git-sig/README.md

# Sig #

The simple GPG signature toolchain for directories or git repos.

## Features

  * Generate sha256 manifest for all files in directory
    * Use git for listing if available
  * Add detached signatures to manifest
  * Verify manifest has a minimum threshold of unique detached signatures
  * Verify git history contains a minimum threshold of unique commit siguatures
  * Verify signatures belong to a defined GPG alias group

## Install

  1. Clone

      ```
      git clone git@gitlab.com/pchq/sig.git sig
      ```

  2. Manually generate manifest

      ```
      git ls-files \
      | grep -v .sig \
      | xargs openssl sha256 -r \
      | sed -e 's/ \*/ /g' -e 's/ \.\// /g'
      ```

  3. Manually verify manifest

      ```
      for file in .sig/*.asc; do gpg --verify $file .sig/manifest.txt; done
      gpg log --show-signature
      less sig
      ```

  4. Self verify

      ```
      ./sig verify --threshold 3
      ```

  5. Copy to $PATH

      ```
      cp sig ~/.local/bin/
      ```

## Methods

### Git

This method verifies a git repo contains signed commits by one or more authors.

If 'threshold' is specified, it searches history until enough unique signatures
are found to satisify the threshold, ensuring all commits between are signed.

If 'group' is specified, all signatures must be by keys that belong to a
defined gpg alias group.

Note: this only proves the history had multiple participants, but not that
the current HEAD was verified by all participants.

#### Assumptions
  - Single sig mode: Repo HEAD controlled by signer
  - Multi-sig mode: Repo has contributions from multiple individuals
  - Multi-sig group mode: Repo has contributions from specified individuals
  - Sha1 is not broken

### Detached

This method verifies the state of this folder was signed exactly as-is by one
or more authors.

If 'threshold' is specified, then that number of signatures must be present.

If 'group' is specified, all signatures must be by keys that belong to a
defined gpg alias group.

#### Assumptions
  - Single sig mode: Folder contents controlled by signer
  - Multi-sig mode: Folder contents verified by multiple signers
  - Multi-sig group mode: Folder contents approved by specified individuals
  - Sha256 is not broken

## Usage

* sig verify [-g,--group=<group>] [-t,--threshold=<N>] [-m,--method=<git|detached> ]
  * Verify m-of-n signatures by given group are present for directory
* sig add
  * Add signature to manifest for this directory
* sig manifest
  * Generate hash manifest for this directory
* sig help
  * Show help text.
* sig version
  * Show version information.


## Examples

#### Verify 1 signature via Detached and Git methods

```
sig verify
```

#### Verify 2 unique signatures via Detached and Git methods

```
sig verify --threshold 2
```

#### Verify 3 unique signatures from specified signing group via Git method

```
sig verify --threshold 2 --group myteam --method git
```

#### Add Detached Signature

```
sig add
```

## Frequently Asked Questions

### Why Bash?

Because it is easy to quickly verify at any time, has wide OS compatibility andthe majority of the needed operations are calling other programs already on
your system like gpg and openssl.

If this were in another language it would be harder to audit on the fly, would
require the user to have a specific language toolchain installed, and it would
still mostly just be a bunch of shell executions to call system binaries
anyway.

### Why PGP?

In spite of many popular claims to the contrary, PGP is still the most well
supported protocol for distribution, verification, and signing for keys held
by individual humans. It is also the only protocoal with wide HSM support
allowing you to keep keys out of system memory and requier physical approval
for each operation. E.G a trezor, ledger, or yubikey.

Popular alternatives like signify or straight openssl have poor support for
these workflows.

Admittedly the GnuPG codebase itself is a buggy dated mess, but PGP as a spec
is still Pretty Good for many use cases. A recent modern rewrite by a number
of former GnuPG team members is near complete and set to give PGP a long and
stable future.

See: https://sequoia-pgp.org/

The only promising alternative to GnuPG for software signing that has hsm
support and the very attractive feature of expiring signatures is [The Update Framework](https://theupdateframework.io) which may be supported as an alternate
method in the future if m-of-n multisig is ever implemented.