Support for Rust arrays is now much better so slice-accepting
methods that require a fixed length can be replaced with a method that
accepts an array.
`from_slice()` has been deprecated. A `from_byte_array()` function
already exists to be used instead.
These are only called from within the crate but it is still more correct
to use `$crate` and saves this from biting us later if we copy the code
someplace else.
Internal change only.
be13397570 Make hmac & hkdf more robust against buggy `Hash` (Martin Habovstiak)
94c0614bda Enforce that `Hash::Bytes` is an array (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
This makes sure `Hash::Bytes` is an array. We've discussed this somewhere but I don't remember where.
I'm not sure if the second commit is actually valuable but hopefully shouldn't make things worse.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK be13397570 successfully ran local tests; yep, this looks like an improvement. Agreed that the second commit has questionable value but doe not make things worse
tcharding:
ACK be13397570
Tree-SHA512: 0fed982084f0f98927c2b4a275cec81cb4bbc0efbf01551a0a4a8b6b39a4504830243ee8d55a5c0418d81b5d4babc7b22332dbacc0609ced8fada84d2961ae71
Use the newly added requirement that `Hash::Bytes` is an array to
protect the implementation of hmac and hkdf against implementations that
would accidentally return slices of different sizes from the `AsRef`
impl.
In the future we would like to guarantee the correctness of `LEN` which
is currently not entirely possible, so this at least adds a sealed trait
enforcing the `Bytes` type to be an array. Consumers concerned about the
validity of the length can access the `LEN` constant on `Bytes` instead
to get the correct length of the array.
dae42bef9d do not enable bitcoin-io by default (Antoni Spaanderman)
a14cdaf859 don't enable std by default when testing (Antoni Spaanderman)
e83830dcfc use slice instead of array to not have to hardcode the length (Antoni Spaanderman)
55749d6f61 use `hash.to_byte_array` to check equality with `test.output` (Antoni Spaanderman)
969864e3b0 use fixed size array if possible, otherwise `&'static [u8]` (Antoni Spaanderman)
28ccf70fa6 remove unnecesarry borrow operator (`&`) (Antoni Spaanderman)
fa3a3afd02 remove unnecessary slicing (Antoni Spaanderman)
22e42ab86c fix test code being unnecessarily feature gated (Antoni Spaanderman)
Pull request description:
- remove 2 unnecessary cfg attributes from tests left over from #3167 (it made them not dependent on `alloc` anymore)
- simplify assertion logic by removing unnecessary conversions before comparing
- make tests `no_std` compatible by adding imports to alloc or std
- feature gate tests behind the `alloc` feature if they use anything from the alloc crate (like the `format!` macro)
- `schemars` feature enables `alloc` because (for example) its trait wants implementations to return `String`
- fix `bitcoin-io` always enabling when `std` is enabled (only useful if people depend on `hashes` only, `bitcoin` depends on `bitcoin-io` already)
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK dae42bef9d
Kixunil:
ACK dae42bef9d
apoelstra:
ACK dae42bef9d successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: 622fd4963ef21530a98af89bcfc71abe8723aac12d363ab88d9bd30dcf2f75392711bec10e2901fab5f1a30e11897d1aae36e22892738aa1e5670166f91fddd4
`s.parse` is more idiomatic and produces more helpful error messages.
This has been changed repo wide in the main codebase, not including
examples, rustdocs, and in the test module.
`use std::str::FromStr;` has been removed where this change makes
it unnecessary.
- make tests no_std compatible by adding imports to alloc or std
- feature gate tests behind the 'alloc' feature if they use anything
from 'alloc' (like the `format!` macro)
- schemars feature enables alloc
a2be82c0c9 Use TBD in deprecated attribute (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Our `release` job checks for 'TBD', I can't remember exactly why but I thought we introduced `0.0.0-NEXT-RELEASE` because CI was failing when we used TBD - clearly this is not the case now because we have a bunch of `TBD`s in the code base.
