Bitcoin block headers have a timestamp. Currently we are using a
`u32`. while this functions correctly it gives the compiler no chance
to enforce type safety.
Add a `Timestamp` newtype that is a thin wrapper around a `u32`.
Document it and test the API surface in `api.rs`.
It has turned out that the `rust-ordered` crate and it's
`ArbitraryOrd` trait are only useful for locktimes and only marginally
useful for them at best.
Remove the `ArbitraryOrd` impls and the `rust-ordered` dependency.
This topic was discussed in various places including:
- #2500
- #4002
- #3881Close: #4029
Currently `InputString` is in the public API of `units` because of the
trait bound on `parse::int()`. We can just do the monomorphisisation
manually to remove it.
This patch renames `int` to have three different names, one for `&str`
one for `String`, and one for `Box<str>`.
a5993426fd bitcoin: Improve rustdocs on extern crates (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Make slight improvement to the extern crates we re-export from `bitcoin`.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK a5993426fddea85c29ac6cd5a0e3096988d72b03; successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: bb857316fc2606aa553f15e1c9fcf8dd87374e170121fe30cf9e44ae190f873f94c113af49b096cb49a65fd68d1bf24732e3f1aba04861e2ae934414f30473c6
`rust-bitcoin` is a lot further from 1.0 than `bech32` is. We previously
removed the re-export of `bech32` because we thought it might hold us up
releasing `rust-bitcoin 1.0` but in hindsite this was incorrect.
Having a public re-export of dependencies helps users keep their deps in
sync with those in `rust-bitcoin` and is thus useful.
Close: #3650
On the way re-design the API by doing:
- Introduce `Checked` and `Unchecked` tags
- Rename the `txdata` field to `transactions`
- Make the `Block` fields private
- Add getters for `header` and `transactions` fields
- Move the various `compute_` methods to be free standing functions
- Make the `check_` functions private
- Introduce extension traits
These re-exports are hard to get right. We (I) recently made an attempt
to make our stack of crates easier to navigate using the idea that
exporting a type from the crate it is defined in adds some additional
information without any loss of clarity. Note however that the module
must be re-exported from the "highest" place possible because we at
times add additional functionality as we move up the stack e.g.,
`bitcoin::merkle_tree` has logic in it that `primitives::merkle_tree`
does not. In order to future proof the codebase default to always using
the highest module up the stack even when that module adds no additional
code e.g., re-export `blockdata::fee_rate` as opposed to
`units::fee_rate` in the event that we later add logic to
`bitcoin::blockdata::fee_rate`.
This patch adds an additional re-export: `sequence` (previously missing).
Is there any advantage trying to lay out the re-exports to give users an
idea of the crate structure?
We have the explicit aim that users who depend on `bitcoin` do not ever
need to reach directly into `primitives` (or `units`) however it is kind
of nice to know where things come from, saves jumping to multiple files
looking for them (for those of us that jump to files manually).
I do not know how all the re-exports interact with other folks IDEs, I
personally open files manually and just remember where stuff is.
For users who want to just grab stuff from the crate root it makes total
sense for there to be a `BlockHeader`.
Another nice thing, in the HMTL docs it makes BlockHeader be in the
struct list right along with `Block`, `BlockHash`, and `BlockHeight`.
This has been fixed and we use nightly to lint so we have access to the
merged fix.
Removing the attribute uncovers a bunch of real lint warnings, fix
them while we are at it.
Up until recently we were using wildcard re-exports for types moved to
`units` and `primitives`. We have decided against doing so in favour of
explicit re-exports.
Audit `units` and `primitives` using `git grep 'pub enum'` (and
`struct`) and explicitly re-export all types.
Remove all wildcards except for the re-exports from `opcodes`, there are
too many opcodes, explicitly re-exporting them does not aid clarity.
We use `TBD` in our `deprecated` string and it was discovered that there
is an exception on this string so as not to warn because it is used
internally by the Rust language. However there is a special lint to
enable warnings, lets use it.
Add `#![warn(deprecated_in_future)]` to the coding conventions section
of all crates except `fuzz`.
At some stage we named the compact encoding `VarInt` (which makes sense
because the compact size encoding is a variable length integer encoding).
However it turns out the term "varint" is used in Core for a different
encoding so this may lead to confusion.
While we fix this naming thing observe also that the `VarInt` type is
unnecessarily complicated, all we need to be able to do is encode and
decode integers in compact form as specified by Core. We can do this
simply by extending our `WriteExt` and `ReadExt` traits.
Add `emit_compact_size` and `read_compact_size` to emit and read compact
endcodings respectively.
Includes addition of `internals::compact_size::encoded_size_const`.
