83bd83385e Update sighash.rs (leopardracer)
fc4ea87429 Update transaction.rs (leopardracer)
0e70e85a1a Update key.rs (leopardracer)
f7c28ab44d Update input_string.rs (leopardracer)
Pull request description:
This pull request contains changes to improve clarity, correctness and structure.
- Corrected typos in multiple files (e.g., `transacton` → `transaction`, `function panics` formatting).
- Improved readability of comments in `transaction.rs`, `key.rs`, and `input_string.rs.`
- No functional code changes, only documentation updates.
This message provides a clear summary of what was done and why the changes were made. Let me know if you need any modifications!
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 83bd83385e
tcharding:
ACK 83bd83385e
apoelstra:
ACK 83bd83385e0bbad993f96f5abbe51f71d199aad1; successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: ec0cae0357dd8c60e9286db71c3d18dfa6ba7acbaa27cce78c0586ab73c9631ea58ab453acd85b18d4edd72dcc578a4e08d69b9529e856837d5651efa288a4db
a8168c3f81 Add `taproot_leaf_script` methood to `Witness` (Martin Habovstiak)
59f21a291f Add a test case checking `taproot_control_block` (Martin Habovstiak)
e810ecff7c Fix key/script spend detection in `Witness` (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
Fixes#4097
High priority because it blocks a bunch of work and should be probably swiftly backported.
My plan is to backport this entire PR and then in the breaking version remove the broken `tapscript` method entirely. Keeping it around would be way too confusing if we're going to have tagged script.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK a8168c3f81
apoelstra:
ACK a8168c3f81a76165022af3f3aeec82317d8a6bf1; successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: 9e3c065f045664c7e4fdf8ba4d9e7dc9281a59eda1187f39b297861714007d58e9e5071c37e1f3b16d171372313ae06aca2d98425a06a6be557718d9f73c0e14
We already have `tapscript` method on `Witness` which is broken because
it doesn't check that the leaf script is a tapscript, however that
behavior might have been intended by some consumers who want to inspect
the script independent of the version. To resolve the confusion, we're
going to add a new method that returns both the leaf script and, to
avoid forgetting version check, also the leaf version.
This doesn't touch the `tapscript` method yet to make backporting of
this commit easier. It's also worth noting that leaf script is often
used together with version. To make passing them around easier it'd be
helpful to use a separate type. Thus this also adds a public POD type
containing the script and the version. In anticipation of if being
usable in different APIs it's also generic over the script type.
Similarly to the `tapscript` method, this also only adds the type and
doesn't change other functions to use it yet. Only the newly added
`taproot_leaf_script` method uses it now.
This is a part of #4073
The previous commit fixed a bug when `taproot_control_block` returned
`Some` on key-spends. This adds a test case for it which succeeds when
applied after the previous commit and fails if applied before it.
The `taproot_control_block` did not properly detect whether it deals
with script spend or key spend. As a result, if key spend with annex was
used it'd return the first element (the signature) as if it was a
control block.
Further, the conditions identifying which kind of spend it was were
repeated multiple times but behaved subtly differently making only
`taproot_control_block` buggy but the other places confusing.
To resolve these issues this change adds a `P2TrSpend` enum that
represents a parsed witness and has a single method doing all the
parsing. The other methods can then be trivially implemented by matching
on that type. This way only one place needs to be verified and the
parsing code is more readable since it uses one big `match` to handle
all possibilities.
The downside of this is a potential perf impact if the parsing code
doesn't get inlined since the common parsing code has to shuffle around
data that the caller is not intersted in. I don't think this will be a
problem but if it will I suppose it will be solvable (e.g. by using
`#[inline(always)]`).
The enum also looks somewhat nice and perhaps downstream consumers could
make use of it. This change does not expose it yet but is written such
that after exposing it the API would be (mostly) idiomatic.
Closes#4097
cb270eae8e Make transaction::Version field private (jrakibi)
6c69b66b0d Use Version constant (jrakibi)
Pull request description:
This commit addresses #4041 by making the `transaction::Version` field private.
This forces people to either use the associated constants (`Version::ONE/TWO/THREE`) or the `non_standard`/`from_consensus` methods for any other transaction version.