Change all the instances of `0.0.0-NEXT-RELEASE` to be `TBD`.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK a2be82c0c9
apoelstra:
ACK a2be82c0c9 successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: b383cc4095484291a7b4dca593ad5e017e3a9de9bfae9d6e9447ae36da32aa1c0d1fd593f49fd52c04db5ca5cdbaae8b30a772f792df13542f0a157a86295746
Our `release` job checks for 'TBD', I can't remember exactly why but I
thought we introduced `0.0.0-NEXT-RELEASE` because CI was failing when
we used TBD - clearly this is not the case now because we have a bunch
of `TBD`s in the code base.
Change all the instances of `0.0.0-NEXT-RELEASE` to be `TBD`.
The previous change was just a dumb rename with no deprecation and it
also kept the `self` type which should be taken by value since the hash
is `Copy`. This improves on it by adding a deprecated method of the
original name and changing the type to be `self` instead of `&self`.
Previously we had removed `Default` impl on `siphash24::HashEngine` by
reimplementing the type manually. This was a really bad idea as it
inevitably led to API differences that broke the build which we didn't
notice because of unrelated bug. It should've just split the macro from
the start as was suggested but it was claimed to be difficult, I don't
think was the case as can be seen by this PR.
This commit does what the previous one should've done: it renames the
macro to have `_no_default` suffix, creates another one of the original
name that calls into `_no_default` one and moves anything related to
`Default`. This cleanly ensures all previous hashes stay the same while
siphash gets `Default` removed. This also removes all now-conflicting
impls from `siphash24` module which makes the module almost identical to
what it looked like before the change. The only differences are removed
`Default`/`new`, fixes in tests and recent rename of `as_u64` to
`to_u64`.
60b3cabb41 Panic in const context (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Now that our MSRV is past 1.57 we can panic in const contexts.
Fix: #2427
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 60b3cabb41
apoelstra:
ACK 60b3cabb41 successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: 705a8b7d52a11826e6084684706cb7e01dfaa554e4e369739e64e64263537b0c8c0e518b04e96249ecdeea1f22b534594ffd2a89e17ebba85b369d896e820239
c97389596b Remove stale docs from sha256t_hash_newtype (Tobin C. Harding)
39f7dcb816 Reduce API surface of tagged wrapped hash types (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Recently we made it so that wrapper types created with `hash_newtype` were not general purpose hash types i.e., one could not easily hash arbitrary data into them. We would like to do the same for tagged wrapped hash types.
In `hashes` do:
- Create a new macro `sha256_tag` that does just the tag/engine stuff out of the `sha256t_hash_newtype` macro.
- Deprecate the `sha256t_hash_newtype` macro.
In `bitcoin` do:
- Use a combination of `sha256_tag` and `hash_newtype` to create tagged wrapped hash types.
Note that we do not add private helper functions `engine` and `from_engine` to the tagged wrapper types as we do for legacy/segwit in `sighash`. Can be done later if wanted/needed.
Fix: #3135
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK c97389596b
apoelstra:
ACK c97389596b successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: d937a8eac1a77298231f946f9dfbc2f7739af8da00f2075b0b54803b4111c0cec810bc6564515153769193056cf102a9c954e216664f055b249d4a6153b14bca
Recently we made it so that wrapper types created with `hash_newtype`
were not general purpose hash types i.e., one could not easily hash
arbitrary data into them. We would like to do the same for tagged
wrapped hash types.
In `hashes` do:
- Create a new macro `sha256t_tag` that does just the tag/engine stuff
out of the `sha256t_hash_newtype` macro.
- Deprecate the `sha256t_hash_newtype` macro.
In `bitcoin` do:
- Use a combination of `sha256t_tag` and `hash_newtype` to create tagged
wrapped hash types.
Note that we do not add private helper functions `engine` and
`from_engine` to the tagged wrapper types as we do for legacy/segwit in
`sighash`. Can be done later if wanted/needed.
In recent work making functions on hash types inherent it seems we
missed `siphash`. Add inherent getters/setters to the `siphash::Hash`
type and call through to them from the `Hash` trait impl.
