a55e78a28d
In an unrelated PR CI run we got the following error: ``` error: you should consider adding a `Default` implementation for `ArrayVec<T, CAP>` ``` I did not bother to dig any deeper since this seems like a reasonable suggestion by the compiler since we provide a `new` function that takes zero arguments. Add a `Default` implementation to `ArrayVec`. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| error | ||
| array_vec.rs | ||
| const_tools.rs | ||
| error.rs | ||
| lib.rs | ||
| macros.rs | ||
| parse.rs | ||
| serde.rs | ||