This aligns with our approach to `block::Version`
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK cb270eae8e
Kixunil:
ACK cb270eae8e
Tree-SHA512: dcf5b50dfeda04e56fec350acd735dcb7099989b552afce4261d559a8a846c0eb3705369ad635ef9bbbfb2373d203a2c3641178925de6685426aa91245db9a8c
This commit addresses #4041 by making the transaction::Version field private
Changes:
- Make the `Version` field private with `pub(crate)`
- Rename `non_standard` to `maybe_non_standard` for clarity since it accepts both standard and non-standard versions
- Add `#[inline]` attributes to small, frequently used methods:
- `as_u32`
- `maybe_non_standard`
Users now must use either:
- Constants (`Version::ONE/TWO/THREE`) for standard versions
- `maybe_non_standard` method for any version (standard or non-standard)
f61e93ccf1 Properly deprecate Hash::from_slice (Tobin C. Harding)
50c0af7138 Stop using Hash::from_slice (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
The `hashes::error::FromSliceError` error is only returned from `from_slice`. We attempted to deprecate this function but it seems we only did half a job at it.
- deprecate _all_ instances of the method/function
- deprecate the error type
- stop using the deprecated functions in `bitcoin`
Close: #4053
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK f61e93ccf1db7e7e3c9604fdb09b4e25195d88b2; successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: 61a0e5127019859776ffac66bd4d320c86b8462bb1e908127d0bf42896aaa8df85fd2b06850342b694ca1cd68ed50355c81cad6ae3e9a5fd6e3933efe85498ad
It has turned out that the `rust-ordered` crate and it's
`ArbitraryOrd` trait are only useful for locktimes and only marginally
useful for them at best.
Remove the `ArbitraryOrd` impls and the `rust-ordered` dependency.
This topic was discussed in various places including:
- #2500
- #4002
- #3881Close: #4029
This function is deprecated, stop using it in favour of
`Hash::from_byte_array`.
Patch only touches test code, I'm guessing that is why lint warnings
were no showing up.
6244cb75fa Introduce monadic AmountOpResult (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
We would like to return an error when doing math ops on amount types. We cannot however use the stdlib `Result` or `Option` because we want to implement ops on the result type.
Add an `NumOpResult` type. Return this type from all math operations on `Amount` and `SignedAmount`.
Implement `core::iter::Sum` for the new type to allow summing iterators of amounts.
Note please this removes `AddAssign` impls for amount types.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 6244cb75faf62aed4b47d63a59d14cb766e4e7a8; successfully ran local tests; let's do it -- but definitely want the followup issues addressed
Kixunil:
ACK 6244cb75fa
Tree-SHA512: 7a105acb1aa492ab3e97d94ae182ac4c30a364edd183f71cc320cf80d85060049e8caf1e5736ef6d1af32f39c3376f21382afe35ac65ea1b8c15130c622d9d64
For private WIF keys corresponding to a compressed address,
the last byte of the key needs to be 0x01, but the API
doesn't enforce this when using PrivateKey::from_wif(). So,
invalid keys can be accepted.
Thus we check if the last byte is equivalent to 0x01
if the key's length is 34 (which indicates it's
compressed).
We would like to return an error when doing math ops on amount types.
We cannot however use the stdlib `Result` or `Option` because we want to
implement ops on the result type.
Add an `AmountOpResult` type. Return this type from all math operations
on `Amount` and `SignedAmount`.
Implement `core::iter::Sum` for the new type to allow summing iterators
of amounts - somewhat ugly to use, see tests for example usage.
6002ccdc56 Add a tagged sha256t hash engine (Tobin C. Harding)
3e8e2e46bf Use Self::Engine in GeneralHash impl (Tobin C. Harding)
a0211906fe sha256t: Remove standalone from_engine function (Tobin C. Harding)
5ce8781162 Remove the Tag::engine method (Tobin C. Harding)
ba6425947f hashes: Use associated cost for pre-tagging (Tobin C. Harding)
613fddc82b Delete deprecated sha256t_hash_newtype macro (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Add a new hash engine to the `sha256t` module and put the tag on it.
Note the issue suggests adding the tag to `sha256::HashEngine` but this PR adds a new type to `sha256t` and adds the tag on it.
Resolve: #1552
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 6002ccdc567b26c69f6b55173f5d11b95b4d6966; successfully ran local tests
Kixunil:
ACK 6002ccdc56
Tree-SHA512: 8a8945bdb89841b87af2eb94073b4d01993338f34a7a3e919bccf4e8edea0fe9d5d2818b6484700b2e72143f315633338692a436149935c5156b77757b025f5e
We would like it if two different pre-tagged engines were considered
different types so it is not possible to mix them up.
Add a new `sha256t::HashEngine<T>` where `T` is a tag the same as on
`sha256t::Hash<T>`.
Now we have an associated const we can do away with the `engine` trait
method all together. Users can call `Hash<FooTag>::engine` instead. This
is better because its an API more similar to the other hash types and
therefor easier to discover and remember.