Note:
- The `extra_test.sh` script runs for all toolchains.
- The `schemars` crate does not use the repo lock files.
- We need to pin some deps when building the `schemars` test.
Pin in the `extra_test.sh` script, and mention it in the docs so the
docs don't go stale next MSRV update.
This was previously unnoticed because of the `run_task` bug.
ref: rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin-maintainer-tools#10
e7762e0612 hashes:: Rename const_hash functions (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
There are a number of issues with the two `const_hash` functions in the `sha256` module:
- The two `const_hash` functions in the `sha256` module differ slightly, one finalizes the hash and one is for computing the midstate.
- They are inefficient and provided for usage for const context only.
Fix both issues by renaming the functions as discussed in #3075.
Close: #3075
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK e7762e0612
apoelstra:
ACK e7762e0612 successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: 2b765bbbaa596d060a555495582b24175f660bf630de489cf0e0199f1c589f13f46dde5c9735bffece10a1ff116a70472f821df66c62a97fffb424f16e5568f9
975f22f399 hashes: Call through to trait methods (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Currently we have duplicate code in inherent functions that also occurs in the default implementation of the `GeneralHash` trait methods, this is unnecessary because we can call through to the trait methods.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 975f22f399
apoelstra:
ACK 975f22f399 successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: 74d8905a20d75536abf477dd2226e3cb12d8bd7330b1769e520840df1538362c6cbec6a976dfeb771797732b1f9259ee4f1970cadb69eca67b8b9bbe956ceeca
There are a number of issues with the two `const_hash` functions in the
`sha256` module:
- The two `const_hash` functions in the `sha256` module differ slightly,
one finalizes the hash and one is for computing the midstate.
- They are inefficient and provided for usage for const context only.
Fix both issues by renaming the functions as discussed in #3075.
Close: #3075
Add a function `hash_reader` that uses the `BufRead` trait to read
bytes directly into the hash engine.
Add the functionality to:
- as a trait method in the `GeneralHash` trait with default implementation
- as inherent functions to all the hash types
Close: #3050
Currently we have duplicate code in inherent functions that also occurs
in the default implementation of the `GeneralHash` trait methods, this
is unnecessary because we can call through to the trait methods.
* The Default bound only makes sense for unkeyed hash functions which
can fire up a new engine without a key. Keyed hash functions, like
SipHash24 or Poly1305 require a secret key to be initialized and
should not implement a default engine generator.
* SipHash24 tests updated to the previous default key "0".
c72069e921 Bump MSRV to 1.63 (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
The version 1.63 satisfies our requirements for MSRV and provides significant benefits so this commit bumps it. This commit also starts using some advantages of the new MSRV, namely namespaced features, weak dependencies and the ability to use trait bounds in `const` context.
This however does not yet migrade the `rand-std` feature because that requires a release of `secp256k1` with the same kind of change - bumping MSRV to 1.63 and removing `rand-std` in favor of weak dependency. (Accompanying PR to secp256k1: https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/pull/709 )
Suggested plan:
* merge both PRs
* at some point release `hashes` and `secp256k`
* remove `rand-std` from `bitcoin`
* release the rest of the crates
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK c72069e921
tcharding:
ACK c72069e921
Tree-SHA512: 0b301ef8145f01967318d3ed1c738d33e6cf9e44f835f3762122b460a536f926916dbd6ea39d6f80b4f95402cd845e924401e75427dbb0731ca5b12b4fa6915e
The version 1.63 satisfies our requirements for MSRV and provides
significant benefits so this commit bumps it. This commit also starts
using some advantages of the new MSRV, namely namespaced features, weak
dependencies and the ability to use trait bounds in `const` context.
This however does not yet migrade the `rand-std` feature because that
requires a release of `secp256k1` with the same kind of change - bumping
MSRV to 1.63 and removing `rand-std` in favor of weak dependency.
The midstate has not been finalized [0], so use the term in the struct
header.
