e0442782c8 fix(script): account for data pushing opcodes in `is_standard_op_return` (Rob N)
Pull request description:
While I believe the original commit used 80 bytes for the entire script as the limit, Bitcoin Core as of [this commit](1101837461/src/policy/policy.h (L68-L72)) will relay OP_RETURN outputs as long as the data itself is not above 80 bytes, meaning a script of maximum size 83 bytes should be standard.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK e0442782c8
apoelstra:
ACK e0442782c8c04bdc48c2743e70f46e41c507e5f4; successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: edd627806c9b5c85050594d45fde49ce3945b9358ae67b4bd0e22f7feb855fe5f4d90f1770870716decbc70aa1a3e0758902c74e3c010977731b823fd72ec23b
9aebb96fb9 Fix psbt fuzz crash (Sanket Kanjalkar)
Pull request description:
Fixes: https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/3628
This occurs when combining two PSBTs with different xpub key sources. Added a length check before indexing into slices to prevent out-of-bounds access.
For some reason, the precommit hook complained about non-ascii files. I don't think any of the names here are non-ascii
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 9aebb96fb99e8e9e019663659c6eff851a62f2ce; successfully ran local tests; thanks!
tcharding:
ACK 9aebb96fb9
Tree-SHA512: b61274c594bc1f2ea4d04c8a7ace673a7632bb9ea31f59b56779a008c35e61281ea4f6b869990d886779e3e556932a3b2e8b015733ef18e236f12ca77e211c26
While I believe the original commit used 80 bytes for the entire script as the limit,
Bitcoin Core as of [this commit](7a172c76d2/src/policy/policy.h)
will relay OP_RETURN outputs as long as the data itself is not above 80 bytes, meaning a script of maximum size 83 bytes should be standard.
261c8d8ae6 Add total_weight to Input Weight Prediction (yancy)
cc4c36e8ac Deprecate weight (yancy)
Pull request description:
Closes https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/3645
I'm not sure if `total_weight` is the most accurate. Please advise if there's a different name that is better.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 261c8d8ae659d98fd3f63228f16d8f2eb4010b7e; successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: f7fbcc587d3b72edf4add8a7bfecf99ee8133f679bd905c2ab6eeb959db455905c7e32ae91c95571599f09df605454f1e9953f1a47d1f1ee6d66270784c77793
d9ccb60a2f Fix typo in hash tag type (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
In commit: `39f7dcb Reduce API surface of tagged wrapped hash types` I introduced a typo in the tagged hash tag type. Fortunately it has no effect because the tag type controls how an engine is created (when the tag is input into the engine) and has no effect on the call to `from_engine`. However the typo makes the code confusing.
This bug is currently unreleased.
Fix: #3649
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK d9ccb60a2f9e89c8bb1979f032e8a222ab9b025a; successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: 54cc78fb74ea119beaf4500d49a4d3954ffc3c52494b3ebc1539a3eec35078cb9388e72b42c59f371b53cced89b7b6303a0e3d3b02e59d72da182dd7bbfe2a55
`rust-bitcoin` is a lot further from 1.0 than `bech32` is. We previously
removed the re-export of `bech32` because we thought it might hold us up
releasing `rust-bitcoin 1.0` but in hindsite this was incorrect.
Having a public re-export of dependencies helps users keep their deps in
sync with those in `rust-bitcoin` and is thus useful.
Close: #3650
In commit: `39f7dcb Reduce API surface of tagged wrapped hash types` I
introduced a typo in the tagged hash tag type. Fortunately it has no
effect because the tag type controls how an engine is created (when the
tag is input into the engine) and has no effect on the call to
`from_engine`. However the typo makes the code confusing.
This bug is currently unreleased.
Fix: #3649
073ff81536 address: Simplify `Address::assume_checked` impl (Max Fang)
e4cf8ebc20 address: Add `Address::into_unchecked` (Max Fang)
Pull request description:
## Commits
### address: Add `Address::into_unchecked`
Adds an ergonomic way to convert any `Address` (network can be checked
or unchecked) into an `Address<NetworkUnchecked>` without cloning, which
I've found useful in several contexts.
