33ee7a58af Add README build docs for std and no-std (Steve Myers)
Pull request description:
Building this crate requires the `std` and/or `no-std` features be enabled. This PR documents this build constraint in the README ~~and gives an error is anyone tries to build without enabling one or both of these features~~.
See discussion in rust-bitcoin/rust-miniscript#533.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 33ee7a58af
Kixunil:
ACK 33ee7a58af
apoelstra:
ACK 33ee7a58af
Tree-SHA512: 4c0f46681ee09a1d63d269c84ec69bd12944129c94a62f62f78694ae428566f3dfee9a36ac2742e02502b184c4ec0d6aec60a0c0760df3d75587700cb8a76ad2
2961c0c589 Exclude usage of atomic types if not supported for the target (Salvatore Ingala)
Pull request description:
Hi! I'm still a beginner with both Rust and cross-compilation, so please take the rest with a few grains of salt!
I'm setting up a project targeting `riscv32i-unknown-none-elf`, which seems not to support atomic types. Even with `--no-default-features` and `no-std`, I would get this error:
```
error[E0432]: unresolved import `alloc::sync`
--> rust-bitcoin/bitcoin/src/blockdata/script/mod.rs:52:12
|
52 | use alloc::sync::Arc;
| ^^^^ could not find `sync` in `alloc`
error[E0432]: unresolved import `alloc::sync`
--> rust-bitcoin/bitcoin/src/lib.rs:163:114
|
163 | pub use alloc::{string::{String, ToString}, vec::Vec, boxed::Box, borrow::{Borrow, Cow, ToOwned}, slice, rc, sync};
| ^^^^ no `sync` in the root
|
= help: consider importing one of these items instead:
bitcoin_hashes::_export::_core::sync
core::sync
```
This PR gates the usage of `Arc` so that it's only enabled with the `std` feature.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 2961c0c589
Kixunil:
ACK 2961c0c589
Tree-SHA512: c864fb8363fca6a020472b3bdfe488bc2f33d52df98d88f0bc90ebdaa2e9f58b91cc6578eb4fc36f434ff1c50ff9c222a752bd3a72f6b9351244ad5827061e8f
a6188a90c0 Improve QR code formatting documentation (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
It wasn't obvious that displaying address with alternate formatting upper cases bech32 addresses.
This change adds information about this and also a note about the compatibility of various wallets.
BTW why do we prefix upper case `BITCOIN` only in case of bech32? Proper BIP21 should support it for all addresses. (And yest, it still does save space.)
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK a6188a90c0
tcharding:
ACK a6188a90c0
Tree-SHA512: b62b17664f12d4ce05296131cde9f307311b8114c457970f8e3f1beb4d6fd397981045c61c44e1da573623842b74b73d088f757f9ff063eb783ab69145102cd7
It wasn't obvious that displaying address with alternate formatting
upper cases bech32 addresses.
This change adds information about this and also a note about the
compatibility of various wallets.
2158f88f1d Add a method to `pow::Target` for returning difficulty as an f64. (junderw)
Pull request description:
Closes#1703
This adds a conversion function to U256 to get an f64. We use the method shown in the following blog post.
https://blog.m-ou.se/floats/
Target::MAX was converted to a f64 and set as a const that is verified in a unit test.
The code is rather confusing, so I took a crack at explaining it in my comments as well. Please let me know if you want it cleaned up some more.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 2158f88f1d
tcharding:
ACK 2158f88f1d
Tree-SHA512: 7c0e82bd1756950c1c6dfb9da91fd71b276e2e7dc8a33e69112f87b87e358240f0f7c4894d24ab228e149d862938833a2e65e345ce2712a78dc86dec197da34f
9dd4c54a74 Fix CI builds where default features are added accidentally (Steven Roose)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 9dd4c54a74
tcharding:
ACK 9dd4c54a74
apoelstra:
ACK 9dd4c54a74
Tree-SHA512: 7c63b33c2cc7aa988194150e6fb3dacec894f7aeccb90992a9255fcde2312793f4e2556b00d600241e481399445c0434009dd06207783ee592acd5d96452063f
f0a3aad5b8 Add tests to Weight type (yancy)
Pull request description:
Add tests for Weight type
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK f0a3aad5b8
apoelstra:
ACK f0a3aad5b8
Tree-SHA512: 12875cd774762743c53b55f1c56494cd4c3995fc481dd5653810efb363627dfa770bd1e147dacd452a6a61d3906910dc974c979a4a3c41655f8a32a4b4a14ef4
This adds a conversion function to U256 to get an f64. We use the method shown in the following blog post. https://blog.m-ou.se/floats/
Target::MAX was converted to a f64 and set as a const that is verified in a unit test.
bfd401c96e bitcoin_hashes: add CHANgELOG (Andrew Poelstra)
d1b7b54e3a bump bitcoin-hashes version to 0.12 (Andrew Poelstra)
Pull request description:
It was a little tricky to bump the version number because of https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/issues/1553. There are a couple other things I considered trying, which maybe we'll do for future releases, but I believe this works for now.