FTR I don't know _exactly_ what "finalized" means in the context of
sha256 hashing (or hashing in general). This change came from a review
suggestion and we have other mentions of "finalized" in the code.
In a `HashEngine` the `length` field represents number of bytes
input into the hash engine.
Note also:
> the midstate bytes are only updated when the compression function is
run, which only happens every 64 bytes.
Currently our midstate API allows extracting the midstate after any
amount of input bytes, this is probably not what users want.
Note also that most users should not be using the midstate API anyways.
With all this in mind, add a private `length` field to the `Midstate`
struct and enforce an invariant that it is modulo 64.
Add a single const `Midstate` constructor that panics if the invariant
is violated. The `Midstate` is niche enough that panic is acceptable.
Remove the `from_slice`, `from_byte_array`, and `to_byte_array`
functions because they no longer make sense. Keep `AsRef<[u8]>` for
cheap access to the midstate's inner byte slice.
Note change to `Debug`: `bytes` field now does not include the `0x`
prefix because `as_hex` because of the use of `debug_struct`.
Enjoy nice warm fuzzy feeling from hacking on crypto code.
Done in preparation for adding a `length` field to `Midstate` and also
in preparation for removing the `Display` implementation (will be
justified in the patch that does it).
Currently in the `Debug` impl of `Midstate` we are calling through to
`Display` using the alternate form of printing, we can use `as_hex` to
achieve almost the same thing. Note that in `LowerHex` we use the
`fmt_hex_exact` macro that allows us to reverse the iterator however
when we later attempt to use `f.debug_struct` we cannot use the macro.
Elect to change the current behaviour to `Debug` forwards, shown by the
change to the regression test.
Currently we are using a macro to implement `AsRef` and `Borrow` for
`sha256::Midstate`.
In preparation for adding a length field to the `Midstate` remove the
implementation of `Borrow` but keep `AsRef`.
API breaking change.
The `sha256::Midstate` is a niche use case type, there is no real reason
we need to support serialization/deserialization. If people really want
this they can just get the byte array and serialize it themselves.
API breaking change.
In preparation for changing the `sha256::Midstate` internals stop using
the `arr_newtype_fmt_impl` macro and implement the `fmt` traits
manually.
In doing so, remove the `DISPLAY_BACKWARDS` const but keep the current
behaviour of displaying the midstate backwards.
Put the impl block for `Midstate` under the struct, as is customary.
(Note the diff shows moving some other code around the impl block not
the impl block itself.)
Code move only.
Explicitly import `sha256t` in docs builds and remove explicit link
target. This patch is code churn on its own but the `sha256t` module
will be used again in proceeding patches, done separately to reduce the
size/complexity of proceeding patches.
2169b75bba Use lower case error messages (Jamil Lambert, PhD)
Pull request description:
Error messages should be lower case, except for proper nouns and variable names. These have all been changed.
~~They should also state what went wrong. Some expect error messages were positive, giving the correct behaviour or correct input. These have been changed so that they are now negative, i.e. saying what went wrong.~~
EDIT: After further discussion it was decided not to change the expect messages.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 2169b75bba
tcharding:
ACK 2169b75bba
Tree-SHA512: 92442c869e0141532425f6fca5195fd319b65026f68c4230a65ad70253565d98931b2b44ee202975c307280525c505147e272297dc81207312e40c43d007021c
2b56f763d0 hashes: Remove to/from/as_raw_hash (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
In an effort to shrink the API of `hashes` remove the `from_raw_hash`, `to_raw_hash`, and `as_raw_hash` inherent functions from types created with the `hash_newtype` macro.
There are a few reasons why this is favourable:
- It allows stable crates to use the macro and not expose unstable `hashes` types in their API.
- It makes types created with the macro less "general" in the sense that its more obscure to just hash any data into them. This allows us to write cleaner APIs in `rust-bitcoin`.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 2b56f763d0
apoelstra:
ACK 2b56f763d0
Tree-SHA512: 3d73aa8250dd775994623c9201dd819256acf2ec82526b3537da74c9e19c2ac5e8bba358a2171f7b02342804cb6b4d5ac4dca88d912b3d46d14e3bc35dd5cb91
In an effort to shrink the API of `hashes` remove the `from_raw_hash`,
`to_raw_hash`, and `as_raw_hash` inherent functions from types created
with the `hash_newtype` macro.