### address: Simplify `Address::assume_checked` impl
Removes an unnecessary `match` which I noticed while implementing `Address::into_unchecked`.
## Small note on use of `Self`
The style guide in `CONTRIBUTING.md` notes to return `Self` when possible, but that doesn't apply here as the `Address` being returned is different from the `Address` type referred to by `Self`, due to the changed `NetworkValidation` type.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 073ff81536
apoelstra:
ACK 073ff81536e7a24883d6470ecf3054f4b7263186; successfully ran local tests; nice!
Tree-SHA512: dd6749cffad75d88568106169032d8af023ed56df4b1b38fa613ae7b140d1eb22933e7b0ffc1b17681a5db4b11b28d9db4efb62868755ca3c0f7cac20de0be4b
a8379bf005 Mark `checked_` functions const in bitcoin. (Jamil Lambert, PhD)
fe10ff2eb7 Mark functions `const` in `units` (Jamil Lambert, PhD)
Pull request description:
Following on #3608, #3627 and #1174 the rest of the `checked_` functions in all `rust-bitcoin` have been marked as const. Except for tests and traits.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK a8379bf0053e66cf5984ce449d19e54e529b6b70; successfully ran local tests; thanks! I find this much easier to read
tcharding:
ACK a8379bf005
Tree-SHA512: b8d97b7a3d9fc33b57349f418ccc5aac2f3e8c4145a73bf0e24e85547217d41214696e9a80b1fb5a1bae7e766aad1c2b5df6044564772fe76cec9b3628bcd8e5
Adds an ergonomic way to convert any `Address` (network can be checked
or unchecked) into an `Address<NetworkUnchecked>` without cloning, which
I've found useful in several contexts.
ad82ed7179 Fix spelling typo (yancy)
8fe5ffde4c Rename tests that have _test suffix (yancy)
Pull request description:
Convention is to not include test as a suffix
Used `git grep -n _test` and renamed all the tests that made sense to rename. There are a number of fn `do_test(data: &[u8]) {` that I felt it would be better not to touch. Everything else that was a testname I renamed if it had a _test suffix.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK ad82ed71796c79399cd8a81814b1af61c4ca3582; successfully ran local tests
tcharding:
ACK ad82ed7179
Tree-SHA512: 9c4ee71974e39814a8a63d269e3dcf6e761312dd0903ac1e6268dc421b9ef89a63f27cade3d5a51436660bb01457ac1a2f23a628a4d11622cd4a33fa6c483934
ec06028f63 hashes: Make hex dependency optional (Tobin C. Harding)
9dce0b4b8c Remove hex string trait bounds from GeneralHash (Tobin C. Harding)
766f498b33 Pull serde stuff out of impl_bytelike_traits macro (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
This is done in 3 parts:
1. Pull the `serde` stuff out of `impl_bytelike_traits` to fix the bug described here: https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/2654#issuecomment-2470716693
2. Prepare the `hashes` trait by removing string/hex trait bounds from `GeneralHash` and also pull the hex/string stuff out of `impl_bytelike_traits`
3. Make hex optional, including adding custom debug logic when `hex` feature is not enabled
Patch 3 is tested in `hashes/embedded`, by the new `debug` unit test, and there is a `Midstate` unit test as well that covers the `Debug` impl.
Close: #2654 - BOOM!
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK ec06028f63ba591a14c3a15cdfd410bb5ff1c09b; successfully ran local tests; nice!
Tree-SHA512: 85eb10d36a4581af6cd700f7ff876585bcc114c60e9864906e65659f3b3ee550fe6d9f40ca4230d870a9e23f0720723e11443ec329f16e40259a259b9be57466
In preparation for releasing `primitives v0.101.0` bump the version
number, add a changelog entry, update the lock files, and depend on the
new version in all crates that depend on `primitives`.
