This clearly states lack of support for 16-bit architectures as well as
adds readable `compile_error!()` call. It also fixes a few stylistic
mistakes - headings (top-level should not be repeated) and missing
newlines.
Closes#660
f2042bd89a Add i686 to tested architectures (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
This adds i686 to CI which can help catching pointer-size-related bugs
such as the one addressed by #658.
Opening a new PR seemed more appropriate than adding it to #658 I can change it if you disagree.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK f2042bd89a
Tree-SHA512: b772c8cbc5faa6fed25faed275eb903cd7226d8ff618ff57ce3e6735cc53b5c797380a519c670faf4fd5aa86ae01d5232e8c21e03a282599e7caa532b2176be8
76cf74fa9b Added test for the overflow bug and few others (Martin Habovstiak)
a0e1d2e706 Check for overflow in Script::bytes_to_asm_fmt() (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
This adds an overflow check in `Script::bytes_to_asm_fmt()` motivated by
`electrs` issue. While it was not tested yet, I'm very confident that
overflow is the cause of panic there and even if not it can cause panic
becuase the public function takes unvalidated byte array and reads
`data_len` from it.
The `electrs` issue: https://github.com/romanz/electrs/issues/490
~~Strangely, this breaks a test case and I can't see why. I'm publishing in case someone wants to help.~~
Edit: One damn character. :D Should be OK now.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 76cf74fa9b
Tree-SHA512: 4ffeca442a71b10c132f055f056128ae64e66cbdc1891662c3a4e743b82fa5d27075a44513e844be37888b33068eef3bbf6bcced5def70c17c9c5bd5b9d870cc
This adds a test case for script formatting which caused overflow in the
past and a few others from the same "interesting" transaction. Note that
to trigger the bug one has to run the test on 32 bit architecture.
This adds an overflow check in `Script::bytes_to_asm_fmt()` motivated by
`electrs` issue. While it was not tested yet, I'm very confident that
overflow is the cause of panic there and even if not it can cause panic
becuase the public function takes unvalidated byte array and reads
`data_len` from it.
The `electrs` issue: https://github.com/romanz/electrs/issues/490
c704ee7ffe [docs-only] Use backtick in addition to square parentheses for types references, clarify legacy, non_exhaustive comment, remove std:: (Riccardo Casatta)
f223be618f Rename access_witness to witness_mut and return Option (Riccardo Casatta)
c9bc0b928a [fmt-only] autoformatting with `rustfmt src/util/sighash.rs` (Riccardo Casatta)
07774917c2 Use get_or_insert_with in segwit_cache (Martin Habovstiak)
497dbfb7c3 Use get_or_insert_with in common_cache() (Martin Habovstiak)
ca80a5a030 Use get_or_insert_with in taproot_cache (Martin Habovstiak)
6e06a32ccc Wrap ErrorKind in Io enum variant, fix doc comment for the IO variant (Riccardo Casatta)
1a2b54ff23 introduce constant KEY_VERSION_0 (Riccardo Casatta)
417cfe31e3 Derive common traits for structs and enum, make internal struct not pub (Riccardo Casatta)
55ce3dd6ae Fix validation error if SINGLE with missing corresponding output, remove check_index and check with get().ok_or(), more details in errors (Riccardo Casatta)
2b3b22f559 impl Encodable for Annex to avoid allocation (Riccardo Casatta)
1a7afed068 Add Reserved variant to SigHashType for future use (ie SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT) (Riccardo Casatta)
53d0e176d3 Deprecate bip143::SigHashCache in favor of sighash::SigHashCache (Riccardo Casatta)
15e3caf62d [test] Test also sighash legacy API with legacy tests (Riccardo Casatta)
24acfe3672 Implement Bip341 signature hash, create unified SigHashCache for taproot, segwit and legacy inputs (Riccardo Casatta)
683b9c14ff add [En|De]codable trait for sha256::Hash (Riccardo Casatta)
Pull request description:
Adds https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0341.mediawiki message signature algorithm
The base is taken from `bip143::SigHashCache`, some code results duplicated but I think it's more clear to keep things separated
Would mark some bullet point on https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/503
Test vectors are taken by running d1e4c56309/test/functional/feature_taproot.py with a modified `TaprootSignatureHash` function to print intermediate values that I cannot found in the bip341 [test vector json](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets/main/unit_test_data/script_assets_test.json)
UPDATE: Latest version includes the suggestion from @sanket1729 to create a unified tool for signature message hash for legacy, segwit, and taproot inputs. In particular, makes sense for mixed segwit v0 and taproot v1 inputs because cached values could be shared
ACKs for top commit:
sanket1729:
ACK c704ee7ffe. Reviewed the diff from a37de1ade475e0c31c932121abaa7aec701b9987 which I previously ACKed
dr-orlovsky:
utACK c704ee7ffe by diffing it to 6e06a32ccc having my ACK before.
