Enforcing the MAX_MONEY invariant is quite involved because it means
multiple things:
- Constructing amounts is now fallible
- Converting from unsigned to signed is now infallible
- Taking the absolute value is now infallible
- Integer overflow is illuminated in various places
Details:
- Update from_sat to check the invariant
- Fix all docs including examples
- Use the unchecked constructor in test code
- Comment any other use of the unchecked constructor
- Deprecate unchecked_abs
- Fail serde (using the horrible string error variant)
- Try not to use the unchecked constructor in rustdocs, no need to encourage unsuspecting users to use it.
- Use ? in rustdoc examples (required by Rust API guidlines)
- Remove TryFrom<Amount> for SignedAmount because the conversion is now infallible. Add a From impl.
- Fix the arbitrary impls
- Maintain correct formatting
- Remove private check_max function as its no longer needed
a4b9c196b1 Manually update nightly version (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
While trying to use the `macro_use_imports` lint I found that there is a bug in last weeks nightly. It has been fixed already so lets update.
Update to todays nightly compiler. Doing so causes some new linter warnings, for now we just allow them.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK a4b9c196b13a2029ef0de198114a29c71a192d03; successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: a982ba05713c214af3b9375ecf37b66aea07ec0330392c30d2dbe3c9b40e1219b587ee43222f2355292b9b374a6a1d8a19d18b559bb47d33e544ed78509a51b8
While trying to use the `macro_use_imports` lint I found that there is a
bug in last weeks nightly. It has been fixed already so lets update.
Update to todays nightly compiler. Doing so causes some new linter
warnings, for now we just allow them.
We would like to return an error when doing math ops on amount types.
We cannot however use the stdlib `Result` or `Option` because we want to
implement ops on the result type.
Add an `AmountOpResult` type. Return this type from all math operations
on `Amount` and `SignedAmount`.
Implement `core::iter::Sum` for the new type to allow summing iterators
of amounts - somewhat ugly to use, see tests for example usage.
We want to get rid of this constant, so we replace it in tests with 0
amount, empty script. Notably, the tests were already using it as a
dummy value - the exact amount was irrelevant, so this change doesn't
break anything.
a7c44cebf9 Use _unchecked to construct amounts (Tobin C. Harding)
09df951760 Use sat variable in tests (Tobin C. Harding)
4a5b2c60c6 Use ssat variable in tests (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
We have a `_unchecked` constructor now for both `Amount` and `SignedAmount`. Soon we would like to start enforcing the `MAX_MONEY` invariant in both amount types. To make that change easier do a few refactorings:
- Patch 1 and 2 introduce local variables for amount constructors.
- Patch 3 replaces the local variables introduce in (1) and (2) with macros
- Patch 4 uses `_unchecked` constructor for hard coded integers
The strange patch separation is done intentionally so we don't inadvertently reduce test coverage by using the wrong constructor. I made this mistake already in a previous PR, lesson learned.
Note please, the macro introduced in patch 3 is in preparation for enforcing `MAX_MONEY`. The macros allow us to panic (`from_sat().unwrap()`) instead of using the `_unchecked` version.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK a7c44cebf9975c4eeba56a65c0ea65be90e5c7f3; successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: 55c2428ae231882542a4cfa724675341f7b493d158f4bec26277d3eefb04d9597cc29b05dce859661a96855fa6f4bac250d53c3dfa9f86a9611d43387ee18667
We have a `_unchecked` constructor now for both `Amount` and
`SignedAmount`. In preparation for enforcing the `MAX_MONEY` invariant
use the `_unchecked` constructor throughout the codebase to construct
amounts from hard coded integer values.
Rust macros, while at times useful, are a maintenance nightmare. And
we have been bitten by calling macros from other crates multiple times
in the past.
In a push to just use less macros remove the usage of the
`impl_from_infallible` macro in the bitcoin, units, and internals crates
and just write the code.
There is a loose convention in Rust to not use `test_` prefix. The
reason being that `cargo test` outputs 'test <test name>' using the
prefix makes the output stutter.
This patch smells a bit like code-churn but having the prefix in some
places and not others is confusing to new contributors and is leading me
to explain this many times now. Lets just fix it.
Remove the prefix unless doing so breaks the code.
The Amount type provides better type safety and is more appropriate in
this context than u64. Currently the checked arithmetic operations for
Amount and u64 are identical in behavior. Therefore, this refactor does
not result in any behavior change and is purely cosmetic.
To prevent rounding errors converting to and from f64 change
`Amount::MAX` to `MAX_MONEY` which is below the limit in f64 that has
issues.
