Its not immediately obvious why we nest the whole `io` code in an `io`
submodule within `lib.rs`. As far as I can tell we can inline it and
re-export from `rust-bitcoin` same as we do for our other dependencies.
This change would effect other users of the crate but since the `io`
crate is unreleased this effects no-one except us.
761de886be Remove imports of TryFrom and TryInto (Tobin C. Harding)
4d5415f835 Add rust-version to the workspace manifests (Tobin C. Harding)
a41e978855 Update to edition 2021 (Tobin C. Harding)
d9cc724187 Bump MSRV to Rust version 1.56.1 (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Rust version 1.56.0 introduced edition 2021. Shortly afterwards, on October 21 2021 Rust version 1.56.1 was released.
Debian stable is currently shipping `rustc 1.63.0`. Our stated MSRV policy is: In Debian stable and at least 2 years old. Therefore our MSRV policy is met by Rust version 1.56.1 and we can strat to bump our MSRV org wide. Start by bumping the `rust-bitcoin` and `hashes` MSRV to Rust 1.56.1
Start by bumping the `rust-bitcoin` and `hashes` MSRV to Rust 1.56.1, includes:
- Update docs.
- Update CI and remove pinning.
- Update the build files and remove now stale cfg attributes rust_v_1_x for values less than the new MSRV.
- Use new `IntoIterator` for arrays so we no longer need to allocate a vector to iterate.
Links:
- https://blog.rust-lang.org/2021/11/01/Rust-1.56.1.html
- https://blog.rust-lang.org/2021/10/21/Rust-1.56.0.html
- https://packages.debian.org/stable/rust/rustc
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 761de886be
apoelstra:
ACK 761de886be
Tree-SHA512: 3a81c8bfa37d8cec0ec794f516f014da67ae8e437decf149c9681aa547885acac0ee07ea2c0f42e4f6bfd6f7ed1695fcf4747f53cc50e5f4e70ce3fe7bcba4e9
fa104aefa5 bitcoin: Add signing examples (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Add two signing examples to showcase signing a simple one input two output transaction using both segwit v0 outputs and taproot outputs.
This patch is the result of the recent rust-bitcoin TABConf workshop, with bug fix by Sanket, updated to use APIs from tip of master branch.
This code, depending on v0.30.0 is what was added to the cookbook.
ACKs for top commit:
realeinherjar:
ACK fa104aefa5
apoelstra:
ACK fa104aefa5
Tree-SHA512: ce0d5b8291c94387c68b5e1cf740d3267fc00c997af5b96f5be525f348140d9a9af17ab66d556990f09bf081a5a812374cb633ea276100c7c21f218b85eae3fd
We do not need this dependency because we can get the serde derives
directly from `serde`.
diff --git a/bitcoin/Cargo.toml b/bitcoin/Cargo.toml
index 3868bd08..db7fb322 100644
--- a/bitcoin/Cargo.toml
+++ b/bitcoin/Cargo.toml
@@ -53,7 +53,6 @@ actual-serde = { package = "serde", version = "1.0.103", default-features = fals
[dev-dependencies]
serde_json = "1.0.0"
serde_test = "1.0.19"
-serde_derive = "1.0.103"
bincode = "1.3.1"
[target.'cfg(mutate)'.dev-dependencies]
In order to support standard (de)serialization of structs, the
`rust-bitcoin` ecosystem uses the standard `std::io::{Read,Write}`
traits. This works great for environments with `std`, however sadly
the `std::io` module has not yet been added to the `core` crate.
Thus, in `no-std`, the `rust-bitcoin` ecosystem has historically
used the `core2` crate to provide copies of the `std::io` module
without any major dependencies. Sadly, its one dependency,
`memchr`, recently broke our MSRV.
Worse, because we didn't want to take on any excess dependencies
for `std` builds, `rust-bitcoin` has had to have
mutually-exclusive `std` and `no-std` builds. This breaks general
assumptions about how features work in Rust, causing substantial
pain for applications far downstream of `rust-bitcoin` crates.
Here, we add a new `bitcoin_io` crate, making it an unconditional
dependency and using its `io` module in the in-repository crates
in place of `std::io` and `core2::io`. As it is not substantial
additional code, the `hashes` io implementations are no longer
feature-gated.