apoelstra:
ACK c704ee7ffe
Tree-SHA512: 35530995fe9d078acd0178cfca654ca980109f4502c91d578c1a0d5c6cafacab7db1ffd6216288eac99f6a763776cbc0298cfbdff00b5a83e98ec4b15aa764e8
95fb4e01f9 Document cargo features (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
This documents cargo features in two ways: explictly in text and in code
using `#[doc(cfg(...))]` attribute where possible. Notably, this is
impossible for `serde` derives. The attribute is contitional and only
activated for docs.rs or explicit local builds.
This change also adds `package.metadata.docs.rs` field to `Cargo.toml`
which instructs docs.rs to build with relevant features and with
`docsrs` config activated enabling `#[doc(cfg(...))] attributes.
I also took the opportunity to fix a few missing spaces in nearby code.
Notes for reviewers:
* To build and look at result locally run: `RUSTDOCFLAGS="--cfg docsrs" cargo +nightly doc --features std,secp-recovery,base64,rand,use-serde,bitcoinconsensus --open` (don't confuse `RUSTDOCFLAGS` with `RUSTFLAGS` - took me a while to figure that out 😞)
* You should see needed features being called out - e.g. in `Script::verify`
* More information and some screenshots: https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/8103#issuecomment-653154049
* For an example why this matters see: https://github.com/Kixunil/loptos/issues/1😉
* Serde issue: https://github.com/serde-rs/serde/issues/2063
ACKs for top commit:
dr-orlovsky:
ACK 95fb4e01f9
apoelstra:
ACK 95fb4e01f9
Tree-SHA512: 4d6428bfa05cbeb2d8737f0239aa1836b5f36f4b040e1ac5e0862663c4ea783711d122182dd8313913fd593ab224915bd8def5e268b272215bee2c9856a27674
This documents cargo features in two ways: explictly in text and in code
using `#[doc(cfg(...))]` attribute where possible. Notably, this is
impossible for `serde` derives. The attribute is contitional and only
activated for docs.rs or explicit local builds.
This change also adds `package.metadata.docs.rs` field to `Cargo.toml`
which instructs docs.rs to build with relevant features and with
`docsrs` config activated enabling `#[doc(cfg(...))] attributes.
I also took the opportunity to fix a few missing spaces in nearby code.
This refactors the code to make it possible to use `get_or_insert_with`
instead of unwrapping in `segwit_cache()`. To achieve it `common_cache`
is refactored into two functions: one taking only the required borrows
and the original calling the new one. `segwit_cache` then calls the new
function so that borrows are OK.
Apart from removing unwrap, this avoids calling `common_cache` multiple
times.
There was a question whether this is equally performant. There are
multiple good reasons why it should be:
1. `get_or_insert_with` is marked `#[inline]`
2. Any good optimizer will inline a function that is used exactly once
3. 1 and 2 conclude that the closure will get inlined
4. Computing self.tx can then be moved to the only branch where it is
required.
5. Even if get_or_insert_with didn't get optimized, which is extremely
unlikely, the `tx` field is at the beginning of the struct and it
probably has pointer alignment (`Deref` suggests it's a pointer).
Alignment larger than pointer is not used, so we can expect the
fields to be ordered as-defined. (This is not guaranteed by Rust but
there's not good reason to change the order in this case.) We can
assume that offset to tx is zero in most cases which means no
computation is actually needed so the expression before closure is
no-op short of passing it into the closure as an argument.
At the time of writing `#[inline]` can be seen at
https://doc.rust-lang.org/src/core/option.rs.html#933
Riccardo Casatta
Sanket Kanjalkar
Dr Maxim Orlovsky
Clark Moody
Martin Habovstiak
Andrew Poelstra
Vikas S Shetty
Ben Carman
Devrandom