On the way re-design the API by doing:
- Introduce `Checked` and `Unchecked` tags
- Rename the `txdata` field to `transactions`
- Make the `Block` fields private
- Add getters for `header` and `transactions` fields
- Move the various `compute_` methods to be free standing functions
- Make the `check_` functions private
- Introduce extension traits
In preparation for adding a block extension trait move the only private
method off the `Block` type and make it free standing.
While we are at it just take a slice of transactions since we don't need
the block itself - rename appropriately.
Internal change only.
The only reason we need `hex-conservative` is to parse strings and
format them as hex. For users that do not require this functionality we
can make the `hex-conservative` crate an optional dependency.
The `serde` feature requires `Display` so we enable `hex` from the
`serde` feature.
If `hex` feature is not enabled we still need to be able to debug so
provide `fmt::Debug` functionality by way of macros.
Close: #2654
For the `hashes` crate we would like to make `hex` an optional
dependency. In preparation for doing so do the following:
- Remove the trait bounds from `GeneralHash`
- Split the hex/string stuff out of `impl_bytelike_traits` into a
separate macro.
The `impl_bytelike_traits` macro is public and it is used in the
`hash_newtype` macro, also public.
Currently if a user calls the `hash_newtype` macro in a crate that
depends on `hashes` without the `serde` feature enabled and with no
`serde` dependency everything works. However if the user then adds a
dependency that happens to enable the `serde` feature in `hashes` their
build will blow up because `serde` code will start getting called from
the original crate's call to `hash_newtype`.
Pull the serde stuff out of `hash_newtype` and provide a macro to
implement it `impl_serde_for_newtype`.
Add a unit test that verifies we correctly remove the annex when getting
the tapscript from the witness stack.
Unit test written by Casey, pulled out of #3599.
Co-developed-by: Casey Rodarmor <casey@rodarmor.com>
In #2646 we introduced a bug in the taproot witness stack getter
functions, of which we have three:
- `tapscript`
- `taproot_control_block`
- `taproot_annex`
Each returns `Some` if a possible bytes slice is found (with no other
guarantees).
Use `taproot_annex` combined with getters from `primitives` to implement
the other two getters. This simplifies the code and fixes the bug.
Add an additional getter to `primitives` `Witness::third_from_last`.
Fix: #3598
These re-exports are hard to get right. We (I) recently made an attempt
to make our stack of crates easier to navigate using the idea that
exporting a type from the crate it is defined in adds some additional
information without any loss of clarity. Note however that the module
must be re-exported from the "highest" place possible because we at
times add additional functionality as we move up the stack e.g.,
`bitcoin::merkle_tree` has logic in it that `primitives::merkle_tree`
does not. In order to future proof the codebase default to always using
the highest module up the stack even when that module adds no additional
code e.g., re-export `blockdata::fee_rate` as opposed to
`units::fee_rate` in the event that we later add logic to
`bitcoin::blockdata::fee_rate`.
This patch adds an additional re-export: `sequence` (previously missing).
8098d5ee05 Reword `Address` constructor docs (Jamil Lambert, PhD)
Pull request description:
Change the wording of the Address constructor function docs to be a standard format. Following up on [#3584 comment](https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/3584#issuecomment-2457197066)
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 8098d5ee055d672fc8f6e4eef3971b66478a61b0; successfully ran local tests
tcharding:
ACK 8098d5ee05
Tree-SHA512: 1027f334d69182465b2ecafd6fcf9f5deb2b299a64d12dea7f09f25379bd98b1e11be52a04fea83c2194164fd428931f6416eee52603f4bc043717b4e4d1b193
3523b8e117 Rename generic parameter and variable (yancy)
Pull request description:
Use W for Write
closes https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/3590
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 3523b8e117
apoelstra:
ACK 3523b8e1171663fc93ab25765271a1070a2d649f; successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: 8dd9f38ee07e7652ebd291eb121a2630ebb09ea9ea70873f87e57241f51e5114106517511d1fe07774ec4f42920e9d0619031a1545787631a30422de12421a67
c61df05916 Fix bip34 number parsing for Block (junderw)
Pull request description:
Fixes#3583
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK c61df059160d3aeef73046de28cb5d5afcb962d2; successfully ran local tests
tcharding:
ACK c61df05916
Tree-SHA512: 3fade122f98c7c9e3b2888c33479d3a9426fb35f212ccee6b89b7cd5c92d2b58c93e165d5c59eda183c0943809d7e633d929000be92b197988a3ceb0ea37514f
1649b68589 Standardize wording to `constructs a new` (Jamil Lambert, PhD)
27f94d5540 Replace `creates` with `constructs` (Jamil Lambert, PhD)
Pull request description:
As discussed in issue #3575 there are various ways of saying a new object is created.