This doesn't actually accomplish anything on its own, only adding
the new crate which still depends on `core2`.
Add two signing examples to showcase signing a simple one input two
output transaction using both segwit v0 outputs and taproot outputs.
This patch is the result of the recent rust-bitcoin TABConf workshop,
wit bug fix by Sanket, updated to use APIs from tip of master branch.
This code, depending on v0.30.0 is what is being introduced to the
cookbook at the moment.
Upgrade the `secp256k1` dependency to the newly released `v0.28.0`.
FTR this includes two simple changes:
- Use `Message::from_digest_slice` instead of `Message::from_slice`.
- Use `secp256k1::Keypair` instead of `secp256k1::KeyPair`.
Update the `bech32` dependency to use the newly release beta version.
The main fix here is silent, a bug fix in `bech32` that was being hit by
our fuzzing suite.
bb8bd16302 internals: Remove hex module (Tobin C. Harding)
2268b44911 Depend on hex-conservative (Tobin C. Harding)
db50509cd3 Add usage docs to the "core2" feature (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Use the newly released `hex-conservative` crate, by doing the following:
- Depend on `hex-conservative` in `bitcoin` and `hashes`
- Re-export `hex-conservative` as `hex` from both crate roots.
- Remove all the old hex code from `hashes`
- Remove all the old hex code from `internals`
- Remove the now unused `internals::prelude`
- Fix all the import statements (makes up the bulk of the lines changes in this patch)
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK bb8bd16302
sanket1729:
utACK bb8bd16302
Tree-SHA512: ec83b3941cae6f32272471779f28461bb04959a3f6a126a68bbf2c748d83ff9518ff8932d9e937a6f389c10028bf3eb58c6b6d71ea066924dd7a34faaec7a087
We have just released the `hex-conservative` crate, we can now use it.
Do the following:
- Depend on `hex-conservative` in `bitcoin` and `hashes`
- Re-export `hex-conservative` as `hex` from both crate roots.
- Remove all the old hex code from `hashes`
- Fix all the import statements (makes up the bulk of the lines changed
in this patch)
We use two different methods for specifying local dependencies, `patch`
and also `path`. There does not seem to be a reason why we use both,
lets be uniform. Elect to use `patch` for all local crates.
In preparation for release bump the version and add a changelog entry.
Includes updating the dependency in `bitcoin` and `hashes` as well as
the minimal/recent lock files.
This implements basic facilities to conditionally carry string inputs in
parse errors. This includes:
* `InputString` type that may carry the input and format it
* `parse_error_type!` macro creating a special type for parse errors
* `impl_parse` implementing parsing for various types as well as its
`serde`-supporting alternative
We can use `package` to rename `bitcoin_hashes` to `hashes` and
`bitcoin_internals` to `internals`. This makes imports more terse with
no loss of meaning.
Because we have rust-secp in the loop, we need to update rust-secp, push
a new tag, and use that here, to ensure that the direct dependency on
bitcoin_hashes, and the rust-secp version, are compatible.
Currently we have an associated type on hash types `Inner` with
accompanying methods `into_inner`, `from_inner`, `as_inner`. Also, we
provide a way to create new wrapped hash types. The use of 'inner'
becomes ambiguous with the addition of wrapped types because the inner
could be the inner hash type or the `Inner` byte array of the inner
wrapped hash type.
In an effort to make the API more clear and uniform do the following:
- Rename `Inner` -> `Bytes`
- Rename `*_inner` -> `*_byte_array`
- Rename the inner hash to/from methods to `*_raw_hash`
Correct method prefix `into_` -> `to_` because theses methods convert
owned `Copy` types.
Add the trait Bound `Copy` to the `Bytes` type because we rely on this
trait bound for the conversion methods to be correctly named according
to convention.
Because of the dependency hole created by `secp256k1` this patch changes
the secp dependency to a git tag dependency that includes changes to the
hashes calls required so that we can get green lights on CI in this
repo.
So far we deserialized hex into `Vec<u8>` at run time. This was mainly
in tests where it had negligible performance cost. However moving the
computation to compile time has a few benefits: it allows proving the
length of the decoded bytes and identifies potential typos before the
code goes through LLVM and other compilation machinery which makes
feedback faster.
This change uses the `hex_lit` crate to move computation to compile
time. It is implemented as `const` declarative macro which doesn't blow
up compilation time.
