995c797e0d feat: generate PrivateKey (kshitjj)
Pull request description:
added a function to generate a private key
Resolves: #1823
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 995c797e0d
tcharding:
ACK 995c797e0d
Tree-SHA512: 29ba54be8cb777e71a4683835686cbf2978b23736f629d7bbff468074235fece261ca170c23f358d1bd878987566d09e4488c3f1a106c59a5c8bdf52b98abffe
8e6f953aa7 Expose valid (min, max) difficulty transition thresholds (Wilmer Paulino)
Pull request description:
Once `U256` was made private, we lost the ability to check whether a valid difficulty transition was made in the chain, since `Target` doesn't expose any operations. We only choose to expose `Shl<u32>` and `Shr<u32>` such that we can compute the min and max target thresholds allowed for a difficulty transition.
This is something we realized was missing after bumping to `rust-bitcoin v0.30.0` in `rust-lightning`, specifically for our `lightning-block-sync` crate. It may also be worth having a helper in `rust-bitcoin` that checks a header properly builds upon the previous, but that can be left for future work.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 8e6f953aa7
sanket1729:
ACK 8e6f953aa7 . Sorry, was confused by some details.
apoelstra:
ACK 8e6f953aa7
Tree-SHA512: 740dd64089426463dc6a19726d5a562276bd0966e0e31af8e1e67b28d18945644ac0e50be3cf0cc7fa604acc3d2c5b912a77a7caa69d8cff85f70fd57e5328c5
dff757d7db Comment predict_weight (yancy)
Pull request description:
I've been reading over the `predict_weight` function since it is one of the biggest challenges for coin-selection. IE choosing inputs and constructing an optimal selection strategy requires predicting the weight to get the best selection. It's great this work has been done but there are some things I don't understand well enough to comment.
1) why are we looking at the size of VarInt struct here
> let script_size = script_len + VarInt(script_len as u64).len()
2) [predict_weight_internal](36500b4451/bitcoin/src/blockdata/transaction.rs (L1245)) has a bunch of magic numbers. I'd like to be able to comment this as well but I don't fully understand that function.
Also, `Transaction.rs` is a big file and it seems like all of the prediction stuff could be moved to a separate module or maybe a separate crate?
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK dff757d7db
Kixunil:
ACK dff757d7db
Tree-SHA512: 8ffa16d500075d691528ce1819b9352a148af431889bebbd7cddcf470bd4e3048ec53a5e778bc3659e33d8c25b68422a93dac1d46b9489ff56f41d88d7f05433
d57ec019d5 Use Amount type for TxOut value field (yancy)
Pull request description:
Propose using `Amount` type for the `TxOut` `value` field. I only implemented `Decodable ` and `Encodable` enough to compile but this needs to completed obviously if using `Amount` seems like a good idea.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK d57ec019d5
apoelstra:
ACK d57ec019d5
Tree-SHA512: df3fd55294d5f9392ca90bb920be8fbb9d7d285d97669412e07d5a099f70f81fd73e7e259679de9c8ce5c6c855e64f62213700f0fb7db415e0c706c509485377
ed6421c939 address: Add generic serde::Serialize for Address (Steven Roose)
814b9917da address: Add Sync, Send, Sized and UnPin marker traits on NetworkValidation (Steven Roose)
Pull request description:
With the new rewrite of Address, `serde::Serialize` is only implemented on `Address<bitcoin::address::NetworkChecked>` and `Address<bitcoin::address::NetworkUnchecked>`. But the compiler has no way of knowing that that are all the possible versions of `Address`, so the generic `Address<impl bitcoin::address::NetworkValidation>` doesn't implement `serde::Serialize`.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK ed6421c939
tcharding:
ACK ed6421c939
Tree-SHA512: 65e43dff244c94fe08ccb2d985781a2687a1e2db186960a35d4ae89f3b31c5af66892630a3ebaac9cecdc83638487425afa17374869d278648b348869e0ba091
Once `U256` was made private, we lost the ability to check whether a
valid difficulty transition was made in the chain, since `Target`
no longer exposes any arithmetic operations.
