If one writes signing data using one of the two
`*_encode_signing_data_to` functions then creating the message to sign
is slightly nuanced and different for each of the functions. For Taproot
one must use a specific tagged hash and for ECDSA one must use a sha256d
hash.
Add documentation that explains the hashing requirements for each
function.
f96bbebdcc Set release version in deprecated attribute (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
In preparation for release replace "TBD" with the next release version - `v0.32.0`.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK f96bbebdcc
storopoli:
ACK f96bbebdcc
Tree-SHA512: 7478808322357d853fab2bf25a7d42a972d5ee05ed6f206bfb73748efe1154fb392dc76c3d0e1a50314bcfdac3a55a415f3c6d40dfaaab802ae1c69dd1ad9e76
30a09670e8 Add docs for custom signets (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
We have started using `AsRef<Params>` in a few places as a function parameter. If a user of the library wishes to use these functions they need to create a type that can implement this trait. Because we use `non_exhaustive` on the `Params` struct it is not possible to just construct a `Params` type. This may be surprising for some folk.
Add module level docs to the `consensus::params` module with an example of how to create a type that can be used to describe a custom signet network. Use fields inspired by Mutiny Wallet's described usage.
Close: #2690
ACKs for top commit:
sanket1729:
ACK 30a09670e8.
apoelstra:
ACK 30a09670e8 this is great; would like to see more `const` but for example code no big deal
Tree-SHA512: 50881763aea99641e24871b0eae60650174c48f620742944e7d5617fcf1edff73a20b2a8f043433f6f114ff5f3f4691703fc37b28880c305bb052c2d75d1eeeb
We have started using `AsRef<Params>` in a few places as a function
parameter. If a user of the library wishes to use these functions they
need to create a type that can implement this trait. Because we use
`non_exhaustive` on the `Params` struct it is not possible to just
construct a `Params` type. This may be surprising for some folk.
Add module level docs to the `consensus::params` module with an example
of how to create a type that can be used to describe a custom signet
network. Use fields inspired by Mutiny Wallet's described usage.
Close: #2690
I'm not sure why I haven't see this before during the whole test cycle
but while running `cargo kani --only-codegen` we get a bunch of warnings
of form:
warning: use of deprecated field `consensus::params::Params::pow_limit`
We deprecated the `pow_limit` field but still set it (obviously) in
const structs - just shoosh the warning.
830c1e9cfe Allow m prefix in derivation paths (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Recently in #2451 we disallowed bip32 derivation paths with the leading 'm' variable.
There is some confusion as to what exactly the bip specifies however Bitcoin Core RPC call `getaddressinfo` returns a derivation path with a leading "m/". This means we need to be able to parse it irrespective of what the bip says.
Be more liberal in what we accept as a derivation path, including both with and without the leading 'm/'.
Leave the full investigation of the bip to a later date.
Change back some of the test strings as makes sense and include test strings to showcase the full current behaviour.
This PR replaces #2674.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 830c1e9cfe
sanket1729:
ACK 830c1e9cfe
junderw:
ACK 830c1e9cfe
Tree-SHA512: 7a4fccd49cb8cd91a6c8db51d758ae116d9d2e98fead7b87520ca302022b37ddbcf3f85453941c5f336f8e934ad224beba99527dc29ce8368fbb1f25508c1615
Recently in #2451 we disallowed bip32 derivation paths with the leading
'm' variable.
There is some confusion as to what exactly the bip specifies however
Bitcoin Core RPC call `getaddressinfo` returns a derivation path with a
leading "m/". This means we need to be able to parse it irrespective of
what the bip says.
Be more liberal in what we accept as a derivation path, including both
with and without the leading 'm/'.
Leave the full investigation of the bip to a later date.
Change back some of the test strings as makes sense and include test
strings to showcase the full current behaviour.
The deprecation notice for `is_provably_unspendable` contains "is not
very useful" which is a bit presumptuous to tell to users, it may very
well be useful to them. Use the more helpful text that already exists in
rustdoc on the function.
051c358bcb Remove deprecated legacy numeric methods (Divyansh Gupta)
Pull request description:
As `rustc 1.79.0-nightly (9d79cd5f7 2024-04-05)` is released which solves the issue mentioned , but the release has deperacted legacy numeric methods.
Thus replaced `u16::max_value()` etc with `u32::MAX` & `core::u16` to directly `u16`.
fix#2639
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 051c358bcb
apoelstra:
ACK 051c358bcb thanks! I will remove an equivalent commit from my #2669
Tree-SHA512: c08c856f7f3b281417c29283351eac5e0f75cc1c8d23d9aae58d969219a327b2337fe57932053e53773ebb9dbec04254f90149266b6639a66c5c09f2ad1675ef
As `rustc 1.79.0-nightly (9d79cd5f7 2024-04-05)` is released which solves the issue mentioned , but the release has deperacted legacy numeric methods.
