRV for `no-std` is 1.51 or so
It doesn't really make sense to have a constant for every common
script type's dust limit, instead we should just use the
`Script::dust_value()` function to have users calculate it.
The dust calculations added were only valid for P2WPKH and P2PKH
outputs, and somehow this fact was missed in review, despite the
upstream Core code being linked to and looked at by two reviewers
and the author (me).
Someday I will grow eyeballs, but that day is not today.
This is instead of encode::Errors because the encoders should
not be allowed to return errors that don't originate in the writer
they are writing into.
This is a part of the method definition that has been relied upon for a
while already.
- Rename the `iter` method to `instructions`.
- Add `instructions_minimal` for minimal-enforced iteration.
- Iterator has `Result<Instruction, Error>` as items.
Tobin Harding
Martin Habovstiak
Andrew Poelstra
sanket1729
Dr Maxim Orlovsky
Devrandom
Riccardo Casatta
Sebastian
Sebastian Geisler
Antoine Poinsot
Matt Corallo
Steven Roose
Elichai Turkel