Currently we have a code comment that is supposed to assist devs in
maintaining the `network::constants::Network` type by failing to build
if a new variant is added. This plays havoc with the formatter because
the comment is hanging at the bottom of a match block and the formatting
thinks its for the proceeding line of code.
Instead of using a code comment add a panic so the unit test fails if a
new variant is added to `network::constants::Network`.
In preparation for running the formatter introduce a couple of local
variables to reduce the line length and inhibit function call from being
split over multiple lines.
Refactor only, no logic changes.
bef7992ce5 Update readme to mention pin for 1.47 (Tobin C. Harding)
58033cf14e pin serde dep on 1.47 (Tobin C. Harding)
f5f4a33fa9 pin serde dep on 1.41 (Andrew Poelstra)
ee9b297e98 ci: update dupe check to whitelist syn (Andrew Poelstra)
6aa640ff8d update rust-secp to 0.27.0 (Andrew Poelstra)
Pull request description:
Also remove the spurious dev-dependency copy of rust-secp, which should've been updated to remove the "recovery" feature in https://www.github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/545 and then been removed entirely in https://www.github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/1387
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK bef7992ce5
tcharding:
ACK bef7992ce5
Tree-SHA512: 7d1bf062dc6920bcafa85311b4b5ed348e31fb20aa21156e545bf7a4cc4c194e2b6dcfd0d3c6db3df337e4e2cd0f7b74f41ea421549521f07080feb88fbd9382
00b46d6d9d Indent functions (Martin Habovstiak)
d56d202aeb Support weight prediction in `const` context (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
**Notes for reviewers:**
This is something that I want to use in my code and hopefully reasonably easy to review, so if this can get into 0.30 that'd be really nice. No hard feelings if it doesn't.
I tried to put extra effort into making review easier by:
* intentionally "mis-formatting" the first commit so diff is smaller and easy to understand - see individual commits.
* copying patterns from non-const fn to const fn so it's obviously correct (includes same variable names)
* not bothering with the array trick in `VarInt::len` and simply accepting the limitation of Rust 1.46+ (I use 1.48 BTW).
**Description**
Some smart contracts or simplified wallets statically know the sizes of
transactions or inputs. The possible approaches to handling them so far
were re-computing the values (and hoping the optimizer will const fold
them) or using a simple constant which may be harder to understand and
get right. It's much nicer to just use a `const` but our code didn't
support it until now.
This change adds methods that can compute the prediction in `const`
context for Rust versions >= 1.46.0 which allow use of loops (and
conditions but those could be workaround anyway).
As a side effect of this, the change also adds `const` to `VarInt::len`
in Rust 1.46+. While this one could be made unconditional using array
trick it's probably not worth it because of the planned MSRV bump.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 00b46d6d9d
tcharding:
ACK 00b46d6d9d
Tree-SHA512: 5509886a68b4de5227db0e28d92a40be8de64592e0b189c519213db21bcfe98ca03d9a1936b1024729b97db69e8ec0b55fac870a7ce9bab0d0c9a47b2087990f
Some smart contracts or simplified wallets statically know the sizes of
transactions or inputs. The possible approaches to handling them so far
were re-computing the values (and hoping the optimizer will const fold
them) or using a simple constant which may be harder to understand and
get right. It's much nicer to just use a `const` but our code didn't
support it until now.
This change adds methods that can compute the prediction in `const`
context for Rust versions >= 1.46.0 which allow use of loops (and
conditions but those could be workaround anyway).
As a side effect of this, the change also adds `const` to `VarInt::len`
in Rust 1.46+. While this one could be made unconditional using array
trick it's probably not worth it because of the planned MSRV bump.
Note: this commit is intentionally unformatted to make diff easier to
understand. Formatting will be done in future commit.
It wasn't obvious that displaying address with alternate formatting
upper cases bech32 addresses.
This change adds information about this and also a note about the
compatibility of various wallets.
2158f88f1d Add a method to `pow::Target` for returning difficulty as an f64. (junderw)
Pull request description:
Closes#1703
This adds a conversion function to U256 to get an f64. We use the method shown in the following blog post.
https://blog.m-ou.se/floats/
Target::MAX was converted to a f64 and set as a const that is verified in a unit test.
