There is a new lint error on nightly-2025-04-25 "variables can be used
directly in the `format!` string".
Use the variables in the `format!` string for all cases in
`bitcoin/examples/`.
3bb6c73f2d Add methods to retrieve inner types (Shing Him Ng)
Pull request description:
Resolves#4345
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 3bb6c73f2d
apoelstra:
ACK 3bb6c73f2d3edd1165b7b7f3a833fa471786e166; successfully ran local tests; should backport to 0.32.x
Tree-SHA512: c89017bbc2126ec62c756c4ee9b49dcc8b94a3063a8155aadcf7c69a6f0bc9337baedffe7f52a4ab6f0b738302bea683391d394483c4c7eefbb622b97d34d26c
For TweakedKeypair, `to_inner` is also renamed to `to_keypair` to maintain
consistency. Similarly, `to_inner` is renamed to `to_x_only_pubkey` for
TweakedPublicKey
b9a12043b0 bip32: return error when trying to derive a path too deep (Andrew Poelstra)
73781e047b bip32: rename Error to ParseError (Andrew Poelstra)
a66ad97fb6 bip32: split InvalidChildNumber and InvalidChildNumberFormat out of error (Andrew Poelstra)
a891fb9b74 bip32: remove unused error variants (Andrew Poelstra)
f0a237c001 bip32: split out DerivationError from the main error enum (Andrew Poelstra)
32d96f6c33 bip32: make Xpriv::new_master be infallible (Andrew Poelstra)
0e5e021b69 bip32: change several cryptographically unreachable paths to expects (Andrew Poelstra)
Pull request description:
This PR makes a first pass at splitting the `bip32::Error` type into multiple distinct types -- one for derivation (which can fail if you try to derive a hardened child of an xpub, or if you try to derive too many layers), one for parsing child numbers or derivation paths, and one for parsing xkeys. Along the way it cleans up a ton of weird things and typos, e.g. the psbt `GetKeyError` having an unused `Bip32` variant whose display text references "bip 23".
Because all the error types get renamed, every part of this PR is an API break, but only the last commit is a "real" API break which uses the new `DerivationError::MaximumDepthExceeded` error variant to return an error when trying to derive a path of length 256 or longer. This means that `Xpriv::derive_xpriv` again returns an error result.
I will make a simpler version of this last commit suitable for backporting to 0.32.x. (In 0.32.x `Xpriv::derive_priv` returns an error, so we can change it to error out on max-depth-exceeded without breaking the API. Sadly most users are likely to be unwrapping the error because in 0.32.x currently the error path is cryptographically unreachable...but at least this way the panic will be in their control rather than ours.)
Fixes https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/4308
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK b9a12043b0
Tree-SHA512: 688826126ff24066c6de9de3caa73db68c516ba8893d64d9226a498774a2fb9db7d7fd797375c6b3f820588c178632e1e6e8561022dfa7042a560582bf1509b4
I'm not sure why we do not use consensus encoding currently for encoding
and decoding scripts to/from hex strings. Many tests include hard coded
hex which do not include the length prefix.
- Add a pair of encoding functions to encode/decode to/from hex without
the length prefix.
- Make `to_hex` and `from_hex` expect the length prefix i.e., use
consensus encoding.
This makes the API easier to use because the various encoding APIs can
be use together now eg `consensus::encode_hex` and `ScriptBuf::from_hex`.
We have a ton of calls to `from_sat_unchecked` for small constants which
were clearly in range, e.g. in fee.rs. Add a new constfn for these
cases. Don't bother making a generic Into<u32>/Into<u16> variant because
there isn't an obvious name for it.
There are 7 instances where we're using this method with values that are
out of range, which we leave as from_sat_unchecked for now.
We would like to return an error when doing math ops on amount types.
We cannot however use the stdlib `Result` or `Option` because we want to
implement ops on the result type.
Add an `AmountOpResult` type. Return this type from all math operations
on `Amount` and `SignedAmount`.
Implement `core::iter::Sum` for the new type to allow summing iterators
of amounts - somewhat ugly to use, see tests for example usage.