Patch originally written by Steven, Tobin cherry-picked and did a bunch
of impovements after the varint vs compact_size thing (#1016).
ref: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Protocol_documentation#Variable_length_integer
Co-developed-by: Tobin C. Harding <me@tobin.cc>
Examples in documentation are not linted in the same way as other code,
but should still contain correctly written code.
unused_imports in docs have been removed in bitcoin, and a warn
attribute added to lib.rs.
c427d8b213 bitcoin: Compile time assert on index size (Tobin C. Harding)
49a6acc1a0 internals: Remove double parenthesis in const_assert (Tobin C. Harding)
2300b285ef units: Remove compile time pointer width check (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
3 patches in preparation for other size related work, this PR does not touch the `ToU64` issue which will be handled separately.
- Patch 1: Don't check pointer width in `units` because its not consensus code
- Patch 2: Modify internal macro `const_assert`
- Patch 3: Use index size to enforce not building on a 16 bit machine
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK c427d8b213 though I think the last commit was kinda a waste of time and it should have been adding the trait instead or leave it for later.
apoelstra:
ACK c427d8b213 successfully ran local tests; unsure if we want to merg this or wait for #3215
Tree-SHA512: 823df5b6a5af3265bce2422c00d287f45816faeb5f965685650ac974a1bd441cf548e25ac2962591732ff221bee91a55703da936382eb166c014ca5d4129edf8
Currently we enforce that our code only runs on machines with a
certain pointer width (32 or 64 by failing to compile if pointer size
width is 16). One of the underlying reasons is because of requirements
in consensus code in Bitcoin Core which requires containers with more
than 2^16 (65536) items [0].
We can better express our requirements by asserting on Rust's index
size (the `usize` type).
As a side benefit, there is active work [1] to make Rust support
architectures where pointer width != idex size. With this patch applied
`rust-bitcoin` will function correctly even if that work progresses.
- [0] https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/2929#discussion_r1659399813
- [1] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65473
The version 1.63 satisfies our requirements for MSRV and provides
significant benefits so this commit bumps it. This commit also starts
using some advantages of the new MSRV, namely namespaced features, weak
dependencies and the ability to use trait bounds in `const` context.
This however does not yet migrade the `rand-std` feature because that
requires a release of `secp256k1` with the same kind of change - bumping
MSRV to 1.63 and removing `rand-std` in favor of weak dependency.
29b213daca Move validation module to consensus_validation (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
The `consensus` module is currently doing two things, validation and encoding. These two things are orthogonal.
Move the `consensus::validation` module to `consensus_validation`. Remove the function re-exports from `consensus`.
This was originally discussed here: https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/2779
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 29b213daca
apoelstra:
ACK 29b213daca
Tree-SHA512: 3bd0e43c220b0d89a47e9df0e0c92b776ccc65f5f60d57f413db834acc8e86269379bc9fdd688f8c4f0138db22f8eb8983770afa2d7d53d51acf063f2302121c
The `consensus` module is currently doing two things, validation and
encoding. These two things are orthogonal.
Move the `consensus::validation` module to `consensus_validation`.
Remove the function re-exports from `consensus`.
The `Params` struct is currently defined in the `consensus` module which
has become a collection of orthogonal consensus-ish things. We would
like to put things in more descriptive places.
The `Params` struct defines constants that are network specific so it
makes sense to put it in the `network` module. As soft proof of this
argument note in this patch how often the `Params` type is imported
along with the `Network` type.
API break:
The type is no longer available at `bitcoin::consensus::Params` but
rather is re-exported at `bitcoin::network::Params`.
The `absolute` and `relative` locktimes as well as the `Sequence` are
all primitive bitcoin types.
Move the `Sequence`, and `locktime` stuff over to `primitives`.
There is nothing surprising here, the consensus encoding stuff stays in
`bitcoin` and we re-export everything from `blockdata`.
7fa53440dc Move serde_round_trip macro to internals (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
We currently duplicate the serde_round_trip macro in `units` and `bitcoin`, this is unnecessary since it is a private test macro we can just throw it in `internals`.
While we are at it lets improve the macro by testing a binary encoding also, elect to use the `bincode` crate because we already have it in our dependency graph.
Add `test-serde` feature to `internals` to feature gate the macro and its usage (preventing the transient dependency on `bincode` and `serde_json`).
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 7fa53440dc
apoelstra:
ACK 7fa53440dc
Tree-SHA512: f40c78bf2539940b7836ed413d5fe96ce4e9ce59bad7b3f86d831971320d1c2effcd23d0da5c785d6c372a2c6962bf720080ec4351248fbbdc0f2cfb4ffd602c
4bb9240992 bitcoin: Add comment to manifest (Tobin C. Harding)
c6c70a721e bitcoin: Update feature docs (Tobin C. Harding)
7712e5d891 bitcoin: Use 100 colum width in crate level docs (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Update stale crate level docs in `bitcoin`. Done as two separate patches so the last one is trivial to review, whitespace only.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 4bb9240992
apoelstra:
ACK 4bb9240992
Tree-SHA512: b9d5474f7e7a0576f535df428ea20084acbcb74d0576e7f2934c547dd2c54f4a939d73ec547b3b254105a45c2372113c65ce136be1eabd63701259a3a6de3737
We currently duplicate the serde_round_trip macro in `units` and
`bitcoin`, this is unnecessary since it is a private test macro we can
just throw it in `internals`.