The code is rather confusing, so I took a crack at explaining it in my comments as well. Please let me know if you want it cleaned up some more.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 2158f88f1d
tcharding:
ACK 2158f88f1d
Tree-SHA512: 7c0e82bd1756950c1c6dfb9da91fd71b276e2e7dc8a33e69112f87b87e358240f0f7c4894d24ab228e149d862938833a2e65e345ce2712a78dc86dec197da34f
This adds a conversion function to U256 to get an f64. We use the method shown in the following blog post. https://blog.m-ou.se/floats/
Target::MAX was converted to a f64 and set as a const that is verified in a unit test.
bfd401c96e bitcoin_hashes: add CHANgELOG (Andrew Poelstra)
d1b7b54e3a bump bitcoin-hashes version to 0.12 (Andrew Poelstra)
Pull request description:
It was a little tricky to bump the version number because of https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/1553. There are a couple other things I considered trying, which maybe we'll do for future releases, but I believe this works for now.
Maybe should wait for #1111.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK bfd401c96e
sanket1729:
utACK bfd401c96e. ChangeLog looks good to me, did not review whether all noteworthy changes were included.
Tree-SHA512: d2104fc93e364415ae955e8123e6087c1eaa4c955aeaf4647ead051a223563326f66c0e278d68f64335e22c9d0af9b296dc3b744cd9d82d206844461fe7bf9c9
e3f95ee22b Add tests for the FeeRate type (yancy)
Pull request description:
Adds some tests for the `FeeRate` type.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK e3f95ee22b
tcharding:
ACK e3f95ee22b
Kixunil:
ACK e3f95ee22b
Tree-SHA512: 74d6597c747d5aa62a6510bf9fa8de971f89ad56f571aadd496f6487e80cc88bb2b5a1c6bcfed825d09d18ca2310b2bfd6fdbe330f2760369d167a653d26bef8
3eb648df01 Add constants to `InputWeightPrediction` (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
There are several common spends in Bitcoin that have known input weight predictions. It can be useful to have these as constants, so this change adds them. However, this only adds native segwit ones as the others are slowly fading away and might clutter the API.
If anyone wants other constants, please write them for me, their value is not that great to me so I'm not motivated to figure out the correct numbers. :)
This would be nice to add to 0.30 since it's small and easy but not critical.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 3eb648df01
tcharding:
ACK 3eb648df01
sanket1729:
ACK 3eb648df01
Tree-SHA512: 51d2cd2ecef7e6b79f9d4b52319e34b908fe8b5a337551dc2088994feeafc9c3ca87884c3db8369f8bd002947d6d14b373f08ef1419db282713206ed6f1b309a
There are several common spends in Bitcoin that have known input weight
predictions. It can be useful to have these as constants, so this change
adds them. However, this only adds native segwit ones as the others are
slowly fading away and might clutter the API.
Enable formatting in CI by doing:
- Add a section to the `test.sh` scripts to run the formatter (guarded by
the env variable `DO_FMT`) for all crates (bitcoin, hashes, internals).
- Add `DO_FMT` to the nightly `Tests` CI job.
Various formatting issues have crept into the codebase because we do not
run the formatter in CI.
In preparation for enabling formatting checks in CI run `cargo +nightly
fmt` to fix current formatting issues. No changes other than those
create by the formatter.
Because we have rust-secp in the loop, we need to update rust-secp, push
a new tag, and use that here, to ensure that the direct dependency on
bitcoin_hashes, and the rust-secp version, are compatible.
74022baa44 Rename ScriptLeaf to LeafNode (sanket1729)
289dc1e7f5 Remove serde for taprootspendinfo (sanket1729)
a397ab0c19 Remove serde for ScriptLeaf (sanket1729)
9affda3012 Introduce Hidden leaves in ScriptLeaves (sanket1729)
22bc39a143 Fix serde for TaprootMerkleBranch (sanket1729)
38ed9bdf49 MOVE ONLY: Move TapTree to taproot module (sanket1729)
Pull request description:
This PR changes/removes the serde implementation for the following types
- TaprootSpendInfo: Removed. This data structure contains derived information for taproot spending that cannot be validated easily. To elaborate, `TaprootSpendInfo` is constructed from a tree, but loses information about the tree structure and maintains handy information like `script_control_block_map`, cached tweaked key, Merkle root etc.
- TaprootBuillder: Removed. Hard to implement and not very useful.
- TapTree: Modified to check invariants.