Add checks to `from_str_in`, `checked_add` and `checked_mul` that the
result is below MAX, where previously a u64 overflow was relied on.
Change tests to account for new lower MAX that is within the range of
SignedAmount and does not overflow so easily
Remove overflow tests
`Amount::MAX` is now below `u64::MAX` and within the range of values for
`SignedAmount`. These tests therefore do not overflow.
In effective_value there is no error with `Amount::MAX` and the correct
value is returned.
In psbt the removed test is effectively the same as the previous test.
Modify `Amount` tests to work with new `MAX`
Tests need to be changed that checked values above the new `MAX` or
`Amount::MAX` was out of range for `SignedAmount` which it isn't anymore
9aebb96fb9 Fix psbt fuzz crash (Sanket Kanjalkar)
Pull request description:
Fixes: https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/3628
This occurs when combining two PSBTs with different xpub key sources. Added a length check before indexing into slices to prevent out-of-bounds access.
For some reason, the precommit hook complained about non-ascii files. I don't think any of the names here are non-ascii
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 9aebb96fb99e8e9e019663659c6eff851a62f2ce; successfully ran local tests; thanks!
tcharding:
ACK 9aebb96fb9
Tree-SHA512: b61274c594bc1f2ea4d04c8a7ace673a7632bb9ea31f59b56779a008c35e61281ea4f6b869990d886779e3e556932a3b2e8b015733ef18e236f12ca77e211c26
There is a range of different wordings used in the docs of constructor
type functions.
Change all to start with `Constructs a new` or `Constructs an empty`.
In functions that act like constructors there is a mixture of the usage
of `creates` and `constructs`.
Replace all occurrences of `creates` with `constructs` in the first line
of docs of constructor like functions.
WARNING: This is not like all the other extension traits.
Because of the use of generics on various `Transaction` methods it is
not easily possible to use the `define_extension_trait` macro.
Manually create the extension traits (public and private) for the
`Transaction` type. This is quite ugly but c'est la vie
(Includes two in the `transaction` module and one in the
`consensus_validation` module.)
2f656f77ba psbt: Use u64 for key type (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Currently we use `u8` for key type but it was pointed out that we should be using a `u64` and encoding it as a compact type. The reason our code works now is because the compact type encoding for a `u8` (less than
This breaks the `serde` impl, as shown by changes to the regression tests,
Fix: #2891
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 2f656f77ba successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: ce5fe46b54cb724a0b0f9f874c037e5b5d344e5d3c380f9cdb3fdb5cbc5e31e4e32c229f5f2f72547823238934f6b0c3640c2c2ce79d98aa57bac509d130cb82
We had an initial go at this but we didn't do the `Hash` trait method.
In order to do so we need to hack the serde code a fair bit, note the
public visitor types.
Currently we use `u8` for key type but it was pointed out that we should
be using a `u64` and encoding it as a compact type. The reason our code
works now is because the compact type encoding for a `u8` (less than
253) is the same as for a `u8`.
This breaks the `serde` impl, as shown by changes to the regression tests.
This change makes method names on Xpub and Xpriv more consistent and
easier to discover by following two patterns:
- if the method deals with extended key, it contains 'xpub' or
'xpriv' in its name
- if the method deals with non-extended key, it contains
'public_key' or 'private_key'
One exception is 'ckd_*' methods, which are lower-level and their names
come from BIP32; these keep using 'priv' and 'pub'.
Currently we provide `Default` implementations for a couple of types in
the `transaction` module, the values returned are meaningless and it
seems these impls were added to make writing test code easier. In
hindsight this was the wrong thing to do.
Break the API and remove the `Default` implementations for `OutPoint`
and `TxIn`.
Add an associated const `TxIn::EMPTY_COINBASE` that is, as the name
suggests, an empty transaction input with the prevout set to all
zeros as for the coinbase transaction.
8ec3571d80 Implement GetKey for Vec<Xpriv> (Nadav Ivgi)
Pull request description:
It appears that the `BTreeSet<Xpriv>`/`HashSet<Xpriv>` sets currently implementing `GetKey` cannot actually be constructed, because `Xpriv` does not implement `Ord` nor `Hash`. (And that the rust-bitcoin code referencing these sets should not even compile? yet evidently it does 👀 )
This PR adds support for `Vec<Xpriv>` to enable signing with multiple `Xpriv`s, but does not address the issue with the existing sets.
