We have a `_unchecked` constructor now for both `Amount` and
`SignedAmount`. In preparation for enforcing the `MAX_MONEY` invariant
use the `_unchecked` constructor throughout the codebase to construct
amounts from hard coded integer values.
There is a range of different wordings used in the docs of constructor
type functions.
Change all to start with `Constructs a new` or `Constructs an empty`.
In functions that act like constructors there is a mixture of the usage
of `creates` and `constructs`.
Replace all occurrences of `creates` with `constructs` in the first line
of docs of constructor like functions.
Move the `Witness` over to `primitives` leaving behind any method that
takes or returns a `Script` or a signature.
Includes addition of a feature gate to unit test.
Recently we deprecated the `all_zeros` functions on `Wtxid` and
`Txid` but for some reason our usage of them is not triggering a lint
warning.
Note please that this changes logic slightly, for example by using an
array of `0xFF` bytes instead of all zeros. Done in an effort to make it
even more obvious that the value is a dummy value and not mix it up with
the all zeros being used for coinbase thing.
Done in preparation for moving the script types to `primitives`.
The script types have a bunch of functionality to support scriptPubkeys,
and scriptPubkeys are an address thing.
Create a module under `address` and in it create a bunch of extension
traits to hold all scriptPubkey functionality.
Includes adding an ugly-as-hell macro to create the traits.
We should pass `Copy` types by value not by reference.
Currently this is not done in secp, but lets do it here in bitcoin.
Pass by value:
- `SerializedSignature`
- bitcoin sigs
- secp sigs
- secp `Message`
9f01871c11 api: Run just check-api (Tobin C. Harding)
7929b51640 Pass keys by value (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
We should pass `Copy` types by value not by reference. Pass the key types by value.
This is patch 1 from #2404
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 9f01871c11 this will annoy some people but I think we should do it
Tree-SHA512: 18afab537edf4ade4dc1c1e5992e50060b8935531f1e3cbe1d3b94b2fcb87aafa39947f342e0e762835bda3b4091dd35b3b74ea79f4dbb3b21660ffd21d1f82e
Currently we have a trait `Hash` that is required for `Hmac`, `Hkdf`,
and other use cases. However, it is unegonomic for users who just want
to do a simple hash to have to import the trait.
Add inherent functions to all hash types including those created with
the new wrapper type macros.
This patch introduces some duplicate code but we are trying to make
progress in the hashes API re-write. We can come back and de-dublicate
later.
Includes making `to_byte_array`,`from_byte_array`, `as_byte_array`, and
`all_zeros` const where easily possible.
In the segwit signing example we are using the incorrect value when
creating the signature - we should be using the utxo amount (input
amount) not the spend amount (output spend amount).
Close: #2680
Applies to both `ecdsa::Signature` and `taproot::Signature`.
Re-name the `Signature` fields with more descriptive names. The
names used were decided upon in the issue discussion.
Impove rustdocs while we are at it.
Note, the change to `sign-tx-segwit-v0` is refactor only, the diff does
not show it but we have a local variable already called `sighash_type`
that is equal to `EcdsaSighashType::All`.
Includes a function argument rename as well, just to be uniform.
Fix: #2139
Add two signing examples to showcase signing a simple one input two
output transaction using both segwit v0 outputs and taproot outputs.
This patch is the result of the recent rust-bitcoin TABConf workshop,
wit bug fix by Sanket, updated to use APIs from tip of master branch.
This code, depending on v0.30.0 is what is being introduced to the
cookbook at the moment.
Tobin C. Harding
Jamil Lambert, PhD
ChrisCho-H
Fmt Bot
Andrew Poelstra