It could happen that we unknowingly depend on a new version of a crate
without updating `Cargo.toml`. This could cause resolution issues for
downstream users. It's also unclear for outsiders to see which
dependencies we tested the crate with.
This change commits two lock files: `minimal` and `recent`. `minimal`
contains minimal depdendency versions, while `recent` contains
dependency versions at the time of making the change.
Further, this adds CI jobs to test with both lock files, CI job for
`internals` crate, removes old `serde` pinning and prints a warning if
`recent` is no longer up to date. (We may have to override it somehow if
any crate breaks MSRV.)
The documentation is also updated accordingly.
Co-developed-by: Tobin C. Harding <me@tobin.cc>
Closes#1230
Done as is single patch to make sure all the docs and CI are in sync and
correct.
We currently pin the `schemars` dependency using `<=0.8.3` as well as a
the `dyn-clone` transient dependency in the manifest (`hashes` and the
extended test crate). This is incorrect because it makes usage of the
crate klunky (or possibly impossible) if downstream users wish to use a
later version of `schemars`.
Observe also that we do not have to pin `schemars`, we do however have to pin
the `serde` crate if either `serde` or `schemars` features are enabled.
Do so in CI and document in the readme file within hashes.
Currently we have a pin remaining from the old MSRV (`syn` due to use
of `matches!`).
Fix pinning by:
- Remove pin in manifest for `schemars`
- Fix pinning for MSRV in CI and docs (this includes documenting pinning
requirements for `schemars` feature because it is related to the other
pin of `serde`) in both `hashes` readme and main repo readme.
1dc04fe10f Remove rust_v_1_46 (Tobin C. Harding)
71fa9e81e7 Bump MSRV to 1.48.1 (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Just patch 2, patch 1 is #1728
From the commit log of patch 2
Bump MSRV to 1.48.1
As per discussion [0] bump our MSRV for all crates in `rust-bitcoin`
repo to 1.48.1 [1].
[0] https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/discussions/1329
[1] https://blog.rust-lang.org/2020/11/19/Rust-1.48.html
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 1dc04fe10f
sanket1729:
ACK 1dc04fe10f
Tree-SHA512: 533470c55f7aeede88382db8245033dac9317d75b38ced2ad8256d38319632a524335f893044e96300a1e60048f9aaca2d1634735eb324eb8ed9ad3c9ab2f872
We now have a few different test harnesses in use, add a section to the
readme about each
- normal unit/integration tests
- benchmarks
- kani
- mutagen
We have stale docs referring to the old MSRV. We do not need MSRV docs
in `CONTRIBUTING` because we have them in the README already.
Fix stale docs by doing:
- Remove the MSRV docs from readme in favour of `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
- Add a sentence to the redame pointing readers towards `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
ded1a32a59 Add cargo crev reminder to readme (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
As suggested by the `cargo-crev` project; add a comment to the readme reminding people to use `cargo-crev` to check their dependencies.
### Notes
Today I explored `cargo-crev`, it was new to me before today. I completed proofs for `bech32`, `rust-bitcoinconsenus`, `bitcoin_hashes`, `rust-secp256k1`, and `rust-bitcoin`. I published the proofs to https://github.com/tcharding/crev-proofs.
If I'm understanding correctly proofs are only useful if the author is connected to a web of trust. So far I only found @dpc within the active rust-bitcoin devs with a `crev-proofs` repo (that includes an ID). Since he wrote `cargo-crev` its not surprising he has one :) Two other devs have `crev-proofs` repos but they are both incomplete (no ID) so I was unable to climb onto their web, so to speak. I am not a particularly well know dev so I imagine it would be more useful if some of you more well know fellas publish proofs as well.
If we can get a web of trust between all the regular hackers here then we can start doing reviews/proofs of our dependencies and publishing them.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK ded1a32a59
apoelstra:
ACK ded1a32a59
sanket1729:
ACK ded1a32a59
Tree-SHA512: c2d3b195a522095fcabcf51bb956b339f3a421541652f646f8e56286ebf850aa106d4acbf4defd344b5b0f57dd9626d1dbafe50c9d54b1436fd9e2c8b434fc07
f3b2120ec9 Create configuration conditional bench (Tobin C. Harding)
f60c92ca58 Add informative error message to DO_BENCH (Tobin C. Harding)
c6d5a12b60 Add cargo/rustc sanity calls (Tobin C. Harding)
34d5a3141d Put triple ticks on their own line (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Currently we are unable to build with all features enabled with a non-nightly toolchain, this is because of the use of
`#![cfg_attr(all(test, feature = "unstable"), feature(test))]`
which causes the following error when building:
error[E0554]: `#![feature]` may not be used on the stable release channel
The "unstable" feature is used to guard bench mark modules, this is widely suggested online but there is a better way.