There are a few reasons why this is favourable:
- It allows stable crates to use the macro and not expose unstable
`hashes` types in their API.
- It makes types created with the macro less "general" in the sense that
its more obscure to just hash any data into them. This allows us to
write cleaner APIs in `rust-bitcoin`.
Midstates are not generic objects; they don't have universal
cryptographic properties and if you are using them you should be using a
specific midstate type. Therefore it shouldn't be part of `GeneralHash` or
`HashEngine`. Furthermore, in practice it seems like `sha2` midstates are
the only ones that anybody uses, at least in bitcoin.
Remove the midstate stuff from the `GeneralHash` and `HashEngine`
traits. Keep the `midstate` functionality as inherent functions if it is
used internally. Keep the functionality on `sha256` as inherent public
functions.
Depending on types being in scope when calling macros is bad practice
but we have mistakenly done so in `internal_macros` when using the
`FromSliceError`.
Use `$crate::FromSliceError` in the macro and remove import statements.
Currently we are using a type alias for the `hash160::HashEngine`.
Type alias' allow for potential mixing of types, a `hash160::HashEngine`
struct can better serve our users with not much additional complexity or
maintenance burden.
As we did for the `sha256d::HashEngine`, add a new wrapper type
`hash160::HashEngine` that replaces the current type alias.
Currently we are using a type alias for the `sha256d::HashEngine`.
Type alias' allow for potential mixing of types, a `sha256d::HashEngine`
struct can better serve our users with not much additional complexity or
maintenance burden.
Wildcards have been replaced with what is actually used.
In a couple of cases an additional use statement was added to the test
module to import `DisplayHex` which is only used in test, but
previously imported with the wildcard at the top.
bc25ed35d5 Order serde feature list alphabetically (Tobin C. Harding)
5bd3387c15 Move package metadata to be underneath package section (Tobin C. Harding)
a2a9f193fe Put workspace crates in alphabetical order (Tobin C. Harding)
05931cc0fa Run the formatter (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
We are getting an increasing number of crates in the repo, clean up the manifests a bit in an endevour to help keep things manageable.
All patches are trivial and the PR makes no logic changes.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK bc25ed35d5
apoelstra:
ACK bc25ed35d5
Tree-SHA512: a9850449a6f71ac5d53f501e36175e900bf4986f44c7636d3b1b55df80804b92bb10d8da7798f6bb866722aa2354ad2880ab5c0f5c4633f198c137d2ca42b7c9
In an effort to make the `hashes` crate more ergonomic to use add a
bunch of alias' to the crate root - use re-exports where possible and
type alias' where required.
We intentionally do not rename the `foo::Hash` types so that uses have a
choice of either using the module path to differentiate or to use the
alias.
Update the crate level docs to use the alias' because they are more
terse with no loss of clarity.
The package metatadata never changes and is not necessary to look at
basically ever, put it down the bottom of the manifest out of the way.
Helps to keep features and dependencies closer together.
Refactor only, no logic changes.
We manually implement these methods (and the GeneralHash trait) on newtypes
around sha256t::Hash, because tagged hashes require a bit more work. In
the next commit (API diff) you will see that this affects two hashes,
which are the only things that appear green in the diff.
Users who want to implement their own engine/from_engine types now need
to do it on their own. We do this for the non-Taproot sighash types in
`bitcoin` (though only privately) to demonstrate that it's possible.
This commit illustrates the transformation I intend to make everywhere
we use newtyped hashes as "general hashes". *Within the module that the
newtype is defined* I encapsulate engine calls, which I do by calling
engine methods on the underlying general hash function. So within the
module there is a slight reduction in type safety, in the sense that I
need to make sure that I'm wrapping stuff properly.
