0857697665 Replace impl blocks with extension traits (Martin Habovstiak)
b99bdcfdd6 Format `Script` blocks (Martin Habovstiak)
b027edffe7 Wrap `Script` impl blocks in temporary modules (Martin Habovstiak)
5a461545c7 Separate private `Script` methods (Martin Habovstiak)
27adc09e9f Generalize fn params in `define_extension_trait` (Martin Habovstiak)
fcc3cb03f0 Support non-doc attrs in extension trait macro (Martin Habovstiak)
ca1735f24c Separate POD methods (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
This moves methods from `Script` to extension traits in steps that should be easy to follow.
Moving to `primitives` requires doing the same with `ScriptBuf` so I'm holding off until this approach gets concept ACK (or alternatively someone else can do it :))
Closes#3161
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 0857697665
apoelstra:
ACK 0857697665 successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: 3768d879e36139cf971c1921d3236141cbe87d707fd4bab7852f6ed8857b7867fa4146dfe720bd54e3d8cc50ecdc93886a10254cf9a82246358253f0312ffb47
In preparation to move script types to `primitives` we replace impl
block with extension traits by replacing the temporary modules with
`define_extension_trait`.
`rustfmt` is unable to format macro calls so instead we wrap the impl
blocks in modules to enable formatting in the next commit. We need to
change the visibility of the methods but that's OK since they're
internal.
579b76b7cb Introduce ToU64 conversion trait (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
The idea for this was pulled out of Steven's work in #2133
We already explicitly do not support 16 bit machines.
Also, because Rust supports `u182`s one cannot infallibly convert from a `usize` to a `u64`. This is unergonomic and results in a ton of casts.
We can instead limit our code to running only on machines where `usize` is less that or equal to 64 bits then the infallible conversion is possible.
Since 128 bit machines are not a thing yet this does not in reality introduce any limitations on the library.
Add a "private" trait to the `internals` crate to do infallible conversion to a `u64` from `usize`.
Implement it for all unsigned integers smaller than `u64` as well so we have the option to use the trait instead of `u32::from(foo)`.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 579b76b7cb
apoelstra:
ACK 579b76b7cb successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: 2eaddfff995987a346e052386c6dfef3510e4732e674e3a2cfab60ee391b4cce1bf7ba4fb2dfd4926f8203d7251eea2198ccb61f0b40332e624c88fda4fa7f48
191897f9ea Manually format (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Run `rustfmt` and manually fix the places where comments are moved to the wrong place.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 191897f9ea
apoelstra:
ACK 191897f9ea successfully ran local tests
Tree-SHA512: f977ff373d1d410012734208c090bfcd8f9dbda414d0b19400acf8f552df481b4a2bc20d77c61538895a6fb66197be13cbdadf74956d67fd4d055b99ba8ab356
We already explicitly do not support 16 bit machines.
Also, because Rust supports `u182`s one cannot infallibly convert from a
`usize` to a `u64`. This is unergonomic and results in a ton of casts.
We can instead limit our code to running only on machines where `usize`
is less that or equal to 64 bits then the infallible conversion is
possible.
Since 128 bit machines are not a thing yet this does not in reality
introduce any limitations on the library.
Add a "private" trait to the `internals` crate to do infallible
conversion to a `u64` from `usize`.
Implement it for all unsigned integers smaller than `u64` as well so
we have the option to use the trait instead of `u32::from(foo)`.
6836de9ee6 Remove catch all pattern (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
The `PushBytes` type enforces len is less than 0x100000000 so we do not need to panic in a catch all pattern after explicitly matching against less than 0x100000000.
Refactor only because of the invariant on `PushBytes` - no logic changes.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 6836de9ee6 successfully ran local tests
Kixunil:
ACK 6836de9ee6
Tree-SHA512: a7cdb31683a8c00eecbdd0879886bec48133f9029f899b5279f1f5294ef40320592db196bfcafdeef4507636fc785a7ab87879b25b6d1b4905ae573b545f1ff4
The `PushBytes` type enforces len is less than 0x100000000 so we do
not need to panic in a catch all pattern after explicitly matching
against less than 0x100000000.
Refactor only because of the invariant on `PushBytes` - no logic
changes.
As much as it hurts the C hacker inside me we have settled on using
`_internal` to mark private function names that clash with a public
function of the same name.
Introduce a policy section and rename one instance, I did not grep the
codebase looking for other violations.