Thus replace `u16::max_value()` etc with `u32::MAX` & `core::u16` to directly `u16`.
fix#2639
When signing a Taproot input (in a PSBT) using a key path spend we
currently return the pubkey associated with key that signs. However it
is common to think of the internal key as being the one that signs even
though this is not technically true. We also have the internal key in
the PSBT so matching against it is less surprising.
When using the `Psbt` type to sign a Taproot input using a key path
spend return the internal key.
There is no need to panic if input index is out of bounds because we
have a function to check the validity of the `input_index` argument and
use it in other places already.
f6467ac98d Minimize usage of Network in public API (Tobin C. Harding)
3ec5eff56e Add Magic::from_params (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Minimize usage of the `Network` enum in the public API.
See #2225 for context, and https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/1291#discussion_r1492993788 for an interpretation of that long discussion.
Close: #2169
ACKs for top commit:
sanket1729:
reACK f6467ac98d.
apoelstra:
ACK f6467ac98d
Tree-SHA512: f12ecd9578371b3162382a9181f7f982e4d0661915af3cfdc21516192cc4abb745e1ff452649a0862445e91232f74287f98eb7e9fc68ed1581ff1a97b7216b6a
A release or so ago we added `non_exhaustive` to the `Network` enum,
this turned out to make usage of the enum un-ergonomic for downstream
users. After much debate we decided that a way forward was to just
minimize the usage of the enum in the public API by instead use
`AsRef<Params>` so that downstream could define their own network enum
based on the networks they support.
Minimize usage of `Network` by using `AsRef<Params>` as a parameter type
instead. "minimize" because the `Network` still appears in some places.
Currently we are using `Self` (in backticks) in the docs to functions
defined by the `do_iml` macro, this is a bit lazy, we can do better than
that.
Use `doc` attribute and the `$ty` macro variable to construct the docs
to use the type name.
Use a code comment to document the calling restrictions of private
function `from_hex_internal`. (Code comment because comment is not well
formed as per convention in this codebase.)
Improve the rustdocs on the private `U256` type by doing:
- Remove link to self within constructors, just use backticks
- Use `U256` instead of `Self` or `self`
- Fix incorrect usage of `CompactTarget` [0]
[0] We knew this was wrong when we merged it but because the docs are
private we elected to do this follow up patch.
Currently `Magic` has per network consts but no way to dynamically get
the magic bytes for a network. Note also that we are currently trying to
reduce the usage of `Network` in the public API.
Add a public constructor to the `Magic` type that accepts a `Params`
parameter to determine the network to use.
The `pow` types implement `fmt::LowerHex` but do not implement hex
parsing.
Add inherent methods `from_hex` and `from_prefixed_hex` to the
`pow` types.
fd6fedc3ad Improve API for max target threshold calculation (Tobin C. Harding)
6e47d57744 Rename difficulty transition threshold functions (Tobin C. Harding)
4121c9a09f Rename Params::pow_limit to max_attainable_target (Tobin C. Harding)
f0f6d3f162 Take Params instead of Network in difficulty function (Tobin C. Harding)
104dee9376 Debug assert that target != zero in difficulty calc (Tobin C. Harding)
c1ba496a07 Document current behaviour of difficulty_float (Tobin C. Harding)
3d01146374 Allow needless-borrows-for-generic-args (Tobin C. Harding)
2a6821b426 Use link to CompactTarget in rustdoc (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
When computing the maximum difficulty transition threshold we forgot to check that the returned `Target` is not bigger than the maximum. This value is network specific so keep the original logic but with `_unchecked` on the function name.
This was noted in the discussion on #2161
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK fd6fedc3ad
sanket1729:
ACK fd6fedc3ad
Tree-SHA512: 520ee2a07edb251c84b5ce8b48ed6e5a5c1945126dc7bcdb5570e97101ec4a3dc63fa7992725194869e22b21ee4f5955579d5e2499fcb48167637fd1fb3ae74d
The maximum target threshold has a network dependant upper bound.
Currently we are not checking this bound. One complication is that there
is currently heated open debate around the `Network` type.
We can bypass the `Network` issue by using `AsRef<Params>` instead.
Add a function that does the checks based on the `Params` type as well
as an unchecked version.
These two functions calculate the min/max threshold transition which is
a _target_ not a "difficulty" number. Using "difficulty" in the function
name is unnecessarily confusing.
Rename and deprecate the functions.
The maximum "attainable" target is a `rust-bitcoin` thing, Core use max
unattainable.
Deprecated the `Params::pow_limit` field and add a new field
`max_attainable_target`.
The `Params` type is `non_exhaustive` so this is not an API breaking
change.
What we really want is the maximum target, but since this is a const in
`Params` use an `AsRef<Params>` argument in the `difficulty` functions.
Requires implementation of `AsRef<Params> for Params`.
The `difficulty` calculation requires dividing a target value by `self`.
Add an assertion that `self` is not zero to help devs debug this.
