This commit tries to achieve separation of signature- and key-related types, previously mixed in a single ECDSA module.
Rationale: bitcoin key types are not specific for signature algorithm.
This is achieved through
- Remove key mod with its content moved to ecdsa mod
- Re-export keys under key module in util mod - to make git generate diff for the rename of ecdsa mod in the next commit correctly.
7405836411 Fix warning about deprecated method use (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
f39b1300fa CI: do not fail fast (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
f77c57195a Making Script method new_* names more consistent (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
91b68a468d Taproot-related methods for Script type (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
599c5f9488 Generalizing taproot key tweaking for KeyPairs (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
Pull request description:
* Adds taproot-related methods to `Script`
* Fixes API for existing taproot methods
* Generalizes `TapTweak` trait to work with both public keys and key pairs
~~UPD: PR is pending https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/pull/342~~
ACKs for top commit:
sanket1729:
ACK 7405836411
apoelstra:
ACK 7405836411
Tree-SHA512: 4a76dfffa1452baadc15e19812831ef9d2e66794c090a8fc123388d7119b2c8a1f0420ce723ad22e01683c8198711fe62e0cdf00c9ad2d2974606383baaf1cb0
9a8ab3f3ff Change type of final script witness to Witness from Vec<Vec<u8>> (sanket1729)
Pull request description:
Doing this would certainly help APIs downstream that operate on &Witness because they would not conversion from &Vec<Vec<u8>> to &Witness.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 9a8ab3f3ff
RCasatta:
ACK 9a8ab3f3ff
dr-orlovsky:
ACK 9a8ab3f3ff
apoelstra:
ACK 9a8ab3f3ff
Tree-SHA512: 647e18d254a51d6216a0122407146e8bc1d39504e76c1e0e746f740cec7cda587455b61d4cdadc3c59b1cf03eba87000de35fbde645a30fb166a84847ba101b2
eb09019720 Rename inner key field in PrivateKey and PublicKey (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
Pull request description:
Since we already broke all possible key-related APIs with this release, I think this one is good to have with 0.28.
Closes#532
ACKs for top commit:
sanket1729:
utACK eb09019720
Kixunil:
ACK eb09019720
Tree-SHA512: 26cee647c403416f9ef6eaf208c08c9ea7162f2e04ee0210749349112bc5bf6b3cb83702a960ccded0b70e50f310c058de8ee12fa7eb30b4546469ad40603d6e
a6e8f581db PSBT BIP32 keys moved to Secp256k1 from bitcoin ECDSA (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
Pull request description:
Fourth step in implementation of Schnorr key support after #588. This PR is a follow-up to non-API breaking #589 and API-breaking #590, which must be reviewed and merged first. ~~(The current PR includes all commits from #589 and #590, which should be reviewed there. The only commit specific to this PR is b8105e95dc8651626b783403ca060f7d32d21144)~~
UPDATE: All related PRs are merged now and this PR is ready for the review
PR description:
While PSBT BIP174 does not specify whether uncompressed keys are supported in BIP32-related fields, from BIP32 it follows that it is impossible to use uncompressed keys within the extended keys. This PR fixes this situation and is a companion to BIP174 PR clarifying key serialization: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1100
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK a6e8f581db
sanket1729:
ACK a6e8f581db. Not sure which order to merge since there are many ready PRs which that would break each other.
Tree-SHA512: 198ba646bbce1949b255a54a97957d952acdad8b7f9580be123116c0f44d773e6d90e0cac0d5993ec9a6b3328aa43aced0908522817861585877c50008fec835
I think it is more natural to write Wintess::new() followed by Witness::push()
then Witness::default(). In any case, there is no harm in having additional constructors.
bb70820fed improve example: take hex-encoded seed instead of WIF in bip32 example (KaFai Choi)
Pull request description:
This is my understanding of what we want to fix the confusing bip32 example. Apologize in advance if I misunderstand it.