While we are at it lets improve the macro by testing a binary encoding
also, elect to use the `bincode` crate because we already have it in
our dependency graph.
Add `test-serde` feature to `internals` to feature gate the macro and
its usage (preventing the transient dependency on `bincode` and
`serde_json`).
The `bitcoin` crate documents its features in the crate level rustdocs,
currently they are stale.
Update and improve the feature docs section of crate level docs.
We have various different column widths being used in a single rustdoc
block, since we favour 100 for comments around here use it.
No text changes, whitespace only.
Currently we are defining the two merkle tree hash types in the `block`
module, a better home for them is the `merkle_tree` module.
This is an API breaking change because the types were public in the
`block` module, however the change should/could be unnoticeable to users
if they use the crate level re-export - which is maintained.
We just added to now types that are thin wrappers around `u32`s for
block heights and intervals.
Add `Encodable` and `Decodable` impls and use the new types. While we
are at it re-export the types from the crate root so users don't have to
dig into the `units` crate.
The `error` module is empty except for public re-exports. We are still
in the "break everything and get the API right" stage so this module
adds no value - remove it.
A release or so ago we added `non_exhaustive` to the `Network` enum,
this turned out to make usage of the enum un-ergonomic for downstream
users. After much debate we decided that a way forward was to just
minimize the usage of the enum in the public API by instead use
`AsRef<Params>` so that downstream could define their own network enum
based on the networks they support.
Minimize usage of `Network` by using `AsRef<Params>` as a parameter type
instead. "minimize" because the `Network` still appears in some places.
fd6fedc3ad Improve API for max target threshold calculation (Tobin C. Harding)
6e47d57744 Rename difficulty transition threshold functions (Tobin C. Harding)
4121c9a09f Rename Params::pow_limit to max_attainable_target (Tobin C. Harding)
f0f6d3f162 Take Params instead of Network in difficulty function (Tobin C. Harding)
104dee9376 Debug assert that target != zero in difficulty calc (Tobin C. Harding)
c1ba496a07 Document current behaviour of difficulty_float (Tobin C. Harding)
3d01146374 Allow needless-borrows-for-generic-args (Tobin C. Harding)
2a6821b426 Use link to CompactTarget in rustdoc (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
When computing the maximum difficulty transition threshold we forgot to check that the returned `Target` is not bigger than the maximum. This value is network specific so keep the original logic but with `_unchecked` on the function name.
This was noted in the discussion on #2161
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK fd6fedc3ad
sanket1729:
ACK fd6fedc3ad
Tree-SHA512: 520ee2a07edb251c84b5ce8b48ed6e5a5c1945126dc7bcdb5570e97101ec4a3dc63fa7992725194869e22b21ee4f5955579d5e2499fcb48167637fd1fb3ae74d
This lint triggers when parsing a reference to a large struct as a
generic argument, which is wrong.
Allow it crate wide because [subjectively] this lint never warns for
anything useful.
d91cdd20bf docs: Document ordered feature (Tobin C. Harding)
3520f550f0 Implement ArbitraryOrd for relative::LockTime (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
TL;DR As we do for `absolute::LockTime` and for the same reasons; implement `ArbitraryOrd` for `relative::LockTime`.
locktimes do not have a semantic ordering if they differ (blocks, time) so we do not derive `Ord` however it is useful for downstream to be able to order structs that contain lock times. This is exactly what the `ArbitraryOrd` trait is for.
Fix: #2566
ACKs for top commit:
sanket1729:
ACK d91cdd20bf
apoelstra:
ACK d91cdd20bf
Tree-SHA512: 52ace9222e765dfa266d003b4aff3e93e35d1414c9fd579c4a4a36998d6d1b08bf6d4964a6f1c1d769068d65e47a882495daa4aacf254909a35dce8e01c99a9e
Move the following unit types to the new `units` crate:
- `locktime::absolute::{Height, Time}`
- `locktime::relative::{Height, Time}`
- `FeeRate`
- `Weight`
Also move the `parse` module as well as constants as required.
Do minimal changes to get things building:
- Feature gate on "alloc" as needed.
- Remove rustdocs that use `bitcoin` types.
- Re-export units types so this is a non-breaking change.
- Fix import paths.
b873a3cd44 Do infallible int from hex conversions (Tobin C. Harding)
4d762cb08c Remove the FromHexStr trait (Tobin C. Harding)
026537807f Remove mention of packed (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
The `FromHexStr` trait is used to parse integer-like types, however we can achieve the same using inherent methods.
Move the hex parsing functionality to inherent methods, keeping the same behaviour in regard to the `0x` prefix.
Patch 1 is trivial preparatory cleanup.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK b873a3cd44
sanket1729:
ACK b873a3cd44
Tree-SHA512: a280169b68304fcc1a531cc9ffb6914b70238efc4c2241a766105053911a373a0334b73e5ea3525c331ccb81ce98c43fea96dae77668804e608376a48d5ed8ac