But outside of the module, there will be no difference except that I
will no longer export engine/from_engine/hash/etc on newtyped hashes.
Instead callers will need to compute the newtyped hash only in ways
supported by the API.
In theory we could have a macro to produce engine/from_engine/etc for
newtypes that want to act as general hashes. But AFAICT there is no use
case for this.
Alternately, we could have a macro that produces *private* Engine types
and private engine/from_engine/etc methods for the hashes, which could
be used within the module and would provide stronger type safety within
the module. But in practice, raw hashing is usually only used within a
couple of methods, so all this infrastructure is way overkill and will
just make maintenance harder for everybody.
Manually implement it for Wtxid, Txid and BlockHash, where the all-zero
"hash" has a consensus meaning. But in general we should not be
implementing this method unless we have a good reason to do so. It can
be emulated or implemeted in terms of from_byte_array.
The use of Wtxid::all_zeros is obscure and specific enough that I am
tempted to drop it. But for txid and blockhash, the 0 hash appears in
actual blockdata and we should keep it.
All other uses of all_zeros were either in test code or in places where
the specific hash was not important and [u8; 32] was a more appropriate
type.
As you can see from the - lines in the API diff, there is no reduction
in API surface (we just remove the T:Tag bound from the sha256t::Tag
type, which is not strictly necessary but maybe we would prefer to keep).
1f58476cb4 Run schemars test from extra_tests (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
We have a mechanism to run additional custom tests by way of the `extra_tests.sh` script in each crate.
Remove the CI job and run the schemars test using `extra_tests.sh`. This patch changes the test coverage because currently the schemars test is only run with a stable toolchain but with this patch applied it runs with stable, MSRV, and nightly.
Fix: #2787
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 1f58476cb4
Tree-SHA512: 607132890ed08bf75fb544a0e10aeeda5f9c137eb04349f8af5ab28866408d4208cae4688c08645ffca95e7d9568562dbbbfa992382b5d2cb3efeba583d78b1f
We have a mechanism to run additional custom tests by way of the
`extra_tests.sh` script in each crate.
Remove the CI job and run the schemars test using `extra_tests.sh`. This
patch changes the test coverage because currently the schemars test is
only run with a stable toolchain but with this patch applied it runs
with stable, MSRV, and nightly.
Fix: #2787
Currently we have a trait `Hash` that is required for `Hmac`, `Hkdf`,
and other use cases. However, it is unegonomic for users who just want
to do a simple hash to have to import the trait.
Add inherent functions to all hash types including those created with
the new wrapper type macros.
This patch introduces some duplicate code but we are trying to make
progress in the hashes API re-write. We can come back and de-dublicate
later.
Includes making `to_byte_array`,`from_byte_array`, `as_byte_array`, and
`all_zeros` const where easily possible.
8aa893ebd0 Remove repetition from sha256t_hash_newtype macro (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
The `sha256t_hash_newtype` macro is hard to reason about because we allow repetition so which tag goes with which type is slightly obscure.
Remove repetition and call the macro three times.
Internal change in `bitcoin`, API change in `hashes`.
Fix#2811
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 8aa893ebd0 nice, small diff
Tree-SHA512: b38e7c307ac7288b4a5c1c3170ad6aa54c62bd3198922ec8bb091867b230bb9149f7dc996766fc8fa20a1af18b318c475b3e83e2689d322b7f4af0d5cb588e50
The `sha256t_hash_newtype` macro is hard to reason about because we
allow repetition so which tag goes with which type is slightly obscure.
Remove repetition and call the macro three times.
Internal change in `bitcoin`, API change in `hashes`.
The `hash_trait_impls` macro currently adds an impl block for `Hash` -
this is not what the docs say since and `impl Hash` block is nothing
to do with traits.
Move the impl block and add a duplicate of the functions to the
`sha256t::Hash` type.