Our previous MSRV did not support MIN/MAX associated consts so we had
methods min/max_value. Now that our MSRV is Rust 1.48.0 we can use the
consts.
Deprecate min/max_value methods in favor of MIN/MAX associated conts.
We currently use the functions `min_value` and `max_value` because the
consts were not available in Rust 1.41.1, however we recently bumped the
MSRV so we can use the consts now.
1c3bbd4bf2 internals: Remove attribution from all files (Tobin C. Harding)
99673ab5c4 hashes: Introduce SPDX license identifiers (Tobin C. Harding)
984fe69448 bitcoin: Remove attribution from all files (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Please note, whether or not we need a per-file license comment is out of scope for this PR. This PR leaves us with the most simple per-file solution possible and leaves the merit of per-file license comment to be discussed on another day.
Simplify the per-file license stuff by doing:
- Remove the attribution line from each file.
Currently we have a mishmash of attribution lines accompanying the SPDX identifier. These lines are basically meaningless because:
- The date is often wrong
- The original author attributed is not the only contributor to a file
- The term "rust bitcoin developers" is basically just noise
- Introduce SPDX license identifiers into `hashes` and remove attribution line (ie, make `hashes` uniform with `bitcoin`)
Required before merge please:
- [x] ack from apoelstra because as the library original author many of the changes in this PR remove his name
- [x] ack from Kixunil because he had some concerns in the issue descussion
Fix: #1816
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 1c3bbd4bf2
sanket1729:
ACK 1c3bbd4bf2
apoelstra:
ACK 1c3bbd4bf2
Tree-SHA512: c5ac05c5eb23b3b6a760f707c344b22f5871a4dedee4990b1840f57e4cee1d38560ff4507c354bbf29bc8ff05a179d95d7e100fcf19bd93c5362344a352c7b5a
Currently we have a mishmash of attribution lines accompanying the SPDX
identifier. These lines are basically meaningless because:
- The date is often wrong
- The original author attributed is not the only contributor to a file
- The term "rust bitcoin developers" is basically just noise
Just remove all the attribution lines and be done with it. While we are
at it add an SPDX line to the few files missing it, whether this license
nonsense is even needed is left as an argument for another day.
dd4ad9444e Hardcode expected weight in txin_txout_weight_tests (Peter Todd)
Pull request description:
Rational: the expected weight is fixed so this both ensures we don't accidentally change it somehow, and makes it easier to re-use these test cases in other codebases (eg python-bitcoinlib).
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK dd4ad9444e
tcharding:
ACK dd4ad9444e
Kixunil:
ACK dd4ad9444e
Tree-SHA512: 4769a4bb8695f4f4c95e258bb5f06a232090b14c3d9159d6d5de2d09d7fc934a1b920b90cc09677a88fc0cf37ac21ed27794692dff2c73df4252c9551dc10fc2
Rational: the expected weight is fixed so this both ensures we don't
accidentally change it somehow, and makes it easier to re-use these test
cases in other codebases (eg python-bitcoinlib).
a54e1ceab1 Apply rustfmt (The rustfmt Tyranny)
38d11ce3da ci: Make release CI search for NEXT.RELEASE instead (Steven Roose)
dad3abd20f transaction: Rename is_coin_base to is_coinbase (Steven Roose)
Pull request description:
Alternative to https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/1795.