Note that this should never really be hit, but its possible there is a
bug somewhere causing the target to be set to zero - so this may help
debugging.
Also, add panics section to rustdocs.
This lint triggers when parsing a reference to a large struct as a
generic argument, which is wrong.
Allow it crate wide because [subjectively] this lint never warns for
anything useful.
d91cdd20bf docs: Document ordered feature (Tobin C. Harding)
3520f550f0 Implement ArbitraryOrd for relative::LockTime (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
TL;DR As we do for `absolute::LockTime` and for the same reasons; implement `ArbitraryOrd` for `relative::LockTime`.
locktimes do not have a semantic ordering if they differ (blocks, time) so we do not derive `Ord` however it is useful for downstream to be able to order structs that contain lock times. This is exactly what the `ArbitraryOrd` trait is for.
Fix: #2566
ACKs for top commit:
sanket1729:
ACK d91cdd20bf
apoelstra:
ACK d91cdd20bf
Tree-SHA512: 52ace9222e765dfa266d003b4aff3e93e35d1414c9fd579c4a4a36998d6d1b08bf6d4964a6f1c1d769068d65e47a882495daa4aacf254909a35dce8e01c99a9e
TL;DR As we do for `absolute::LockTime` and for the same reasons;
implement `ArbitraryOrd` for `relative::LockTime`.
locktimes do not have a semantic ordering if they differ (blocks, time)
so we do not derive `Ord` however it is useful for downstream to be able
to order structs that contain lock times. This is exactly what the
`ArbitraryOrd` trait is for.
Update the rustdocs in `relative` and mirror the docs changes in
`absolute`.
Fix: #2566
`require_network` is typically called as part of parsing, often in the
same line of code. Counter to our normal errors, it makes
`require_network` more ergonomic to use if we just return a `ParseError`
variant.
Close: #2507
Done in preparation for adding the `NetworkValidationError` as a variant
of `ParseError`.
Move the `NetworkValidationError` type to beneath `ParseError`.
Code move only, no other changes.
fd040f5e38 Replace TBD with 0.32.0 (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
We are gearing up for the 0.32.0 release; replace all instances of TBD with the version number of the upcoming release.
ACKs for top commit:
sanket1729:
ACK fd040f5e38
apoelstra:
ACK fd040f5e38
Tree-SHA512: fe73fd47a794557742f618b21434cd3cc18cde0e861216716723bfcc9135accf63590e1ea60bfeda066acec7312c8b9f1bf09e7454e7161ccaba5ebe60af66fd
af49841433 Hide base58::Error internals (Tobin C. Harding)
4f68e79da0 bitcoin: Stop using base58 errors (Tobin C. Harding)
669d5e8fc6 base58: Add InvalidCharacterError for decoding (Tobin C. Harding)
ec8609393b base58: Add error module (Tobin C. Harding)
42fabbab03 base58: Run the formatter (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Improve the error code in the new `base58` crate.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK af49841433
sanket1729:
ACK af49841433
Tree-SHA512: c05479f02a9a58c7c98fd5987e760288562372e16cceeeb655f0a5385b4a8605945a3b6f7fcf473a7132a40f8dc90d204bc5e9e64fd2cc0bdc37dbcabb4ddc5c
c17db32df3 Pub back in deprecated dust_value (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
When we renamed `dust_value` to `minimal_non_dust` we forgot to keep the original and deprecated it, doing so assists with the upgrade path.
Put back in deprecated `dust_value`, linking to the rename.
Renamed in #2255, found while testing upgrade of downstream software.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
> ACK [c17db32](c17db32df3) I _think_ this matches the behavior of the old version
apoelstra:
ACK c17db32df3 I *think* this matches the behavior of the old version
sanket1729:
ACK c17db32df3
Tree-SHA512: 28e1bd2e1a0fd13c78c70ad2667b72b3bf649c293201b79c86c00f09d0126389ebaeb430b8dd32aeeec3d60cbd8761ae949f5784a5ea7756b1b9ae77ec96ce61
dec05b63e9 Refactor witness_version and is_witness_program (Tobin C. Harding)
dac552b436 Add unit tests for shortest/longest witness program (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Refactor `witness_version` and `is_witness_program`.
- Patch 2 adds a couple of preparatory unit tests.
- Patch 2 does the refactor
Fix: #2618
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK dec05b63e9
sanket1729:
ACK dec05b63e9
Tree-SHA512: 3db0a1d8175cbb2fd18f3254854d02db3ad7efa2620b12f08d9727ef6bb5854f0a015917e57023cd2196a36d13276e80536a0e96318c44a1173da4f6793ca370
When we renamed `dust_value` to `minimal_non_dust` we forgot to keep the
original and deprecated it, doing so assists with the upgrade path.
Pub back in deprecated `dust_value`, linking to the rename.
Tobin C. Harding
Andrew Poelstra
Fmt Bot
Divyansh Gupta