Maybe should wait for #1111.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK bfd401c96e
sanket1729:
utACK bfd401c96e. ChangeLog looks good to me, did not review whether all noteworthy changes were included.
Tree-SHA512: d2104fc93e364415ae955e8123e6087c1eaa4c955aeaf4647ead051a223563326f66c0e278d68f64335e22c9d0af9b296dc3b744cd9d82d206844461fe7bf9c9
e3f95ee22b Add tests for the FeeRate type (yancy)
Pull request description:
Adds some tests for the `FeeRate` type.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK e3f95ee22b
tcharding:
ACK e3f95ee22b
Kixunil:
ACK e3f95ee22b
Tree-SHA512: 74d6597c747d5aa62a6510bf9fa8de971f89ad56f571aadd496f6487e80cc88bb2b5a1c6bcfed825d09d18ca2310b2bfd6fdbe330f2760369d167a653d26bef8
3eb648df01 Add constants to `InputWeightPrediction` (Martin Habovstiak)
Pull request description:
There are several common spends in Bitcoin that have known input weight predictions. It can be useful to have these as constants, so this change adds them. However, this only adds native segwit ones as the others are slowly fading away and might clutter the API.
If anyone wants other constants, please write them for me, their value is not that great to me so I'm not motivated to figure out the correct numbers. :)
This would be nice to add to 0.30 since it's small and easy but not critical.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 3eb648df01
tcharding:
ACK 3eb648df01
sanket1729:
ACK 3eb648df01
Tree-SHA512: 51d2cd2ecef7e6b79f9d4b52319e34b908fe8b5a337551dc2088994feeafc9c3ca87884c3db8369f8bd002947d6d14b373f08ef1419db282713206ed6f1b309a
2d6467f980 Add cargo fmt to pre-commit githook (Tobin C. Harding)
55312f2972 Update contributing docs re cargo fmt (Tobin C. Harding)
c1360067e9 Enable formatting in CI (Tobin C. Harding)
61c560baba Improve the DO_BENCH error message (Tobin C. Harding)
a11cf07501 Run the formatter (Tobin C. Harding)
21d716b313 Use new fn_params_layout option (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
Run the formatter in CI so we stop continually introducing formatting problems in the code that is currently supposed to be formatted.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 2d6467f980
sanket1729:
ACK 2d6467f980
Tree-SHA512: 0dbe12bb853b0ec6102066118a9272462bf9ebf2dc53b1394c294185b9d4a824ba0cca478f500fcc44088e4bc54a61153402a6911f285435b68bc9a306f9f11f
There are several common spends in Bitcoin that have known input weight
predictions. It can be useful to have these as constants, so this change
adds them. However, this only adds native segwit ones as the others are
slowly fading away and might clutter the API.
Enable formatting in CI by doing:
- Add a section to the `test.sh` scripts to run the formatter (guarded by
the env variable `DO_FMT`) for all crates (bitcoin, hashes, internals).
- Add `DO_FMT` to the nightly `Tests` CI job.
Various formatting issues have crept into the codebase because we do not
run the formatter in CI.
In preparation for enabling formatting checks in CI run `cargo +nightly
fmt` to fix current formatting issues. No changes other than those
create by the formatter.
Because we have rust-secp in the loop, we need to update rust-secp, push
a new tag, and use that here, to ensure that the direct dependency on
bitcoin_hashes, and the rust-secp version, are compatible.
74022baa44 Rename ScriptLeaf to LeafNode (sanket1729)
289dc1e7f5 Remove serde for taprootspendinfo (sanket1729)
a397ab0c19 Remove serde for ScriptLeaf (sanket1729)
9affda3012 Introduce Hidden leaves in ScriptLeaves (sanket1729)
22bc39a143 Fix serde for TaprootMerkleBranch (sanket1729)
38ed9bdf49 MOVE ONLY: Move TapTree to taproot module (sanket1729)
Pull request description:
This PR changes/removes the serde implementation for the following types
- TaprootSpendInfo: Removed. This data structure contains derived information for taproot spending that cannot be validated easily. To elaborate, `TaprootSpendInfo` is constructed from a tree, but loses information about the tree structure and maintains handy information like `script_control_block_map`, cached tweaked key, Merkle root etc.
- TaprootBuillder: Removed. Hard to implement and not very useful.
