8098d5ee05 Reword `Address` constructor docs (Jamil Lambert, PhD)
Pull request description:
Change the wording of the Address constructor function docs to be a standard format. Following up on [#3584 comment](https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/3584#issuecomment-2457197066)
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 8098d5ee055d672fc8f6e4eef3971b66478a61b0; successfully ran local tests
tcharding:
ACK 8098d5ee05
Tree-SHA512: 1027f334d69182465b2ecafd6fcf9f5deb2b299a64d12dea7f09f25379bd98b1e11be52a04fea83c2194164fd428931f6416eee52603f4bc043717b4e4d1b193
3523b8e117 Rename generic parameter and variable (yancy)
Pull request description:
Use W for Write
closes https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/3590
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 3523b8e117
apoelstra:
ACK 3523b8e1171663fc93ab25765271a1070a2d649f; successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: 8dd9f38ee07e7652ebd291eb121a2630ebb09ea9ea70873f87e57241f51e5114106517511d1fe07774ec4f42920e9d0619031a1545787631a30422de12421a67
c61df05916 Fix bip34 number parsing for Block (junderw)
Pull request description:
Fixes#3583
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK c61df059160d3aeef73046de28cb5d5afcb962d2; successfully ran local tests
tcharding:
ACK c61df05916
Tree-SHA512: 3fade122f98c7c9e3b2888c33479d3a9426fb35f212ccee6b89b7cd5c92d2b58c93e165d5c59eda183c0943809d7e633d929000be92b197988a3ceb0ea37514f
1649b68589 Standardize wording to `constructs a new` (Jamil Lambert, PhD)
27f94d5540 Replace `creates` with `constructs` (Jamil Lambert, PhD)
Pull request description:
As discussed in issue #3575 there are various ways of saying a new object is created.
These have all be standardized to the agreed version.
Close#3575
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 1649b68589834dfe9d5b63812da3e9f0e5930107; successfully ran local tests
tcharding:
ACK 1649b68589
Tree-SHA512: 0ed9b56819c95f1fc14da1e0fdbbe03c4af2d97a95ea6b56125f72913e8d832db5d2882d713ae139d00614e651f3834a4d72528bdf776231cceb6772bf2f9963
There is a range of different wordings used in the docs of constructor
type functions.
Change all to start with `Constructs a new` or `Constructs an empty`.
In functions that act like constructors there is a mixture of the usage
of `creates` and `constructs`.
Replace all occurrences of `creates` with `constructs` in the first line
of docs of constructor like functions.
81d8699b55 units: Put no_std up top (Tobin C. Harding)
3e332c3839 amount: Fix docs on FromStr (Tobin C. Harding)
5bec76aa51 amount: Fix rustdocs (Tobin C. Harding)
41c80cc476 amount: Improve docs on div by weight (Tobin C. Harding)
2b4a61739a Add type to debug output for Amount (Tobin C. Harding)
42e5043b33 Add from_int_btc group of functions (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Improve the `amount` module by doing:
- Patch 1: Add/update `from_int_btc` and `from_int_btc_const` functions
- Patch 2: Add type to debug output for `Amount`
- Patch 3: Fix incorrect docs
- Patch 4: Make docs use correct style and be uniform across the two amount types
- Patch 5: Fix docs on `FromStr`
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 81d8699b55dad570247cb14d2b3eea64270a83cf; successfully ran local tests
jamillambert:
ACK 81d8699b55
Tree-SHA512: ddd6e02b4cd9a9aa8cbdd2d2f7ae289a6bcca9eb002ef0c6d83a6eca950b2cd08f5918286bb33e814f321e3bfe83fdf75ae051cf8f91ee45d3e4abe76c1c2a4c
Is there any advantage trying to lay out the re-exports to give users an
idea of the crate structure?
We have the explicit aim that users who depend on `bitcoin` do not ever
need to reach directly into `primitives` (or `units`) however it is kind
of nice to know where things come from, saves jumping to multiple files
looking for them (for those of us that jump to files manually).
I do not know how all the re-exports interact with other folks IDEs, I
personally open files manually and just remember where stuff is.
85942c355d Re-export block::Header as BlockHeader (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
For users who want to just grab stuff from the crate root it makes total sense for there to be a `BlockHeader`.
Another nice thing, in the HMTL docs it makes BlockHeader be in the struct list right along with `Block`, `BlockHash`, and `BlockHeight`.
Close: #3548
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 85942c355dfdcf9ddf9a46202f4db56794dcc85d; successfully ran local tests
jamillambert:
ACK 85942c355d
Tree-SHA512: 6fbaf7936062323d31940179ffcbc62951b21f53955a42dca2e28476bda0cebeb041db0e1b4f1ceeac32e43d94fe5476ef055595ae88dc6cfc266d32082bdf4d
4431df18fe script: remove `unsafe` marker from slice-to-script conversions (Andrew Poelstra)
Pull request description:
The length of the slices is not a safety invariant.