Keep the old method as deprecated and add doc alias. Also change internal usage of the method.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK a54e1ceab1
apoelstra:
ACK a54e1ceab1
Tree-SHA512: 52d9729bf83da164556d960f8867cb836ff57a0f619da3dd3620efffb28a974aac23b8085863ab0e072a4bdb2f13ac576efa43ad2eec9a271ad044227f4d00a4
8f6317fbab Add predict_weight test for witness address types (yancy)
Pull request description:
Add a predict_weight test for address types with witness data
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 8f6317fbab
apoelstra:
ACK 8f6317fbab
Tree-SHA512: 954908f068d6b0e8f7cc6bc6bffd110d490d7165cf2544ff0f936264761cb1f8e4da1e37fd5a6a34fd8b05f8d72817a3b340bbf968b29c9f538f10853347fdf0
fabcde036f Use package in manifest and shorten import (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
We can use `package` to rename `bitcoin_hashes` to `hashes` and `bitcoin_internals` to `internals`. This makes imports more terse with no loss of meaning.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK fabcde036f
Kixunil:
ACK fabcde036f
Tree-SHA512: bc5bff6f7f6bf3b68ba1e0644a83da014081d8c6c9d578c21cb54fdd56a018f68733dd1135d05b590ba193ed9efd12fa9019182c1fed347e604d8548f6ef9103
29cb34eed7 Refactor Address struct and its methods (Harshil Jani)
Pull request description:
Closes#1755
In this PR the `as_unchecked` is added to the Address struct, which returns a reference to the same address but with the type Address<NetworkUnchecked>. Similarly, the `assume_checked_ref` is added to Address<NetworkUnchecked>, which returns a reference to the same address but with the type Address.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 29cb34eed7
apoelstra:
ACK 29cb34eed7
Tree-SHA512: 75ba40883d9fb31026b0e94e8d3fdcf808ff38a4d10f61f99a1e14ddc48358da86bad44cd78563dc67aa5d39382a5493e73c03891317f361f590e39b6257cb84
91f45a214f Replace hardcoded values with compile-time hashing (Martin Habovstiak)
095b7958dd Make `sha256t_hash_newtype!` evocative of the output. (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
The Rust API guidelines state that macros should be evocative of the
output, which is a sensible recommendation. We already had this for
`hash_newtype!` macro but didn't for sha256t version.
This changes the macro to have this syntax:
```rust
sha256t_hash_newtype! {
// Order of these structs is fixed.
/// Optional documentation details here. Summary is auto-generated.
/*pub*/ struct Tag = raw(MIDSTATE_BYTES, LEN);
/// Documentation here
#[hash_newtype(forward)] // optional, default is backward
/*pub*/ struct HashType(/* attributes allowed here */ _);
}
```
Closes https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/1427
Depends on #1769
How do you like the syntax? Is weird `struct Foo = bar(..);` acceptable?
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 91f45a214f
apoelstra:
ACK 91f45a214f
Tree-SHA512: f6b555b20311a4c1cb097bc296c92459f6fbe16ba102d8c977eb2383dbcae3cc8ffce32e3cb771e7e22197fda26379971aa4feaadc5e2e70d37fa690ae8b8859
873501a85f Use slice patterns (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
Some code looks better with slice patterns. This changes `bip32` to use them.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 873501a85f
tcharding:
ACK 873501a85f
Tree-SHA512: 2e91b21d0f943c04f592112f241444ba3b1b1dad47ea6bea162f62cfbcaf98e383257cad144072b3807aaa0c122dabab638ac10b1cc1f5179727a5f05aac0659
This commit refactors the Address struct and its methods to improve
its functionality and usability.The AddressInner struct now holds
the payload and network, and the PhantomData<V> type is used to track
the network validation state.
Also as_unchecked and assume_checked_red methods are added to allow
conversion between checked and unchecked network validation state.
Signed-off-by: Harshil Jani <harshiljani2002@gmail.com>
Previous changes enabled passing the string used as a tag into
`sha256t_hash_newtype!` macro rather than hard-coding midstate. This
commit takes advantage of it and replaces the hard-coded values with
compile-time executed (`const`) hashing.
The Rust API guidelines state that macros should be evocative of the
output, which is a sensible recommendation. We already had this for
`hash_newtype!` macro but didn't for sha256t version.
This changes the macro to have this syntax:
```rust
sha256t_hash_newtype! {
// Order of these structs is fixed.
/// Optional documentation details here. Summary is auto-generated.
