`s.parse` is more idiomatic and produces more helpful error messages.
This has been changed repo wide in the main codebase, not including
examples, rustdocs, and in the test module.
`use std::str::FromStr;` has been removed where this change makes
it unnecessary.
In preparation for moving the `ScritpBuf` type to `primitives` add a
public and private extension trait for the functions we want to leave
here in `bitcoin`.
Note, includes a change to the `difine_extension_trait` metavariable
used on `$gent` from `ident` to `path` to support the generic
`AsRef<PushBytes>`.
In preparation to move script types to `primitives` we replace impl
block with extension traits by replacing the temporary modules with
`define_extension_trait`.
Done in preparation for moving the script types to `primitives`.
The script types have a bunch of functionality to support scriptPubkeys,
and scriptPubkeys are an address thing.
Create a module under `address` and in it create a bunch of extension
traits to hold all scriptPubkey functionality.
Includes adding an ugly-as-hell macro to create the traits.
We should pass `Copy` types by value not by reference.
Currently this is not done in secp, but lets do it here in bitcoin.
Pass by value:
- `SerializedSignature`
- bitcoin sigs
- secp sigs
- secp `Message`
433fd6bf7e api: Run just check-api (Tobin C. Harding)
8fd583b069 Pass hash types by value (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
We should pass `Copy` types by value not by reference. Pass the hash types by value.
Second step in the pass-copy-types-by-value work, pulled out of #2404.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 433fd6bf7e
Kixunil:
ACK 433fd6bf7e
Tree-SHA512: 999d12f60550cacc4ae19b4cbf505b25c1eed803820f22b1a706e9f95da1b7e7b422f393f4115d579927c0c476cd504036a39b3cdc06a1d6befbcff5513f7433
9f01871c11 api: Run just check-api (Tobin C. Harding)
7929b51640 Pass keys by value (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
We should pass `Copy` types by value not by reference. Pass the key types by value.
This is patch 1 from #2404
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 9f01871c11 this will annoy some people but I think we should do it
Tree-SHA512: 18afab537edf4ade4dc1c1e5992e50060b8935531f1e3cbe1d3b94b2fcb87aafa39947f342e0e762835bda3b4091dd35b3b74ea79f4dbb3b21660ffd21d1f82e
Currently we have a trait `Hash` that is required for `Hmac`, `Hkdf`,
and other use cases. However, it is unegonomic for users who just want
to do a simple hash to have to import the trait.
Add inherent functions to all hash types including those created with
the new wrapper type macros.
This patch introduces some duplicate code but we are trying to make
progress in the hashes API re-write. We can come back and de-dublicate
later.
Includes making `to_byte_array`,`from_byte_array`, `as_byte_array`, and
`all_zeros` const where easily possible.
In a few cases a function header documents the parameters of the following function under the heading"Arguments", this has been changed to "Parameters"
In the segwit signing example we are using the incorrect value when
creating the signature - we should be using the utxo amount (input
amount) not the spend amount (output spend amount).
Close: #2680
Recently in #2451 we disallowed bip32 derivation paths with the leading
'm' variable.
There is some confusion as to what exactly the bip specifies however
Bitcoin Core RPC call `getaddressinfo` returns a derivation path with a
leading "m/". This means we need to be able to parse it irrespective of
what the bip says.
Be more liberal in what we accept as a derivation path, including both
with and without the leading 'm/'.
Leave the full investigation of the bip to a later date.
Change back some of the test strings as makes sense and include test
strings to showcase the full current behaviour.
In BIP0032, m is used as a variable for the root extended key. It is not
meant to be used as a constant prefix when serializing paths.
Update the DerivationPath parser to no longer require the m prefix.
Remove the m prefix from the unit tests and the bip32, ecdsa-psbt,
and taproot-psbt examples.
close#2449
5eb2de1660 Remove TODO about rand trait (Tobin C. Harding)
66cc007c2b p2p: Remove TODO comments (Tobin C. Harding)
0b5fb45ea0 consensus: Remove HEX_BUF_SIZE todo (Tobin C. Harding)
579668892a consensus: Remove TODO (Tobin C. Harding)
53beb9db30 Remove ancient todos in test code (Tobin C. Harding)
abe2241828 units: Remove "alloc" TODO (Tobin C. Harding)
5386ef0fd2 psbt: Delete TODO comments (Tobin C. Harding)
14c8a2232b examples: Remove TODO (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Done while working on #2368. There are 5 left. Do we want to leave the MSRV ones in there?