85e0330d7f Run the formatter (Tobin C. Harding)
7be0db730a hashes: Move bench and test code into files (Tobin C. Harding)
665fa9de99 hashes: Pull crypto out into submodule (Tobin C. Harding)
1bfd1e071a hashes: Make module subdirectories (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
This is an attempt at point 3 in https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/3961#issuecomment-2619946074
However instead of using `api.rs` and `implementation.rs` it uses `crypto.rs` for the cryptography stuff and leaves the rest in `mod.rs`.
This whole PR is internal changes only. Almost entirely code moves, review is easy if you have your `diff` configured nicely.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 85e0330d7f
apoelstra:
ACK 85e0330d7f057c9fe447bff5fdb6023150ead319; successfully ran local tests; look great! thanks!
Tree-SHA512: e52e6410e86fc93ec34a72be8c64f02148f46958f8f5c1850075b1a7f41886c220f09144ccd05a98a551c356a5d25524c8884fc8578a205b27f385ec0725f13b
a7526b6a70 Remove `fee_vb` (yancy)
73b14d03b9 Add `to_fee` in place of `fee_wu` (yancy)
Pull request description:
Rename fee_wu and remove fee_vb
closes https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/3908
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK a7526b6a70642e04f0a8ad8a89aa368031fdb6cd; successfully ran local tests
Kixunil:
ACK a7526b6a70
Tree-SHA512: fd865525e56caddc49158fd94fb125d92fd09654d5c72609a6f8e34370e79a9be4213dbd7e69b0d8498d92fca8a970142262f56b63cebd76c200aca75b6e0ca6
Use the more idiomatic to_fee instead of `fee_wu`. Since the method
takes a strongly typed argument, remove `wu` from the method name
to improve clarity.
We want to get rid of this constant, so we replace it in tests with 0
amount, empty script. Notably, the tests were already using it as a
dummy value - the exact amount was irrelevant, so this change doesn't
break anything.
The `encode_signing_data_to_inner` function previously constructed a
transaction internally, requiring a bunch of allocations, which it'd
then consensus-serialize into a writer (hasher). It also used a dummy
`TxOut::NULL` value which we want to get rid of.
To get rid of both allocations and the NULL value we serialize the
transaction on-the-fly. Because the encoding doesn't involve witnesses
it's not too complicated and the consensus encoding will never change so
there are no desync bugs possible. We may later change this to an
abstract transaction though.
New nightly lint warning "called `Iterator::last` on a
`DoubleEndedIterator`; this will needlessly iterate the entire iterator"
Code that gives the warning is correct, allow the lint to remove the
warning.
Update rustc nightly to 2025-01-16
Back in 2022 we elected to use `mutagen` for mutation testing. Since
then `cargo mutants` has progressed to a point where we would now like
to use it instead.
Remove all the `mutagen` stuff and update the lock files.
Close: #2829
The mining reward for the first epoc is 50 bitcoin. For mainnet this is
old news but for regtest it is still relevant.
Add and use a new const `FIFTY_BTC` to the `Amount` type. To keep the
amount types uniform also add it to the `SignedAmount`.
b11ace359a Fix up ParsePublickeyError (Innocent Onyemaenu)
Pull request description:
Resolves#3835
In #945fcd09 we forgot to Update impl for ParsePublicKeyError Display and Error traits
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK b11ace359a
apoelstra:
ACK b11ace359a52d9137b8fe5919d9825d61e3e9fad; successfully ran local tests; thanks!!
Tree-SHA512: 5c4e5e113605bc5b9c3c0d2ca65a0fdae80726a0f2f791255cc1d6567812a9132ff4f5bd8f30276fef916469d5fd29f6d72ddf4adb6340e52f4e0198ac4fb371
In #3847 we added an `InvalidCharError` into one of the variants of
`ParsePublicKeyError` but we forgot to update the trait
implementations.
Fix the `error::Error` and `Display` implementations for
`ParsePublicKeyError`. While we are at it match on `*self` as is
typical in this codebase.
With this applied #3835 is fully resolved.
Close: #3835
Currently `InputString` is in the public API of `units` because of the
trait bound on `parse::int()`. We can just do the monomorphisisation
manually to remove it.
This patch renames `int` to have three different names, one for `&str`
one for `String`, and one for `Box<str>`.
kilavvy
merge-script
leopardracer
Liu-Cheng Xu
Martin Habovstiak
Jose Storopoli
jrakibi
Tobin C. Harding
Fmt Bot
ndungudedan
Andrew Toth
yancy
yancy
Peter Todd
Jamil Lambert, PhD
Innocent Onyemaenu