Closes#748
ACKs for top commit:
dr-orlovsky:
ACK bb70820fed
RCasatta:
utACK bb70820fed
Tree-SHA512: aaec9f7e3e8ce0e58b2a405e6ada75b1fc9de46ee6efb7fa2543fa626aa5f05704b05585158ab6147c495fc19abc6ade3c25225b3d75b3a3edeb8e00ba8d3976
9835736ef5 wrap u8 and LeafVersion in backticks and square bracket in doc (KaFai Choi)
Pull request description:
Found this minor doc issue while reviewing(learning) previous merged PR.
Close https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/763
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 9835736ef5
dr-orlovsky:
ACK 9835736ef5
Tree-SHA512: 3cdeb88a5a13c26e345552038a80c34c68ec581de5739ec3545643c4900c46cee4636a5cf84f5d1b4c8652a032dc2e4a66fe60fa9cbebc3adfef4b8886c7730c
Fourth step in implementation of Schnorr key support after #588.
While PSBT BIP174 does not specify whether uncompressed keys are supported in BIP32-related fields, from BIP32 it follows that it is impossible to use uncompressed keys within the extended keys. This PR fixes this situation and is a companion to BIP174 PR clarifying key serialization: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1100
7f06e91a93 LowerHex and UpperHex implementations for LeafVersion (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
6a3f3aabaf Inverse alternative formatting for LeafVersion type (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
bec6694233 Fix docs on error conditions in LeafVersion::from_consensus (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
7c28b47451 LowerHex and UpperHex implementations for FutureLeafVersion (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
Pull request description:
Trivial post-merge fixups from review comments in #718
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 7f06e91a93
sanket1729:
ACK 7f06e91a93
Tree-SHA512: d94c4bd3d0b466287c8965103f74ecaba185d14c13b6c3f37d9fbe194343b3fc902fd2c7716554ad01fe28ff89cda933df199b7e8388a3fa6097028caf62522b
cf0c48cc86 Improve Debug for PrivateKey (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
b65a6ae49b Test for extended private key keypair generation f5875a (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
e6a3d603c9 BIP32 extended key `to_ecdsa()` and `to_schnorr()` methods (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
b72f56c4ae BIP32 extended keys are using Scep256k1 keys instead of bitcoin ECDSA (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
Pull request description:
This is third step required to introduce Schnorr key support according to #588. This PR starts API-breaking changes and is follow-up to non-API breaking #589, which is already merged.
PR rationale: BIP32 does not support uncompressed keys and using type with compression flag was a mistake
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK cf0c48cc86
sanket1729:
ACK cf0c48cc86. #757 might need rework after this
Tree-SHA512: 6356a65004e7517256bacbf9aaeb69a22fd8536b341e567c5c4e819288e1105d083fe12ac0641404c407c97acf039bdc525f8e02b1b594a6cdda90106f3b1bdc
ef8a3a839e Introduce FutureLeafVersion (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
b028385a72 Improve docs in LeafVersion (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
839c022f29 Make serde for LeafVersion to have byte representation (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
67b8db05a8 Converting LeafVersion into an enum (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
2405417432 Use TAPROOT_ANNEX_PREFIX in sighash module (Dr Maxim Orlovsky)
Pull request description:
The original `LeafVersion` implementation was just a newtype around `u8`. I think that having enum explicitly listing consensus script implementation rules may be more beneficial in terms of both code readibility and future use of multiple script types, where `LeafVersion` may operate as a context object provided to `Script` to specify interpretation rules for particular op codes.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK ef8a3a839e
sanket1729:
crACK ef8a3a839e. Waiting a day to let others complete review before merging.
apoelstra:
ACK ef8a3a839e
Tree-SHA512: 3356d2b9b00cf904edfece26d26ffbc646ba74446cc23ec4b2b4026ed50861285802f077226e30ba8fed466f68f8e8556c729ce48cb38581b1d95a02a6fde9cf
Dr Maxim Orlovsky
sanket1729
Andrew Poelstra
KaFai Choi
Nils Loewen