This came up because I had to look at what `_inner` implied when reading
the function name somewhere else.
c72069e921 Bump MSRV to 1.63 (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
The version 1.63 satisfies our requirements for MSRV and provides significant benefits so this commit bumps it. This commit also starts using some advantages of the new MSRV, namely namespaced features, weak dependencies and the ability to use trait bounds in `const` context.
This however does not yet migrade the `rand-std` feature because that requires a release of `secp256k1` with the same kind of change - bumping MSRV to 1.63 and removing `rand-std` in favor of weak dependency. (Accompanying PR to secp256k1: https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-secp256k1/pull/709 )
Suggested plan:
* merge both PRs
* at some point release `hashes` and `secp256k`
* remove `rand-std` from `bitcoin`
* release the rest of the crates
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK c72069e921
tcharding:
ACK c72069e921
Tree-SHA512: 0b301ef8145f01967318d3ed1c738d33e6cf9e44f835f3762122b460a536f926916dbd6ea39d6f80b4f95402cd845e924401e75427dbb0731ca5b12b4fa6915e
feef34fdea Make ScriptBuf::p2wpkh_script_code stand alone (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
We would like to move the `Script` type to `primitives` without moving any key stuff, including pubkey hashes. We may later, before releasing `primitives`, move the `WPubkeyHash` at which time this patch can be reverted or re-implemented on `ScriptBuf`.
The `ScriptBuf::p2wpkh_script_code` function does not take `self` as a parameter but it does return `Self` - this can trivially be made into a standalone function.
Make `ScriptBuf::p2wpkh_script_code` a standalone function.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK feef34fdea
apoelstra:
ACK feef34fdea
Tree-SHA512: 9de43bb274480b85d328ddd4cb6d79b501a525837307ca399dea1c3d39e9a7c0d8719dbb0e5d852629351d2b1fe09ce0244df82c53ff9ef2342be85a71887329
The version 1.63 satisfies our requirements for MSRV and provides
significant benefits so this commit bumps it. This commit also starts
using some advantages of the new MSRV, namely namespaced features, weak
dependencies and the ability to use trait bounds in `const` context.
This however does not yet migrade the `rand-std` feature because that
requires a release of `secp256k1` with the same kind of change - bumping
MSRV to 1.63 and removing `rand-std` in favor of weak dependency.
29b213daca Move validation module to consensus_validation (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
The `consensus` module is currently doing two things, validation and encoding. These two things are orthogonal.
Move the `consensus::validation` module to `consensus_validation`. Remove the function re-exports from `consensus`.
This was originally discussed here: https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/2779
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 29b213daca
apoelstra:
ACK 29b213daca
Tree-SHA512: 3bd0e43c220b0d89a47e9df0e0c92b776ccc65f5f60d57f413db834acc8e86269379bc9fdd688f8c4f0138db22f8eb8983770afa2d7d53d51acf063f2302121c
We would like to move the `Script` type to `primitives` without moving
any key stuff, including pubkey hashes. We may later, before releasing
`primitives`, move the `WPubkeyHash` at which time this patch can be
reverted or re-implemented on `ScriptBuf`.
The `ScriptBuf::p2wpkh_script_code` function does not take `self` as a
parameter but it does return `Self` - this can trivially be made into a
standalone function.
Make `ScriptBuf::p2wpkh_script_code` a standalone function.
3b15ef6d27 Fix rustdocs in `blockdata` (Jamil Lambert, PhD)
Pull request description:
Following up on the [comment](https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/2646#discussion_r1548848611) in #2646 the rustdocs formatting was fixed in `blockdata`.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 3b15ef6d27
tcharding:
ACK 3b15ef6d27
Tree-SHA512: 509aa2b8ae559f5a7f8230c016c0866f468cc147773238e226b9a975784d7a424c41a5d966ddcf9b3f8f8d4fe197a4f272b5777c61f3cc53051803abb520b95e
ab581a90f8 Remove re-export of ParseIntError (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
In d242125 I claimed that `ParseIntError` was somehow special, I no longer thing this is the case. As we pin down the re-export policy (for errors and other types) it is hard if we have one non-typical re-export.
We have https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/3068 to discuss the policy, for now just remove the unusual re-export.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK ab581a90f8
shinghim:
ACK ab581a90f8
apoelstra:
ACK ab581a90f8
Tree-SHA512: 5ac4123aeb27c8cee78e5760f21e70be8035d526ba7e14e72759cba27f98b51cc2cba9b2bf0eeb99e0f6b7210ec4a750986bb6c5dc0725ed892730fdec8a7e06
54c30556a2 Move params to network module (Tobin C. Harding)
045a661ebe Create network directory (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Discussed in #2779. Patch one moves `network.rs` to `network/mod.rs`, and patch 2 moves the `params` module over there.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 54c30556a2 Yeah, this seems like a good place for it
Kixunil:
ACK 54c30556a2
Tree-SHA512: 134813419db21323d303d465b12fcbf37fd61dc1baf3305e156d324eafd822379e63dede02877ee99dce41540193a29e6e13acd13f9121f3e2fe11096524aa5e
The `consensus` module is currently doing two things, validation and
encoding. These two things are orthogonal.