These have all be standardized to the agreed version.
Close#3575
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 1649b68589834dfe9d5b63812da3e9f0e5930107; successfully ran local tests
tcharding:
ACK 1649b68589
Tree-SHA512: 0ed9b56819c95f1fc14da1e0fdbbe03c4af2d97a95ea6b56125f72913e8d832db5d2882d713ae139d00614e651f3834a4d72528bdf776231cceb6772bf2f9963
There is a range of different wordings used in the docs of constructor
type functions.
Change all to start with `Constructs a new` or `Constructs an empty`.
In functions that act like constructors there is a mixture of the usage
of `creates` and `constructs`.
Replace all occurrences of `creates` with `constructs` in the first line
of docs of constructor like functions.
81d8699b55 units: Put no_std up top (Tobin C. Harding)
3e332c3839 amount: Fix docs on FromStr (Tobin C. Harding)
5bec76aa51 amount: Fix rustdocs (Tobin C. Harding)
41c80cc476 amount: Improve docs on div by weight (Tobin C. Harding)
2b4a61739a Add type to debug output for Amount (Tobin C. Harding)
42e5043b33 Add from_int_btc group of functions (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Improve the `amount` module by doing:
- Patch 1: Add/update `from_int_btc` and `from_int_btc_const` functions
- Patch 2: Add type to debug output for `Amount`
- Patch 3: Fix incorrect docs
- Patch 4: Make docs use correct style and be uniform across the two amount types
- Patch 5: Fix docs on `FromStr`
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 81d8699b55dad570247cb14d2b3eea64270a83cf; successfully ran local tests
jamillambert:
ACK 81d8699b55
Tree-SHA512: ddd6e02b4cd9a9aa8cbdd2d2f7ae289a6bcca9eb002ef0c6d83a6eca950b2cd08f5918286bb33e814f321e3bfe83fdf75ae051cf8f91ee45d3e4abe76c1c2a4c
Is there any advantage trying to lay out the re-exports to give users an
idea of the crate structure?
We have the explicit aim that users who depend on `bitcoin` do not ever
need to reach directly into `primitives` (or `units`) however it is kind
of nice to know where things come from, saves jumping to multiple files
looking for them (for those of us that jump to files manually).
I do not know how all the re-exports interact with other folks IDEs, I
personally open files manually and just remember where stuff is.
85942c355d Re-export block::Header as BlockHeader (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
For users who want to just grab stuff from the crate root it makes total sense for there to be a `BlockHeader`.
Another nice thing, in the HMTL docs it makes BlockHeader be in the struct list right along with `Block`, `BlockHash`, and `BlockHeight`.
Close: #3548
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 85942c355dfdcf9ddf9a46202f4db56794dcc85d; successfully ran local tests
jamillambert:
ACK 85942c355d
Tree-SHA512: 6fbaf7936062323d31940179ffcbc62951b21f53955a42dca2e28476bda0cebeb041db0e1b4f1ceeac32e43d94fe5476ef055595ae88dc6cfc266d32082bdf4d
merge-script
Rob N
Sanket Kanjalkar
yancy
Tobin C. Harding
Max Fang
LLFourn
Jamil Lambert, PhD
Fmt Bot
Shing Him Ng
junderw