/*pub*/ struct Tag = raw(MIDSTATE_BYTES, LEN);
/// Documentation here
#[hash_newtype(forward)] // optional, default is backward
/*pub*/ struct HashType(/* attributes allowed here */ _);
}
```
Closes#1427
We've upgraded MSRV but didn't update clippy config, so some things that
could be improved aren't caught by clippy. This updates the config and
fixes the new issues.
I also `rg '1\.41\.1'`ed for interesting changes and found one
additional improvement.
a189942c64 Use doc_auto_cfg (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
If we use `#![cfg_attr(docsrs, feature(doc_auto_cfg))]` instead of `#![cfg_attr(docsrs, feature(doc_cfg))]` we no longer need to manually mark types with `#[cfg_attr(docsrs, doc(cfg(feature = "std")))]`.
Sweeeeeet.
Props to pezcore for the lesson :)
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK a189942c64
Kixunil:
ACK a189942c64
Tree-SHA512: 1ced1e09f5d1733b362b83ca650d3f52c89eb57e78e8437f74c496d89776548f8c50feab6750352342e2abe680434681de2c126ce36a81dda21397b9695d4d4e
Signed-off-by: Harshil Jani <harshiljani2002@gmail.com>
implementation of PartialEq<Address> for Address<NetworkUnchecked>
Signed-off-by: Harshil Jani <harshiljani2002@gmail.com>
If we use `#![cfg_attr(docsrs, feature(doc_auto_cfg))]` instead of
`#![cfg_attr(docsrs, feature(doc_cfg))]` we no longer need to manually
mark types with `#[cfg_attr(docsrs, doc(cfg(feature = "std")))]`.
Sweeeeeet.
ed80df5ebc Add `ChainHash::from_genesis_block_hash` (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
This improves readability of converting `BlockHash` into `ChainHash`. It's useful in e.g. Electrum protocol which sends `BlockHash` (serialized backward).
Closes#1751
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK ed80df5ebc
tcharding:
ACK ed80df5ebc
Tree-SHA512: b03eb9ca0a1eb38196cc8e43751c2def0d00b463b774003c5319bf56599db598ddd4bb0e2ad0bd3803f21a925135992d421848e7b1ba5e7bab3a405f60fc973c
We can use `package` to rename `bitcoin_hashes` to `hashes` and
`bitcoin_internals` to `internals`. This makes imports more terse with
no loss of meaning.
82b6332b91 create a set of recognized denomination forms (yancy)
Pull request description:
I took a stab at restricting the acceptable forms here. There was some consensus that "BtC" was confusing that was discussed in a previous pr https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/1715.
Also, personally I felt that the `PossiblyConfusingDenomination` enum variant was itself confusing. I think it's probably cleaner to just maintain a list of acceptable forms and treat everything else as unknown. For now I just created a const of possibly confusing forms.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 82b6332b91
apoelstra:
ACK 82b6332b91
Tree-SHA512: f3c212046e4d8a34ce2d50f34065b1778ae190ca80dd9ad73ef41eb5925705c88c0a764ec149d731eb1735d670c5542415953633a7f3f672d0c1e46b6e004d0b
This improves readability of converting `BlockHash` into `ChainHash`.
It's useful in e.g. Electrum protocol which sends `BlockHash`
(serialized backward).
Closes#1751
122188f7dd Use shorter import statements (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Just patch 2, patch 1 is #1728
From the commit log of patch 2
Use shorter import statements
As per discussion [0] use the shorter form for importing crates that we
re-export (`hashes` and `secp256k1`).
[0] https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/discussions/1661
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 122188f7dd
sanket1729:
utACK 122188f7dd
Tree-SHA512: 3f540464d38c72ba9d68f8ceda8600540bd0c3eef0ba67531c87fa1e0e4f757af7035cf80a1a5f17aa05604a17fdd9ef59bb6bece6b4145d540dac1e5362fc01
yancy
Andrew Poelstra
kshitjj
Wilmer Paulino
Tobin C. Harding
Riccardo Casatta
Peter Todd
The rustfmt Tyranny
Steven Roose
Sergi Delgado Segura
Harshil Jani
Martin Habovstiak