The mining reward for the first epoc is 50 bitcoin. For mainnet this is
old news but for regtest it is still relevant.
Add and use a new const `FIFTY_BTC` to the `Amount` type. To keep the
amount types uniform also add it to the `SignedAmount`.
We have a `_unchecked` constructor now for both `Amount` and
`SignedAmount`. In preparation for enforcing the `MAX_MONEY` invariant
use the `_unchecked` constructor throughout the codebase to construct
amounts from hard coded integer values.
Add/update the from_int group of functions to provide one that errors
and one that is const and panics (errors in const context are not useful
because one cannot call `unwrap` in const context).
Deprecate the `Script::to_bytes` function in favour of `to_vec` as we
are doing elsewhere.
Note that `ScriptBuf` has `into_bytes` because it does not copy.
Potentially this should be deprecated in favour of `into_vec`?
Note that in regards to the `to_` prefix this naming as valid according
to convention because the `Script` type is borrowed and `to_vec` copies
the underlying bytes.
WARNING: This is not like all the other extension traits.
Because of the use of generics on various `Transaction` methods it is
not easily possible to use the `define_extension_trait` macro.
Manually create the extension traits (public and private) for the
`Transaction` type. This is quite ugly but c'est la vie
(Includes two in the `transaction` module and one in the
`consensus_validation` module.)
This change makes method names on Xpub and Xpriv more consistent and
easier to discover by following two patterns:
- if the method deals with extended key, it contains 'xpub' or
'xpriv' in its name
- if the method deals with non-extended key, it contains
'public_key' or 'private_key'
One exception is 'ckd_*' methods, which are lower-level and their names
come from BIP32; these keep using 'priv' and 'pub'.
In preparation for moving the `ScritpBuf` type to `primitives` add a
public and private extension trait for the functions we want to leave
here in `bitcoin`.
Note, includes a change to the `difine_extension_trait` metavariable
used on `$gent` from `ident` to `path` to support the generic
`AsRef<PushBytes>`.
In preparation to move script types to `primitives` we replace impl
block with extension traits by replacing the temporary modules with
`define_extension_trait`.
Done in preparation for moving the script types to `primitives`.
The script types have a bunch of functionality to support scriptPubkeys,
and scriptPubkeys are an address thing.
Create a module under `address` and in it create a bunch of extension
traits to hold all scriptPubkey functionality.
Includes adding an ugly-as-hell macro to create the traits.
Recently in #2451 we disallowed bip32 derivation paths with the leading
'm' variable.
There is some confusion as to what exactly the bip specifies however
Bitcoin Core RPC call `getaddressinfo` returns a derivation path with a
leading "m/". This means we need to be able to parse it irrespective of
what the bip says.
Be more liberal in what we accept as a derivation path, including both
with and without the leading 'm/'.
Leave the full investigation of the bip to a later date.
Change back some of the test strings as makes sense and include test
strings to showcase the full current behaviour.
In BIP0032, m is used as a variable for the root extended key. It is not
meant to be used as a constant prefix when serializing paths.
Update the DerivationPath parser to no longer require the m prefix.
Remove the m prefix from the unit tests and the bip32, ecdsa-psbt,
and taproot-psbt examples.
close#2449
Applies to both `ecdsa::Signature` and `taproot::Signature`.
Re-name the `Signature` fields with more descriptive names. The
names used were decided upon in the issue discussion.
Impove rustdocs while we are at it.
Note, the change to `sign-tx-segwit-v0` is refactor only, the diff does
not show it but we have a local variable already called `sighash_type`
that is equal to `EcdsaSighashType::All`.
Includes a function argument rename as well, just to be uniform.
Fix: #2139
We have a new API function available with recent version of `secp256k1`
to create a `Message` directly from a sighash byte array.
Use `Message::from_digest(sighash.to_byte_array())` to construct
messages ready to sign.
Upgrade the `secp256k1` dependency to the newly released `v0.28.0`.
FTR this includes two simple changes:
- Use `Message::from_digest_slice` instead of `Message::from_slice`.
- Use `secp256k1::Keypair` instead of `secp256k1::KeyPair`.