This is a refactor, no API or logic changes. Note that wrapper types
currently do net get these functions - that will be
discussed/implemented separately.
c9d1ff7037 Update hashes API changes (Nick Johnson)
878ab924d1 Add HMAC Extract-and-Expand Key Derivation Function (Nick Johnson)
Pull request description:
rustaceanrob and I have been working on a Rust-based BIP324 implementation over at https://github.com/rustaceanrob/bip324. We have been attempting to keep the code pretty clean in hopes of a future "soft landing" in rust-bitcoin. I figured the HKDF implementation is a small, self-contained chunk that might allow us to learn the ropes here first.
There was a mention in the [discussion thread on BIP324](https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/discussions/1691) that the hashes interface may be changing in the near future. I am not sure the effect that would have on this implementation, but happy to work through any issues.
Closes#2551
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK c9d1ff7037
apoelstra:
ACK c9d1ff7037
Tree-SHA512: 404d51ca055db4366ec57f1503fcf350aebcd181f36a20a17763ea8c47ade851213fc882acd2785313953a3e768d588c230f737ff93f88121b97c34b37c65127
Some of our CI shell scripts are meant only to be sourced and not
run directly however they include an initial shebang line, implying that
they should be run.
Remove the shebang line from `crates.sh` and the various `test_vars.sh`
scripts. Add a `shellcheck` directive to inhibit the no-shebang warning.
Fix: #2764
BIP324's peer to peer encryption protocol requires an HMAC-based extract
and expand key derivation function (HKDF). HKDFs were not part of many
bitcoin protocols before BIP324, but the hope is that the encrypted
protocol becomes the dominant standard justifying this implementation.
30a482504b bump nightly-version (Andrew Poelstra)
5ad7c245e3 cargo: whitelist all cfgs used in this repo (Andrew Poelstra)
814786b0a6 crypto: enable and fix accidentally disabled unit test (Andrew Poelstra)
Pull request description:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124800 has been fixed and we can update our nightly version by whitelisting all cfgs that are used.
There was one place where we had an old `cfg(feature = "no-std")` despite having removed the feature. By removing that cfg check we re-enabled a previously disabled test.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 30a482504b
Tree-SHA512: d25bed819091db74b9d47cb2c23caa3ceb0d7be323b37831326e2ec1608cb1577d41aad2e1cdf59d66df69397537bc3e17a3c2872935d5a4f46f4dc55b5e613c
4446be6fc8 hashes: Add regression tests (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
We have regression tests spread out throughout the `hashes` module but they are not labelled as such. To give us more confidence and help debug when patching the `hashes` crate we can add a bunch of regression tests in a single place.
Add a module that does a single regression test for each type, simply hash some arbitrary data and check the hex display against a hard coded hex string.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 4446be6fc8 nice :)
Tree-SHA512: db643fdf799d23735934ad966ee66b40b3adb72db8f777112005f94d61ab4e382399a66e48d9fc9fdb0cd0abe17b3d4087fe6e6c494836d0c6fc713f4efc6413
We have regression tests spread out throughout the `hashes` module but
they are not labelled as such. To give us more confidence and help
debug when patching the `hashes` crate we can add a bunch of regression
tests in a single place.
Add a module that does a single regression test for each type, simply
hash some arbitrary data and check the hex display against a hard coded
hex string.
021bea89bb ci: shellcheck checks (Jose Storopoli)
Pull request description:
Closes#2739.
I am proposing that we use this GitHub Shellcheck action:
[`ludeeus/action-shellcheck`](https://github.com/ludeeus/action-shellcheck)
since it has most stars (and eyes on it).
I also did all fixes that I could find with
```bash
shellcheck **/*.sh
```
If I've missed any please let me know.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 021bea89bb
tcharding:
ACK 021bea89bb
Tree-SHA512: 67e37da9ae3ea0c5551af57b928016a2d9e76761af5558b3057ac47e773189629dd20eea9e659b4323c8568fb48dcdbe9ebd5c730f2c6266fb0db52886c9835f
Jamil Lambert, PhD
Tobin C. Harding
merge-script
Martin Habovstiak
Antoni Spaanderman
Fmt Bot
leichak
Shing Him Ng
Nick Johnson
Jose Storopoli