The BIP-32 extended public key and extended private key exist in the
Bitcoin vernacular as xpub and xpriv. We can use these terms with no
loss of clarity.
Rename our current BIP-32 types
- `ExtendedPubKey` to `Xpub`
- `ExtendedPrivKey` to `Xpriv`
This patch is a mechanical search-and-replace, followed by running the
formatter, no other manual changes.
This error type is only used in the `from_slice` function. Use prefix
`Sig` because `taproot::FromSliceError` does not fully express how the
error came about.
Use specific identifier for the error, this aids usage but also prevents
us later adding "random" other variants into this error and using it in
other functions.
We are trying to make error types stable on the way to v1.0
The current `hashes::Error` is a "general" enum error type with a single
variant, better to use a struct and make the error usecase specific.
Improve the `hashes::Error` by doing:
- Make it a struct
- Rename to `FromSliceError`
- Move it to the crate root (remove `error` module)
Includes usage in `bitcoin`.
fabcde036f Use package in manifest and shorten import (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
We can use `package` to rename `bitcoin_hashes` to `hashes` and `bitcoin_internals` to `internals`. This makes imports more terse with no loss of meaning.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK fabcde036f
Kixunil:
ACK fabcde036f
Tree-SHA512: bc5bff6f7f6bf3b68ba1e0644a83da014081d8c6c9d578c21cb54fdd56a018f68733dd1135d05b590ba193ed9efd12fa9019182c1fed347e604d8548f6ef9103
If we use `#![cfg_attr(docsrs, feature(doc_auto_cfg))]` instead of
`#![cfg_attr(docsrs, feature(doc_cfg))]` we no longer need to manually
mark types with `#[cfg_attr(docsrs, doc(cfg(feature = "std")))]`.
Sweeeeeet.
We can use `package` to rename `bitcoin_hashes` to `hashes` and
`bitcoin_internals` to `internals`. This makes imports more terse with
no loss of meaning.
Cleanly separate `TapTree` and `NodeInfo`. Fix serde not respecting
invariants for several data structures
Repurpose some tests from removed taproot builder for taptree
"schnorr" is a dirty word; the current `schnorr` module defines a
`Signature` that includes a sighash type, this sighash type is a bitcoin
specific construct related to taproot. Therefore the `Signature` is
better named `taproot::Signature`. Note also that the usage of `schnorr`
in `secp256k1` is probably justified because the
`secp256::schnorr::Signature` is just doing the crypto.
While we are at it, update docs and error messages to use "taproot"
instead of "schnorr". Also change function names and identifiers that
use "schnorr".
Tobin C. Harding
Andrew Poelstra
sanket1729
DanGould
Arturo Marquez