Move the `consensus::validation` module to `consensus_validation`.
Remove the function re-exports from `consensus`.
beea3c1e5d Remove public error re-export (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
We do not have a policy to re-export things from other modules just because they are in the public API - I don't see any other reason to re-export this error, users should go to the `validation` module directly to get the error type.
Raising this trivial change as a separate PR so that we can really pin down our re-export policy. Please review the policy implications as well as the code change.
Note please that this change was introduced in 7d695f6b4 by me, and buried in a PR that did not mention the change. This was wrong, as in the code change was wrong and also the patching method was wrong.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK beea3c1e5d
Tree-SHA512: 5fc072f3fb8a727f30751211c6bc85dc268d413ee62937c714bdf9f47405dfdbc93cfff3df76c201493c39f49d5d315907fc9e7e4fa0d927652c01038815fdc5
In d242125 I claimed that `ParseIntError` was somehow special, I no
longer thing this is the case. As we pin down the re-export policy (for
errors and other types) it is hard if we have one non-typical re-export.
We have https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/3068 to
discuss the policy, for now just remove the unusual re-export.
The `Params` struct is currently defined in the `consensus` module which
has become a collection of orthogonal consensus-ish things. We would
like to put things in more descriptive places.
The `Params` struct defines constants that are network specific so it
makes sense to put it in the `network` module. As soft proof of this
argument note in this patch how often the `Params` type is imported
along with the `Network` type.
API break:
The type is no longer available at `bitcoin::consensus::Params` but
rather is re-exported at `bitcoin::network::Params`.
We do not have a policy to re-export things from other modules just
because they are in the public API - I don't see any other reason to
re-export this error, users should go to the `validation` module
directly to get the error type.
2169b75bba Use lower case error messages (Jamil Lambert, PhD)
Pull request description:
Error messages should be lower case, except for proper nouns and variable names. These have all been changed.
~~They should also state what went wrong. Some expect error messages were positive, giving the correct behaviour or correct input. These have been changed so that they are now negative, i.e. saying what went wrong.~~
EDIT: After further discussion it was decided not to change the expect messages.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 2169b75bba
tcharding:
ACK 2169b75bba
Tree-SHA512: 92442c869e0141532425f6fca5195fd319b65026f68c4230a65ad70253565d98931b2b44ee202975c307280525c505147e272297dc81207312e40c43d007021c
The `absolute` and `relative` locktimes as well as the `Sequence` are
all primitive bitcoin types.
Move the `Sequence`, and `locktime` stuff over to `primitives`.
There is nothing surprising here, the consensus encoding stuff stays in
`bitcoin` and we re-export everything from `blockdata`.
bcf6d2839e Introduce scriptPubkey extension traits (Tobin C. Harding)
ee333defa4 Remove path from ScriptBuf (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Done in preparation for moving the script types to `primitives`.
Add three public traits, one each for the three `script` types: `Builder`, `ScriptBuf`, and `Script`.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK bcf6d2839e
apoelstra:
ACK bcf6d2839e
Tree-SHA512: 0ad11e474ddf1183d0119e36454cb4fd18d49a68655d274df800c6ef20afa7f8d0fdecd415c02595ea67a011e3a842b7ccc23c2d58f92ed9acbdc7f277fbd217
Done in preparation for moving the script types to `primitives`.
The script types have a bunch of functionality to support scriptPubkeys,
and scriptPubkeys are an address thing.
Create a module under `address` and in it create a bunch of extension
traits to hold all scriptPubkey functionality.