In `bitcoin` when we use the `core2` dependency we always need the
"alloc" feature. Enabling "alloc" when enabling "core2" in the "no-std"
feature is confusing because it makes it seem that we don't always need
it.
Set usage of the "alloc" feature of `core2` in the `features` list.
`core2` is for Read/Write, nothing to do with allocation and we do not
use the "alloc" feature of `core2` in `hashes`.
Fix core2 dependency/features by doing:
- Explicitly enable "bitcoin_hashes/core2" in `bitcoin`.
- Do not enable "core2/alloc" in `hashes`
Improve all manifest package sections by doing:
- Order the list of options uniformly
- Remove unnecessary homepage option (currently same as repo)
- Add categories section
We can check which files are included in the packaged release with
`cargo package --list `.
Add an `exclude` section to each manifest that excludes `tests/` and
`contrib/`. Not all crates have a `tests/` directory yet but they should
so add the exclude anyway to future proof the crates.
The rust version is supposed to be set by the build script so that users
automagically get features matching the toolchain in use. Currently we
have a feature in the manifest for `rustv_1_53` instead setting a
compiler conditional configuration option in the build script. This
causes `cargo +1.41.1 --all-features check` to fail.
The `bip158` module uses a `HashSet` and in order to do so requires the
`hashbrown` dependency for "no-std" builds.
We can replace the usage of `HashSet` with a `BTreeSet` in `bip158` and
remove the `hashbrown` dependency entirely.
This patch makes no claims about performance cost or benefit of this
change. The patch also makes no claims about the validity of the current
`HashSet` usage.
The `hashbrown` dependency and `HashSet` usage can be trivially added
back in if someone comes up with perf data to back it up.
941083ec4e Remove rand-std dev-dependency from secp256k1 (Tobin C. Harding)
f71335f971 Add rand-std feature (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
This PR uncovered incorrect feature gating in `secp256k1`, fixed in https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/pull/519
Currently we enable "secp256k1/rand-std" in the "rand" feature, this is incorrect because it means "rand" implies "std" which it does not.
Add a "rand-std" feature that turns on "seck256k1/rand-std" and make the "rand" feature turn on "seck256k1/rand".
Fix: #1384
ACKs for top commit:
sanket1729:
ACK 941083ec4e
apoelstra:
ACK 941083ec4e
Tree-SHA512: e1d12196766c2b3082b488fe7d0c03a865ebbfc70ffa6f128c57074df14da71e56c31ea92982991d376ac62fa86c6639049ce17aac93613b523ddcc99677c269
8ce928b8e7 Add testing section to readme (Tobin C. Harding)
2e79a0bdc4 Introduce mutation testing (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Introduce mutation testing by way of mutagen [0] (see #1484 for context).
- Conditionally add the dev-dependency `mutagen` (using `do_mutate` flag)
This flag is not very well named but `mutagen` and `mutate` are already taken?
- Mutate all methods of the `U256` struct that do not require additional unit tests.
Uses `cfg(all(test, do_mutate), mutate)` - I cannot workout why we need to check on `test` as well i.e., I don't understand why we cannot use `cfg(do_mutate, mutate)`?
With this applied test can be run as usual with a stable toolchain. To run mutagen we use `RUSTFLAGS='--cfg=do_mutate' cargo +nightly mutagen` (doing so runs 29 mutants).
[0] https://github.com/llogiq/mutagen
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 8ce928b8e7
apoelstra:
ACK 8ce928b8e7
Tree-SHA512: 024ba5d2dc983f7cd0444e09ba13280771157204999d2a44502e07a1d6436f571b75003c7cb543c943f17949b848d4070eda4e194bda774a3e41443ff79af0af
In order to get better test coverage we should not enable the secp26k1
feature "rand-std" in dev-dependencies but instead feature gate tests
that depend on this feature.
Currently we enable "secp256k1/rand-std" in the "rand" feature, this is
incorrect because it means "rand" implies "std" which it does not.
Add a "rand-std" feature that turns on "seck256k1/rand-std" and make the
"rand" feature turn on "seck256k1/rand".
Tobin C. Harding
Andrew Poelstra
Matt Corallo
sanket1729
junderw
Steven Roose
Martin Habovstiak