Fixes#3531
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 4431df18fe
Tree-SHA512: 85f745058bc5bf68d312f75c53cef570ead986247ca3cb3fc54b5381dd0214e7df55c1fcb99f06e693b0b9478ec6a9785186cac56886f8007ab7b827d903bd01
The length of the slices is not a safety invariant.
Fairly large diff because I had to remove a bunch of `unsafe` blocks
around calls to this function.
Fixes#3531
Add/update the from_int group of functions to provide one that errors
and one that is const and panics (errors in const context are not useful
because one cannot call `unwrap` in const context).
We have a couple of problems:
1. There are two macros currently for fmt stuff that do similar things,
`arr_newtype_fmt_impl` and `hex_fmt_impl` - the difference is not
immediately obvious, its the way that the byte array is iterated.
2. Our hash types are missing `AsRef<[u8; len]>` and `Borrow<[u8; len]>`.
Introduce a new macro and remove a bunch of other macros. Include
extensive docs but hide the macro from public docs because its not
really for consumers of the library.
The macro requires `$crate::hex` to point to `hex-conservative`.
Note the macro is pretty generic (as in general purpose), `hashes` might
not be the right home for it. Potentially a better place would be in
`hex` itself?
For users who want to just grab stuff from the crate root it makes total
sense for there to be a `BlockHeader`.
Another nice thing, in the HMTL docs it makes BlockHeader be in the
struct list right along with `Block`, `BlockHash`, and `BlockHeight`.
This has been fixed and we use nightly to lint so we have access to the
merged fix.
Removing the attribute uncovers a bunch of real lint warnings, fix
them while we are at it.
a51768af3f key: Deprecate to_bytes (Tobin C. Harding)
3af3239ad0 script: Re-order functions (Tobin C. Harding)
db40297f87 script: deprecate to_bytes (Tobin C. Harding)
c5cd0db493 Revert the change to to_bytes (Tobin C. Harding)
dc2ca785d2 Add to_vec and deprecate to_bytes for array types (Tobin C. Harding)
a6b7ab32a8 Move impl_array_newtype to internal_macros (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Use `to_vec` and deprecate `to_bytes`, the opposite of what we did in #2585.
For functions that return a `Vec` by first allocating use function name `to_vec`. This explicitly excludes:
- Functions that return an array (`CompressedPublicKey::to_bytes`)
- Functions that consume self and return a `Vec` without allocating (`ScriptBuf::into_bytes`)
See #3025 for discussion and consensus.
Close: #3025
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK a51768af3f3d4c8e138e1ded250800810bedc903; successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: ee932c13ad2e09c2b76a7833b23c859df175aa307f56e673921f3ae8b5d865518c6f999749e3b627594457b3ca33301b777177ada3520cf006acc0f14e5dacf8
0bf1910980 Remove wildcard from script self re-exports (Tobin C. Harding)
397a4b9382 Remove wildcard in push_bytes module (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
We thought #3436 was done (well I thought it was), turns out I was wrong.
ACKs for top commit:
jamillambert:
ACK 0bf1910980
apoelstra:
ACK 0bf1910980a13005496244ec4d4adf0553afbc73; successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: 131a4aa4a907099790d14cfc2d19305943a2270cf6852c7dd92e35ea69188c9a40797fb22fd2ed8b2fefc2d6380b884401b5e32f521711f0f7b2da610d0e332f
The private_key_debug_is_obfuscated test is removed because it belongs
in the secp256k1 library, not in the bitcoin library. Keeping it here
is redundant and creates unnecessary maintenance.
As we have been doing in other places deprecate `to_bytes` in favour of
`to_vec`. Note this is only for functions that return a `Vec`, the `key`
module has `CompressedKey::to_bytes` still as it returns an array.
Deprecate the `Script::to_bytes` function in favour of `to_vec` as we
are doing elsewhere.
Note that `ScriptBuf` has `into_bytes` because it does not copy.
Potentially this should be deprecated in favour of `into_vec`?
Note that in regards to the `to_` prefix this naming as valid according
to convention because the `Script` type is borrowed and `to_vec` copies
the underlying bytes.
During this release cycle we deprecated `to_vec` in favour of
`to_bytes`, we have since reversed our position on the name.
Remove the deprecation of `to_bytes` from the three types that had it
and use `to_vec`.
For the array wrapper types (eg `ShortId`) created with the
`impl_array_newtype` macro deprecated the `to_bytes` function and add a
`to_vec` function.
Discussed and decided upon in issue: #3025
dfb76c1e15 Use doc(notable_trait) (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
There is an unstable feature that puts up a little 'i' in a circle next to any function that returns a type that implements an notable trait. For us this means we can make the extension traits more discoverable.
ref: https://doc.rust-lang.org/unstable-book/language-features/doc-notable-trait.htmlClose: #3232
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK dfb76c1e15933fe0058c1bb69c4b1b9acddceee8; successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: 0fbc7a2a3c8c499a9276d1e86b9966a7ae6bd8a354aff5fd40aa11d07945db589b2a9c2cdfa43ddadfafcee706ae7f68cedc269f74622643307cc43cd07d554f
In the `script` module remove the wildcards and re-export stuff from
`self` explicitly in both `primitives` and `bitcoin`.