When running the bench marks use the following incantation:
`RUSTFLAGS='--cfg=bench' cargo bench`
This creates a configuration conditional "bench" that can be used to guard the bench mark modules.
```
#[cfg(bench)]
mod benches {
...
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK f3b2120ec9
apoelstra:
ACK f3b2120ec9
Tree-SHA512: 7ec2a501a30bfe2ce72601077cd675cf5e5ac2f0f93f97fc7e83cb7401606b69ae909b35bfc0ace8bd1ea771ca4fba70e2ad9ac9ba26f2b6e371494cf694c0a8
Currently we are unable to build with all features enabled with a
non-nightly toolchain, this is because of the use of
`#![cfg_attr(all(test, feature = "unstable"), feature(test))]`
which causes the following error when building:
error[E0554]: `#![feature]` may not be used on the stable release
channel
The "unstable" feature is used to guard bench mark modules, this is
widely suggested online but there is a better way.
When running the bench marks use the following incantation:
`RUSTFLAGS='--cfg=bench' cargo bench`
This creates a configuration conditional "bench" that can be used to
guard the bench mark modules.
#[cfg(bench)]
mod benches {
...
}
In markdown triple ticks go on a line of their own. This change does not
effect the rendering in GitHub which is managing to parse this section
correctly already.
When `rust-bitcoin` was started in 2014 the SPDX license list and short
identifiers where not a thing. Now that we have short identifiers and
they are gaining popularity in other projects we can consider using
them.
- Add links to the SPDX website in the readme
- Shorten the author section to a single line
- Remove all the licence information in each file and replace it with an
SPDX ID (see https://spdx.dev/ids/#how)
Of note:
- If the author of a file is explicitly listed, maintain this
information
- If the 'author' is listed as the generic 'Rust Bitcoin developers'
just remove the attribution, this is implicit. This does loose the date
info but that can be seen at any time from the git index using
`git log --follow --format=%ad --date default <FILE> | tail -1`
Add a `githooks` directory. Copy the sample pre-commit hook into it.
Add a section to the README explaining how to take advantage of the
githooks.
The sample pre-commit hook includes checks for trailing whitespace that
we are seeing occasionally in PRs.
Done in preparation for adding a clippy githook.
The docs lint `broken-intra-doc-links` has been changed but the new name
is not available in our MSRV, this means we get a build warning. We only
build docs with the nightly toolchain so we can move this lint control
to the docs build command in `test.sh` instead of doing it crate wide.
With this patch applied devs risk not noticing docs link issues until
they hit them on CI _if_ they do not build with the test script or
explicitly pass in `-- -D rustdoc::broken-intra-doc-links`, which no one
is going to do. Hence we add a line to the readme with a shell alias
that can be used to check docs, taken directly from `test.sh`.
7854bd7918 Fix `no_std` MSRV Fixes#690, #947 (mcroad)
Pull request description:
`rust-bitcoin` does not work with rust 1.29 under a `no_std` environment. This could be considered a bug. However, `no_std` support is a recent addition and this is likely not breaking anyone's builds.
A decision needs to be made, either `no_std` MSRV is the current stable version while keeping the `std` MSRV as 1.29, or it needs to be fixed.
This pr adds `no_std` to the 1.29 test suite.
This came as I try to get rust-bitcoin/rust-miniscript#277 working and got stuck on the issue of testing `no_std` under 1.29.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 7854bd7918
tcharding:
ACK 7854bd7918
sanket1729:
ACK 7854bd7918
apoelstra:
ACK 7854bd7918
Tree-SHA512: 1614fb2193f760ed340592bdb94d076066f6f783bc1dc2b145d97f7151a28316e56b1975f1ad948460eb26db04e7e9382e60076686a681e46dcf33521fda5fca
This warns contributors about possible rebases. Changing CONTRIBUTING
should ensure that GitHub will display special warning. This will be
removed after migration is done.
Disable problematic jobs that involve Github Actions caching or `cross`
whenever the environment is set to ACT. This allows running the CI
pipeline locally and hopefully speeds up PR cycle times by reducing
unexpected CI pipeline results.
This clearly states lack of support for 16-bit architectures as well as
adds readable `compile_error!()` call. It also fixes a few stylistic
mistakes - headings (top-level should not be repeated) and missing
newlines.
Closes#660
Martin Habovstiak
Andrew Poelstra
Tobin C. Harding
David A. Harding
Harshil Jani
Steve Myers
sanket1729
DanGould
Dawid Ciężarkiewicz
mcroad
Hunter Trujillo
Andrew Ahlers
Alekos Filini
Sebastian Geisler
Steven Roose
Will Binns
Elichai Turkel
Tamas Blummer
lucash-dev