be7b3754a9
"schnorr" is a dirty word; the current `schnorr` module defines a `Signature` that includes a sighash type, this sighash type is a bitcoin specific construct related to taproot. Therefore the `Signature` is better named `taproot::Signature`. Note also that the usage of `schnorr` in `secp256k1` is probably justified because the `secp256::schnorr::Signature` is just doing the crypto. While we are at it, update docs and error messages to use "taproot" instead of "schnorr". Also change function names and identifiers that use "schnorr". |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| bip32.rs | ||
| ecdsa-psbt.rs | ||
| handshake.rs | ||
| taproot-psbt.rs | ||