The added test case demonstrates the issue:
```rust
error[E0277]: the trait bound `bip32::Xpriv: std:#️⃣:Hash` is not satisfied
--> bitcoin/src/psbt/mod.rs:2301:24
|
2301 | HashSet::new().insert(xpriv.clone());
| ^^^^^^ the trait `std:#️⃣:Hash` is not implemented for `bip32::Xpriv`
|
note: required by a bound in `std::collections::HashSet::<T, S>::insert`
--> /rustc/82e1608dfa6e0b5569232559e3d385fea5a93112/library/std/src/collections/hash/set.rs:888:5
error[E0277]: the trait bound `bip32::Xpriv: Ord` is not satisfied
--> bitcoin/src/psbt/mod.rs:2302:25
|
2302 | BTreeSet::new().insert(xpriv.clone());
| ^^^^^^ the trait `Ord` is not implemented for `bip32::Xpriv`
|
note: required by a bound in `std::collections::BTreeSet::<T, A>::insert`
--> /rustc/82e1608dfa6e0b5569232559e3d385fea5a93112/library/alloc/src/collections/btree/set.rs:899:5
```
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 8ec3571d80 successfully ran local tests
tcharding:
ACK 8ec3571d80
Tree-SHA512: aceb95f8eaf11f91c6829e0b5e1c0264ebffbf587fd420145a22e924cb45678b2f4334f0b7de6ed99b57f0ce24c3d61f9e5c1e348e1b40975bc515e8fd16b75d
In preparation for moving the `ScritpBuf` type to `primitives` add a
public and private extension trait for the functions we want to leave
here in `bitcoin`.
Note, includes a change to the `difine_extension_trait` metavariable
used on `$gent` from `ident` to `path` to support the generic
`AsRef<PushBytes>`.
In preparation to move script types to `primitives` we replace impl
block with extension traits by replacing the temporary modules with
`define_extension_trait`.
The version 1.63 satisfies our requirements for MSRV and provides
significant benefits so this commit bumps it. This commit also starts
using some advantages of the new MSRV, namely namespaced features, weak
dependencies and the ability to use trait bounds in `const` context.
This however does not yet migrade the `rand-std` feature because that
requires a release of `secp256k1` with the same kind of change - bumping
MSRV to 1.63 and removing `rand-std` in favor of weak dependency.
2169b75bba Use lower case error messages (Jamil Lambert, PhD)
Pull request description:
Error messages should be lower case, except for proper nouns and variable names. These have all been changed.
~~They should also state what went wrong. Some expect error messages were positive, giving the correct behaviour or correct input. These have been changed so that they are now negative, i.e. saying what went wrong.~~
EDIT: After further discussion it was decided not to change the expect messages.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 2169b75bba
tcharding:
ACK 2169b75bba
Tree-SHA512: 92442c869e0141532425f6fca5195fd319b65026f68c4230a65ad70253565d98931b2b44ee202975c307280525c505147e272297dc81207312e40c43d007021c
64c31cfb97 Move locktimes and Sequence to primitives (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
The `absolute` and `relative` locktimes as well as the `Sequence` are all primitive bitcoin types.
Move the `Sequence`, and `locktime` stuff over to `primitives`.
There is nothing surprising here, the consensus encoding stuff stays in `bitcoin` and we re-export everything from `blockdata`.
Note please `Sequence` is no longer publicly available at `bitcoin::transaction::Sequence` but it is available at `bitcoin::Sequence`.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 64c31cfb97
apoelstra:
ACK 64c31cfb97
Tree-SHA512: 968aa595bfb53e8fcfa860dae797ec5381ed49c67326a8ef9494086ec65d737502dffe4b24143e159042d07c59c5109d50103029082f87e1c3c26671e975f1b3
The `absolute` and `relative` locktimes as well as the `Sequence` are
all primitive bitcoin types.
Move the `Sequence`, and `locktime` stuff over to `primitives`.
There is nothing surprising here, the consensus encoding stuff stays in
`bitcoin` and we re-export everything from `blockdata`.
Done in preparation for moving the script types to `primitives`.
The script types have a bunch of functionality to support scriptPubkeys,
and scriptPubkeys are an address thing.
Create a module under `address` and in it create a bunch of extension
traits to hold all scriptPubkey functionality.
Includes adding an ugly-as-hell macro to create the traits.
Wildcards have been replaced with what is actually used.
In a couple of cases an additional use statement was added to the test
module to import `DisplayHex` which is only used in test, but
previously imported with the wildcard at the top.
Fmt Bot
Tobin C. Harding
merge-script
19年梦醒
Martin Habovstiak
Shing Him Ng
yancy
Jamil Lambert, PhD
Sanket Kanjalkar
Jiri Jakes
Nadav Ivgi