- TapTree: Modified to check invariants.
- NodeInfo: Now implements serde with support for Hidden nodes
- ScriptLeaf: Removed serde. Users should not directly construct this. This is just an output iterator item of `TapTree::script_leaves()`
Data structure changes:
- Introduced `LeafNode`: Supports Hidden leaves. Has serde implemented
- Cleanly separate `TapTree` and `NodeInfo`: `TapTree` is a full BIP370 compatible tree with no hidden nodes. `NodeInfo` is a tree that can potentially contain hidden leaves.
- Added `NodeInfo::leaf_nodes`: Iterator that iterates over known and hidden leaves of `NodeInfo`.
- Updated `TapTree::script_leaves`: Iterator that is guaranteed to output known leaves.
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK 74022baa44
apoelstra:
ACK 74022baa44
Tree-SHA512: 919ea5bf60dc0cd8431301c1b744b046d1d781b3bed302b83a600cfa644216b6c682752795d463646b2723ac8661879284f557862a67e4572fd965fcf3dc194d
b0b0cdb46c Improve the public API for Feerate and Weight (yancy)
Pull request description:
Small nit for https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/1627/ to re-export `Weight` and `FeeRate` to shorten the use path.
```
use bitcoin::Weight;
use bitcoin::FeeRate;
````
ACKs for top commit:
tcharding:
ACK b0b0cdb46c
Kixunil:
ACK b0b0cdb46c
apoelstra:
ACK b0b0cdb46c
Tree-SHA512: 81e508c980c4f37e3791d26616459608dd60e5a6255ef28b3a049c1d27281b2853b92474d42f10031254c8c46878adf666eb709826aa4ffde1b4b3542451e080
73e876ffd4 Include address in Error::NetworkValidation (Subhradeep Chakraborty)
Pull request description:
Fixes: #1677
## Change
In `bitcoin/src/address.rs`, a new field `address` is added to the enum variant `Error::NetworkValidation`. Also, the implementation of `Display` trait for `Error` is updated to print the `address` field.
However, to print the `address` through `Display`, either the reference is needed or `Address` and `Payload` both need to derive the `Copy` trait. Since I am little new to both the rust-bitcoin codebase and rust itself, I am confused about choosing between the two and have moved with the first one. Would appreciate any feedback on this.
ACKs for top commit:
Kixunil:
ACK 73e876ffd4
tcharding:
ACK 73e876ffd4
apoelstra:
ACK 73e876ffd4
Tree-SHA512: dd53b8648bccc8372c829e56817402fb02a9d51d1dffc854f24e68814bbefe7ea777f67aefb0d170762dbf6cdd50bd3ec55af325a1ffc21b1241d1df5531cd24
Implementing this for spendinfo is really complicated because it
contains some cached data without retaining the components that are used
to compute them.
Users should serde the 1) NodeInfo and 2) internal key and reconstruct
TaprootSpendInfo from it.
This was incorrect and not needed. Users should not be able to create
only tree leaves directly without going through the tree construction in
rust-bitcoin
Cleanly separate `TapTree` and `NodeInfo`. Fix serde not respecting
invariants for several data structures
Repurpose some tests from removed taproot builder for taptree
42b07586ac Improve the public API (Tobin C. Harding)
Pull request description:
We created the `crypto` crate as a container for cryptography modules with the idea that it may be split out into a separate crate. There is no reason for users of the lib to know about this module. Also, we have two `taproot` modules, one in `crypto` and one at the crate root, this makes for un-ergonomic usage of the lib.
Improve the public API by doing:
- Make the `crypto` module private (`pub(crate)`).
- Re-export `crypto::taproot::Signature` (and `Error`) from `crate::taproot`
Fix: #1668
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
ACK 42b07586ac
Kixunil:
ACK 42b07586ac
Tree-SHA512: 5713b98b2a48d2776cdd6ca2c0e798d6e2df604d780e5182bd770fb2df807cf1f65bc24663ee6f7734fc1e0c80494c5a87dc60e44c83acefcffec7f059203a47
We created the `crypto` crate as a container for cryptography modules
with the idea that it may be split out into a separate crate. There is
no reason for users of the lib to know about this module. Also, we have
two `taproot` modules, one in `crypto` and one at the crate root, this
makes for un-ergonomic usage of the lib.
Improve the public API by doing:
- Make the `crypto` module private (`pub(crate)`).
- Re-export `crypto::taproot::Signature` (and `Error`) from
`crate::taproot`
Andrew Poelstra
Steve Myers
Salvatore Ingala
Martin Habovstiak
Steven Roose
junderw
yancy
Tobin C. Harding
Subhradeep Chakraborty
sanket1729