```bash
bitcoin/src/blockdata/weight.rs:66: // TODO replace with panic!() when MSRV = 1.57+
bitcoin/src/consensus/serde.rs:101: // TODO: statically prove impossible cases
bitcoin/src/pow.rs:445: // TODO: Use `carrying_mul` when stabilized: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85532
units/src/amount.rs:595: // TODO replace whith unwrap() when available in const context.
units/src/amount.rs:599: // TODO replace with panic!() when MSRV = 1.57+
```
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 5eb2de1660
apoelstra:
ACK 5eb2de1660
Tree-SHA512: 285b1711a6e6fba126e2c4159b25454c7f894122b76fde1d3d29e57b2ec0a6e90230e46ac79d70aa133da177c75d267fc5a13489b69881862649de771027ec8e
6715e93e89 Add Witness::p2tr_key_spend function (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Add a function for creating the witness when doing a key path spend for a P2TR output.
This mirrors what we did for P2WPKH when adding `Witness::p2wpkh`.
Includes update to the taproot signing example to use the new constructor.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 6715e93e89
apoelstra:
ACK 6715e93e89
Tree-SHA512: aab51329e8fda471442bb9cebd6327636548dd157bb9842fe66993fcdd211bb04b2b829aa9d5962dd619f5c0b73d19644a44529c1a5958df1a6bc892147b44f5
Add a function for creating the witness when doing a key path spend for
a P2TR output.
This mirrors what we did for P2WPKH when adding `Witness::p2wpkh`.
Includes update to the taproot signing example to use the new constructor.
We have a bunch of functions that take `Network` when what they really
want is something that can be converted to a `KnownHrp`.
Make `KnownHrp` public and accept `impl Into<KnownHrp>`.
Applies to both `ecdsa::Signature` and `taproot::Signature`.
Re-name the `Signature` fields with more descriptive names. The
names used were decided upon in the issue discussion.
Impove rustdocs while we are at it.
Note, the change to `sign-tx-segwit-v0` is refactor only, the diff does
not show it but we have a local variable already called `sighash_type`
that is equal to `EcdsaSighashType::All`.
Includes a function argument rename as well, just to be uniform.
Fix: #2139
BIP-32 only differentiates between mainnet and some testnet when
encoding and decoding xpubs and xprivs. As such we can use the new
`NetworkKind` type instead of `Network` throughout the `bip32` module.
P2WPKH requires keys to be compressed which introduces error handling
even in cases when it's statically known that a key is compressed. To
avoid it, this change introduces `CompressedPublicKey` which is similar
to `PublicKey` except it's statically known to be compressed.
This also changes relevant code to use `CompressedPublicKey` instead of
`PublicKey`.
Add two signing examples to showcase signing a simple one input two
output transaction using both segwit v0 outputs and taproot outputs.
This patch is the result of the recent rust-bitcoin TABConf workshop,
wit bug fix by Sanket, updated to use APIs from tip of master branch.
This code, depending on v0.30.0 is what is being introduced to the
cookbook at the moment.
We have a new API function available with recent version of `secp256k1`
to create a `Message` directly from a sighash byte array.
Use `Message::from_digest(sighash.to_byte_array())` to construct
messages ready to sign.
Upgrade the `secp256k1` dependency to the newly released `v0.28.0`.
FTR this includes two simple changes:
- Use `Message::from_digest_slice` instead of `Message::from_slice`.
- Use `secp256k1::Keypair` instead of `secp256k1::KeyPair`.
3b60ad5567 example: Modify `taproot-psbt.rs` to make the use of prevouts clearer. (S. Santos)
Pull request description:
The `taroot-psbt.rs` example uses only one input, and therefore the current code may not make it clear that the number of prevout items must correspond to the number of transaction inputs, since the prevout slice is built within a loop.
This PR aims to make this clear to any user who wants to reuse the logic from the example code.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 3b60ad5567
apoelstra:
ACK 3b60ad5567
Tree-SHA512: afad63782b0e8a459de6cf69712d31fdab860c0d4cf9f3a51c3d85544a067bd50f4febc10ec4046e3a37d9ca518bbf2460c2599f1569549701c07f8a267dfd05
Fmt Bot
Jamil Lambert, PhD
Tobin C. Harding
Martin Habovstiak
Andrew Poelstra
Divyansh Gupta
Jose Storopoli
yu
josibake
yancy
Thabokani
Vincenzo Palazzo
S. Santos
junderw