Includes adding an ugly-as-hell macro to create the traits.
ac4db6369d witness: Add Witness::witness_script inspector (Steven Roose)
6cc6c8621a witness: Add Witness::taproot_annex (Steven Roose)
b0848022eb witness: Add Witness::taproot_control_block (Steven Roose)
ef336e1387 witness: Improve Witness::tapscript (Steven Roose)
e48a2e4225 script: Add Script::redeem_script inspector (Steven Roose)
Pull request description:
Bundled these because they are very similar. Got a bunch of larger changes coming up based on these. I've been using these for a while for TXHASH work.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK ac4db6369d but will need to wait for next release. I think we should merge these as-is although they will be much clearer after we do script tagging.
tcharding:
ACK ac4db6369d
Tree-SHA512: e1590d1bdc8b91aeba137453f0cdaa7e1ae6df3c8e9e1e0f087ed9be1a6beaf2286818379247d26c5dd27d07c12c10433db1c9b9a71667ab4d8d37c7deff1373
a738754f67 Add TxIdentifier trait (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Add a new trait `TxIdentifier` that abstracts over the `Txid` and `Wtxid` types. We make `AsRef` a super trait so that the new trait needs no methods.
Seal the trait so consumers of the library cannot implement it.
Use the new trait in:
- the `bip152` module to tighten up the `with_siphash_keys` function
- as a trait bound on the `Leaf` associated type in the `MerkleNode` trait
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK a738754f67
Kixunil:
ACK a738754f67
Tree-SHA512: a7bda26a4a5107f96b24ea3c163286a7ab21a817bdec3434b3ab27d78e99c0548a7362a2271d362b89038c80d9251767c0d62e1df702ef57d9edaf141ab55cd6
9a586987d1 Move opcodes to primitives (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Move the `opcodes` module to the new `primitives` crate. This is pretty straight forward, some things to note:
- Are we ok with the public wildcard re-export from `blockdata`? I think so because the whole `blockdata` module should, IMO, be deleted after everything in it is moved to `primitives`.
- `decode_pushnum` becomes public.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 9a586987d1
apoelstra:
ACK 9a586987d1
Tree-SHA512: ee9fa0ae4265f54ff7784dc873abc12572852c32ff24456e34cd6a8a004f9e1f932e01c80d3448107fca76507db4bdaa3dfff6b5a80de0707d59a033e582fb9e
Move the `opcodes` module to the new `primitives` crate. This is pretty
straight forward, some things to note:
- Are we ok with the public wildcard re-export from `blockdata`? I think
so because the whole `blockdata` module should, IMO, be deleted after
everything in it is moved to `primitives`.
- `decode_pushnum` becomes public.
Includes addition of a `patch` section for `primitives` in the
`bitcoin/embedded` crate.
In the `script` module we currently import `script` types using the
fully qualified path, as recently discussed code is easier to maintain
if we use `super` when `super != crate`.
Internal change only, no external changes.
Add a new trait `TxIdentifier` that abstracts over the `Txid` and
`Wtxid` types. We make `AsRef` a super trait so that the new trait needs
no methods.
Seal the trait so consumers of the library cannot implement it.
Use the new trait in:
- the `bip152` module to tighten up the `with_siphash_keys` function
- as a trait bound on the `Leaf` associated type in the `MerkleNode` trait
7fa53440dc Move serde_round_trip macro to internals (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
We currently duplicate the serde_round_trip macro in `units` and `bitcoin`, this is unnecessary since it is a private test macro we can just throw it in `internals`.
While we are at it lets improve the macro by testing a binary encoding also, elect to use the `bincode` crate because we already have it in our dependency graph.
Add `test-serde` feature to `internals` to feature gate the macro and its usage (preventing the transient dependency on `bincode` and `serde_json`).
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 7fa53440dc
apoelstra:
ACK 7fa53440dc
Tree-SHA512: f40c78bf2539940b7836ed413d5fe96ce4e9ce59bad7b3f86d831971320d1c2effcd23d0da5c785d6c372a2c6962bf720080ec4351248fbbdc0f2cfb4ffd602c
We currently duplicate the serde_round_trip macro in `units` and
`bitcoin`, this is unnecessary since it is a private test macro we can
just throw it in `internals`.
While we are at it lets improve the macro by testing a binary encoding
also, elect to use the `bincode` crate because we already have it in
our dependency graph.
Add `test-serde` feature to `internals` to feature gate the macro and
its usage (preventing the transient dependency on `bincode` and
`serde_json`).
15f6bacec9 api: Run just check-api (Ryan Breen)
9684d496bb Add is_standard_op_return (Ryan Breen)
Pull request description:
This is the suggestion for #2292 to check OP_RETURN length
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 15f6bacec9
Tree-SHA512: e346b5eff7cc40b98a08948c83cb5c064184541d819c37a977e432ec09df7f9e1a074f16a4df598142784bd875f1379e2b0848fe898923e4e12829f85b4c4520
merge-script
Martin Habovstiak
Antoni Spaanderman
Tobin C. Harding
Jamil Lambert, PhD
Fmt Bot
Shing Him Ng
Ryan Breen