Internal change only, everything is re-exported.
The current feature gating is wrong, this bug is unreleased because it
was introduced #2585.
The `impl_array_newtype` macro is only used in the `bitcoin` crate, it
does not need to be in `internals`. Also, other crates have an `alloc`
feature which `bitcoin` does not have so if we ever need it in other
places we'll need a duplicate with the correct feature gating anyways.
Move the macro to `bitcoin::internal_macros` and remove the incorrect
`alloc` feature gating.
WARNING: This is not like all the other extension traits.
Because of the use of generics on various `Transaction` methods it is
not easily possible to use the `define_extension_trait` macro.
Manually create the extension traits (public and private) for the
`Transaction` type. This is quite ugly but c'est la vie
(Includes two in the `transaction` module and one in the
`consensus_validation` module.)
Currently `script_pubkey_lens` returns a generic `Iterator` using `impl`
syntax. This syntax is not supported in traits and we want to move the
function to the soon-to-be-added `TransactionExt` trait.
Add a struct to hold the iterator returned by `Map`, this is ugly but
its the least ugly thing I could come up with.
Split the `Transaction` impl block into three parts:
- The bits going to `primitives`
- The bits staying in a public extension trait
- The bits staying in a private extension trait
Internal change only.
It is acceptable to use a wildcard import in bench code for the same
reasons it is acceptable in the `tests` module.
In preparation for introducing extension traits in the `transaction`
module use wildcard import in the module's bench code.
f2e1a4b16c bitcoin: Add some upgrade notes (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
While upgrading `miniscript` to use tip of master I made some notes to help users upgrade. Just throw them in the changelog file or now.
ACKs for top commit:
storopoli:
ACK f2e1a4b16c
apoelstra:
ACK f2e1a4b16cb8b71b50da723a20761fbe3822d6fc; successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: 3e7a64445476dce8c716edf127b2594c434948bfff7c301ac74a723fa49b2784cca90cf74d231fe18a9fa8e80ffd5cb43232fb90aeae5943568623d4252fc4ef
c89b816437 psbt: Fix bug in Subtype consensus_encode (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
In #2906 we switched from using a `u8` for type keys to using a `u64` and encoding as a compact int (inline with the spec). Note that a `u8` encodes to the same bytes as a `u64` when the value is < 252.
In that patch, I introduced a bug because the length returned by `PoprietaryKey::consensus_encode` uses a hard code 1 for the length of the encoding (because of single byte) instead of the variable length for the new compact encoding.
Bug showed up in fuzzing, and was isolated by Jamil - mad props.
Fix: #3501
ACKs for top commit:
jamillambert:
ACK c89b816437
apoelstra:
ACK c89b8164377123eb20476636f2f5271c6a687406; successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: 1b61b6a9ece197d74038ceedb447fd3ca21db8e2a6a96c9281a99ac232c18c3ca55da8e3f46930401714d3575e9a406a36e4f44929ca963208a5df4be6b46cfb
025a8773bf Use fully qualified path in macro (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Using fully qualified paths in macros reduces maintenance burden. We have one macro where we use relative path to access the `psbt` module.
Refactor only, no external change.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 025a8773bf63aacdaca011ef000f41a85a961567; successfully ran local tests; will one-ACK merge
Tree-SHA512: eb5923a48ae4d82499679a58375ef7d2e8ba85c91671e350f7be19f0372750a269f44dd2f05f4a70ed0c7f277b160400eb41ff1d42b90e6057f1344be7e11a89
66da2266e2 Explicitly re-export stuff from crates down the stack (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Up until recently we were using wildcard re-exports for types moved to `units` and `primitives`. We have decided against doing so in favour of explicit re-exports.
Audit `units` and `primitives` using `git grep 'pub enum'` (and `struct`) and explicitly re-export all types.
Remove all wildcards except for the re-exports from `opcodes`, there are too many opcodes, explicitly re-exporting them does not aid clarity.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 66da2266e26dfe53947c4606e9d18620931e93cf; successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: 74717f8b127e975e3d131aab884bdfe78e699d88b7ee1db7731ad117437d37684285264001cf6b2182eb1e565171167695e00c4b6aef28a3e26b69d9cebfbb74
9a7b1c232b Wrap the bech32 decoding error (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
In #2381 we attempted to fully encapsulate the `bech32` crate to help with stabalizing `rust-bitcoin` however we failed to notice the `address:ParseError` has a variant that includes `bech32`. Public enums have public variant internals in Rust. Also the `From<bech32::segtiw::DecodeError` makes `bech32` public.
Closes: #3043
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 9a7b1c232b494dccdce091a46d916cc411a612a1; successfully ran local tests; will one-ACK merge since this is a gazillion years old and obviously right
Tree-SHA512: b5053aa43107aa47da1fe7e7db0f882cfb231b9769a7b67d8c930532c471df191f588bf98f2b00cc76d5a2e9c74e035ee96128da115363ac3952f96a766494ea
merge-script
yancy
Jamil Lambert, PhD
junderw
Tobin C. Harding
Fmt Bot
Diogo Canut
Leo Nash