3b60ad5567 example: Modify `taproot-psbt.rs` to make the use of prevouts clearer. (S. Santos)
Pull request description:
The `taroot-psbt.rs` example uses only one input, and therefore the current code may not make it clear that the number of prevout items must correspond to the number of transaction inputs, since the prevout slice is built within a loop.
This PR aims to make this clear to any user who wants to reuse the logic from the example code.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 3b60ad5567
apoelstra:
ACK 3b60ad5567
Tree-SHA512: afad63782b0e8a459de6cf69712d31fdab860c0d4cf9f3a51c3d85544a067bd50f4febc10ec4046e3a37d9ca518bbf2460c2599f1569549701c07f8a267dfd05
BIP-68 activated a fair while ago (circa 2019) and since then only
transaction versions 1 and 2 have been considered standard.
Currently in our `Transaction` struct we use an `i32`, this means users
can construct a non-standard transaction if they do not first look up
what the value should be. We can help folk out here by abstracting over
the version number.
Since the version number only governs standardness elect to make the
inner `i32` public (ie., not an invariant). The aim of the type is to
make life easy not restrict what versions are used.
Add transaction::Version data type that simply provides two consts `ONE`
and `TWO`.
Add a `Default` impl on `Version` that returns `Version::TWO`.
In tests that used version 0, instead use `Version::default` because the
test obviously does not care.
A P2TR output does not need to be clarified with version 1, it is
implicit. As with p2wpkh/p2wsh and version 0.
Remove redundant version identifiers from function names, deprecating
the originals.
be05f9d852 Rename xpub and xpriv types (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
The BIP-32 extended public key and extended private key exist in the Bitcoin vernacular as xpub and xpriv. We can use these terms with no loss of clarity.
Rename our current BIP-32 types
- `ExtendedPubKey` to `Xpub`
- `ExtendedPrivKey` to `Xpriv`
This patch is a mechanical search-and-replace, followed by running the formatter, no other manual changes.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK be05f9d852
sanket1729:
ACK be05f9d852
Tree-SHA512: 49925688783c3f37a9b92a9767a0df095323a3fa51f3d672a0b5dd1d8bca86f7facbcc33921274bc147b369de09042c4850b08c31e63f71110903435daa6c00c
The `ThirtyTwoByteHash` trait is defined in `secp256k1` and used in
`hashes` as well as `bitcoin`. This means that we must use the same
version of `hashes` in both `bitcoin` and `secp256k1`. This makes doing
release difficult.
Remove usage of `ThirtyTwoByteHash` and use `Message::from_slice`.
Include TODO above each usage because as soon as we release the new
version of secp we can use the new `Message::from_digest`.
This is step backwards as far as type safety goes and it makes the code
more ugly as well because it uses `expect` but thems the breaks.
The BIP-32 extended public key and extended private key exist in the
Bitcoin vernacular as xpub and xpriv. We can use these terms with no
loss of clarity.
Rename our current BIP-32 types
- `ExtendedPubKey` to `Xpub`
- `ExtendedPrivKey` to `Xpriv`
This patch is a mechanical search-and-replace, followed by running the
formatter, no other manual changes.
Various formatting issues have crept into the codebase because we do not
run the formatter in CI.
In preparation for enabling formatting checks in CI run `cargo +nightly
fmt` to fix current formatting issues. No changes other than those
create by the formatter.
We created the `crypto` crate as a container for cryptography modules
with the idea that it may be split out into a separate crate. There is
no reason for users of the lib to know about this module. Also, we have
two `taproot` modules, one in `crypto` and one at the crate root, this
makes for un-ergonomic usage of the lib.
Improve the public API by doing:
- Make the `crypto` module private (`pub(crate)`).
- Re-export `crypto::taproot::Signature` (and `Error`) from
`crate::taproot`
Jamil Lambert, PhD
merge-script
Shing Him Ng
Tobin C. Harding
19年梦醒
Jiri Jakes
Chris Hyunhum Cho
Fmt Bot
Martin Habovstiak
Divyansh Gupta
Jose Storopoli
josibake
yancy
Vincenzo Palazzo
S. Santos
junderw
Clark Moody
yancy