- NodeInfo: Now implements serde with support for Hidden nodes
- ScriptLeaf: Removed serde. Users should not directly construct this. This is just an output iterator item of `TapTree::script_leaves()`
Data structure changes:
- Introduced `LeafNode`: Supports Hidden leaves. Has serde implemented
- Cleanly separate `TapTree` and `NodeInfo`: `TapTree` is a full BIP370 compatible tree with no hidden nodes. `NodeInfo` is a tree that can potentially contain hidden leaves.
- Added `NodeInfo::leaf_nodes`: Iterator that iterates over known and hidden leaves of `NodeInfo`.
- Updated `TapTree::script_leaves`: Iterator that is guaranteed to output known leaves.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 74022baa44
apoelstra:
ACK 74022baa44
Tree-SHA512: 919ea5bf60dc0cd8431301c1b744b046d1d781b3bed302b83a600cfa644216b6c682752795d463646b2723ac8661879284f557862a67e4572fd965fcf3dc194d
b0b0cdb46c Improve the public API for Feerate and Weight (yancy)
Pull request description:
Small nit for https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/1627/ to re-export `Weight` and `FeeRate` to shorten the use path.
```
use bitcoin::Weight;
use bitcoin::FeeRate;
````
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK b0b0cdb46c
Kixunil:
ACK b0b0cdb46c
apoelstra:
ACK b0b0cdb46c
Tree-SHA512: 81e508c980c4f37e3791d26616459608dd60e5a6255ef28b3a049c1d27281b2853b92474d42f10031254c8c46878adf666eb709826aa4ffde1b4b3542451e080
73e876ffd4 Include address in Error::NetworkValidation (Subhradeep Chakraborty)
Pull request description:
Fixes: #1677
## Change
In `bitcoin/src/address.rs`, a new field `address` is added to the enum variant `Error::NetworkValidation`. Also, the implementation of `Display` trait for `Error` is updated to print the `address` field.
However, to print the `address` through `Display`, either the reference is needed or `Address` and `Payload` both need to derive the `Copy` trait. Since I am little new to both the rust-bitcoin codebase and rust itself, I am confused about choosing between the two and have moved with the first one. Would appreciate any feedback on this.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 73e876ffd4
tcharding:
ACK 73e876ffd4
apoelstra:
ACK 73e876ffd4
Tree-SHA512: dd53b8648bccc8372c829e56817402fb02a9d51d1dffc854f24e68814bbefe7ea777f67aefb0d170762dbf6cdd50bd3ec55af325a1ffc21b1241d1df5531cd24
Implementing this for spendinfo is really complicated because it
contains some cached data without retaining the components that are used
to compute them.
Users should serde the 1) NodeInfo and 2) internal key and reconstruct
TaprootSpendInfo from it.
This was incorrect and not needed. Users should not be able to create
only tree leaves directly without going through the tree construction in
rust-bitcoin
Cleanly separate `TapTree` and `NodeInfo`. Fix serde not respecting
invariants for several data structures
Repurpose some tests from removed taproot builder for taptree
42b07586ac Improve the public API (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
We created the `crypto` crate as a container for cryptography modules with the idea that it may be split out into a separate crate. There is no reason for users of the lib to know about this module. Also, we have two `taproot` modules, one in `crypto` and one at the crate root, this makes for un-ergonomic usage of the lib.
Improve the public API by doing:
- Make the `crypto` module private (`pub(crate)`).
- Re-export `crypto::taproot::Signature` (and `Error`) from `crate::taproot`
Fix: #1668
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 42b07586ac
Kixunil:
ACK 42b07586ac
Tree-SHA512: 5713b98b2a48d2776cdd6ca2c0e798d6e2df604d780e5182bd770fb2df807cf1f65bc24663ee6f7734fc1e0c80494c5a87dc60e44c83acefcffec7f059203a47
We created the `crypto` crate as a container for cryptography modules
with the idea that it may be split out into a separate crate. There is
no reason for users of the lib to know about this module. Also, we have
two `taproot` modules, one in `crypto` and one at the crate root, this
makes for un-ergonomic usage of the lib.
Improve the public API by doing:
- Make the `crypto` module private (`pub(crate)`).
- Re-export `crypto::taproot::Signature` (and `Error`) from
`crate::taproot`
Tobin C. Harding
Andrew Poelstra
junderw
Martin Habovstiak
Salvatore Ingala
Steven Roose
yancy
Subhradeep Chakraborty
sanket1729